[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Al-Nahrain University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":399},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,18,0,[8,44,65,86,106,124,145,166,195,217,236,266,288,306,324,344,363,380],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100607301","comparison-of-emtras-rems-and-gap-scores-in-trauma-100607301",false,"NCT07186777","Comparison of EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP Scores in Trauma","Comparative Predictive Accuracy of EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP Scores for Mortality, Endotracheal Intubation, and Length of Hospitalization in Trauma Patients: The First Prospective Cohort Study From Iraq","TRAPS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients presenting to the emergency department with trauma.\n* Patients or their legal guardians must provide informed consent to participate in the study.\n* Admission within 12 hours of injury.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with incomplete clinical data or those discharged before scoring can be performed.\n* Pregnant patients (due to specific physiological considerations not accounted for by the scoring system).\n* Patients who died before arrival or were declared dead on arrival.\n* Patients who refuse participation or for whom informed consent cannot be obtained.","ALL","16 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},188,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this prospective multicenter cohort study is to evaluate and compare the predictive utility of the EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP scores in determining key outcomes among trauma patients admitted to participating hospitals in Iraq. The primary outcomes of interest include mortality, the need for endotracheal intubation, and length of hospitalization.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nHow accurately do EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP scores predict mortality in trauma patients?\n\nHow effective are these scores in predicting the need for endotracheal intubation?\n\nHow well do these scores correlate with hospitalization duration in trauma patients?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using EMTRAS, REMS, and GAP scores upon admission to the emergency department.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including survival, intubation requirements, and length of hospital stay, monitored throughout their hospitalization.",[25],"Trauma Patients",[27,28,29,30],"EMTRAS","REMS","GAP","Trauma","RECRUITING","2026-03-03",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-03-04","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":35},"2025-09-15",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-12-15",{"name":41,"class":42},"Al-Nahrain University","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":50,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":57,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":59,"startDateStruct":60,"completionDateStruct":62,"leadSponsor":64,"locationsCount":43},"100572520","validation-of-the-stumbl-score-for-blunt-thoracic-trauma-100572520","NCT06734338","Validation of the STUMBL Score for Blunt Thoracic Trauma","Validation of the STUMBL Score for Risk Stratification in Emergency Department Patients With Blunt Thoracic Trauma: A Prospective Observational Study in Iraq","STUMBL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients presenting to the emergency department with blunt thoracic trauma (e.g., motor vehicle accidents, falls, or direct impacts to the chest).\n* Patients who present within 4 hours of sustaining the injury.\n* Patients or their legal guardians must provide informed consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with penetrating chest trauma (e.g., stab wounds, gunshot wounds).\n* Patients with other life-threatening injuries that overshadow the thoracic trauma (e.g., head or abdominal trauma).\n* Pregnant women due to potential risks related to radiation or certain diagnostic procedures.\n* Pediatric patients under 18 years of age.\n* Patients with a history of major thoracic surgery (e.g., prior lung or heart surgery) that may interfere with the assessment of trauma severity.","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},"This prospective observational study aims to validate the STUMBL score for risk stratification in emergency department patients with blunt thoracic trauma in Iraq. The main questions it seeks to answer are:\n\nHow accurately does the STUMBL score predict mortality and critical outcomes such as ICU admission or advanced interventions? How well does the score stratify patients by injury severity in a resource-limited setting? Are there demographic or clinical factors that influence the score's predictive performance?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using the STUMBL score upon arrival at the emergency department to predict risk levels.\n\nHave demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, injury mechanism, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay, collected to explore potential associations with outcomes.",[56],"Chest Trauma",[50,30,58],"Chest",{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":61,"type":35},"2025-04-20",{"date":63,"type":21},"2026-12-20",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":66,"slug":67,"hasResults":11,"nctId":68,"briefTitle":69,"officialTitle":70,"acronym":71,"eligibilityCriteria":72,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":73,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":75,"conditions":76,"keywords":78,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":81,"startDateStruct":82,"completionDateStruct":84,"leadSponsor":85,"locationsCount":43},"100573338","comparison-of-rts-and-mgap-scores-in-predicting-outcomes-of-trauma-patients-100573338","NCT06744985","Comparison of RTS and MGAP Scores in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients","Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients: A Comparison of the Revised Trauma Score and MGAP Score at a Trauma Center","RTS-MGAP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presentation to the trauma center within 6 hours of injury.