[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100589610":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":20,"overallOfficials":24,"centralContacts":29,"locations":24,"responsibleParty":35,"collaborators":24,"id":39,"slug":40,"hasResults":41,"nctId":42,"briefTitle":43,"officialTitle":44,"acronym":24,"eligibilityCriteria":45,"healthyVolunteers":41,"sex":46,"minAge":47,"maxAge":24,"enrollmentInfo":48,"targetDuration":24,"studyType":51,"phases":52,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":24,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":72,"locationsCount":24},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Cairo University","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Beautifil Flow Plus X F00","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","Conventional flowable giomer restorative material",[13],"Other: Beautifil Flow Plus F00",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":17,"interventionNames":18},"FIT SA","EXPERIMENTAL","Self Adhesive Flowable giomer restoration",[19],"Other: FIT SA",[21,25],{"type":6,"name":15,"description":22,"armGroupLabels":23,"otherNames":24},"Self Adhesive Flowable giomer restorative material",[15],null,{"type":6,"name":26,"description":27,"armGroupLabels":28,"otherNames":24},"Beautifil Flow Plus F00","Conventional Flowable giomer composite",[9],[30],{"name":31,"role":32,"phone":33,"phoneExt":24,"email":34},"Rana Ayman, PhD degree","CONTACT","+201226000747","rana.ayman@dentistry.cu.edu.eg",{"type":36,"investigatorFullName":37,"investigatorTitle":38,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":24,"oldOrganization":24},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Rana Ayman Kamal","Doctor","100589610","18-month-clinical-evaluation-of-self-adhesive-flowable-giomer-compared-to-conventional-flowable-giomer-in-conservative-occlusal-restorations-100589610",false,"NCT06956651","18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations","18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Posterior vital tooth with Class I caries.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Teeth with clinical symptoms of pulpitis, such as spontaneous pain.\n* Pain or sensitivity to pressure.\n* Non-vital teeth.\n* Fractured or cracked teeth.\n* Endodontically treated teeth.\n* Periodontally affected teeth.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":49,"type":50},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[53],"NA","The study compares two restorative materials to restore occlusal decay, offering the patients high-strength, high-durability restorations with antibacterial properties.",[56],"Occlusal Caries",[58,59,60,61,15,62],"self adhesive giomer","class I","clinical performance","Beautifil Flow","USPHS Criteria","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-05-14",{"date":66,"type":67},"2025-05-18","ACTUAL",{"date":69,"type":50},"2025-09",{"date":71,"type":50},"2027-04",{"name":5,"class":6}]