[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":271},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,10,0,[8,46,71,96,119,145,167,199,227,249],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100624472","comparative-assessment-of-oral-premedication-regimens-in-pediatric-ambulatory-surgery-100624472",false,"NCT07410078","Comparative Assessment of Oral Premedication Regimens in Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery","A Comparative Evaluation of Oral Premedication Regimens in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pediatric patients aged 4-12 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II\n* Scheduled for elective ambulatory (day-case) surgery\n* Eligible to receive oral premedication\n* Cognitive ability sufficient to complete behavioral and pain scale assessments\n* Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA physical status III or higher\n* Moderate to severe intellectual disability\n* Moderate to severe autism spectrum disorder\n* Known allergy or contraindication to midazolam, ketamine, or ibuprofen\n* History of sedative or opioid use within the previous 24 hours\n* Complete loss of premedication due to vomiting","ALL","4 Years","12 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},135,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This prospective, three-arm study aims to evaluate the effects of different oral premedication regimens on venipuncture tolerance in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective day-case procedures will receive oral midazolam alone, midazolam combined with ibuprofen, or midazolam combined with ketamine prior to anesthesia induction. The primary outcome is the proportion of children with well-tolerated venipuncture, assessed using standardized behavioral and pain scales. Secondary outcomes include anxiety levels, venipuncture success parameters, time to successful intravenous access, and parent and anesthesiologist satisfaction. In cases of inadequate premedication or failed venipuncture, a predefined rescue inhalational induction protocol will be applied to ensure patient safety. The study aims to identify clinically effective premedication strategies that may improve cooperation and reduce distress during intravenous cannulation in pediatric ambulatory anesthesia.",[27,28],"Pediatric Anesthesia","Premedication",[27,28,30,31,32],"Ambulatory surgery","Venipuncture tolerance","Anxiety","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-03-03",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-03-05","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-02-19",{"date":41,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"name":43,"class":44},"Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":53,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":4,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":60,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":45},"100622514","preoperative-prediction-of-difficult-airway-in-children-100622514","NCT07384611","Preoperative Prediction of Difficult Airway in Children","Prediction of Difficult Airway in Pediatric Patients Using Preoperative Clinical Parameters","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pediatric patients aged 0-12 years\n* Scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia\n* ASA physical status I-III\n* Written informed consent obtained from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients older than 12 years\n* ASA physical status IV or higher\n* Emergency situations that do not allow systematic documentation of the airway management process\n* Presence of a congenital or acquired tracheostomy\n* Surgical procedures planned to be performed using a supraglottic airway without endotracheal intubation\n* Surgical procedures planned to be performed using face mask ventilation without endotracheal intubation\n* Inability to obtain parental or legal guardian consent","1 Day",{"count":55,"type":21},1000,"OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative clinical airway assessment parameters for difficult airway management in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Preoperative clinical measurements and bedside airway tests will be recorded, and their association with intraoperative airway outcomes, including difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation, will be analyzed. Difficult laryngoscopy will be defined as Cormack-Lehane grade III-IV, while secondary outcomes will include difficult intubation, difficult mask ventilation, and airway-related complications. The study seeks to identify clinically applicable predictors and improve preoperative risk stratification for pediatric airway management. The findings may contribute to safer anesthetic practice in children by facilitating early identification of patients at increased airway risk.",[27,59],"Difficult Laryngoscopy",[27,59,61],"Difficult Airway","RECRUITING","2026-02-10",{"date":65,"type":37},"2026-02-11",{"date":67,"type":37},"2026-02-02",{"date":69,"type":21},"2027-05-20",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":72,"slug":73,"hasResults":11,"nctId":74,"briefTitle":75,"officialTitle":76,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":77,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":78,"maxAge":79,"enrollmentInfo":80,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":82,"briefSummary":83,"conditions":84,"keywords":87,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":89,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":90,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":45},"100620217","effect-of-parasternal-plane-block-on-intraoperative-nociception-100620217","NCT07354750","Effect of Parasternal Plane Block on Intraoperative Nociception","Effect of Parasternal Plane Block on Intraoperative Nociception in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 