[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":261},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,52,81,107,137,165,191,218,237],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":40,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":41,"startDateStruct":44,"completionDateStruct":46,"leadSponsor":48,"locationsCount":51},"100641523","timing-of-serratus-anterior-plane-block-in-mastectomy-surgery-100641523",false,"NCT07661212","Timing of Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Mastectomy Surgery","The Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block Timing on Postoperative Quality of Recovery, Postoperative Pain, and Inflammatory Response in Elective Unilateral Mastectomy Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Female patients aged 18 years or older\n* Scheduled for elective unilateral mastectomy surgery\n* Planned to undergo surgery under general anesthesia\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III\n* Willing and able to participate in the study\n* Provision of written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Refusal to participate in the study\n* Known allergy to local anesthetics planned for use in the study\n* Chronic opioid use\n* Current steroid or immunosuppressive therapy\n* Presence of chronic inflammatory disease\n* Surgical duration shorter than 30 minutes\n* Active infection\n* Coagulopathy\n* Infection at the planned block site\n* Pregnancy or lactation\n* Advanced hepatic failure or advanced renal failure\n* Reoperation due to recurrent disease\n* Inability to communicate adequately or to provide reliable pain scores\n* Psychiatric or neurological condition limiting reliable completion of the QoR-15 questionnaire or Numeric Rating Scale assessments","FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},80,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Postoperative pain following mastectomy may adversely affect early mobilization, patient comfort, and overall quality of recovery. Serratus anterior plane block is an ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique that provides analgesia to the anterolateral thoracic wall and is increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia for breast surgery. Although the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block has been investigated in breast surgery, the clinical impact of the timing of block administration remains insufficiently defined.\n\nThis prospective, randomized, controlled, patient and assessor blinded clinical trial will compare two different timings of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block in adult female patients undergoing elective unilateral mastectomy under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomized to receive serratus anterior plane block either after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision, or after completion of surgery and before extubation. In both groups, the block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.\n\nThe primary outcome is postoperative quality of recovery at 24 hours, assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at predefined time points during the first 24 postoperative hours, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative opioid and non-opioid analgesic requirements, time to first analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, complications, inflammatory response markers including CRP and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and intraoperative hemodynamic variables.\n\nThe study is planned to enroll 80 participants at a single tertiary training and research hospital. The findings are expected to clarify whether preincisional administration of serratus anterior plane block provides superior postoperative recovery, analgesic efficacy, and modulation of inflammatory response compared with administration at the end of surgery.",[26,27,28,29],"Quality of Recovery After Mastectomy","Serratus Anterior Plane Block","Postoperative Pain","Mastectomy",[27,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"Regional Anesthesia","Pain Management","Bupivacaine","Quality of Recovery","CRP","Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio","Inflammation","Breast Surgery","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-18",{"date":42,"type":43},"2026-06-22","ACTUAL",{"date":45,"type":20},"2026-09-01",{"date":47,"type":20},"2027-10-01",{"name":49,"class":50},"Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":53,"slug":54,"hasResults":11,"nctId":55,"briefTitle":56,"officialTitle":57,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":58,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":59,"minAge":17,"maxAge":60,"enrollmentInfo":61,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":62,"briefSummary":63,"conditions":64,"keywords":69,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":73,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":74,"startDateStruct":76,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":4},"100643045","opioid-free-versus-opioid-based-sedation-for-endoscopic-procedures-100643045","NCT07649746","Opioid-Free Versus Opioid-Based Sedation for Endoscopic Procedures","Evaluation of an Opioid-Free Approach in Sedation Method Selection in Endoscopy Units: A Prospective Randomized Observational Double-Blind Comparison of Dexmedetomidine (Opioid-Free) and Remifentanil-Dexmedetomidine (Opioid-Based) Combination","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 to 85 