[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":110},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,41,64,89],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":22,"conditions":23,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100562616","early-fixation-for-diaphyseal-humeral-shaft-fractures-in-the-elderly-patients-100562616",false,"NCT06605482","Early Fixation for Diaphyseal Humeral Shaft Fractures in the Elderly Patients","Early Fixation for Diaphyseal Humeral Shaft Fractures in the Elderly Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Diaphyseal humeral shaft fracture (as defined as superior border of insertion of pectoralis major proximally, to the distal diaphysis)\n2. Ambulatory (with or without the use of walking aides)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Fractures with intra-articular extension\n2. Ipsilateral upper extremity injury\n3. Patients with vascular injury\n4. Brachial plexus injury\n5. Compartment syndrome\n6. Pathological fractures\n7. Open fractures\n8. Periprosthetic fracture\n9. BMI \\>40\n10. Dementia or cognitive impairment that inhibits the collection of outcome measures\n11. Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, not mentally competent to give consent, intellectually challenged, patients without adequate support, etc.)\n12. Inability to provide informed consent","ALL","65 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},94,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The study purpose is to evaluate whether early surgical fixation of upper arm fractures in elderly patients' age 65 years and older improves patient functional and psychological outcome scores compared to the standard of care with non-operative management.",[24,25],"Humerus Shaft Fracture","Elderly (People Aged 65 or More)",[27],"patient outcomes","RECRUITING","2025-02-26",{"date":31,"type":32},"2025-02-28","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2024-11-07",{"date":36,"type":20},"2027-12-31",{"name":38,"class":39},"Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society","NETWORK",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":47,"eligibilityCriteria":48,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":4,"briefSummary":51,"conditions":52,"keywords":54,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":57,"startDateStruct":59,"completionDateStruct":61,"leadSponsor":63,"locationsCount":40},"100449704","strength-after-elbow-fractures-in-the-elderly-100449704","NCT05135949","Strength After Elbow Fractures in the Elderly","Strength and Function After Non-operative Treatment of Displaced Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly: Implications of Standing UP From a Seat","STAND-UP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. ≥65 years of age\n2. Mayo type II olecranon fracture\n3. Ambulatory (with or without the use of walking aides)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Additional injuries to the affected arm or contralateral arm\n2. Associated nerve injury\n3. Dementia or cognitive impairment that inhibits the collection of outcome measures\n4. Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, not mentally competent to give consent, intellectually challenged, patients without adequate support, etc.)\n5. Injury or previous deficit to the contralateral arm\n6. Currently enrolled in any other research study involving drugs or medical devices\n7. Open fractures\n8. Inability to provide informed consent",{"count":50,"type":20},50,"Elderly patients strength and function, specifically the ability to rise from a seat after either operative or non operative treatment of an mayo type 2 olecranon fracture.",[53],"Fracture;Elbow",[55,56],"Operative","Non Operative",{"date":58,"type":32},"2025-02-27",{"date":60,"type":32},"2021-02-22",{"date":62,"type":20},"2027-07-01",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":65,"slug":66,"hasResults":11,"nctId":67,"briefTitle":68,"officialTitle":69,"acronym":70,"eligibilityCriteria":71,"healthyVolunteers":72,"sex":16,"minAge":73,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":74,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":76,"phases":77,"briefSummary":79,"conditions":80,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":82,"startDateStruct":83,"completionDateStruct":85,"leadSponsor":87,"locationsCount":88},"100447820","study-comparing-sbs-and-lrti-for-treatment-of-cmc-arthritis-100447820","NCT05111405","Study Comparing SBS and LRTI for Treatment of CMC Arthritis","A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Study Comparing Suture Button Suspensionplasty (SBS) with Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition (LRTI)","SBSvsLRTI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age fifty years or older\n* Isolated carpometacarpal (trapeziometacarpal) osteoarthritis\n* Failure to respond to non-operative management\n* Willing and able to consent on their own behalf and follow the protocol and clinical visits as described\n* Able to read and understand English or have interpreter available\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous surgery for CMC arthritis\n* Duration of symptoms for less than 6 months\n* Greater than or equal to 30 degrees of ipsilateral metacarpophalangeal (MCP) hyperextension\n* Scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (stage 4 CMC) arthritis\n* Other significant ipsilateral wrist or hand pathology\n* A history of inflammatory arthropathy\n* A requirement for concomitant surgery for another condition\n* Any previous hand or wrist fracture\n* Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, not mentally competent to give consent, intellectually challenged patients without adequate support, etc.)",true,"50 Years",{"count":75,"type":20},138,"INTERVENTIONAL",[78],"NA","A multi-center, randomized control trial comparing the two standard of care surgical treatments for CMC arthritis ; trapezial excision with or without soft tissue interposition and \u002For ligament reconstruction (LRTI) versus the suture button suspension arthroplasty (SBS). Patient reported outcomes will be collected at 6 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months.",[81],"Arthritis",{"date":31,"type":32},{"date":84,"type":32},"2022-06-20",{"date":86,"type":20},"2026-05",{"name":38,"class":39},2,{"id":90,"slug":91,"hasResults":11,"nctId":92,"briefTitle":93,"officialTitle":94,"acronym":95,"eligibilityCriteria":96,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":97,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":98,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":76,"phases":100,"briefSummary":101,"conditions":102,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":104,"startDateStruct":105,"completionDateStruct":107,"leadSponsor":109,"locationsCount":40},"100427860","static-helical-screw-locking-of-pertrochanteric-femur-fractures-using-the-tfn-a-100427860","NCT04851509","Static Helical Screw Locking of Pertrochanteric Femur Fractures Using the TFN-A","Static Helical Screw Locking of Pertrochanteric Femur Fractures Using the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System - a Randomized Trial","TFN-A","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients \\>18 years of age\n* AO\u002FOTA 31-A fractures who the surgeon deems eligible for treatment with a cephalomedullary nail\n* Open and closed fractures\n* Ambulatory prior to injury (with or without walking aides)\n* Native (non-fractured, no implant) contralateral hip\n* Willing and able to sign consent (substitute decision maker)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Contralateral hip fracture or hip arthroplasty\n* Fracture not amenable to treatment with a cephalomedullary nail\n* Non-ambulatory patient\n* Fractures \\>14 days (time of injury to OR)\n* Bilateral pertrochanteric hip fractures\n* Non-unions\n* Pathologic fractures\n* Periprosthetic fractures\n* Patients with spinal injury\n* Incarceration\n* Pregnancy\n* Limited life expectancy due to significant medical co-morbidities or medical contra-indications to surgery\n* Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e., patients with no fixed address, report a plan to move out of town, or intellectually challenged patients without adequate family support).","18 Years",{"count":99,"type":20},218,[78],"The study will investigate the shortening and collapse of pertrochanteric fractures following surgical management with the TFN-Advanced nailing system. The focus will be on comparing radiographic assessments of nails which have been statically locked versus dynamically locked. This is a randomized control study with the initial invention being randomized to either statically locking or dynamically locking. For a two-month period, all eligible patients will receive the randomized allocated treatment, then treatment will switch to the alternate treatment for the next two months and will continue to alternate treatments for two-month periods until study enrollment has completed.",[103],"Pertrochanteric Fracture",{"date":31,"type":32},{"date":106,"type":32},"2021-05-17",{"date":108,"type":20},"2027-01",{"name":38,"class":39},""]