[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100625782":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":18,"overallOfficials":11,"centralContacts":23,"locations":29,"responsibleParty":46,"collaborators":11,"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":52,"nctId":53,"briefTitle":54,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":11,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":52,"sex":56,"minAge":57,"maxAge":11,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":11,"studyType":61,"phases":62,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":11,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":11,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":77},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Sohag University","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Road Mapping Guided Puncture","EXPERIMENTAL",null,[13],"Procedure: Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":11,"interventionNames":17},"Ultrasound Guided Puncture","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR",[13],[19],{"type":20,"name":21,"description":21,"armGroupLabels":22,"otherNames":11},"PROCEDURE","Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access",[9,15],[24],{"name":25,"role":26,"phone":27,"phoneExt":11,"email":28},"Yohana F Fayez, MBBCh","CONTACT","+201288374728","yohana_farouz_post@med.sohag.edu.eg",[30],{"facility":31,"status":32,"city":33,"state":11,"zip":34,"country":35,"countryCode":36,"cosmosGeoPoint":37,"geoPoint":42,"contacts":43},"Sohag University Hospital","RECRUITING","Sohag","82511","Egypt","EG",{"type":38,"coordinates":39},"Point",[40,41],31.69478,26.55695,{"lat":41,"lon":40},[44],{"name":45,"role":26,"phone":27,"phoneExt":11,"email":28},"Yohana Farouz Fayez, MBBCh",{"type":47,"investigatorFullName":48,"investigatorTitle":49,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":11,"oldOrganization":11},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Yohana Farouz Fayez","Vascular surgery resident, Sohag University Hospitals, Egypt","100625782","road-mapping-guided-puncture-versus-ultrasound-guided-puncture-during-retrograde-angioplasty-feasibility-and-safety-100625782",false,"NCT07427108","Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety","Inclusion criteria: -.\n\n1. Adults : Both male and female participants.\n2. Diagnosed with critical limp threatening ischemia (CLTI):\n\n   significant occlusions in the femoropopliteal\n\n   o Rutherford Class 5: Non-healing wounds or ulcers\n3. Failed or unable to achieve antegrade access:\n\n   Patients requiring retrograde puncture for the procedure.\n4. Planned intervention with retrograde access: Candidates for endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stent deployment\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n• Active infection at the puncture site: Any localized infection, particularly over the ankle region , will be an exclusion.\n\n• Severe calcification or anatomical abnormalities: Patients with excessive arterial calcification or significant anatomical distortion preventing safe retrograde puncture.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":59,"type":60},32,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[63],"NA","The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by:\n\n* Puncture success rate\n* Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)",[66,67],"Peripheral Arterial Disease","Vascular Diseases","2026-02-15",{"date":70,"type":71},"2026-02-23","ACTUAL",{"date":73,"type":71},"2026-02-01",{"date":75,"type":60},"2027-03-01",{"name":5,"class":6},1]