6 months and 7 years\n* Scheduled for elective congenital cardiac surgery\n* Planned median sternotomy\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III\n* Hemodynamically stable preoperative condition\n* Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Emergency surgery or redo sternotomy\n* Age \\\u003C6 months or \\>7 years\n* ASA physical status I or \\>III\n* Severe neurological disorders preventing reliable application of behavioral pain scales\n* Failure to obtain written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian","6 Months","7 Years",{"count":81,"type":21},60,[24],"Effective pain control during pediatric cardiac surgery remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in procedures involving median sternotomy, which is associated with intense nociceptive stimulation. Inadequate intraoperative analgesia may lead to increased opioid requirements, hemodynamic instability, delayed extubation, and prolonged intensive care unit stay. Objective monitoring of nociception may provide valuable information beyond conventional hemodynamic parameters in this vulnerable population.\n\nThis prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided parasternal plane block on intraoperative nociception in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy. Intraoperative nociception will be objectively assessed using the Pain Index Monitor (PAM), based on skin conductance measurements.\n\nThe results of this study are expected to provide objective evidence regarding the efficacy of parasternal plane block in attenuating nociceptive responses during pediatric cardiac surgery and to support the integration of regional anesthesia techniques and objective nociception monitoring into perioperative pain management strategies for children.",[85,86],"Median Sternotomy","Pain Management",[85,88],"Parasternal Plane Block","2026-01-29",{"date":67,"type":37},{"date":92,"type":37},"2026-01-30",{"date":94,"type":21},"2026-08-17",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":97,"slug":98,"hasResults":11,"nctId":99,"briefTitle":100,"officialTitle":101,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":102,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":103,"maxAge":104,"enrollmentInfo":105,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":107,"briefSummary":108,"conditions":109,"keywords":112,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":89,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":114,"startDateStruct":115,"completionDateStruct":116,"leadSponsor":118,"locationsCount":45},"100620382","effect-of-social-stories-on-anesthesia-compliance-in-children-with-autism-100620382","NCT07356895","Effect of Social Stories on Anesthesia Compliance in Children With Autism","The Effect of the Social Stories Technique on Anesthesia Compliance in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures\n* Children aged 3 to 18 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I-II\n* Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian\n* Caregivers willing and able to read the Social Stories materials at home as instructed\n* Caregivers able to understand the Social Stories materials prepared in the Turkish language\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with ASA physical status class III or higher systemic disease\n* Patients requiring emergency surgery\n* Children with severe intellectual disability or significant visual or hearing impairment\n* History of severe behavioral problems during previous general anesthesia\n* Families unable or unwilling to comply with the Social Stories intervention during the study period\n* Inability to obtain written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian\n* Children receiving pharmacological treatment for a comorbid psychiatric disorder","3 Years","18 Years",{"count":106,"type":21},40,[24],"Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) frequently experience heightened anxiety and reduced cooperation during the perioperative period, which can complicate anesthesia induction and negatively affect procedural safety and efficiency. Non-pharmacological behavioral preparation methods that enhance predictability and understanding of medical procedures may improve anesthesia-related cooperation in this vulnerable population. The Social Stories Technique is a structured, visual-based behavioral intervention designed to support children with ASD by explaining upcoming experiences in a clear and developmentally appropriate manner.\n\nThis prospective controlled study aims to evaluate the effect of the Social Stories Technique on anesthesia compliance and preoperative anxiety in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder undergoing elective surgery. Children in the intervention group will receive Social Stories materials to be reviewed with their families prior to surgery, while the control group will receive standard preoperative information only. Primary and secondary outcomes will include anesthesia induction compliance, preoperative anxiety levels. The findings of this study are expected to contribute evidence regarding the effectiveness of a low-risk, non-pharmacological behavioral intervention to improve perioperative care in children with ASD.",[110,111],"Autism Spectrum Disorder","Social Stories",[110,111,113],"Preoperative Anxiety",{"date":67,"type":37},{"date":92,"type":37},{"date":117,"type":21},"2026-08-20",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":120,"slug":121,"hasResults":11,"nctId":122,"briefTitle":123,"officialTitle":124,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":125,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":126,"maxAge":127,"enrollmentInfo":128,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":56,"phases":4,"briefSummary":130,"conditions":131,"keywords":134,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":139,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":142,"leadSponsor":144,"locationsCount":45},"100604326","inflammatory-biomarkers-as-predictors-of-ponv-following-pediatric-orchiopexy-100604326","NCT07148063","Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of