[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100582534":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":21,"overallOfficials":28,"centralContacts":28,"locations":28,"responsibleParty":29,"collaborators":28,"id":33,"slug":34,"hasResults":35,"nctId":36,"briefTitle":37,"officialTitle":37,"acronym":28,"eligibilityCriteria":38,"healthyVolunteers":35,"sex":39,"minAge":40,"maxAge":28,"enrollmentInfo":41,"targetDuration":28,"studyType":44,"phases":45,"briefSummary":47,"conditions":48,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":53,"whyStopped":28,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":54,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":55,"startDateStruct":58,"completionDateStruct":60,"leadSponsor":62,"locationsCount":28},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Universidad de Granada","OTHER",[8,13,17],{"label":9,"type":6,"description":10,"interventionNames":11},"Suture 1: Silk.","Silk suture.",[12],"Other: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery",{"label":14,"type":6,"description":15,"interventionNames":16},"Suture 2: Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.","Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.",[12],{"label":18,"type":6,"description":19,"interventionNames":20},"Suture 3: Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.","Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.",[12],[22],{"type":6,"name":23,"description":24,"armGroupLabels":25,"otherNames":26},"To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery","To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.",[9,14,18],[27],"2028\u002FCEIH\u002F2021",null,{"type":30,"investigatorFullName":31,"investigatorTitle":32,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":28,"oldOrganization":28},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Jose Manuel Alarcón Cordovilla","DDS (University of Granada), MSc (Oral Surgery)","100582534","comparison-of-three-types-of-sutures-in-oral-surgery-study-of-bacterial-colonization-tissue-reaction-and-clinical-characteristics-randomized-clinical-study-100582534",false,"NCT06864559","Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with indication for extraction of a third lower molar retained in an unfavorable position that requires a bayonet incision in the surgical procedure.\n* Age: patients aged 18 years or older.\n* ASA I patients (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology, 1979): healthy patients who tolerate stress well, without systemic pathology, no anxiety and in whom a therapeutic modification is not necessary.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.\n* Smoking patients.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":42,"type":43},24,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[46],"NA","Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).",[49,50,51,52],"Wound Healing Complication","Oral Surgery","Third Molar Extraction","Oral Infection","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-03-03",{"date":56,"type":57},"2025-03-07","ACTUAL",{"date":59,"type":43},"2025-03-01",{"date":61,"type":43},"2025-12-01",{"name":5,"class":6}]