[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100624646":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":8,"overallOfficials":11,"centralContacts":17,"locations":23,"responsibleParty":40,"collaborators":7,"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":44,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":48,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":44,"sex":50,"minAge":51,"maxAge":7,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":7,"studyType":55,"phases":7,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":7,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":72,"locationsCount":73},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Hôpital NOVO","OTHER",null,[9],{"type":6,"name":10,"description":10,"armGroupLabels":7,"otherNames":7},"Comparison of functional improvement in nasal breathing between the two techniques using questionnaires administered to patients by their practitioners in routine practice",[12,15],{"name":13,"affiliation":5,"role":14},"Khaled AL TABAA","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"name":16,"affiliation":5,"role":14},"Esthelle MINKA",[18],{"name":19,"role":20,"phone":21,"phoneExt":7,"email":22},"Mathilde WLODARCZYK","CONTACT","0033130754650","mathilde.wlodarczyk@ght-novo.fr",[24],{"facility":25,"status":7,"city":26,"state":7,"zip":7,"country":27,"countryCode":28,"cosmosGeoPoint":29,"geoPoint":34,"contacts":35},"Hopital Novo","Pontoise","France","FR",{"type":30,"coordinates":31},"Point",[32,33],2.1,49.05,{"lat":33,"lon":32},[36,39],{"name":13,"role":20,"phone":37,"phoneExt":7,"email":38},"0033130754040","khaled.altabaa@ght-novo.fr",{"name":16,"role":20,"phone":7,"phoneExt":7,"email":7},{"type":41,"investigatorFullName":7,"investigatorTitle":7,"investigatorAffiliation":7,"oldNameTitle":7,"oldOrganization":7},"SPONSOR","100624646","disarticulation-septoplasty-versus-classical-way-100624646",false,"NCT07412340","Disarticulation Septoplasty Versus Classical Way","Disarticulation Septoplasty Versus Classical Septoplasty: Retrospective Study","DSARTICULATION","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient aged 18 and over\n* Patient undergoing a new disarticulation septoplasty, or an open approach for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum, confirmed by endoscopy\n* Patient operated between 01\u002F01\u002F2023 and 31\u002F12\u002F2025\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatient undergoing surgery but with the following medical history (on the day of surgery):\n\n* Patient with septal perforations\n* Patient with previous nasal septum surgery or cosmetic rhinoplasty\n* Patient with allergic rhinitis\n* Patient with chronic sinusitis\n* Patient with concha bullosa\n* Refusal to participate","ALL","18 Years",{"count":53,"type":54},40,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The objective of this study is to determine which of the two techniques (disarticulation septoplasty versus open surgery) offers the best functional results for correcting symptomatic deviations of the nasal septum.\n\nMore specifically it's about:\n\n* Compare the improvement in respiratory symptoms between the two techniques\n* Analyze and compare complication rates between the two techniques\n* Evaluate patient satisfaction with aesthetic results (including columella deviation)",[58],"Nasal Septum Deviation",[60,61,62],"Nasal septum deviation","Septoplasty","Open surgery","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-17",{"date":66,"type":67},"2026-02-19","ACTUAL",{"date":69,"type":54},"2026-01-31",{"date":71,"type":54},"2026-06-30",{"name":5,"class":6},1]