\n* Availability of complete clinical and demographic data for scoring using RTS and MGAP.\n* Patients who consent to participate in the study or whose legal representatives provide consent.\n* Capability to assess outcomes such as survival, ICU admission, and complications.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who expired before scoring or evaluation\n* Missing or unreliable medical data for RTS or MGAP score calculations.\n* Transfers from other facilities with interventions that could impact RTS or MGAP reliability.\n* Pregnant patients, due to the unique considerations of trauma in pregnancy.",{"count":74,"type":21},200,"The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and the MGAP score in determining clinical outcomes among multiple trauma patients hospitalized at a trauma center in Iraq.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhich score, RTS or MGAP, provides a more accurate prediction of clinical outcomes, including mortality? Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where one scoring system outperforms the other?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using both the RTS and MGAP scores upon admission. Have their clinical outcomes, including mortality and other relevant indicators, monitored throughout their hospital stay.",[77],"Multiple Trauma\u002FInjuries",[79,80],"RTS","MGAP",{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":83,"type":35},"2025-01-20",{"date":63,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":87,"slug":88,"hasResults":11,"nctId":89,"briefTitle":90,"officialTitle":91,"acronym":92,"eligibilityCriteria":93,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":94,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":96,"conditions":97,"keywords":98,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":102,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":104,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":43},"100570453","thorax-vs-trauma-injury-severity-scores-as-outcome-predictors-in-chest-trauma-100570453","NCT06707441","Thorax vs. Trauma Injury Severity Scores as Outcome Predictors in Chest Trauma","Which Score Best Predicts Outcomes in Chest Trauma? A Prospective Comparison of Thorax and Trauma Injury Severity Scores","TTSS\u002FTRISS\u002FER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with chest injuries that require clinical assessment using the Thorax Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) and the Trauma Injury Severity Score (TISS) within 6 hours of admission.\n* Patients (or their legal guardians) must provide informed consent for participation in the study. This ensures ethical standards are maintained.\n* Patients presenting with thoracic injuries, including rib fractures, pulmonary contusions, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and other chest-related injuries. This will include both isolated chest trauma and trauma with multiple injuries\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 16 years.\n* Patients with chest injuries caused by conditions unrelated to trauma, such as spontaneous pneumothorax, infections, or other medical conditions (e.g., non-traumatic rib fractures or cancer).\n* Patients with severe co-morbidities (e.g., terminal illnesses, advanced stages of cancer, or end-stage organ failure) that would significantly affect outcomes unrelated to the chest trauma.\n* Patients with pre-existing severe neurological conditions or other comorbidities that would interfere with trauma assessment and clinical management (e.g., severe brain injury, vegetative state).\n* Patients or their legal representatives who refuse consent for participation in the study.\n* Pregnant women due to potential risks associated with trauma and interventions during pregnancy.",{"count":95,"type":21},150,"The goal of this observational study is to compare the predictive utility of the Thorax Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in determining outcomes among patients presenting with chest trauma to the emergency room. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the TTSS provide a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes (e.g., mortality, ICU admission) than the TRISS? Are there specific patient subgroups where one score is more effective than the other?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nHave their chest trauma severity assessed using both TTSS and TRISS during their emergency room admission.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay) monitored throughout their hospital stay.",[56],[99,100,101],"TTSS","ER","TRISS",{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":83,"type":35},{"date":63,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":111,"acronym":112,"eligibilityCriteria":113,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":114,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":116,"conditions":117,"keywords":118,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":119,"startDateStruct":120,"completionDateStruct":121,"leadSponsor":123,"locationsCount":43},"100572401","comparative-analysis-of-mgap-and-gap-trauma-scores-in-predicting-outcomes-for-multiple-trauma-patients-100572401","NCT06732791","Comparative Analysis of MGAP and GAP Trauma Scores in Predicting Outcomes for Multiple Trauma Patients","A Comparative Analysis of MGAP and GAP Trauma Scores in Predicting Prognosis for Multiple Trauma Patients: A Prospective Observational Study","MGAP-GAP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged 16 years or older.\n* Patients presenting with multiple trauma (Multiple trauma is defined as injuries involving two or more body regions or organ systems that might need coordinated multidisciplinary management).\n* Patients presenting to the emergency department within 6 hours of sustaining trauma.\n* Patients or their legal representatives must provide informed consent for participation in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Transfers from other facilities with interventions that may affect GAP or MGAP reliability.\n* Pregnant women.