PONV Following Pediatric Orchiopexy","Association of Preoperative Inflammatory Biomarkers With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Children Undergoing Orchiopexy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 1 and 8 years\n* Patients with ASA physical status I-II\n* Patients scheduled for elective orchiopexy\n* Obtained written informed consent from parents\u002Fguardians\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 1 year or older than 8 years\n* Patients with ASA physical status III or higher\n* Presence of acute infection signs\n* History of previous nausea or vomiting","1 Year","8 Years",{"count":129,"type":21},170,"Orchiopexy is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of cryptorchidism in the pediatric population, with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).\n\nRecent evidence suggests that systemic inflammation may contribute to PONV pathogenesis, and preoperative inflammatory biomarkers such as NLR, PLR, SII, MLR, and SIRI could serve as predictive indicators.\n\nThis prospective observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between these biomarkers and PONV incidence in children undergoing orchiopexy.",[27,132,133],"Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)","Inflammatory Biomarkers",[135,136,132,137],"Pediatric anesthesia","Orchiopexy","Inflammatory biomarkers","2025-09-08",{"date":140,"type":37},"2025-09-09",{"date":138,"type":37},{"date":143,"type":21},"2026-03-27",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":146,"slug":147,"hasResults":11,"nctId":148,"briefTitle":149,"officialTitle":150,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":151,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":126,"maxAge":127,"enrollmentInfo":152,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":154,"briefSummary":155,"conditions":156,"keywords":158,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":138,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":162,"startDateStruct":163,"completionDateStruct":164,"leadSponsor":166,"locationsCount":45},"100604249","comparison-of-the-postoperative-analgesic-effects-of-rsb-and-ceb-in-pediatric-patients-scheduled-for-percutaneous-internal-ring-suturing-100604249","NCT07147062","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of RSB and CEB in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Rectus Sheath Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Scheduled for Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 1 and 8 years\n* ASA physical status I-II\n* Patients who underwent PIRS surgery in the operating room and received either a rectus sheath block or a caudal epidural block\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 1 year or older than 8 years\n* ASA physical status ≥ III\n* History of bleeding diathesis",{"count":153,"type":21},65,[24],"Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical pathologies in children, and the minimally invasive percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique is widely preferred.\n\nBy providing effective pain control, nerve blocks reduce postoperative opioid requirements, thereby minimising opioid-related adverse effects and lowering the risk of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications.\n\nThis study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of rectus sheath block and caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing PIRS.",[157,86],"Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing",[159,160,161],"Percutaneous internal ring suturing","Rectus sheath block","Caudal epidural block",{"date":140,"type":37},{"date":138,"type":37},{"date":165,"type":21},"2026-02-27",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":168,"slug":169,"hasResults":11,"nctId":170,"briefTitle":171,"officialTitle":172,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":173,"healthyVolunteers":174,"sex":175,"minAge":104,"maxAge":176,"enrollmentInfo":177,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":179,"briefSummary":180,"conditions":181,"keywords":185,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":191,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":192,"startDateStruct":194,"completionDateStruct":196,"leadSponsor":198,"locationsCount":45},"100604868","different-intraperitoneal-pressures-on-optic-nerve-sheath-diameter-in-laparoscopic-surgeries-100604868","NCT07155109","Different Intraperitoneal Pressures on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Laparoscopic Surgeries","The Effects of Different Intraperitoneal Pressures on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Laparoscopic Gyneco-oncologic Surgeries","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Laparoscopic gyneco-oncological surgeries\n* Female patients aged 18-65 years\n* ASA physical status classification I-II-III patients\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with diabetic retinopathy\n* Patients with glaucoma\n* Patients with cerebrovascular disease\n* Pregnant women\n* Patients with known allergy to anaesthetic agents\n* Morbidly obese patients with BMI \\> 40",true,"FEMALE","65 Years",{"count":178,"type":21},100,[24],"The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of low and normal intraperitoneal pressures on intraoperative optic nerve sheath diameter in laparoscopic gyneco-oncologic surgeries.",[182,183,184],"Intracranial Pressure Increase","Abdominal Pain","Head Pain",[186,187,188,189,190],"Intracranial Pressure","optic nerve","laparascopy","gyneco-oncologic surgery","low