[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100626150":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":10,"overallOfficials":15,"centralContacts":20,"locations":28,"responsibleParty":46,"collaborators":10,"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":51,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":54,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":56,"minAge":57,"maxAge":10,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":61,"studyType":62,"phases":10,"briefSummary":63,"conditions":64,"keywords":67,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":10,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":78,"completionDateStruct":80,"leadSponsor":82,"locationsCount":83},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla","OTHER",[8,12],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":10},"Laparoscopic Surgery",null,"Laparoscopic procedure",{"label":13,"type":10,"description":14,"interventionNames":10},"Robotic Surgery","Robotic Procedure",[16],{"name":17,"affiliation":18,"role":19},"Patricia Tejedor Patricia Tejedor, M.D.,Ph.D.","University Hospital Gregorio Marañón","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",[21,26],{"name":22,"role":23,"phone":24,"phoneExt":10,"email":25},"Patricia Tejedor Patricia Tejedor, M.D., Ph.D.","CONTACT","0034915 86 80 00","tejedorpat@gmail.com",{"name":27,"role":23,"phone":10,"phoneExt":10,"email":10},"Joaquín Mascaró Joaquín Mascaró, M.D.",[29],{"facility":30,"status":31,"city":32,"state":10,"zip":10,"country":33,"countryCode":34,"cosmosGeoPoint":35,"geoPoint":40,"contacts":41},"University Hospital Gregorio Marañon","RECRUITING","Madrid","Spain","ES",{"type":36,"coordinates":37},"Point",[38,39],-3.70256,40.4165,{"lat":39,"lon":38},[42],{"name":43,"role":23,"phone":44,"phoneExt":10,"email":45},"Patricia Tejedor Tejedor, M.D., Ph.D.","0034609700386","patricia.tejedor@hotmail.com",{"type":19,"investigatorFullName":47,"investigatorTitle":48,"investigatorAffiliation":18,"oldNameTitle":10,"oldOrganization":10},"Patricia Tejedor","M.D., Ph.D.","100626150","pain-evaluation-across-robotic-and-laparoscopic-surgery-for-colorectal-procedures-100626150",false,"NCT07431892","Pain Evaluation Across Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Procedures","PEARL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 years or older\n* Signed informed consent\n* Meeting inclusion requirements of the hospital's Enhanced Recovery Protocol (RICA program), including:\n* Adequate cognitive status\n* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification I, II, or III\n* Elective colon surgery (right or left hemicolectomy) for malignant disease\n* Planned laparoscopic or robotic surgical approach\n* Preoperative evaluation completed as per RICA protocol (nutritional, nursing, anesthetic, and pharmacy assessments)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a preoperative decision for open surgery\n* Patients undergoing rectal surgery (partial or total mesorectal excision without protective stoma)\n* Patients with inflammatory bowel disease requiring colorectal resection\n* Patients requiring multivisceral resection due to oncologic indications identified intraoperatively\n* Extraction incision different from Pfannenstiel approach\n* Current or past history of chronic opioid use or opioid abuse\n* Current or past history of benzodiazepine use or abuse\n* Chronic use of analgesics for other comorbid medical conditions\n* Current or past history of recreational drug use or abuse\n* Non-compliance with the RICA protocol, including:\n* Lack of preoperative nutritional, nursing, anesthetic, or pharmacy evaluation\n* Non-adherence to preoperative care protocols (e.g., premedication, fasting, carbohydrate loading, thromboembolism prophylaxis, antibiotic prophylaxis, anesthetic care guidelines)","ALL","18 Years",{"count":59,"type":60},80,"ESTIMATED","30 Days","OBSERVATIONAL","Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal conditions, such as laparoscopic or robotic surgery, has been shown to offer benefits over traditional open surgery. These benefits include less pain after surgery, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.\n\nThis study aims to compare two types of minimally invasive surgery-laparoscopic and robotic surgery-to determine which approach results in less postoperative pain for patients undergoing colon or rectal surgery. The central hypothesis is that robotic surgery, due to its higher precision and reduced tissue trauma, will lead to lower pain levels after surgery.\n\nThe study will enroll adult patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery at the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón in Madrid. Participants will undergo either laparoscopic or robotic surgery based on clinical availability and surgical planning, as long as they meet all inclusion criteria under the hospital's enhanced recovery protocol (RICA program).\n\nResearchers will assess patients' pain levels at different time points after surgery (immediately after recovery, at 24, 48, and 72 hours, and at discharge) using validated pain scales. The use of pain medications, hospital stay duration, complication rates, and quality of life up to 12 months after surgery will also be measured.\n\nAll patient data will be collected anonymously using a secure electronic system (REDCap). The study will last approximately 2 years and include about 80 patients (40 in each group).\n\nThe results could help surgeons and hospitals choose the most effective surgical approach to reduce postoperative pain and improve patient recovery in colorectal surgery.",[65,66],"Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures","Colon Cancer Patients",[68,69,70,71,72,73],"colorectal surgery","minimally invasive surgery","robotic surgery","laparoscopic surgery","postoperative pain","Nociception Level Index (NOL)","2026-02-18",{"date":76,"type":77},"2026-02-25","ACTUAL",{"date":79,"type":77},"2025-09-01",{"date":81,"type":60},"2028-09-01",{"name":5,"class":6},1]