[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100620226":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":20,"overallOfficials":24,"centralContacts":29,"locations":24,"responsibleParty":35,"collaborators":24,"id":39,"slug":40,"hasResults":41,"nctId":42,"briefTitle":43,"officialTitle":44,"acronym":24,"eligibilityCriteria":45,"healthyVolunteers":41,"sex":46,"minAge":47,"maxAge":48,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":24,"studyType":52,"phases":53,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":60,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":24,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":24},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"FASTER robot-assisted ESD group","EXPERIMENTAL","FASTER robot-assisted ESD group - Patients undergo ESD with the FASTER robotic arm attached to the endoscope tip, with robotic grasping to assist submucosal dissection.",[13],"Other: FASTER robot-assisted ESD group",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":17,"interventionNames":18},"Conventional colorectal ESD","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","Conventional colorectal ESD - Patients undergo standard ESD using a transparent distal cap without robotic assistance.",[19],"Other: Conventional ESD group",[21,25],{"type":6,"name":9,"description":22,"armGroupLabels":23,"otherNames":24},"In the experimental group, the FASTER robotic arm will be attached to the tip of the endoscope at the beginning of the procedure. ESD will then be performed according to the standard steps of conventional ESD: (1) lesion marking; (2) submucosal injection with normal saline mixed with indigo carmine; and (3) circumferential incision. After completion of the submucosal injection and circumferential incision, the robotic arm will be deployed, and the end-effector grasper will grasp and lift the mucosal edge to provide a clear view of the dissection plane, after which submucosal dissection will be performed. Finally, the resected specimen will be retrieved using the FASTER system through the endoscope or via suction. Throughout the procedure, patients' vital signs and any procedure-related serious adverse events will be recorded for statistical analysis",[9],null,{"type":6,"name":26,"description":27,"armGroupLabels":28,"otherNames":24},"Conventional ESD group","In the control group, a transparent distal attachment cap will be mounted onto the tip of the endoscope at the beginning of the procedure. ESD will then be performed following the standard steps of conventional ESD, including: (1) lesion marking; (2) submucosal injection using normal saline mixed with indigo carmine; (3) circumferential incision; (4) submucosal dissection; and (5) retrieval of the resected specimen via suction. Throughout the procedure, patients' vital signs and any procedure-related serious adverse events will be recorded for statistical analysis.",[15],[30],{"name":31,"role":32,"phone":33,"phoneExt":24,"email":34},"xiaobing cui","CONTACT","13631312723","xbing119@163.com",{"type":36,"investigatorFullName":37,"investigatorTitle":38,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":24,"oldOrganization":24},"SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR","Kaiyun Liu","Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor","100620226","effect-of-simplified-robot-faster-assisted-versus-conventional-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-esd-for-colorectal-lesions-100620226",false,"NCT07354867","Effect of Simplified Robot (FASTER) Assisted Versus Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for Colorectal Lesions","Effect of Simplified Robot (FASTER) Assisted Versus Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age between 18 and 80 years.\n2. Patients with colorectal lesions scheduled to undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)\n3. Lesion characteristics meeting any of the following criteria: (1) Lesions unsuitable for en bloc resection using snare-based EMR, including non-granular type laterally spreading tumors (LST-NG), especially pseudo-depressed subtype (PD); lesions with type VI pit pattern (VI-type glandular opening configuration); carcinomas with superficial submucosal invasion (T1-SM); large depressed-type tumors; large protruding lesions suspected of malignancy, including nodular mixed-type granular LSTs (LST-G); other lesions unsuitable for en bloc resection using snare-based EMR; (2) Lesions with special background conditions, including mucosal tumors with submucosal fibrosis (caused by prior biopsy or mucosal prolapse due to peristalsis); sporadic tumors arising in the context of chronic inflammation (e.g., ulcerative colitis); local residual or recurrent early carcinoma following prior endoscopic resection;\n4. Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Suspected deep submucosal invasive carcinoma based on endoscopic features；\n2. Lesions presenting with non-lifting signs, suggesting deep submucosal invasive carcinoma or tumors with severe submucosal fibrosis;\n3. Lesions extending to the appendiceal orifice, colonic diverticulum, or ileocecal valve; (4) Pregnant women or women who may be pregnant; lactating women;\n4. Pregnant women or women who may be pregnant; lactating women;\n5. Patients with coagulation disorders;\n6. Patients considered ineligible for specific reasons;\n7. Patients with contraindications to anesthesia and\u002For colonoscopy. -","ALL","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":50,"type":51},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[54],"NA","This study aims to compare the outcomes of Simplified Robot (FASTER) assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) with conventional ESD in the treatment of colorectal lesions. Using a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled design, the investigators will systematically evaluate differences between the two approaches in terms of total procedure time, mucosal dissection time and speed, resection quality (R0 resection rate and en bloc resection rate), incidence of complications (bleeding, perforation, muscularis injury), and the flexibility and clinical feasibility of robotic operation. The clinical significance of this study lies in assessing the value of robotic assistance in colorectal ESD, optimizing intraoperative workflow, reducing complication risks, improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency, and providing evidence to support individualized therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.This study aims to compare the outcomes of Simplified Robot (FASTER) assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) with conventional ESD in the treatment of colorectal lesions. Using a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled design, the investigators will systematically evaluate differences between the two approaches in terms of total procedure time, mucosal dissection time and speed, resection quality (R0 resection rate and en bloc resection rate), incidence of complications (bleeding, perforation, muscularis injury), and the flexibility and clinical feasibility of robotic operation. The clinical significance of this study lies in assessing the value of robotic assistance in colorectal ESD, optimizing intraoperative workflow, reducing complication risks, improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency, and providing evidence to support individualized therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.",[57,58,59],"Colorectal Lesions","Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)","FASTER Robot",[58,61,62,63,64],"Colorectal lesions","FASTER robot","Procedure time","Randomized controlled trial (RCT)","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-01-12",{"date":68,"type":69},"2026-01-21","ACTUAL",{"date":71,"type":51},"2026-01-06",{"date":73,"type":51},"2026-11-30",{"name":37,"class":6}]