pressure","2025-08-27",{"date":193,"type":37},"2025-09-04",{"date":195,"type":21},"2025-08-30",{"date":197,"type":21},"2025-10-20",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":200,"slug":201,"hasResults":11,"nctId":202,"briefTitle":203,"officialTitle":204,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":205,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":104,"maxAge":206,"enrollmentInfo":207,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":209,"briefSummary":210,"conditions":211,"keywords":214,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":219,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":220,"startDateStruct":222,"completionDateStruct":224,"leadSponsor":226,"locationsCount":45},"100603559","comparison-of-gastric-volume-in-i-gel-and-proseal-laryngeal-mask-airways-100603559","NCT07138092","Comparison of Gastric Volume in I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airways","Comparison of Gastric Insufflation Volume by Ultrasound Using I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Patients Undergoing Urological Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status score of 1 to 3\n* undergoing urological surgeries performed with I-gel or ProSeal LMA\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Difficult airway\n* Clinically significant upper respiratory tract infection\n* Pre-existing airway disease\n* Pre-existing airway disease\n* History of head and neck surgery\n* Pregnant patients\n* Patients with upper gastrointestinal tract disease","79 Years",{"count":208,"type":21},50,[24],"This study was planned to compare the gastric insufflation volume between i jel and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and its relationship with the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing urological surgery.",[212,213],"Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative","Sore-throat",[215,216,217,218],"Gastric insufflation","Ultrasound","Supraglottic airway devices","Oropharyngeal leak pressure","2025-08-15",{"date":221,"type":37},"2025-08-22",{"date":223,"type":21},"2025-08-18",{"date":225,"type":21},"2025-10-10",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":228,"slug":229,"hasResults":11,"nctId":230,"briefTitle":231,"officialTitle":232,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":233,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":176,"maxAge":234,"enrollmentInfo":235,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":236,"briefSummary":237,"conditions":238,"keywords":240,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":219,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":245,"startDateStruct":246,"completionDateStruct":247,"leadSponsor":248,"locationsCount":45},"100603558","air-q-in-totally-edentulous-and-dentate-geriatric-patients-100603558","NCT07138079","Air-Q in Totally Edentulous and Dentate Geriatric Patients","The Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Self-Pressurizing Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Totally Edentulous and Dentate Geriatric Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 65-90 year-old patients\n* Edentulous and gentate patients\n* American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification I-III,\n* Undergoing an elective operation under general anesthesia in our hospital\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Predicted difficult airway (Mallampati class 4, mouth opening \\\u003C 3 cm, or thyromental distance \\\u003C 6 cm)\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\> 40 kg\u002Fm2\n* Patients with a high risk of aspiration (e.g., history of gastrectomy, -gastroesophageal reflux disease, or hiatal hernia),\n* Unstable vital signs\n* Cervical spine problems, Respiratory complications (e.g. recent pneumonia).","90 Years",{"count":208,"type":21},[24],"In this study, we aim to investigate the clinical performance, efficacy, and associated complications of the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in totally edentulous and dentate geriatric patients.",[239,213],"Postoperative Complications",[241,218,242,243,244],"Air-Q Laryngeal İntubating Airway","supraglottic airways","Edentulous patients","Geriatric patients",{"date":221,"type":37},{"date":223,"type":21},{"date":225,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":250,"slug":251,"hasResults":11,"nctId":252,"briefTitle":253,"officialTitle":254,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":255,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":104,"maxAge":206,"enrollmentInfo":256,"targetDuration":53,"studyType":56,"phases":4,"briefSummary":257,"conditions":258,"keywords":260,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":263,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":264,"startDateStruct":266,"completionDateStruct":268,"leadSponsor":270,"locationsCount":45},"100568464","comparison-of-analgesic-effects-of-tap-block-and-rsb-in-ralps-100568464","NCT06681571","Comparison of Analgesic Effects of TAP Block and RSB in RALPs","Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomies","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-79 who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy\n* Patients have ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status score of 1-3.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with an allergy to local anesthetic agents\n* a platelet count below 100,000\n* INR value above 2",{"count":178,"type":21},"In this research, we aim to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of these two peripheral blocks in patients undergoing RALP who have received preoperative TAP block and RSB block.",[259],"Postoperative Pain",[261,160,262],"transversus abdominis plane block","Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy","2024-11-07",{"date":265,"type":37},"2024-11-08",{"date":267,"type":21},"2024-11-20",{"date":269,"type":21},"2025-01-30",{"name":43,"class":44},""]