[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":196},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,8,0,[8,45,72,95,118,138,159,179],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100632975","does-capsuloplasty-reduce-external-rotation-after-coracoid-impingement-100632975",false,"NCT07520669","Does Capsuloplasty Reduce External Rotation After Coracoid Impingement?","Does Capsuloplasty Reduce External Rotation After Coracoid Impingement? A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Standard indications for surgery (glenoid bone loss, advanced Hill-Sachs lesion, failed Bankart repair, contact sports, etc.).\n* Shoulder not previously operated on\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Significant associated rotator cuff pathology, associated SLAP lesion\n* Advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.\n* Recurrent impingement, history of shoulder surgery\n* Presence of severe external rotation deficit of the shoulder prior to surgery","ALL","18 Years","50 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},104,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The coracoid anchor (Latarjet procedure) is the gold standard technique for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Despite excellent postoperative stability, a reduction in external rotation has been reported, which can affect function, glenohumeral kinematics, and return to sports, particularly among athletes in combat and contact sports.\n\nThe combination of an anterior capsuloplasty with the coracoid buttress is performed inconsistently among surgeons, with no consensus; the capsular repair techniques associated with the Latarjet procedure vary widely among teams. Some teams routinely perform capsular repair to enhance stability and reposition the capsule on the glenoid rim, while others consider it non-essential and potentially responsible for further limiting external rotation.\n\nTo date, there are few studies specifically evaluating the impact of capsuloplasty on joint range of motion beyond the end-stop, and the available results remain contradictory. In 2023, the team of Kim et al. suggested that the Latarjet technique without capsular repair resulted in good restoration of laxity and good clinical outcomes, with less early postoperative limitation of external rotation than that observed with the same technique combined with capsular repair. Nevertheless, at 1 year, there was no significant deficit in external rotation between the two groups.\n\nA prospective randomized comparative analysis will determine whether the addition of capsuloplasty significantly alters ranges of motion, given identical surgical and rehabilitation protocols. The results could clarify the indications for this procedure, optimize surgical practices, and improve recommendations for the management of shoulder instability.",[27],"Shoulder Anterior Latarjet Instability",[29,30,31],"instability","dislocation","Latarjet","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-03",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-04-09","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":21},"2026-05-02",{"date":40,"type":21},"2028-12-31",{"name":42,"class":43},"Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac","OTHER",1,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":50,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":54,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":69,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":44},"100562433","prospective-randomized-study-comparing-the-spherika-medacta-and-origin-symbios-prostheses-during-total-knee-replacement-using-the-kinematic-alignment-technique-100562433","NCT06603103","Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the SpheriKA® (MEDACTA) and Origin® (SYMBIOS) Prostheses During Total Knee Replacement Using the Kinematic Alignment Technique","KAOR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with indication for initial total knee replacement\n* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme\n* Patient informed of the study and formally included (informed consent signed) before the first research examination.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with complex osteoarthritis (e.g. bone loss, history of patellar instability)\n* Patient with contralateral knee prosthesis\n* Patient with symptomatic osteoarthritis (stiffness and\u002For pain) of a hip or contralateral knee\n* Patient with another condition (acquired pathology) of the lower limbs and\u002For nervous system that may significantly affect gait quality\n* Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision,\n* Patient of legal age under legal protection or unable to express consent.",{"count":53,"type":21},120,[24],"The traditional technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as mechanical alignment, does not aim to preserve the original anatomy and laxity of the knee. Instead, the implants are \"systematically\" aligned to create a non-naturally straight lower limb. Respectively 20% and 50% of patients with a mechanically aligned total knee prosthesis are dissatisfied with the result, and complain of residual symptoms. A newer, more physiological technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as kinematic alignment, aims to recreate the unique native anatomy and laxity of each patient\\'s knee. The kinematic alignment technique has been shown to reduce the risk of residual symptoms and thus improve the