\n* Burn injuries represent the primary mechanism of trauma.\n* Incomplete records or failure of follow-up\n* Patients who are deceased upon arrival at the emergency department.\n* Patient discharge against medical advice.",{"count":115,"type":21},522,"The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive accuracy of the MGAP and GAP trauma scores in determining the prognosis of multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency department at Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital, Iraq.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the MGAP score provide a more accurate prediction of outcomes compared to the GAP score? Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where one score demonstrates superior predictive utility over the other?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using both the MGAP and GAP scores upon admission to the emergency department.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, and need for surgery, tracked throughout their hospital stay.",[30],[80,29],{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":83,"type":35},{"date":122,"type":21},"2027-03-20",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":125,"slug":126,"hasResults":11,"nctId":127,"briefTitle":128,"officialTitle":129,"acronym":130,"eligibilityCriteria":131,"healthyVolunteers":132,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":133,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":134,"conditions":135,"keywords":137,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":140,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":144,"locationsCount":43},"100570093","prevalence-and-severity-of-depression-among-cardiothoracic-surgery-healthcare-workers-in-baghdad-a-phq-9-cross-sectional-study-100570093","NCT06702761","Prevalence and Severity of Depression Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Healthcare Workers in Baghdad: A PHQ-9 Cross-Sectional Study","Assessing the Prevalence and Severity of Depression Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Healthcare Workers in Baghdad Using the PHQ-9: A Cross-Sectional Study","DEPRESS\u002FPHQ-9","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Healthcare professionals actively working in cardiothoracic surgery departments in Baghdad, including surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and support staff.\n* Participants who provide informed consent for participation in the study.\n* Able to complete questionnaire form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with a previously diagnosed psychiatric condition other than depression that could confound the results.\n* Incomplete or missing responses on the PHQ-9 questionnaire.\n* Refusal to provide informed consent.\n* Participants are currently undergoing treatment for depression or other mental health conditions.\n* Healthcare workers on long-term leave or who have not actively worked in the cardiothoracic surgery department for the past 3 months.",true,{"count":74,"type":21},"This observational study aims to estimate the prevalence and severity of depression in HCWs in cardiothoracic surgery departments in Baghdad City, Iraq, using a self-administered PHQ-9 questionnaire. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhat is the prevalence of depression among cardiothoracic surgery healthcare workers? How is the severity of depression distributed within this group? Are there specific occupational or demographic factors associated with higher levels of depression?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nFill out the PHQ-9 in order to measure the severity of depressive symptoms at a specific moment in time.\n\nDemographic and occupational details such as age, gender, years of experience and position held should be taken to look for possible relationship with depression.",[136],"Depression Disorders",[138,139],"PHQ-9","HCWs",{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":142,"type":35},"2024-12-01",{"date":39,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":146,"slug":147,"hasResults":11,"nctId":148,"briefTitle":149,"officialTitle":150,"acronym":151,"eligibilityCriteria":152,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":153,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":155,"conditions":156,"keywords":157,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":158,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":159,"startDateStruct":161,"completionDateStruct":163,"leadSponsor":165,"locationsCount":43},"100573336","thorax-trauma-severity-score-in-chest-trauma-a-study-in-iraq-100573336","NCT06744959","Thorax Trauma Severity Score in Chest Trauma: A Study in Iraq","Reliability of Thoracic Trauma Severity Scores in Predicting Outcomes Among Chest Trauma Patients in Low-Resource Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study From Iraq","TTSS-Iraq","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients above 16 years of age.\n* Patients presenting to the emergency department with thoracic trauma.\n* Patients or their legal guardians must provide informed consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with incomplete clinical data or those discharged before scoring can be performed.\n* Pregnant patients (due to specific physiological considerations not accounted for by the scoring system).\n* Patients who succumb to their injuries before scoring or baseline data collection.\n* chronic respiratory diseases\n* malignancy and end-organ failure\n* Patients with severe head injury (having extradural, subdural, subarachnoid, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage and skull bone fracture) or those requiring prior neurosurgical intervention\n* patients with severe abdominal injury requiring surgical intervention like laparotomy",{"count":154,"type":21},166,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the predictive utility of the Thorax Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) in determining morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with chest trauma at a tertiary hospital in Iraq. The primary objectives of the study are:\n\nTo assess the accuracy of TTSS in predicting mortality and critical outcomes such as ICU admission and the need for advanced interventions.