[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100638732":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":23,"overallOfficials":45,"centralContacts":49,"locations":55,"responsibleParty":73,"collaborators":44,"id":76,"slug":77,"hasResults":78,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":44,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":83,"sex":84,"minAge":85,"maxAge":44,"enrollmentInfo":86,"targetDuration":44,"studyType":89,"phases":90,"briefSummary":92,"conditions":93,"keywords":44,"overallStatus":95,"whyStopped":44,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":100,"completionDateStruct":102,"leadSponsor":104,"locationsCount":105},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center","OTHER",[8,15,19],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Aim 3 group 1 (tiered tax condition VCEs)","EXPERIMENTAL","Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high) and 2) flavors (fruit\u002Fsweet vs. ice vs. menthol\u002Fmint vs. tobacco) with optimal tiered tax conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).",[13,14],"Other: Discrete Choice Study","Other: Survey Administration",{"label":16,"type":10,"description":17,"interventionNames":18},"Aim 3 group 2 (banned condition VCEs)","Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) nicotine levels (low versus vs. high), 2) flavors (fruit\u002Fsweet vs. ice vs. menthol\u002Fmint vs. tobacco), and 3) purchasing sources (out-of-state legal vs. local\u002Fonline illegal, vs. local legal) with banned conditions among four different products (preferred EC type, cigarettes, cigars, ONPs) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).",[13,14],{"label":20,"type":10,"description":21,"interventionNames":22},"Aims 1 & 2 (EC tax base and rate VCEs)","Participants complete VCEs over 20 minutes on study with random assignment to: 1) Nicotine levels (low vs. high); 2) Flavors (fruit\u002Fsweet vs. ice vs. menthol\u002Fmint vs. tobacco); 3) EC tax bases (by product type vs. by flavor vs. by nicotine concentration), and 4) rate levels (status quo \\[equal rates\\] vs. 50% higher vs. 100% higher vs. 200% higher) among six different products (tanks, pods, disposables, cigarettes, cigars, and oral nicotine pouches \\[ONPs\\]) and opt-out options (none of the six products or quitting).",[13,14],[24,32,36,40],{"type":6,"name":25,"description":26,"armGroupLabels":27,"otherNames":28},"Discrete Choice Study","Complete EC tax base, rate, nicotine level, and flavor VCEs",[20],[29,30,31],"DCE","Discrete Choice Experiment","Discrete Choice Task",{"type":6,"name":25,"description":33,"armGroupLabels":34,"otherNames":35},"Complete tiered tax condition VCEs",[9],[29,30,31],{"type":6,"name":25,"description":37,"armGroupLabels":38,"otherNames":39},"Complete banned condition VCEs",[16],[29,30,31],{"type":6,"name":41,"description":42,"armGroupLabels":43,"otherNames":44},"Survey Administration","Ancillary studies",[9,16,20],null,[46],{"name":47,"affiliation":5,"role":48},"Ce Shang, PhD","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",[50],{"name":51,"role":52,"phone":53,"phoneExt":44,"email":54},"The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center","CONTACT","800-293-5066","OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu",[56],{"facility":5,"status":44,"city":57,"state":58,"zip":59,"country":60,"countryCode":61,"cosmosGeoPoint":62,"geoPoint":67,"contacts":68},"Columbus","Ohio","43210","United States","US",{"type":63,"coordinates":64},"Point",[65,66],-82.99879,39.96118,{"lat":66,"lon":65},[69,72],{"name":47,"role":52,"phone":70,"phoneExt":44,"email":71},"614-685-3741","ce.shang@osumc.edu",{"name":47,"role":48,"phone":44,"phoneExt":44,"email":44},{"type":48,"investigatorFullName":74,"investigatorTitle":75,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":44,"oldOrganization":44},"Ce Shang","Principal Investigator","100638732","studying-the-impacts-of-higher-taxes-and-bans-on-electronic-cigarettes-to-improve-public-health-100638732",false,"NCT07581041","Studying the Impacts of Higher Taxes and Bans on Electronic Cigarettes to Improve Public Health","Design Tiered Tax Rates for Electronic Cigarettes (ECs) Based on Their Appeals to Youth and Young Adults","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* AYAs aged 15-24 who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and are not smoking in the past 30 days\n* AYA tobacco nonusers aged 15-24 who are susceptible to EC or tobacco use (i.e., curiosity about the product, intention to try it in the near future, and likely response if a best friend were to offer them the product)\n* Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of ECs and combustible tobacco in the past 30 days\n* Adults aged 18+ who are daily or nondaily users of combustible tobacco in the past 30 days, not currently using ECs but are open to trying ECs",true,"ALL","15 Years",{"count":87,"type":88},3400,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[91],"NA","This clinical trial studies whether imposing higher taxes and bans on electronic cigarettes (EC) with appealing features impacts tobacco use among current and susceptible adolescents and young adults (AYA) EC users and adults who use EC or are open to EC use. ECs are currently the most popular form of nicotine or tobacco product in the United States. Compared to burned cigarette products, ECs generally pose fewer short-term harms, making them a promising tool for lowering users' exposure to toxins and cancer-causing chemicals from smoking, promoting better public health outcomes. However, evidence shows that EC marketing has increased overall initiation into nicotine use among AYAs, and that EC users are at a higher risk of becoming smokers, which could have negative public health outcomes. Therefore, understanding the public health impact of EC use and regulation remains a major goal in tobacco control research. This trial studies different scenarios which impose higher taxes or bans on ECs with appealing features. Researchers hope that by studying participant responses to the different scenarios they may be able to identify which ones best discourage EC use among AYAs while promoting adult EC users to quit smoking, which may improve public health.",[94],"Tobacco-Related Carcinoma","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-06",{"date":98,"type":99},"2026-05-12","ACTUAL",{"date":101,"type":88},"2026-08-01",{"date":103,"type":88},"2027-12-31",{"name":5,"class":6},1]