patient\\'s experience of his or her prosthetic knee. As a result of the emergence of the kinematic alignment technique, two manufacturers have developed total knee prosthesis implants specifically for this new insertion technique. A \"made-to-measure\" total knee prosthesis (ORIGIN® - Symbios, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland) was developed with the aim of reproducing the unique contour of each implanted knee. Another manufacturer opted to develop a generic total knee prosthesis implant (SPHERIKA® - Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland), but with a design optimized for the kinematic alignment technique. These two models of total knee prosthesis each offer advantages and limitations that need to be assessed. The main aim of this study is therefore to compare the joint perception of these 2 prostheses. It will also look at the clinical and imaging results, the biomechanics of the prosthetic knee during gait, and the muscular strength of knee extension, obtained for these 2 total knee prostheses.",[57],"Knee Osteoarthritis",[59,60,61,62],"Total knee arthroplasty","kinematic alignment","joint perception","biomechanics","RECRUITING","2026-03-31",{"date":66,"type":36},"2026-04-01",{"date":68,"type":36},"2024-10-03",{"date":70,"type":21},"2028-04-30",{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":73,"slug":74,"hasResults":11,"nctId":75,"briefTitle":76,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":77,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":78,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":80,"briefSummary":81,"conditions":82,"keywords":84,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":88,"startDateStruct":90,"completionDateStruct":92,"leadSponsor":94,"locationsCount":44},"100546498","does-performing-a-composite-test-3-months-post-operatively-reduce-the-risk-of-failure-to-return-to-sport-after-lateral-ankle-ligamentoplasty-100546498","NCT06395714","Does Performing a Composite Test 3 Months Post-operatively Reduce the Risk of Failure to Return to Sport After Lateral Ankle Ligamentoplasty?","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with objective chronic ankle instability who has failed medical treatment and undergone lateral ankle ligament repair surgery\n* Patient practicing a sporting activity at least 2 times a week\n* Patient able to read, write and understand French\n* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Minor or over 50 years of age\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Patient under guardianship, deprived of liberty or under court protection\n* Refusal to participate in research\n* Patient unable to understand or give informed consent\n* Patient having undergone associated surgical procedures modifying the postoperative course\n* Patient having undergone revision surgery",{"count":79,"type":21},116,[24],"Ankle sprain is one of the most common pathologies in the general population (between 2.1 and 3.2 per 1000 patients per year). Nearly 40% of patients will develop chronic instability in the year following the sprain. We also know that a premature return to sport is a risk factor for developing chronic instability. However, despite the consensus of experts on the subject which have shown the key physiological elements to evaluate before resuming sport, no test or cohort of tests are proposed to allow a safe return to sport by reducing the risks of relapse. Some very recent studies have appeared on non-operated subjects but this remains a subject that is still too little studied, where the lack of consensus and objective criteria increases the risk of instability. Surgical treatment remains an effective option to reduce the risk of recurrence but failure of the latter can occur in approximately 13-37% of patients depending on the population, due to a relapse or a return to sport which does not correspond to expectations. of the patient.\n\nThe objective of the study is therefore to evaluate the predictive nature of a composite test (ANKLE-GO) regarding the return to sport at the same level and the risks of recurrence.",[83],"Ankle Injuries",[85,86,87],"ligamentoplasty","ankle-go test","sport return",{"date":89,"type":36},"2026-04-06",{"date":91,"type":36},"2024-05-17",{"date":93,"type":21},"2027-12-31",{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":96,"slug":97,"hasResults":11,"nctId":98,"briefTitle":99,"officialTitle":100,"acronym":101,"eligibilityCriteria":102,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":103,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":104,"briefSummary":105,"conditions":106,"keywords":108,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":112,"startDateStruct":113,"completionDateStruct":115,"leadSponsor":117,"locationsCount":44},"100528275","mechanically-or-kinematically-aligned-total-knee-prosthesis-100528275","NCT06158646","Mechanically or Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Prosthesis","Mechanically or Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Prosthesis: Prospective and Comparative Study of Clinical, Stereoradiographic, and Biomechanical Results","BIOMAKA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient followed as part of a consultation 1 year after TKA placement\n* Adult patient\n* Patient affiliated to a social security system\n* Patient informed of the study and formally included (signing of informed consent) before the first research review\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with a