[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100550130":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":22,"overallOfficials":12,"centralContacts":29,"locations":35,"responsibleParty":51,"collaborators":12,"id":54,"slug":55,"hasResults":56,"nctId":57,"briefTitle":58,"officialTitle":59,"acronym":12,"eligibilityCriteria":60,"healthyVolunteers":61,"sex":62,"minAge":63,"maxAge":12,"enrollmentInfo":64,"targetDuration":12,"studyType":67,"phases":68,"briefSummary":70,"conditions":71,"keywords":12,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":12,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":75,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":76,"startDateStruct":79,"completionDateStruct":81,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":84},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Medical University of Vienna","OTHER",[8,13,16],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"Control: unhealthy","NO_INTERVENTION","Participants with a speech disorder who do not receive the intervention and only complete the outcomes.",null,{"label":14,"type":10,"description":15,"interventionNames":12},"Control: healthy","Participants without a speech disorder who do not receive the intervention and only complete the outcomes.",{"label":17,"type":18,"description":19,"interventionNames":20},"Experimental groups","EXPERIMENTAL","Four groups receiving different rates of questionnaire exposure and wording at either two or four week intervals.",[21],"Other: Patient-reported outcomes for speech disorders: positive",[23],{"type":6,"name":24,"description":25,"armGroupLabels":26,"otherNames":27},"Patient-reported outcomes for speech disorders: positive","The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) aims to assess communication participation in all kinds of communication disorders. The Voice Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (VSEQ) monitors self-efficacy in individuals with self-declared voice problems before and after interventions. The Vocal Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire (VFHQ) and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) aim at reflecting vocal fatigue. Both have been adapted to reflect purely positive wording.",[17],[28],"Patient-reported outcomes for speech disorders: negative",[30],{"name":31,"role":32,"phone":33,"phoneExt":12,"email":34},"Preston Long, PhD","CONTACT","+43 (0)1 40400-66100","preston.long@meduniwien.ac.at",[36],{"facility":37,"status":38,"city":39,"state":12,"zip":40,"country":41,"countryCode":42,"cosmosGeoPoint":43,"geoPoint":48,"contacts":49},"Preston Long","RECRUITING","Vienna","1020","Austria","AT",{"type":44,"coordinates":45},"Point",[46,47],16.37208,48.20849,{"lat":47,"lon":46},[50],{"name":31,"role":32,"phone":33,"phoneExt":12,"email":34},{"type":52,"investigatorFullName":37,"investigatorTitle":53,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":12,"oldOrganization":12},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Principal Investigator","100550130","the-mere-measurement-effect-of-patient-reported-outcomes-100550130",false,"NCT06443073","The Mere-measurement Effect of Patient-reported Outcomes","The Mere-measurement Effect in Patient-reported Outcomes: A Randomized Control Trial With Speech Pathology Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAll patients will be required to have a qualifying disorder known to effect speech as identified below. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be invited to participate in the study by the researchers. Eligibility will be assessed prior to enrolment recruitment screening. AKH patients are not targeted for this study. All patients, regardless of geographic location around the world, can be recruited. The study is entirely online.\n\nSubjects must meet the following inclusion criteria for study entry:\n\n* Strong English skills\\*\n* Technology savvy - able to complete online questionnaire\n* Suffering from one of the following:\n\n  * Muscle tension dysphonia\n  * Inducible laryngeal obstruction\n  * Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)\n  * Patients after a stroke or other brain injury\u002Fdamage\u002Ftrauma, (aphasia, dysarthria)\n  * Parkinson's disease\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Under the age of 18",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":65,"type":66},170,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[69],"NA","The use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) have become increasingly commonplace across many healthcare settings over the past two decades. The value of PROs is now acknowledged by healthcare providers and patients alike. However, to date, little is known about the best practices for formulating PRO measures (PROMS), but even more specifically, the effect had on the responding patients as a result of item word choice, emotional valence, or frequency of use. That is, 1) does the positive or negative wording of items affect the patient's perspective on the latent variable, 2) is there a degree of subliminal influence or measurement effects on their behaviour resulting from exposure to PROs, and finally, 3) is such an effect amplified with repeated exposure?",[72,73,74],"Measurement, Psychological Stress","Speech Disorders","Assessment, Self","2025-05-13",{"date":77,"type":78},"2025-05-14","ACTUAL",{"date":80,"type":78},"2024-05-01",{"date":82,"type":66},"2025-12-22",{"name":5,"class":6},1]