\n\nTo evaluate the utility of TTSS in stratifying patients based on injury severity in a resource-constrained setting.\n\nTo identify demographic and clinical factors influencing the predictive performance of TTSS.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using the TTSS upon arrival at the emergency department to establish risk stratification.\n\nProvide demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, mechanism of injury, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay, for analyzing associations with clinical outcomes.",[56],[99,58,30],"2025-08-06",{"date":160,"type":35},"2025-08-07",{"date":162,"type":35},"2025-07-22",{"date":164,"type":21},"2026-05-10",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":167,"slug":168,"hasResults":11,"nctId":169,"briefTitle":170,"officialTitle":171,"acronym":172,"eligibilityCriteria":173,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":174,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":175,"conditions":176,"keywords":178,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":187,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":188,"startDateStruct":190,"completionDateStruct":192,"leadSponsor":194,"locationsCount":43},"100572840","impact-of-pre-hospital-and-hospital-delays-on-myocardial-infarction-outcomes-100572840","NCT06738498","Impact of Pre-Hospital and Hospital Delays on Myocardial Infarction Outcomes","The Impact of Pre-Hospital and Hospital Delays on Myocardial Infarction Outcomes: A Prospective Study","PHHD-MI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who provide informed consent (or a legal representative provides consent if the patient is unable to do so).\n* Patients who undergo reperfusion therapy, such as thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).\n* Patients admitted to Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital within 12 hours of symptom onset.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with non-acute myocardial infarction (e.g., stable angina, prior MI).\n* Patients with severe comorbidities (e.g., advanced cancer, end-stage renal disease) that may complicate outcome assessments or interfere with treatment protocols.\n* Patients who are transferred to another facility before reperfusion therapy is initiated.\n* Pregnant women or breastfeeding women.",{"count":74,"type":21},"The goal of this prospective observational study is to investigate the impact of pre-hospital and hospital delays on the outcomes of myocardial infarction (MI) patients admitted to Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital, Baghdad.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nHow do pre-hospital delays (e.g., patient transport and first medical contact) affect clinical outcomes such as mortality, complication rates, and recovery time in MI patients? What is the influence of hospital-related delays (e.g., time to intervention or reperfusion therapy) on the prognosis of MI patients?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe monitored for the time elapsed from symptom onset to first medical contact and subsequent time intervals during hospital care.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and post-intervention complications, recorded and analyzed.",[177],"Myocardial Infarction (MI)",[179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186],"Myocardial Infarction","Pre-Hospital Delay","Hospital Delay","Reperfusion Therapy","Patient Outcomes","Mortality","Time-to-Treatment","Cardiovascular Emergency","2025-04-27",{"date":189,"type":35},"2025-04-29",{"date":191,"type":35},"2025-02-20",{"date":193,"type":21},"2025-12-20",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":196,"slug":197,"hasResults":11,"nctId":198,"briefTitle":199,"officialTitle":200,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":201,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":202,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":203,"conditions":204,"keywords":206,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":187,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":210,"startDateStruct":212,"completionDateStruct":214,"leadSponsor":216,"locationsCount":43},"100570615","mortality-prediction-using-trauma-scores-100570615","NCT06709547","Mortality Prediction Using Trauma Scores","Which Trauma Severity Score (ISS, NISS, RTS, or TRISS) Best Predicts Mortality in Trauma Patients? A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Trauma patients admitted to the emergency room (ER).\n* Documented injury data sufficient to calculate both the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS).\n* Trauma scores (ISS, NISS, Revised Trauma Score \\[RTS\\], and Trauma and Injury Severity Score \\[TRISS\\]) calculated within 12 hour of arrival to ensure timely predictions.\n* Informed consent provided by the patient or a legal guardian in cases of incapacity.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Under 18 years of age and pregnant women, due to differences in trauma management and scoring applicability.\n* Non-trauma cases, including patients with terminal illnesses or severe cognitive impairments, to maintain focus on trauma outcomes.\n* Incomplete trauma scoring, missing or incomplete medical records, and\n* patients not treated in the trauma or emergency department.\n* Patients who refuse participation or withdraw consent to ensure ethical participation.\n* Transferred patients and those enrolled in other research studies that could interfere with trauma scoring.",{"count":95,"type":21},"The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive utility of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in determining mortality outcomes among trauma patients admitted to the trauma and emergency department at Kadhimiya Educational Hospital in Baghdad.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhich trauma scoring system provides the most accurate prediction of mortality? Are there specific trauma patient subgroups where one scoring system outperforms the others?