[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Clinique Générale dAnnecy\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":122},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,46,74,102],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100641911","reverse-total-shoulder-arthroplasty-with-or-without-partial-coracoidectomy-evaluation-of-functional-internal-rotation-100641911",false,"NCT07604714","Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With or Without Partial Coracoidectomy: Evaluation of Functional Internal Rotation","Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With or Without Partial Coracoidectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Functional Internal Rotation","I-CORE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Adults undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), including primary procedures or fracture repair. Indications may include arthropathy due to a rotator cuff tear, primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an irreparable rotator cuff tear, or post-traumatic arthritis.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of coracoid fractures or who have previously undergone surgery involving the coracoid process.\n* Patients undergoing latissimus dorsi transfers\n* Presence of an active infection, inflammatory arthritis, or a tumor affecting the shoulder region.\n* Patients with pre-existing neuromuscular disorders affecting shoulder function\n* Patients who are unwilling or unable to participate in the trial or complete follow-up assessments\n* Patients deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative order, in pretrial detention, or under guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection.\n* Pregnant women, women in labor, or breastfeeding women\n* Patients receiving psychiatric care\n* Patients not enrolled in a social security program","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This project aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the functional outcomes and complications of standard reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with partial coracoidectomy. The study will assess functional internal rotation at 12 months post-surgery, as measured by the ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring Internal Rotation) score.",[27],"Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty",[29,30,31,32],"reverse total shoulder arthroplasty","ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring Internal Rotation)","functional internal rotation","coracoidectomy","RECRUITING","2026-06-16",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-06-17","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-06-01",{"date":41,"type":21},"2030-04-01",{"name":43,"class":44},"Clinique Générale dAnnecy","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":52,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":54,"enrollmentInfo":55,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":57,"briefSummary":58,"conditions":59,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":69,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":45},"100527986","rehabilitation-by-multifactorial-approach-after-a-latarjet-procedure-100527986","NCT06154889","Rehabilitation by Multifactorial Approach After a Latarjet Procedure","Rehabilitation by Multifactorial Approach After a Latarjet Procedure : Prospective Single-center Randomized Study (MATASI-L)","MATASI-L","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Primary or recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder\n2. Indication of abutment according to Latarjet (arthroscopic or open sky)\n3. Age: 18-67 years\n4. Understanding of the French language spoken and written\n5. Written informed consent (in accordance with to ICH-GCP guidelines)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Posterior or multidirectional instability of the shoulder (Beighton score \\>5)\n2. Age \\\u003C18 or \\>67 years.\n3. Patients with additional rotator cuff tear.\n4. Patients with a history of surgery on either shoulder.\n5. Patients with connective tissue disorders (eg Ehler-Danlos).\n6. Patients with (current) anxiety disorders or using anxiolytic medications (eg, antipsychotics) (criterion based on patient record\u002Findications).\n7. Patients with neurological disorders or systemic disease.\n8. Patients with inflammatory disease, rheumatoid arthritis or active malignancy.\n9. Patients previously hospitalized for shoulder pain\n10. Patients with upper tubercle fracture\n11. Patients with motor neurological deficit\n12. Pregnant or breastfeeding patient\n13. Patient protected under protective measure","67 Years",{"count":56,"type":21},52,[24],"Kinesiophobia (fear of physical movement) is common after a previous shoulder dislocation and persists after one year, regardless of the occurrence of a recurrence. This kinesiophobia is associated with a lower level of physical activity and a lower return to sport. Increased kinesiophobia, combined with other psychological factors such as depression and fear of re-injury in patients with shoulder instability, results in poor outcomes after treatment. Given that there is currently no postoperative protocol that takes this psychological component into account, a new rehabilitation protocol focused on reducing kinesiophobia was recently designed as part of an international consensus study based on the method Delphi. This protocol includes a core set of evidence-based interventions aimed at regaining functional stability of the shoulder and reducing fear of recurrent dislocation and