[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100607918":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":10,"overallOfficials":10,"centralContacts":14,"locations":10,"responsibleParty":20,"collaborators":10,"id":24,"slug":25,"hasResults":26,"nctId":27,"briefTitle":28,"officialTitle":29,"acronym":10,"eligibilityCriteria":30,"healthyVolunteers":26,"sex":31,"minAge":32,"maxAge":10,"enrollmentInfo":33,"targetDuration":10,"studyType":36,"phases":10,"briefSummary":37,"conditions":38,"keywords":10,"overallStatus":41,"whyStopped":10,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":42,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":43,"startDateStruct":46,"completionDateStruct":48,"leadSponsor":50,"locationsCount":10},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Assiut University","OTHER",[8,12],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":10},"Group 1: 61 patients undergoing CABG will have a posterior pericardial window created for drainage.",null,"Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated minimum required sample size is 122 patients (61 patients in each group).\n\n* Group I (Posterior Pericardial Window group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will have a posterior pericardial window created for drainage.\n* Group II (Retro-cardiac Drain group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will receive a retro-cardiac drain for pericardial drainage.",{"label":13,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":10},"Group 2 : 61 patients undergoing CABG will receive a retro-cardiac drain for pericardial drainage.",[15],{"name":16,"role":17,"phone":18,"phoneExt":10,"email":19},"Ahmed mohamed saad, Principal Investigator","CONTACT","+201014570052","Ahmed.17289818@med.aun.edu.eg",{"type":21,"investigatorFullName":22,"investigatorTitle":23,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":10,"oldOrganization":10},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Ahmed Mohamed Saad Abdelhamid","Principal Investigator","100607918","drainage-technique-in-cabg-100607918",false,"NCT07194798","Drainage Technique in CABG","A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Posterior Pericardial Window Versus Retro-Cardiac Drain for the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Pericardial Complications Following CABG","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients (aged 18 and above) scheduled for elective, first-time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).\n* Patients with preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥ 35%).\n* Ability to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up protocols.\n* No prior history of atrial fibrillation or other significant arrhythmias.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing combined cardiac procedures (e.g., valve repair or replacement).\n* Emergency CABG cases or re-operations.\n* Known bleeding disorders or ongoing anticoagulation therapy that cannot be paused.\n* Severe pericardial adhesions or anatomical abnormalities preventing safe creation of a posterior pericardial window.\n* Chronic pulmonary disease or pleural pathology that may interfere with drainage assessment.\n* Patients with active infections or systemic inflammatory conditions.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":34,"type":35},122,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","aims to compare the efficacy of the posterior pericardial window versus retro-cardiac drain in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation and pericardial complications following CABG, while assessing their impact on hospital and ICU stay, pericardial effusions, re exploration for bleeding, post-operative blood transfusions, and mortality.",[39,40],"CABG","Atrial Fibrillation (AF)","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-09-19",{"date":44,"type":45},"2025-09-26","ACTUAL",{"date":47,"type":35},"2025-10-01",{"date":49,"type":35},"2026-12-01",{"name":5,"class":6}]