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using all four trauma scoring systems (ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS) upon admission to the trauma and emergency department.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including mortality, length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and discharge status, monitored throughout their hospital stay to evaluate the accuracy and utility of each scoring system in predicting patient outcomes.",[205],"Trauma, Multiple",[207,208,79,209],"ISS","NISS","TISS",{"date":211,"type":35},"2025-04-30",{"date":213,"type":35},"2025-01-28",{"date":215,"type":21},"2025-12-15",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":11,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":222,"acronym":223,"eligibilityCriteria":224,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":226,"conditions":227,"keywords":228,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":229,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":230,"startDateStruct":231,"completionDateStruct":233,"leadSponsor":235,"locationsCount":43},"100570339","comparing-niss-and-iss-for-mortality-prediction-in-trauma-patients-100570339","NCT06705959","Comparing NISS and ISS for Mortality Prediction in Trauma Patients","Can NISS or ISS Better Predict Mortality in Blunt Trauma Patients? A Prospective Study","ISS\u002FNISS\u002FER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Trauma patients admitted to the emergency room (ER).\n* Patients with documented injury data are sufficient for calculating both the NISS and ISS.\n* Patients admitted to the ER within 6 hours of injury.\n* Patients providing informed consent (or consent obtained from a legal guardian in cases of incapacity).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 years of age.\n* Trauma cases involving burns as the primary injury.\n* Patients with incomplete medical records or insufficient data to calculate NISS and ISS.\n* Patients with pre-existing terminal conditions (e.g., advanced cancer, end-stage organ failure) unrelated to the trauma.\n* Patients who died on arrival or before NISS\u002FISS assessment could be performed.\n* Cases involving pregnant patients, if the primary focus of injury and risk assessment is maternal-fetal outcomes.",{"count":74,"type":21},"The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive utility of the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) in determining mortality outcomes among trauma patients admitted to emergency rooms (ER) in Iraq.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does the NISS provide a more accurate prediction of mortality than the ISS?\n* Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where one scoring system outperforms the other?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using both the NISS and the ISS upon their ER admission. Have their clinical outcomes, including mortality, monitored throughout their hospital stay.",[30],[208,207,30,100],"2025-04-24",{"date":187,"type":35},{"date":232,"type":21},"2025-04-28",{"date":234,"type":21},"2025-06-15",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":237,"slug":238,"hasResults":11,"nctId":239,"briefTitle":240,"officialTitle":241,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":242,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":243,"minAge":52,"maxAge":244,"enrollmentInfo":245,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":247,"phases":248,"briefSummary":250,"conditions":251,"keywords":253,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":258,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":259,"startDateStruct":261,"completionDateStruct":263,"leadSponsor":265,"locationsCount":43},"100588150","phase-2-the-effect-of-hyaluronic-acid-intrauterine-wash-on-endometrial-receptivity-and-pregnancy-outcome-100588150","NCT06937645","the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Intrauterine Wash on Endometrial Receptivity and Pregnancy Outcome","the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Platelets Rich Plasma on the Endometrial Receptivity and Intracytoplasmic Sperms Injection Outcome","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Infertile females aged 18-40 years.\n* Infertile females scheduled for GnRH antagonist protocol of fresh ICSI cycle.\n* Females use dual stimulation (GnRH agonist plus Ovetrelle) for ovulation triggering.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Infertile females diagnosed as a poor responder.\n* Infertile females diagnosed with uterine pathology.\n* Infertile females who are scheduled for a frozen ICSI cycle.\n* Infertile females diagnosed with endocrine diseases like thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, and hyperprolactinemia.\n* Infertile females diagnosed with thrombocytopenia.","FEMALE","40 Years",{"count":246,"type":21},120,"INTERVENTIONAL",[249],"PHASE2","Hyaluronic acid intrauterine wash is done for infertile females undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection on the day of oocyte retrieval. endometrial receptivity parameters, including the subendometrial vasculature indices were measured before and after the intervention for purpose of studying the effect of hyaluronic acid on improvement of the endometrial receptivity and subsequently the pregnancy outcome",[252],"Infertile Patients",[254,255,256,257],"hyaluronic acid","intrauterine wash","endometrial receptivity","pregnancy outcome","2025-04-18",{"date":260,"type":35},"2025-04-22",{"date":262,"type":35},"2023-09-01",{"date":264,"type":21},"2025-08-01",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":267,"slug":268,"hasResults":11,"nctId":269,"briefTitle":270,"officialTitle":271,"acronym":272,"eligibilityCriteria":273,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":274,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":276,"conditions":277,"keywords":279,"overallStatus":280,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":282,"startDateStruct":284,"completionDateStruct":285,"leadSponsor":287,"locationsCount":43},"100572769","chest-trauma-scoring-systems-as-predictors-of-morbidity-and-mortality-in-iraq-100572769","NCT06737575","Chest Trauma Scoring Systems as Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Iraq","Validation of Chest Trauma Scoring Systems in Predicting Blunt Chest Injury Outcomes in Iraq: A Prospective Study","CTS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients diagnosed with blunt chest trauma.