[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100580002":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":21,"overallOfficials":11,"centralContacts":11,"locations":11,"responsibleParty":28,"collaborators":11,"id":30,"slug":31,"hasResults":32,"nctId":33,"briefTitle":34,"officialTitle":34,"acronym":11,"eligibilityCriteria":35,"healthyVolunteers":32,"sex":36,"minAge":37,"maxAge":38,"enrollmentInfo":39,"targetDuration":11,"studyType":42,"phases":43,"briefSummary":45,"conditions":46,"keywords":48,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":11,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":54,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":55,"startDateStruct":58,"completionDateStruct":60,"leadSponsor":62,"locationsCount":11},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Yeditepe University","OTHER",[8,14,18],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Holmich protocol exercise","EXPERIMENTAL",null,[13],"Other: Holmich protocol exercise",{"label":15,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":16},"Joint Mobilization",[17],"Other: Joint Mobilization",{"label":19,"type":20,"description":11,"interventionNames":11},"control","NO_INTERVENTION",[22,25],{"type":6,"name":9,"description":23,"armGroupLabels":24,"otherNames":11},"The treatment consisted of exercise therapy (ET) protocol suggested by Holmich et al and was started under the supervision of a trained sport physiotherapist who ensured that the exercise was carried out correctly and adhered to the original protocol. No treatment other than ET was applied. Although the ET protocol exactly mirrored the randomised clinical trial of Holmich et al, details such as the perceived resistance or weights (in exercise 3 in module 2) and the rest period between the exercise sets and repetitions, which were not defined in the Holmich study, were explained here for the athletes' benefit (tables 1 and 2). Treatment was administered three times a week (on even or odd days). The duration of each session was about 90 min for module 1 (first two weeks) and 120 min for module 2 (from the third week). From the third week, the athletes were asked to perform exercises from module 1 every other day, between the treatment sessions. Although adductor muscle stretching was for",[9],{"type":6,"name":15,"description":26,"armGroupLabels":27,"otherNames":11},"Focus of treatment was on reducing hip joint pain using joint mobilization techniques provided by the physical therapist and exercises performed in the HEP. Based on published literature, we developed a standard set of mobilizations to target hip joint motion limitations, defined as stiffness or pain that limited joint range of motion. Joint mobilization techniques were prioritized based on patient-specific tasks and the motion used during those tasks, followed by the hip motion limitations. The choice of joint mobilization techniques and grade used was based on direction of hip motion limitation and the relationship of pain and stiffness during hip motion assessment. The HEP included commonly used joint motion and stretching exercises to complement techniques performed during supervised sessions.\n\nThe exercises will be conducted over a period of 12 weeks, which is explained below Techniques will be prioritized based on restrictions noted on baseline examination.\n\n1. Caudal glide\n2. Lat",[15],{"type":29,"investigatorFullName":11,"investigatorTitle":11,"investigatorAffiliation":11,"oldNameTitle":11,"oldOrganization":11},"SPONSOR","100580002","comparing-the-effects-of-holmich-protocol-exercise-therapy-and-joint-mobilization-training-on-pain-balance-function-of-the-lower-limb-and-muscle-activity-in-soccer-players-with-athletic-groin-pain-100580002",false,"NCT06831630","Comparing the Effects of Holmich Protocol Exercise Therapy and Joint Mobilization Training on Pain, Balance, Function of the Lower Limb, and Muscle Activity in Soccer Players with Athletic Groin Pain.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male\n2. between 18-35 years old\n3. Have a normal body mass index (BMI)\n4. Desire to return to the former level of sports activity\n5. groin pain for at least 2 months\n6. Pain at palpation of the adductor tendons or the insertion of the pubic bone or both; Groin pain during active adduction against resistance (squeeze test); Pain during adduction against resistance had to be less than six\\*, based on the visual analogue scale (VAS).\n7. In addition, at least two of the following criteria had to be present: a clear history of groin pain and stiffness in the morning, cough induced or sneeze-induced groin pain, nocturnal groin pain or radiological evidence demonstrating osteitis pubis or pain at the symphysis pubis due to palpation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Receiving physical therapy or other conventional therapy in the past 6 months.\n2. Absence in one of the pre- or post-test sessions.\n3. Absence of more than two sessions in practice sessions.","MALE","18 Years","35 Years",{"count":40,"type":41},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[44],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is comparison the Holmich protocol exercise therapy and joint mobilization training, investigating their respective effects on muscle activity in soccer players with athletic groin pain.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nIs there a difference between Holmich protocol exercise therapy and joint mobilization training on pain, balance, function of the lower limb, and Muscle activity in Soccer Players with athletic Groin Pain ?\n\nResearchers will compare Holmich protocol exercise therapy (HT)with joint mobilization training (JMT) to see if the exercises are effective on pain, balance, lower limb function, and muscle activity.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nPractice Holmich protocol exercise therapy (HT) three times a week, 90 minutes per session, for 12 weeks.\n\nPractice joint mobilization training (JMT) for 12 weeks.",[47],"Groin Pain",[49,47,50,51,52],"Holmich protocol","joint mobilization training","Electromyography","pain","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-02-12",{"date":56,"type":57},"2025-02-18","ACTUAL",{"date":59,"type":41},"2025-04-20",{"date":61,"type":41},"2025-11-20",{"name":5,"class":6}]