[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100580545":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":18,"overallOfficials":17,"centralContacts":25,"locations":31,"responsibleParty":63,"collaborators":66,"id":71,"slug":72,"hasResults":73,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":77,"eligibilityCriteria":78,"healthyVolunteers":73,"sex":79,"minAge":80,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":81,"targetDuration":17,"studyType":84,"phases":85,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":17,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":104,"locationsCount":105},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Consultative PPCI Model via Community Advisory Boards (CAB)","EXPERIMENTAL","Community Advisory Board: a consultative model of engagement where participants attend 4 quarterly meetings with shared leadership between participants and research team.",[13],"Other: Comparison of two standard of care regimens",{"label":15,"type":10,"description":16,"interventionNames":17},"Collaborative PPCI Model via the Participatory Approach to Qualitative","Participatory Approach to Qualitative Research: a collaborative model of engagement with 4 idea coproduction sessions and a close partnership with study staff.",null,[19],{"type":6,"name":20,"description":21,"armGroupLabels":22,"otherNames":23},"Comparison of two standard of care regimens","Participatory Approaches to Qualitative Research (PAQ): Comparing Two Approaches to Patient, Public and Clinician Involvement (PPCI) in Qualitative Research: PAQ and CAB (Community Advisory Boards)",[9],[24],"Comparison between the CAB and PAQ models of community engagement",[26],{"name":27,"role":28,"phone":29,"phoneExt":17,"email":30},"Catherine Saunders, Assistant Professor of Medicine, PhD, MPH","CONTACT","603-650-5402","Catherine.Hylas.Saunders@dartmouth.edu",[32,51],{"facility":33,"status":34,"city":35,"state":36,"zip":37,"country":38,"countryCode":39,"cosmosGeoPoint":40,"geoPoint":45,"contacts":46},"Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth","RECRUITING","Hanover","New Hampshire","03755","United States","US",{"type":41,"coordinates":42},"Point",[43,44],-72.28954,43.70229,{"lat":44,"lon":43},[47,48],{"name":17,"role":28,"phone":29,"phoneExt":17,"email":17},{"name":49,"role":50,"phone":17,"phoneExt":17,"email":17},"Christine M Gunn, PhD","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"facility":5,"status":34,"city":52,"state":36,"zip":53,"country":38,"countryCode":39,"cosmosGeoPoint":54,"geoPoint":58,"contacts":59},"Lebanon","03756",{"type":41,"coordinates":55},[56,57],-72.25176,43.64229,{"lat":57,"lon":56},[60,61],{"name":17,"role":28,"phone":29,"phoneExt":17,"email":17},{"name":62,"role":50,"phone":17,"phoneExt":17,"email":17},"JoAnna K Leyenaar, MD, PhD, MPH",{"type":50,"investigatorFullName":64,"investigatorTitle":65,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":17,"oldOrganization":17},"Catherine Hylas Saunders","Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Health Policy and Clinical Practice",[67,69],{"name":68,"class":6},"Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute",{"name":70,"class":6},"Dartmouth College","100580545","participatory-approaches-to-qualitative-research-paq-comparing-two-approaches-to-patient-public-and-clinician-involvement-in-qualitative-research-100580545",false,"NCT06838689","Participatory Approaches to Qualitative Research (PAQ): Comparing Two Approaches to Patient, Public and Clinician Involvement in Qualitative Research","Participatory Approach to Qualitative Research (PAQ): Comparing Two Methods of Engaging Stakeholders in Qualitative Research","PAQ","Inclusion criteria \\& Exclusion criteria across three sub-specialties:\n\nPediatric mental health\n\nInclusion:\n\n* Adults aged ≥18 years\n* Can communicate in English\n* Able to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n* Patients, care partners, clinicians, other healthcare professionals, teachers and school staff, health policy experts, and community members\n* Has lived experience or professional expertise relating to pediatric mental health\n\nExclusion:\n\n* Children \\\u003C18 years\n* Cannot communicate in English\n* Adults unable to provide verbal consent\n* Prisoners\n* Unable to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n\nGeneralized cancer screening\n\nInclusion:\n\n* Adults aged ≥21 years\n* Can communicate in English\n* Able to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n* Patients, care partners, clinicians, other healthcare professionals, health policy experts, and community members\n* Is eligible for population-based cancer screening tests (breast, prostate, cervical, colorectal cancer), or has lived experience or professional expertise relating to generalized cancer screening\n\nExclusion:\n\n* Children \\\u003C18 years\n* Cannot communicate in English\n* Adults unable to provide verbal consent\n* Prisoners\n* Unable to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n\nSerious illness experience\n\nInclusion:\n\n* Adults aged ≥18 years\n* Can communicate in English\n* Able to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n* Patients, care partners, clinicians, other healthcare professionals, health policy experts, and community members\n* Has lived experience or professional expertise relating to serious illness (defined as \"a health condition that carries a high risk of mortality and either negatively impacts a person's daily functioning or quality of life or excessively strains his or her caregivers.\"\n\nExclusion:\n\n* Children \\\u003C18 years\n* Cannot communicate in English\n* Adults unable to provide verbal consent\n* Prisoners\n* Unable to take part in research activities via a computer or a smartphone\n\nNote: We will not specifically exclude pregnant women, so they may be included incidentally.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":82,"type":83},136,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[86],"NA","The goal of this trial is to compare two types of patient, public and clinician involvement (PPCI) in research: Consultative PPCI and Collaborative PPCI.\n\nThe study team will compare these methods of PPCI in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which PPCI participants will engage with research teams on one of three real qualitative research interview studies addressing topics: 1) pediatric mental health, 2) cancer screening and 3) serious illness. Qualitative interviews are conversations with people about their experiences and perspectives. In all three qualitative studies, PPCI participants will help us at every stage of the research, from design (making choices about how to set up the study) through dissemination (sharing findings).\n\nThe researchers do not know about any quantitative (numbers) evidence from RCTs about how well different PPCI approaches work. As far as the study team knows, this is the first RCT of PPCI approaches. Given this gap in knowledge, the research question is: How does a Consultative PPCI approach compare to a Collaborative PPCI approach in increasing engagement and partnership trust in research, particularly among historically underrepresented groups? The researchers' best guess (hypothesis), considering the information available, is that Collaborative PPCI will increase PPCI participant engagement, trust and the patient-centeredness of research more than Consultative PPCI.",[89,90,91],"Pediatric Mental Health Services","Cancer Screening","Serious Illness",[93,94,95],"Pediatric mental health","Serious illness in elderly patients","cancer screening","2025-11-18",{"date":98,"type":99},"2025-11-19","ACTUAL",{"date":101,"type":99},"2025-09-01",{"date":103,"type":83},"2027-10-31",{"name":5,"class":6},2]