years\n* ASA physical status I-III\n* Scheduled for ERCP, gastroscopy, or colonoscopy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Refusal to participate in the study\n* Inability to communicate\n* Alcohol or substance abuse\n* Neuropsychiatric disease\n* Severe respiratory failure\n* Severe heart failure\n* Pregnancy\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\>30 kg\u002Fm²\n* Hearing impairment\n* History of allergy to study medications\n* Requirement for orotracheal intubation or general anesthesia\n* Procedures lasting less than 20 minutes","ALL","85 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},[23],"This study will compare two different sedation approaches used during gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). One group will receive dexmedetomidine alone (opioid-free sedation), while the other group will receive dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil (opioid-based sedation).\n\nThe purpose of the study is to determine whether an opioid-free sedation approach can reduce opioid-related adverse symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, headache, and fatigue. The study will also evaluate quality of recovery, patient and healthcare staff satisfaction, hemodynamic effects, complications, and time to discharge after the procedure.",[65,66,67,68],"Sedation","Endoscopy","Colonoscopy","Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)",[70,71,72,65,66],"Dexmedetomidine","Opioid-Free Sedation","Remifentanil","2026-06-10",{"date":75,"type":43},"2026-06-16",{"date":77,"type":20},"2026-06",{"date":79,"type":20},"2028-02",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":82,"slug":83,"hasResults":11,"nctId":84,"briefTitle":85,"officialTitle":86,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":87,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":59,"minAge":17,"maxAge":88,"enrollmentInfo":89,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":91,"phases":4,"briefSummary":92,"conditions":93,"keywords":95,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":101,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":102,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":104,"leadSponsor":106,"locationsCount":51},"100642596","esp-block-vs-exora-block-for-postoperative-pain-in-nephrectomy-100642596","NCT07640282","ESP Block vs. EXORA Block for Postoperative Pain in Nephrectomy","Prospective Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of ESP Block and EXORA Block in Nephrectomy Cases","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 80 years\n* Patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy\n* Patients for whom Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block or External Oblique Rectus Abdominis (EXORA) block has been selected by the treating clinician\n* ASA physical status I-III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* No regional block performed in routine clinical practice\n* Body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg\u002Fm²\n* History of opioid dependence\n* Alcohol or other substance dependence\n* Psychiatric disease, mental retardation, dementia, or any condition impairing pain perception or pain assessment","80 Years",{"count":90,"type":20},84,"OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effects of two pain control techniques used after laparoscopic nephrectomy (kidney removal surgery) in adults. The study will compare Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block and External Oblique Rectus Abdominis (EXORA) block, which are both used as part of routine medical care to help control pain after surgery.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDo ESP block and EXORA block differ in how well they control pain after surgery? Do ESP block and EXORA block differ in their effects on recovery quality and the need for additional pain medication?\n\nResearchers will compare participants who receive ESP block with participants who receive EXORA block as part of routine clinical care.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUndergo laparoscopic nephrectomy according to routine clinical practice. Receive either ESP block or EXORA block based on the treating anesthesiologist's usual clinical preference.\n\nComplete a recovery questionnaire before surgery and 24 hours after surgery. Have pain scores, use of additional pain medication, nausea and vomiting, and other routine postoperative measurements recorded during the first 24 hours after surgery.",[28,94],"Nephrectomy",[96,97,98,99,34],"Erector Spinae Plane Block","EXORA Block","Laparoscopic Nephrectomy","Postoperative Analgesia","RECRUITING","2026-06-08",{"date":73,"type":43},{"date":77,"type":20},{"date":105,"type":20},"2029-08",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":108,"slug":109,"hasResults":11,"nctId":110,"briefTitle":111,"officialTitle":112,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":113,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":88,"enrollmentInfo":114,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":116,"briefSummary":117,"conditions":118,"keywords":123,"overallStatus":39,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":129,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":130,"startDateStruct":132,"completionDateStruct":134,"leadSponsor":136,"locationsCount":51},"100625649","prehabilitation-in-breast-cancer-surgery-100625649","NCT07425379","Prehabilitation in Breast Cancer Surgery","Prehabilitation in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Shoulder