\n* Patients presenting to the emergency department within 4 hours.\n* Patients (or their legal representatives) must provide informed consent to participate in the study.\n* Patients who can be assessed using the Chest Trauma Score at the time of arrival (e.g., having stable enough vitals to allow for evaluation).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with penetrating chest trauma (e.g., gunshot or stab wounds), as the Chest Trauma Score is typically used for blunt trauma.\n* Patients presenting with chest conditions unrelated to trauma (e.g., pneumonia, COPD exacerbation, or other non-traumatic causes of chest pain or respiratory distress).\n* Patients with severe pre-existing comorbidities (e.g., end-stage heart failure, terminal cancer) where trauma is unlikely to be the primary cause of morbidity or mortality.\n* Patients with missing or incomplete clinical data, including imaging or vital signs necessary to calculate the CTS accurately.\n* Patients who refuse consent or do not agree to the use of their data for research purposes.",{"count":275,"type":21},190,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chest trauma scoring systems in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients with blunt chest trauma in Iraq. The primary questions it seeks to address are:\n\nHow accurately do chest trauma scoring systems predict mortality and critical outcomes such as ICU admission or the need for advanced interventions? How well do these scoring systems stratify patients based on injury severity in a resource-limited setting? Are there any demographic or clinical factors that impact the predictive performance of these scoring systems?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using chest trauma scoring systems upon arrival at the emergency department to determine risk levels.\n\nHave demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, injury mechanism, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay, collected to explore potential associations with outcomes.",[278],"Chest Injury Trauma Blunt",[272,30],"NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-03-16",{"date":283,"type":35},"2025-03-19",{"date":61,"type":21},{"date":286,"type":21},"2025-06-30",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":289,"slug":290,"hasResults":11,"nctId":291,"briefTitle":292,"officialTitle":293,"acronym":138,"eligibilityCriteria":294,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":295,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":296,"conditions":297,"keywords":299,"overallStatus":280,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":300,"startDateStruct":302,"completionDateStruct":303,"leadSponsor":305,"locationsCount":43},"100572507","depression-among-cardiothoracic-surgery-patients-in-baghdad-100572507","NCT06734169","Depression Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients in Baghdad","Depression Among Cardiothoracic Patients in Baghdad: A Cross-Sectional PHQ-9 Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients admitted to the cardiothoracic surgery ward.\n* Patients who are able to understand and provide informed consent.\n* Patients who have the cognitive ability to complete the PHQ-9 questionnaire.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of diagnosed psychiatric disorders other than depression.\n* Patients who are critically ill or in a life-threatening condition and unable to participate.\n* Patients who are unable to understand the PHQ-9 questionnaire due to language or cognitive barriers.",{"count":74,"type":21},"This observational study aims to estimate the prevalence and severity of depression among patients in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Ward in Baghdad City, Iraq, using a self-administered PHQ-9 questionnaire. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhat is the prevalence of depression among cardiothoracic surgery patients? How is the severity of depression distributed within this group? Are there specific environmental or demographic factors associated with higher levels of depression?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nFill out the PHQ-9 in order to measure the severity of depressive symptoms at a specific moment in time.\n\nDemographic and clinical variables such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, surgery type, comorbidities, and hospital stay length should be taken to look for a possible relationship with depression.",[298],"Depression",[138],{"date":301,"type":35},"2025-03-18",{"date":61,"type":21},{"date":304,"type":21},"2025-06-12",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":307,"slug":308,"hasResults":11,"nctId":309,"briefTitle":310,"officialTitle":311,"acronym":312,"eligibilityCriteria":313,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":314,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":316,"conditions":317,"keywords":318,"overallStatus":280,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":319,"startDateStruct":320,"completionDateStruct":321,"leadSponsor":323,"locationsCount":43},"100572398","evaluating-the-new-trauma-score-nts-for-improved-mortality-prediction-100572398","NCT06732752","Evaluating the New Trauma Score (NTS) for Improved Mortality Prediction","Prospective Validation of the New Trauma Score (NTS) for Superior Prediction of Mortality Compared to the Revised Trauma Score","NTS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All trauma patients (including blunt, penetrating, and traumatic brain injury) admitted to the emergency department.\n* Patients presenting with varying degrees of trauma (mild to severe).\n* Patients (or their legal representatives) who provide informed consent to participate in the study.\n* Trauma patients admitted to the emergency department.\n* Patients who are assessed using both the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and the New Trauma Score (NTS) upon admission to the emergency department.