[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"ALİEMAN\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":75},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,48],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100632289","comparison-of-three-treatment-modalities-in-myofascial-pain-syndrome-100632289",false,"NCT07511751","COMPARISON OF THREE TREATMENT MODALITIES IN MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME","COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OFF DRY NEEDLING, EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE THERAPY, AND TRANSCUTANEOUS PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY IN PATIENTS WITH MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL","MPS-TREAT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 65 years\n* Clinically diagnosed myofascial pain syndrome\n* Back pain lasting at least 3 months\n* Failure to respond to conservative treatments\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of cervical surgery or cervical disc pathology\n* Fibromyalgia\n* Shoulder pathologies\n* Coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulant therapy\n* Infection, malignancy, or inflammatory spinal diseases","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dry needling, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The primary outcomes include pain intensity and functional status. Patients will be randomly assigned to different treatment groups, and outcomes will be evaluated before and after the interventions. The results of this study are expected to contribute to determining the most effective treatment method for pain management.",[28],"Myofascial Pain Syndrome",[30,31,32,33,34],"myofascial pain syndrome","dry needling","ESWT","pulsed radiofrequency","pain","RECRUITING","2026-05-01",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-05-07","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2026-03-10",{"date":43,"type":22},"2027-03-10",{"name":45,"class":46},"ALİEMAN","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":53,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":4},"100635031","comparison-of-classical-and-syringe-free-techniques-in-ultrasound-guided-central-jugular-venous-catheterization-100635031","NCT07547397","COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND SYRINGE-FREE TECHNIQUES IN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CENTRAL JUGULAR VENOUS CATHETERIZATION","syringe-free","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-85 years who have an indication for central venous catheterization in the operating room.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Morbidly obese patients (body mass index \\>40)\n* Those with severe coagulopathy\n* Severe neck deformity\n* Skin deformity or infection at the catheterization site\n* Those with congenital anomalies in the central veins","85 Years",{"count":57,"type":22},90,[25],"During central venous catheterization, both in-plane and out-of-plane techniques can be used. In the in-plane technique, the entire needle can be visualized with ultrasound. In the in-plane technique with a linear probe, the vessel and needle are visualized longitudinally. In the syringe technique, a guide needle attached to a syringe is first inserted into the vein and blood is aspirated, then the catheter is placed through a wire sent into the vein via the needle. This procedure is performed under ultrasound guidance, visualizing the vessels, guide wire, and needle.\n\nIn the syringe-less technique, the guide wire is placed inside the needle and sent directly into the vein. In this technique, there is no need to draw blood into the syringe to confirm that it is in the vein.\n\nThe aim of our study is to compare the two ultrasound-guided techniques in terms of procedure time, number of attempts, and complication rates. We expect the syringe-less technique to have a shorter procedure time, fewer attempts, and a lower complication rate.",[61,62,63],"Central Venous Catheters\u002FStandards","Ultrasonography\u002FMethods","Ultrasonography\u002FStandards",[65],"central venous catheterization with and without syringe","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-17",{"date":69,"type":39},"2026-04-23",{"date":71,"type":22},"2026-03-30",{"date":73,"type":22},"2027-03",{"name":45,"class":46},""]