Function, Pain, Quality of Life and Lymphedema Development","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nWomen aged 18-80\n\nStage I-III invasive breast cancer\n\nScheduled for surgery\n\n≥3 weeks before surgery\n\nNo neoadjuvant therapy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nExercise contraindication\n\nActive shoulder pathology\n\nSevere cardiopulmonary disease\n\nPlanned neoadjuvant therapy",{"count":115,"type":20},54,[23],"This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of a home-based upper extremity-focused prehabilitation program in women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either prehabilitation or usual care. Primary outcomes include shoulder range of motion and upper extremity function (DASH score). Secondary outcomes include grip strength, pain, fatigue, disability, anxiety\u002Fdepression, and lymphedema incidence up to 2 years postoperatively.",[119,120,121,122],"Breast Cancer (Early Breast Cancer)","Postoperative Shoulder Dysfunction","Lymphedema Arm","Cancer Rehabilitation",[124,125,126,127,122,128],"Prehabilitation","Breast Cancer Surgery","Shoulder Range of Motion","Upper Extremity Function","Exercise Therapy","2026-02-23",{"date":131,"type":43},"2026-02-24",{"date":133,"type":20},"2026-03-01",{"date":135,"type":20},"2028-12-01",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":138,"slug":139,"hasResults":11,"nctId":140,"briefTitle":141,"officialTitle":142,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":143,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":59,"minAge":17,"maxAge":144,"enrollmentInfo":145,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":91,"phases":4,"briefSummary":147,"conditions":148,"keywords":151,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":157,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":158,"startDateStruct":160,"completionDateStruct":162,"leadSponsor":164,"locationsCount":51},"100592978","transcranial-doppler-as-a-predictor-of-postoperative-cognitive-dysfunction-following-cardiopulmonary-bypass-100592978","NCT07000461","Transcranial Doppler as a Predictor of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass","Can Transcranial Doppler Predict Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiopulmonary Bypass","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-70\n* Patients scheduled for isolated elective cardiopulmonary bypass surgery\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with carotid stenosis ≥50%\n* Emergency patients or those with a history of reoperation\n* Patients with a history of cerebrovascular events\n* Patients who do not provide consent\n* Patients with temporal window failure\n* Patients with an ejection fraction (EF) \\\u003C40%\n* Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \\\u003C23\n* Patients who require mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours or those who are reintubated","70 Years",{"count":146,"type":20},106,"Neurological dysfunction either transient or permanent is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiopulmonary bypass, and cognitive dysfunction is more frequent in cardiac surgery than in non-cardiac procedures. Variations in cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction are considered key contributing factors. Although pulsatile flow during bypass has shown benefits for renal function and recovery, its effects on postoperative neurological dysfunction and delirium remain unclear due to limited research. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass flow on POCD in adult CABG patients by measuring middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow using transcranial Doppler.",[149,150],"Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction","Delirium, Postoperative",[152,153,154,155,156],"transcranial doppler","delirium","POCD","cerebral perfusion","CABG","2026-02-13",{"date":159,"type":43},"2026-02-17",{"date":161,"type":43},"2025-04-17",{"date":163,"type":20},"2026-04-30",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":166,"slug":167,"hasResults":11,"nctId":168,"briefTitle":169,"officialTitle":170,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":171,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":59,"minAge":17,"maxAge":88,"enrollmentInfo":172,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":174,"briefSummary":175,"conditions":176,"keywords":179,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":183,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":184,"startDateStruct":186,"completionDateStruct":188,"leadSponsor":190,"locationsCount":51},"100619835","automated-intraoperative-lung-recruitment-maneuvers-in-major-laparoscopic-surgery-100619835","NCT07349784","Automated Intraoperative Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in Major Laparoscopic Surgery","Effect of Automated Intraoperative Lung Recruitment Maneuvers on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Major Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 80 years\n* Scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA physical status IV or higher\n* Pregnancy\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\> 40 kg\u002Fm²\n* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), GOLD stage III-IV\n* Advanced heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction \\\u003C35%\n* Previous thoracic surgery\n* Preoperative requirement for supplemental oxygen therapy\n* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent\n* Intraoperative