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 years old.\n* Pregnant women, due to the potential complications and challenges in trauma assessment.\n* Patients who refuse to give consent to participate in the study or whose legal guardians refuse on their behalf.\n* Trauma patients transferred from other hospitals.\n* Patients with incomplete medical records or missing key data required for trauma score calculation.",{"count":315,"type":21},177,"The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the New Trauma Score (NTS), a modification of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), in determining mortality outcomes among trauma patients admitted to the emergency department at Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital, Iraq.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the NTS provide a more accurate prediction of mortality than the RTS? Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where the NTS demonstrates superior predictive utility compared to the RTS?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using both the NTS and RTS upon admission to the emergency department.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including mortality, tracked throughout their hospital stay.",[30],[79],{"date":301,"type":35},{"date":232,"type":21},{"date":322,"type":21},"2025-06-20",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":325,"slug":326,"hasResults":11,"nctId":327,"briefTitle":328,"officialTitle":329,"acronym":330,"eligibilityCriteria":331,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":332,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":333,"conditions":334,"keywords":337,"overallStatus":280,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":339,"startDateStruct":340,"completionDateStruct":341,"leadSponsor":343,"locationsCount":43},"100572396","padua-prediction-score-for-vte-risk-in-thoracic-surgery-patients-100572396","NCT06732726","Padua Prediction Score for VTE Risk in Thoracic Surgery Patients","Assessment of the Padua Prediction Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in Thoracic Surgery Patients: Insights From a Single-Center Cohort Study in Iraq","DVT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who have undergone preoperative Padua Prediction Score assessment.\n* Inpatients with a hospital stay over 3 days\n* Written informed consent obtained from patients or their legal guardians.\n* Availability for postoperative follow-up to assess outcomes like LEVT development or related complications.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Preexisting LEVT or pulmonary embolism.\n* Severe Coagulopathy: Patients with inherited or acquired bleeding disorders (e.g., hemophilia, advanced liver disease).\n* receiving any anticoagulation therapy for any reason.\n* patients who did not undergo a postoperative D-dimer test.\n* Incomplete Data: missing essential clinical or laboratory data.\n* Pregnancy: pregnant women or those within six weeks postpartum.\n* Noncompliance: Patients unwilling or unable to adhere to study follow-up protocols.",{"count":95,"type":21},"The goal of this observational study is to assess the predictive accuracy of the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in thoracic surgery patients.\n\nThe study aims to answer the following question:\n\nDoes the PPS provide a more accurate prediction of VTE risk?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nHave their VTE risk assessed using the PPS during their hospital admission.",[335,336],"DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis","VTE (Venous Thromboembolism)",[338],"Padua Prediction Score (PPS)",{"date":301,"type":35},{"date":61,"type":21},{"date":342,"type":21},"2025-07-15",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":345,"slug":346,"hasResults":11,"nctId":347,"briefTitle":348,"officialTitle":349,"acronym":330,"eligibilityCriteria":350,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":351,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":353,"conditions":354,"keywords":355,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":358,"startDateStruct":359,"completionDateStruct":360,"leadSponsor":362,"locationsCount":43},"100572111","predictive-value-of-modified-caprini-score-and-d-dimer-in-managing-lower-limb-venous-thrombosis-in-cardiothoracic-patients-100572111","NCT06729021","Predictive Value of Modified Caprini Score and D-Dimer in Managing Lower Limb Venous Thrombosis in Cardiothoracic Patients","Predictive Efficacy of Modified Caprini Score and D-Dimer for the Evaluation and Management of Lower Extremity Venous Thrombosis Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients in Baghdad","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inpatients with a hospital stay over 3 days\n* Written informed consent obtained from patients or their legal guardians.\n* Availability for postoperative follow-up to assess outcomes like LEVT development or related complications.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Preexisting LEVT or Pulmonary Embolism: Diagnosed before the index surgery.\n* Severe Coagulopathy: Patients with inherited or acquired bleeding disorders (e.g., hemophilia, advanced liver disease).\n* receiving any anticoagulation therapy for any reason.\n* patients who did not undergo a postoperative D-dimer test.\n* Incomplete Data: missing essential clinical or laboratory data for Modified Caprini Score calculation or D-Dimer measurement.\n* Pregnancy: pregnant women or those within six weeks postpartum.\n* Noncompliance: Patients unwilling or unable to adhere to study follow-up protocols.",{"count":352,"type":21},112,"The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the Modified Caprini Risk Assessment Score and D-Dimer in identifying and managing lower extremity venous thrombosis (LEVT) among cardiothoracic surgery patients in Baghdad. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes combining the Modified Caprini Score with D-Dimer improve the accuracy of predicting lower extremity venous thrombosis (LEVT) compared to using each tool independently? Can these tools effectively guide clinical decisions for lower extremity venous thrombosis (LEVT) prevention and management in this patient population?