contralateral knee prosthesis\n* Patient with another condition (acquired pathology) of the lower limbs (e.g. severe osteoarthritis of the contralateral knee or hip\u002Fankle) and\u002For of the nervous system (e.g. Parkinson's) which may significantly affect the quality of walking\n* Pregnant patient\n* Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision,\n* Adult patient subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express consent",{"count":53,"type":21},[24],"The mechanical alignment technique (Mechanical Alignment - MA) of a total knee prosthesis (TKA) was developed with the aim of making the installation of a TKA simple and reproducible, and that the prosthetic biomechanics are acceptable, thus promoting good longevity of implants. This is a technique that does not aim to restore the constitutional anatomy of the knee; bone cuts are systematically made at fixed angles, in the 3 planes of space, in relation to the mechanical axes of the long bones (femur and tibia). This non-personalized implantation technique therefore systematically alters the anatomy, laxity and kinematics of the knee, causing up to 50% of residual symptoms after prosthetic implantation and 20% of dissatisfied patients.\n\nIn order to improve the clinical results of TKA, a new, more personalized and physiological technique was developed in 2007, called Kinematic Alignment (KA). This technique aims to restore the pre-arthritic anatomy, unique to each knee. Patients with severe constitutional deformity of the lower limb therefore retain this deformity after kinematic prosthetic replacement. The impact of the alignment technique on the biomechanics of the prosthetic knee remains poorly described. The main objective of this study is therefore to compare knee biomechanics between mechanical TKA and kinematic TKA.",[107],"Osteoarthritis, Knee",[109,110,60,111],"total knee prosthesis","mechanical alignment","biomechanic study",{"date":89,"type":36},{"date":114,"type":36},"2023-10-05",{"date":116,"type":21},"2027-09-30",{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":119,"slug":120,"hasResults":11,"nctId":121,"briefTitle":122,"officialTitle":123,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":124,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":125,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":127,"briefSummary":128,"conditions":129,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":131,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":132,"startDateStruct":134,"completionDateStruct":136,"leadSponsor":137,"locationsCount":44},"100595745","comparison-of-interlaminar-ct-guided-epidural-platelet-rich-plasma-versus-steroid-injection-in-patients-with-lumbar-radicular-pain-100595745","NCT07036445","Comparison of Interlaminar CT Guided Epidural Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injection in Patients With Lumbar Radicular Pain","Comparison of Interlaminar CT Guided Epidural Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Steroid Injection in Patients With Lumbar Radicular Pain : a Prospective Study With Long Term Follow up","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosis of unilateral resistant LRP associated with a herniated disc on MRI images. (Diagnosis of resistance after 6 weeks of appropriate medical treatment).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with infections,\n* Patients who have had previous percutaneous corticosteroid injections,\n* Patients undergoing systemic corticosteroid treatment,\n* Patients with immune deficiencies,\n* Patients who are allergic to the contrast medium used,\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients,\n* Patients with a history of allergies to anesthetics or corticosteroids,\n* Anticoagulant treatment or blood disorders, patients on antiplatelet therapy\n* Taking NSAIDs within two weeks prior to the procedure",{"count":126,"type":21},200,[24],"The treatment of persistent lumbar radicular pain (LRP) using CT-guided epidural steroid injection (ESI) is widely used and associated with rare but serious complications. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which has recently been shown to promote healing and the anti-inflammatory process by delivering growth factors and cytokines, could be an alternative and potentially safer option. A previous study showed that PRP was as effective as ESI in treating this condition, without major complications.\n\nThis study aims to compare these two treatments over the long term (2 years).",[130],"Herniated Disc","2025-09-12",{"date":133,"type":36},"2025-09-18",{"date":135,"type":36},"2025-09-11",{"date":40,"type":21},{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":139,"slug":140,"hasResults":11,"nctId":141,"briefTitle":142,"officialTitle":142,"acronym":143,"eligibilityCriteria":144,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":145,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":147,"briefSummary":148,"conditions":149,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":151,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":152,"startDateStruct":154,"completionDateStruct":156,"leadSponsor":158,"locationsCount":44},"100588155","analysis-of-biomechanical-parameters-and-return-to-sport-after-hip-arthroscopy-100588155","NCT06937710","Analysis of Biomechanical Parameters and Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy","ATH","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hip arthroscopy for labrum lesion\n* athlete prior to