conversion to open surgery\n* Development of significant hemodynamic instability during lung recruitment maneuvers",{"count":173,"type":20},56,[23],"Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative atelectasis due to pneumoperitoneum, Trendelenburg positioning, and prolonged anesthesia duration. Atelectasis developing during surgery may persist into the postoperative period and contribute to postoperative pulmonary complications. Automated lung recruitment maneuvers delivered by modern anesthesia ventilators may offer a standardized method to improve lung aeration and reduce atelectasis. This prospective, randomized, single-center controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of automated intraoperative lung recruitment maneuvers on atelectasis detected by lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing elective major laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Adult patients will be randomized to receive either automated lung recruitment maneuvers or standard mechanical ventilation without recruitment. Lung ultrasonography will be used to assess atelectasis at predefined perioperative time points. The primary outcome is the incidence of atelectasis detected by lung ultrasound, and secondary outcomes include postoperative pulmonary complications, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, and perioperative hemodynamic instability.",[177,178],"Atelectasis","Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs)",[180,181,182],"Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)","Automated Lung Recruitment Maneuvers","Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery","2026-01-19",{"date":185,"type":43},"2026-01-21",{"date":187,"type":43},"2025-12-13",{"date":189,"type":20},"2026-12",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":192,"slug":193,"hasResults":11,"nctId":194,"briefTitle":195,"officialTitle":196,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":197,"healthyVolunteers":198,"sex":59,"minAge":199,"maxAge":200,"enrollmentInfo":201,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":203,"briefSummary":204,"conditions":205,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":210,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":211,"startDateStruct":213,"completionDateStruct":215,"leadSponsor":217,"locationsCount":51},"100620904","inhalational-agents-versus-dexmedetomidine-for-maintenance-of-general-anesthesia-100620904","NCT07363681","Inhalational Agents Versus Dexmedetomidine for Maintenance of General Anesthesia","Beyond Inhalational Agents: Dexmedetomidine for Maintenance of General Anesthesia - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Age ≥ 39 years\n* Classified as ASA physical status II-IV\n* Scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgery (e.g., URS, TUR-B, PCNL, TUR-P)\n* Scheduled for postoperative follow-up in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n* Requirement for conversion to open surgery during the perioperative period\n* Patients who decline to participate in the study\n* Presence of neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g., dementia, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, or history of head trauma)\n* History of alcohol or substance abuse\n* Use of psychoactive medications\n* Inability to communicate adequately for any reason",true,"39 Years","99 Years",{"count":202,"type":20},150,[23],"The climate crisis and environmental pollution are escalating day by day, making the reduction of carbon footprints increasingly important both on an individual and industrial level. Inhalational anesthetic agents are widely used in daily anesthesia practice. However, some of these agents are released into the environment either unchanged or as metabolic by-products. It can take hundreds of years for these substances to be fully eliminated from nature. Therefore, there is a growing interest in identifying alternative anesthetic agents that are fully metabolized, do not produce waste, have a shorter duration of action, and pose less harm to ecosystems.\n\nRecent clinical studies have shown that dexmedetomidine, when administered intraoperatively via infusion without a loading dose and in combination with inhalational agents, provides more stable hemodynamics and results in a shorter postoperative recovery period. Commonly used as a long-term sedative agent in intensive care units, dexmedetomidine has gained popularity in the intraoperative setting due to its stable hemodynamic profile, low incidence of withdrawal symptoms, and faster recovery.\n\nIn this study, it is aimed to demonstrate the potential use of dexmedetomidine-whose pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties are well-known to experienced anesthesiologists-as an alternative to inhalational anesthetic agents for the maintenance of anesthesia, particularly in the geriatric patient population.",[206,207,208,209],"Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy","Transurethral Resection of the Bladder","Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy","Transurethral Resection of the