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUndergo risk assessment for lower extremity venous thrombosis (LEVT) using the Modified Caprini Score and have their D-Dimer levels measured during their hospital stay.\n\nBe monitored for clinical outcomes, including confirmed lower extremity venous thrombosis (LEVT) incidence, need for anticoagulation therapy, and complications such as pulmonary embolism or recurrent thrombosis.",[335],[356,357,330],"Caprini Score","D-Dimer",{"date":301,"type":35},{"date":83,"type":35},{"date":361,"type":21},"2025-07-30",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":364,"slug":365,"hasResults":11,"nctId":366,"briefTitle":367,"officialTitle":368,"acronym":369,"eligibilityCriteria":370,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":371,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":372,"conditions":373,"keywords":375,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":376,"startDateStruct":377,"completionDateStruct":378,"leadSponsor":379,"locationsCount":43},"100572986","prevalence-and-severity-of-depression-in-coronary-artery-disease-patients-100572986","NCT06740396","Prevalence and Severity of Depression in Coronary Artery Disease Patients","Assessing the Prevalence and Severity of Depression Among Coronary Artery Diseases Patients in Baghdad Using the PHQ-9: A Cross-Sectional Study","PAD-CAD","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosed with coronary artery disease (confirmed through clinical, imaging, or procedural evidence).\n* Receiving care at designated hospitals in Baghdad.\n* Able to understand and complete the PHQ-9 questionnaire independently or with minimal assistance.\n* Consents to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of severe psychiatric disorders unrelated to depression (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder).\n* Patients with cognitive impairments or neurological conditions affecting their ability to complete the questionnaire.\n* Those currently hospitalized for acute cardiac events (e.g., myocardial infarction) requiring intensive care.\n* Individuals unwilling to provide informed consent.",{"count":74,"type":21},"This observational study aims to estimate the prevalence and severity of depression among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in Baghdad, Iraq, using the self-administered PHQ-9 questionnaire. The study seeks to answer the following questions:\n\nWhat is the prevalence of depression among CAD patients? How is the severity of depression distributed within this group? Are specific demographic, clinical, or environmental factors associated with higher levels of depression?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nComplete the PHQ-9 to assess the severity of depressive symptoms at a specific point in time.\n\nProvide demographic and clinical information, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and CAD-related factors such as type of intervention and duration of illness, to explore potential correlations with depression.",[374],"Depression - Major Depressive Disorder",[138],{"date":301,"type":35},{"date":191,"type":35},{"date":211,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":381,"slug":382,"hasResults":11,"nctId":383,"briefTitle":384,"officialTitle":385,"acronym":386,"eligibilityCriteria":387,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":388,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":390,"conditions":391,"keywords":392,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":281,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":394,"startDateStruct":395,"completionDateStruct":397,"leadSponsor":398,"locationsCount":43},"100570748","accuracy-of-the-new-injury-severity-score-in-evaluating-patients-with-blunt-trauma-100570748","NCT06711276","Accuracy of the New Injury Severity Score in Evaluating Patients With Blunt Trauma","A Prospective Evaluation of the New Injury Severity Score's Accuracy in Blunt Trauma Patients","NISS\u002FER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Trauma patients admitted to the emergency department, presenting with blunt trauma, such as from motor vehicle accidents, falls, or assaults.\n* Patients with adequate documentation of anatomical injuries and physiological parameters required for NISS calculation.\n* Injury assessment and NISS calculation completed within the first 6 hours of arrival to ensure accuracy and consistency in trauma evaluation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 years, pregnant women, or those with pre-existing medical conditions that may alter trauma scoring accuracy or management outcomes.\n* Patients presenting with medical emergencies, terminal illnesses, or conditions unrelated to blunt trauma to ensure focus on trauma-specific evaluations.\n* Patients declared dead on arrival or who do not receive active treatment in the emergency department.\n* Patients or their families refusing participation or withdrawing consent at any stage of the study.\n* Patients transferred from or to another facility or those previously treated elsewhere, as this may affect data collection and scoring reliability.",{"count":389,"type":21},210,"The goal of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the predictive utility of the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in determining mortality outcomes among blunt trauma patients admitted to the Emergency Department of Kadhimiya Educational Hospital, Iraq.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nHow accurately does NISS predict mortality in blunt trauma patients? What is the performance of NISS in predicting secondary outcomes, such as the need for intensive care and length of hospital stay?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe assessed using the NISS score upon their admission to the emergency department.\n\nHave their clinical outcomes, including mortality, need for intensive care, and hospital stay, monitored throughout their hospitalization.",[30],[208,30,100,393],"Death",{"date":301,"type":35},{"date":396,"type":35},"2025-01-10",{"date":342,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},""]