[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100620870":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":15,"overallOfficials":10,"centralContacts":10,"locations":10,"responsibleParty":20,"collaborators":10,"id":24,"slug":25,"hasResults":26,"nctId":27,"briefTitle":28,"officialTitle":29,"acronym":10,"eligibilityCriteria":30,"healthyVolunteers":31,"sex":32,"minAge":33,"maxAge":10,"enrollmentInfo":34,"targetDuration":10,"studyType":37,"phases":10,"briefSummary":38,"conditions":39,"keywords":42,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":10,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":46,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":47,"startDateStruct":50,"completionDateStruct":52,"leadSponsor":54,"locationsCount":10},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Cairo University","OTHER",[8,13],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":10,"interventionNames":11},"implants placed more than 2mm from the inferior alveolar canal",null,[12],"Other: nerve approximation group",{"label":14,"type":10,"description":10,"interventionNames":10},"Implant proximity \u003C 2 mm",[16],{"type":6,"name":17,"description":18,"armGroupLabels":19,"otherNames":10},"nerve approximation group","implants placed with distance more than 2 mm from the inferior alveolar canal",[9],{"type":21,"investigatorFullName":22,"investigatorTitle":23,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":10,"oldOrganization":10},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Ghada Adayil","Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University","100620870","cbct-based-safety-distance-for-implant-placement-near-the-inferior-alveolar-canal-100620870",false,"NCT07363239","CBCT-Based Safety Distance for Implant Placement Near the Inferior Alveolar Canal","A New Concept of Safety Distance to Place Implants in the Area of the Inferior Alveolar Canal to Avoid Neurosensory Disturbance: A Retrospective CBCT Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥ 21 years.\n2. Implants placed in mandibular first\u002Fsecond premolar or molar positions (Froum et al., 2021).\n3. Patients without neurosensory changes following implant placement and healing (Froum et al., 2021).\n4. Patients with neurosensory changes after implant placement, including paresthesia, anesthesia, dysesthesia (and neuralgia where applicable) (Froum et al., 2021).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Incomplete records preventing outcome ascertainment (Froum et al., 2021).\n2. Refusal\u002Funavailability of postoperative CBCT when clinically required for evaluation (Froum et al., 2021).\n3. Poor-quality CBCT scans or scatter artifacts interfering with evaluation (Froum et al., 2021).\n4. Contraindications for radiographs (e.g., pregnancy\u002Fbreastfeeding) in cases where additional imaging would otherwise be clinically required (Froum et al., 2021).\n5. Implants placed after mental foramen",true,"ALL","21 Years",{"count":35,"type":36},100,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","o evaluate the radiologic proximity of mandibular dental implants placed less than 2 mm from the inferior alveolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to determine the relationship between implant-canal distance and the occurrence of postoperative neurosensory disturbances.",[40,41],"Inferior Alveolar Approximation","Implants",[43,44],"inferior alveolar nerve","implants","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-17",{"date":48,"type":49},"2026-03-19","ACTUAL",{"date":51,"type":36},"2027-01-20",{"date":53,"type":36},"2027-01-30",{"name":5,"class":6}]