kinesiophobia. The goal of this study is to determine if we can reduce kinesiophobia in patients who have undergone stabilization surgery for anterior shoulder instability using this new rehabilitation protocol.",[60],"Dislocation Shoulder",[62,63,64,65],"shoulder instability","kinesiophobia","Latarjet","apprehension","2026-03-31",{"date":68,"type":37},"2026-04-06",{"date":70,"type":37},"2023-11-29",{"date":72,"type":21},"2027-05-30",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":78,"acronym":79,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":81,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":85,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":89,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":95,"startDateStruct":97,"completionDateStruct":99,"leadSponsor":101,"locationsCount":45},"100575424","biceps-tenodesis-with-360-suture-anchor-versus-self-locking-tenodesis-in-the-absence-of-rotator-cuff-tears-100575424","NCT06772103","Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears","Blast2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Tendinopathy of the Long Head of the Biceps based on clinical symptoms or SLAP-type lesion\n* Partial thickness rupture or absence of rupture of the rotator cuff of the subscapular, supraspinatus and\u002For infraspinatus tendons, diagnosed preoperatively on ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, defined by narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space or osteophytes, using AP radiography of the affected shoulder.\n* Distance between acromion and humeral head measuring 6 mm or less\n* Previous shoulder surgery.\n* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments.\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Protected adult patient\n* Patient not covered by social security.","40 Years","80 Years",{"count":84,"type":21},100,[24],"This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double-loop 360 lasso biceps tenodesis for the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) during shoulder arthroscopy in patients without arthroscopic rotator cuff tears. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. However, these studies were carried out on patients with rotator cuff tears, and so it has not been possible to directly compare the two procedures. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis in patients without rotator cuff tears. Given its potential advantages, autobloc biceps tenodesis could become the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with long biceps tendon pathology.",[88],"SLAP Lesion",[90,91,92,93],"biceps","tenodesis","imaging","tendon repair","2025-02-11",{"date":96,"type":37},"2025-02-12",{"date":98,"type":37},"2025-01-22",{"date":100,"type":21},"2028-02-28",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":106,"acronym":107,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":81,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":109,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":110,"briefSummary":111,"conditions":112,"keywords":114,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":117,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":119,"leadSponsor":121,"locationsCount":45},"100575633","self-locking-tenodesis-of-the-long-chief-of-the-biceps-vs-lasso-360-tenodesis-in-arthroscopic-rotator-cuff-repair-rotator-cuff-repair-100575633","NCT06774820","Self-locking Tenodesis of the Long Chief of the Biceps Vs. Lasso 360 Tenodesis in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rotator Cuff Repair","BLAST1","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus\u002Finfraspinatus tendon, diagnosed preoperatively by ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI.\n* Patients must be able to read and write in French in order to complete the questionnaires and sign the informed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Partial rotator cuff tear\n* Massive and irreparable rotator cuff tear\n* Grade 4 according to Goutallier classification of fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles\n* Rupture of the long biceps\n* Hourglass deformity of biceps tendon origin\n* Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, defined by narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space or osteophytes, using AP radiography of the affected shoulder.\n* Distance between acromion and humeral head measuring 6 mm or less, defined by Hamada classification as grade 2 or higher.\n* Previous shoulder surgery.\n* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments.\n* Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patients.\n* Persons under legal protection (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice).\n* Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative measure\n* Persons under psychiatric care\n* Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme",{"count":84,"type":21},[24],"The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double 360 lasso loop biceps tenodesis for the treatment of long chief of biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tendon pathology during shoulder arthroscopy in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis. Given its potential advantages, self-locking biceps tenodesis could emerge as the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons to choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients suffering from long biceps tendon pathology.",[113],"Rotator Cuff Injury",[115,90,116],"rotator cuff","long biceps tendon",{"date":96,"type":37},{"date":98,"type":37},{"date":120,"type":21},"2028-01-15",{"name":43,"class":44},""]