arthroscopy with desire to return to sport\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous surgery or pathology of the operated lower limb\n* Contralateral hip operated\n* Neurological pathology affecting movement\n* Medical condition contraindicating participation in sports\n* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Patient under protective supervision\n* Patient not covered by a social security scheme",{"count":146,"type":21},50,[24],"The aim of this prospective study is to describe dynamic movement parameters in active patients who underwent surgery between 3 and 6 months after hip arthroscopy, focusing on movements such as jumping, squatting and acceleration. By examining the relationships between these different parameters and the return to sporting activities, and by integrating different angle and alignment measurements per- and post-operatively, we hope to find predictive factors for successive rehabilitation in athletes, which could lead to more personalized rehabilitation protocols.",[150],"Hip Arthroscopy","2025-06-10",{"date":153,"type":36},"2025-06-11",{"date":155,"type":36},"2025-04-17",{"date":157,"type":21},"2026-07-31",{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":160,"slug":161,"hasResults":11,"nctId":162,"briefTitle":163,"officialTitle":163,"acronym":164,"eligibilityCriteria":165,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":166,"enrollmentInfo":167,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":169,"briefSummary":170,"conditions":171,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":151,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":173,"startDateStruct":174,"completionDateStruct":176,"leadSponsor":178,"locationsCount":44},"100576056","digital-rehabilitation-after-hip-arthroplasty-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100576056","NCT06780319","Digital Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial","Digihip","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Have an email address and a smartphone\n* Patient speaking and writing French\n* Patient covered by a social security scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hip revision surgery, significant comorbidities (Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke) or psychiatric disorders (substance use) that could interfere with rehabilitation\n* Patients with disorders that make it difficult for them to express their feelings\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patients\n* Patient under protective supervision\n* Patient not covered by a social security scheme","80 Years",{"count":168,"type":21},60,[24],"The study aims to compare the effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation versus no physical therapy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in improving patient-reported outcomes and functional recovery. THR is a common surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve function in patients with a variety of hip conditions. Traditional physical therapy is a standard component of the post-operative care pathway for PTH patients, but can be hampered by logistical obstacles. Tele-rehabilitation is emerging as a promising alternative, offering the potential to overcome these barriers and improve access to care. The study uses a prospective monocentric design with two arms and a follow-up time of 6 months. The primary objective is assessed using the Timed up and go Test (TUG), while secondary objectives include patient-reported outcome measures, patient satisfaction, healthcare utilization, and return to physical activity.",[172],"Hip Arthroplasty, Total",{"date":153,"type":36},{"date":175,"type":36},"2025-06-04",{"date":177,"type":21},"2026-10-31",{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":180,"slug":181,"hasResults":11,"nctId":182,"briefTitle":183,"officialTitle":183,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":184,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":185,"enrollmentInfo":186,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":187,"phases":4,"briefSummary":188,"conditions":189,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":151,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":190,"startDateStruct":191,"completionDateStruct":193,"leadSponsor":195,"locationsCount":44},"100577870","analysis-of-biomechanical-parameters-and-return-to-sport-after-total-hip-replacement-100577870","NCT06803914","Analysis of Biomechanical Parameters and Return to Sport After Total Hip Replacement","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient scheduled for total hip replacement surgery\n* Active patient with low to high level of physical activity prior to surgery\n* Informed consent\n* Complete medical file\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Contralateral hip surgery\n* Neurological disorder affecting movement (e.g. Parkinson's disease, stroke)\n* Spinal pathology affecting movement or posture\n* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Patient under protective supervision\n* Patient not covered by a social security scheme","65 Years",{"count":146,"type":21},"OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective study aims to evaluate the dynamic biomechanical parameters of gait in active patients who have undergone total hip replacement (THR), focusing on movements critical for return to sport.",[172],{"date":153,"type":36},{"date":192,"type":36},"2025-01-30",{"date":194,"type":21},"2027-01-31",{"name":42,"class":43},""]