Prostate","2026-01-15",{"date":212,"type":43},"2026-01-23",{"date":214,"type":43},"2024-10-01",{"date":216,"type":20},"2026-03-09",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":219,"slug":220,"hasResults":11,"nctId":221,"briefTitle":222,"officialTitle":222,"acronym":223,"eligibilityCriteria":224,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":59,"minAge":17,"maxAge":88,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":91,"phases":4,"briefSummary":226,"conditions":227,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":229,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":230,"startDateStruct":232,"completionDateStruct":234,"leadSponsor":236,"locationsCount":51},"100585085","does-transcutaneous-phrenic-nerve-stimulation-prevent-diaphragm-atrophy-100585085","NCT06897774","Does Transcutaneous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Prevent Diaphragm Atrophy?","NMES","Inclusion Criteria:Patients on invasive mechanical ventilation for 72 hours or more Patients older than 18 years\n\nExclusion Criteria: Patients under 18 years of age\n\n* Patients with less than 72 hours of mechanical ventilation\n* Pregnancy\n* Patients with a body mass index above 35kg\u002Fm²\n* Neuromuscular disease\n* Refractory epilepsy\n* Patients with pacemakers\n* ARDS\n* Unilateral or bilateral diaphragm paralysis\n* Presence of pneumothorax\n* Patients with large right pleural effusion\n* Tracheostomized patients\n* Patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery",{"count":19,"type":20},"Dear participant Participants's patient, who is participants's first-degree relative, who is connected to a ventilator in the intensive care unit, unconscious and not authorized to give informed consent, has been invited to participate in the study titled 'Does transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation prevent diaphragm atrophy?\n\nIn order to strengthen this muscle and prevent loss of function, investigator provide electrical stimulation between the rib cage and abdomen through the skin with the tens device, causing the muscle to contract and enabling our patient to leave the respirator early.\n\nInvestigator aimed to investigate the protective effect of the tens device on the diaphragm by evaluating the diaphragm muscle with the ultrasonography device during the period when it is connected to the respirator. For this reason, the diaphragm will be contracted by giving electrical stimulation three times a day for 30 minutes with the tens device for 5 days during the period when participants's patient is connected to the respirator, and intermittent diaphragm ultrasound will be evaluated.\n\nParticipants or participants's legal guardian are asked to approve the use of participants's medical records during participants's treatment in the intensive care unit, provided that participants's personal information is kept confidential. Participants will not incur any financial burden by participating in the study and participants will not receive any additional payment.\n\nParticipants are free to leave the study at any time if deemed necessary, and the researcher can terminate the study if deemed necessary. The information obtained within the scope of the research can be used for scientific purposes and can be presented and published provided that the confidentiality record is respected.\n\nI have read (or orally listened to) the text above, which contains the information given to the participants before the research began. I agree to participate in the study as a Volunteer. I consent to the use of my medical information. I also understand that if I do not agree to participate in the study, my treatment will be carried out in full without interruption.\n\nParticipant name and surname:\n\nParticipant's relative's name and surname:\n\nDegree of closeness:\n\nSignature \u002F Date:",[228],"Critical Care, Intensive Care","2025-03-26",{"date":231,"type":43},"2025-03-27",{"date":233,"type":43},"2024-01-22",{"date":235,"type":20},"2025-04-22",{"name":49,"class":50},{"id":238,"slug":239,"hasResults":11,"nctId":240,"briefTitle":241,"officialTitle":242,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":243,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":244,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":91,"phases":4,"briefSummary":246,"conditions":247,"keywords":249,"overallStatus":100,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":253,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":254,"startDateStruct":256,"completionDateStruct":258,"leadSponsor":260,"locationsCount":51},"100563704","alveolar-recruitment-in-obese-patients-in-major-gynaecological-cancer-surgery-100563704","NCT06619626","Alveolar Recruitment in Obese Patients in Major Gynaecological Cancer Surgery","The Effect of Alveolar Recruitment on Perioperative Outcomes in Obese Patients in Major Gynaecological Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with ASAII and III\n* BMI\\>30 kg\u002Fm2 ,\\\u003C40 kg\u002Fm2\n* Patients with an ARISCAT risk score of 26-44\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with an Assessment of Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) risk score \\> 44\n* BMI \\> 40 kg\u002Fm2 patients",{"count":245,"type":20},40,"In this study, the investigators planned to evaluate the effect of alveolar recruitment strategy primarily on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients undergoing lung protective ventilation in major open gynaeco-oncological surgeries. Our other aim was to evaluate perioperative haemodynamics, respiratory mechanics,inpatient length of stay.",[248],"Gynecologic Cancers",[250,251,252],"gynecologic cancer surgery","alveolar recruitment strategy","positive end-expiratory pressure","2024-10-05",{"date":255,"type":43},"2024-10-09",{"date":257,"type":43},"2024-01-01",{"date":259,"type":20},"2024-11-30",{"name":49,"class":50},""]