[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100578061":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":16,"overallOfficials":10,"centralContacts":22,"locations":28,"responsibleParty":46,"collaborators":48,"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":54,"nctId":55,"briefTitle":56,"officialTitle":57,"acronym":10,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":59,"sex":60,"minAge":61,"maxAge":62,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":10,"studyType":66,"phases":10,"briefSummary":67,"conditions":68,"keywords":72,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":10,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":79,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":80,"startDateStruct":83,"completionDateStruct":85,"leadSponsor":87,"locationsCount":88},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology","OTHER",[8,13],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":10,"interventionNames":11},"Individuals after stroke",null,[12],"Diagnostic Test: Stimulus response task",{"label":14,"type":10,"description":10,"interventionNames":15},"Healthy volunteers",[12],[17],{"type":18,"name":19,"description":20,"armGroupLabels":21,"otherNames":10},"DIAGNOSTIC_TEST","Stimulus response task","Participants were tasked with performing a finger extension exercise that required pressing buttons in response to visual stimuli. In cases where physical movement was not possible, participants were instructed to imagine performing the task while focusing on their fingers.",[14,9],[23],{"name":24,"role":25,"phone":26,"phoneExt":10,"email":27},"Daria Petrova, PhD","CONTACT","+7 915 420 5113","d.petrova@skoltech.ru",[29,41],{"facility":30,"status":31,"city":32,"state":10,"zip":10,"country":33,"countryCode":34,"cosmosGeoPoint":35,"geoPoint":40,"contacts":10},"Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech)","COMPLETED","Moscow","Russia","RU",{"type":36,"coordinates":37},"Point",[38,39],37.61781,55.75204,{"lat":39,"lon":38},{"facility":30,"status":42,"city":32,"state":10,"zip":10,"country":33,"countryCode":34,"cosmosGeoPoint":43,"geoPoint":45,"contacts":10},"RECRUITING",{"type":36,"coordinates":44},[38,39],{"lat":39,"lon":38},{"type":47,"investigatorFullName":10,"investigatorTitle":10,"investigatorAffiliation":10,"oldNameTitle":10,"oldOrganization":10},"SPONSOR",[49],{"name":50,"class":51},"Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia","UNKNOWN","100578061","study-of-hemodynamic-markers-of-upper-extremity-motor-dysfunction-in-stroke-patients-using-functional-near-infrared-spectroscopy-fnirs-100578061",false,"NCT06806397","Study of Hemodynamic Markers of Upper Extremity Motor Dysfunction in Stroke Patients Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)","Studying the Mechanisms of Visual-motor Transformation to Find Neurophysiological Markers of Altered Functions of Cortical Motor Circuits in Patients with Neurological Disorders and Developing Technologies for Their Rehabilitation.","For Healthy Volunteers:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n1\\. Availability of signed written informed consent. 3. Absence of somatic and psychiatric diseases (more details in the exclusion criteria) 4. Ability and willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. The presence of superficial injury of head (S00-S09 International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10).\n2. The presence of mental, behavioural disorders (F00-F99 ICD-10).\n3. Drug addiction in the past or at the moment.\n4. The presence of diseases of the nervous system (G00-G99 ICD-10).\n5. . History of intracranial injury (S06 ICD-10) or stroke (I64 ICD-10).\n6. The presence of somatoform disorders (F45 ICD-10).\n7. Any conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, meet the exclusion criteria\n8. Presence of electrical and\u002For metallic implants or stimulants in the body (eg, implanted deep brain stimulation devices, pacemakers, hearing aids and cochlear implants, intracranial metal implants).\n9. Pregnancy\n10. The presence of malignant neoplasms (C00-C97 ICD-10).\n\nFor stroke patients:\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Signed written informed consent.\n2. People after the first acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA), early or late rehabilitation period.\n3. The level of severity of paresis of the upper limb from 3 points to 0 (according to a 6-point neurological scale)\n4. The minimum visual acuity is not lower than 0.2 on the Sivtsev scale.\n5. The ability and willingness of the patient to comply with the requirements of this protocol.\n6. Expressed patient motivation for rehabilitation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Severe cognitive impairment (\\\u003C10 points according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale).\n2. Hamilton score above 18 points.\n3. The score on the Rankin scale is above 4 points.\n4. Associated neurological disorders that cause decreased muscle strength or increased muscle tone in the upper limbs (eg, cerebral palsy, brain damage from trauma) or stiffness (eg, Parkinson's disease, contracture).\n5. Late stages of arthritis or clinically significant limitation of passive range of motion in any of the joints studied in the study due to other reasons.\n6. The absence of a part of the upper limb due to amputation caused by various reasons.\n7. Any medical condition, including mental illness or epilepsy, that may affect the interpretation of study results, study conduct, or patient safety.\n8. Alcohol abuse, medical marijuana use, or recreational drug use in the 12 months prior to Visit 1.\n9. Use of experimental drugs or medical devices within 30 days prior to Visit 1.\n10. Lack of ability to follow study procedures, in the opinion of the investigator.\n11. The severity of the patient's condition according to the neurological or somatic status, which does not allow full rehabilitation.\n12. Severe visual disturbances, minimal visual acuity less than 0.2 Sivtsev visual acuity table.\n13. Unstable angina and\u002For heart attack within the previous month\n14. Repeated stroke.\n15. Severe unilateral spatial neglect.\n16. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension\n17. Ataxia\n18. All forms of epilepsy",true,"ALL","35 Years","70 Years",{"count":64,"type":65},40,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The aim of the study was to explore potential pathways for recovery and adaptation of the motor cortex by examining cerebral blood flow characteristics and hemodynamic markers analyzed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Participants in the study performed a simple stimulus-response task several times with one healthy and one paralyzed limb at different stages of basic rehabilitation. A group of healthy, age-matched volunteers participated in the same experiment to verify the stroke-related changes. The researchers recorded fNIRS signals, muscle activity using electromyography, and heart activity using electrocardiography.",[69,70,71],"Stroke","Stroke with Hemiparesis","Stroke, Ischemic",[73,74,75,76,77,78],"stroke","hemiparesis","hemodynamics","fNIRS","restoration of motor function","Neurovascular coupling","2025-01-28",{"date":81,"type":82},"2025-02-04","ACTUAL",{"date":84,"type":82},"2024-06-26",{"date":86,"type":65},"2025-04",{"name":5,"class":6},2]