[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100608603":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":14,"overallOfficials":20,"centralContacts":24,"locations":11,"responsibleParty":34,"collaborators":11,"id":38,"slug":39,"hasResults":40,"nctId":41,"briefTitle":42,"officialTitle":43,"acronym":11,"eligibilityCriteria":44,"healthyVolunteers":45,"sex":46,"minAge":47,"maxAge":48,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":11,"studyType":52,"phases":53,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":61,"whyStopped":11,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":62,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":63,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":11},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Cairo University","OTHER",[8],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Conventional Mounting Technique","EXPERIMENTAL",null,[13],"Device: Jaw Tracking Device",[15],{"type":16,"name":17,"description":18,"armGroupLabels":19,"otherNames":11},"DEVICE","Jaw Tracking Device","A jaw tracking device is a digital tool that records real-time jaw movements to accurately analyze occlusion and assist in virtual model mounting.",[9],[21],{"name":22,"affiliation":5,"role":23},"Nouran A Abdel Nabi, Professor","STUDY_DIRECTOR",[25,30],{"name":26,"role":27,"phone":28,"phoneExt":11,"email":29},"Omer A Alawad, Prosthodontic resident","CONTACT","+201556143338","omer.elawad@dentistry.cu.edu.eg",{"name":31,"role":27,"phone":32,"phoneExt":11,"email":33},"Mohamed Y Mahmoud, Prosthodontic resident","+971504911683","moh_yasir@outlook.com",{"type":35,"investigatorFullName":36,"investigatorTitle":37,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":11,"oldOrganization":11},"SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR","Omer Abdelmagid","Principal investigator","100608603","comparing-jaw-tracking-and-traditional-methods-for-measuring-bite-accuracy-in-patients-with-teeth-100608603",false,"NCT07203703","Comparing Jaw Tracking and Traditional Methods for Measuring Bite Accuracy in Patients With Teeth","Accuracy of Diagnostic Mounting With Jaw Tracking Device Versus Conventional Mounting Technique on Occlusal Contact Points in Dentate Patients: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients aged 18 to 60 years Presence of full natural dentition (excluding third molars) No history of occlusal rehabilitation or major prosthodontic treatment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients with missing teeth (excluding third molars) Patients with bruxism or other parafunctional habits History of orthodontic treatment in the past 2 years Inability to cooperate with diagnostic procedures patient below 18 years old",true,"ALL","18 Years","60 Years",{"count":50,"type":51},18,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[54],"NA","This study compares two methods used to measure how teeth come together (occlusal contacts) in patients who have natural teeth (dentate patients). The first method uses a modern jaw tracking device, while the second relies on the conventional mounting technique. The goal is to determine which method is more accurate for diagnosing bite alignment and contact points. This is a diagnostic test accuracy study, meaning it focuses on evaluating how well each technique performs in identifying the correct occlusal contacts.",[57],"Jaw Tracking",[59,17,9,60],"Diagnostic Mounting","Occlusal Contact Points","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-09-25",{"date":64,"type":65},"2025-10-02","ACTUAL",{"date":67,"type":51},"2025-10-15",{"date":69,"type":51},"2026-02-01",{"name":36,"class":6}]