[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Hams Hamed Abdelrahman\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":176},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,7,0,[8,41,66,89,109,131,152],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100053707","three-dimensional-bone-augmentation-of-severely-atrophied-posterior-mandibular-alveolar-ridges-using-customized-3d-zirconia-barriers-versus-pre-bent-titanium-mesh-100053707",false,"NCT07700095","Three-Dimensional Bone Augmentation of Severely Atrophied Posterior Mandibular Alveolar Ridges Using Customized-3D Zirconia Barriers Versus Pre-bent Titanium Mesh","Assessment of Three-Dimensional Bone Augmentation of Severely Atrophied Posterior Mandibular Alveolar Ridges Using Customized-3D Zirconia Barriers Versus Pre-bent Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients are systemically medically free according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) considered as ASA I.\n* Ability to maintain good oral hygiene as evidenced in recall visits.\n* patients who had a partial or completely edentulous alveolar ridge with apparent 3D defect following teeth loss.\n* All patients were free from any local or general disease that may interfere with bone healing and had no history of previous grafting procedure at the designated edentulous ridge.\n* The ridge had to exhibit severe vertical and horizontal (3D) alveolar ridge deficiency with alveolar ridge height less than 7 mm from the alveolar crest to the inferior alveolar canal and width less than 5 mm which was firstly measured by CBCT, or a clinically apparent increase in inter-arch space relative to the adjacent natural teeth.\n* Pre-operative clinical assessment of soft tissue coverage was done to cover the graft and its membrane, in addition to assessment of occlusion and inter-arch distance should allow for the graft, membrane, implan and the future prosthesis.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Smoker (\\> 25 cigarettes\u002F day).\n* Patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy\n* Patients having infection or local lesions in the area of surgery.\n* Patients with diabetes mellitus or bone diseases which may compromise the results.\n* Patient with poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease.\n* Patient with limited mouth opening.\n* Participation in other clinical trials","ALL","20 Years","50 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},16,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Zirconia can be considered as an alternative and innovative material suitable for GBR because it has high biocompatibility, together with a scarce tissue integration. Zirconia barriers could be a predictable and alternative barrier material for GBR in terms of (i) biocompatibility, (ii) ease of use and removal, (iii) exposure management, (iv) bone regeneration outcomes.",[27],"Mandibular Atrophy","RECRUITING","2026-07-07",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-07-13","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2024-08-03",{"date":36,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"name":38,"class":39},"Hams Hamed Abdelrahman","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":46,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":49,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":52,"briefSummary":53,"conditions":54,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":57,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":58,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":59,"startDateStruct":61,"completionDateStruct":63,"leadSponsor":65,"locationsCount":40},"100599295","immediate-implant-placement-using-the-socket-shield-technique-in-maxillary-esthetic-zone-100599295","NCT07082634","Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone","Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone (Clinical and Radiographic Study)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a non-restorable maxillary tooth in the aesthetic zone indicated for extraction and subsequent immediate implant placement.\n* Patients with extraction socket Type I.\n* A good standard of oral hygiene.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with extraction socket Type II or III, with defect in the buccal plate.\n* Absence of at least 2 mm bone apical to the extraction socket, necessary to obtain adequate primary stability for the implant assessed by pre-operative radiographic evaluation.\n* The presence of any local factor that may interfere with extraction as tooth ankylosis.\n* Patients with deciduous teeth.\n* Patients with bruxism\n* Heavy smokers.\n* Systemic conditions that are considered as a contraindication for placement of implant or those that may interfere with wound healing and immunocompromised conditions and uncontrolled autoimmune diseases.\n* History of oral or intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or any treatments with other medications that may interfere with bone metabolism within the past 12 months.\n* Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotheraphy.\n* Patient with active infection or chronic infection with severe bone loss.","18 Years","40 Years",{"count":51,"type":21},8,[24],"Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone is an approach that helps preserve soft and hard tissue architecture. However, post extraction bone resorption is still a significant challenge. The socket shield technique (SST) has emerged as a promising way for preserving the buccal plate, potentially improving implant stability and reducing radiographic bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the socket shield technique in the maxillary esthetic zone by assessing implant stability, radiographic bone loss as well as esthetic outcome over a specified follow-up period.",[55,56],"Socket Shield Technique","Maxillary Esthetic Zone","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-07-23",{"date":60,"type":32},"2025-07-24",{"date":62,"type":21},"2025-09-01",{"date":64,"type":21},"2026-06-01",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":67,"slug":68,"hasResults":11,"nctId":69,"briefTitle":70,"officialTitle":71,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":72,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":73,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":74,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":76,"briefSummary":77,"conditions":78,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":57,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":81,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":82,"startDateStruct":84,"completionDateStruct":86,"leadSponsor":88,"locationsCount":40},"100596394","hydrodynamic-piezoelectric-technique-in-internal-sinus-lift-100596394","NCT07044882","Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique in Internal Sinus Lift","Evaluation of the Hydrodynamic Piezoelectric Technique in Internal Sinus Lift With Simultaneous Implant Placement (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with edentulous free end or bounded posterior maxilla that require implant supported restoration.\n* Patients indicated to internal sinus lifting, where insufficient residual alveolar bone height from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus is found.\n* Patients with residual alveolar bone height that ranges from 5-7 mm according to the tomographic radiographic examination.\n* A good standard of oral hygiene.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Patients with residual alveolar bone height less than 5 mm according to the tomographic radiographic examination.\n* Patients with residual alveolar bone height more than 8 mm according to the tomographic radiographic examination, which is not indicated to sinus lifting.\n* Patient with active sinus infection or sinus pathology.\n* History of Oral or intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or any treatments with other medications that may interfere with bone metabolism within the past 12 months.\n* Heavy smokers.\n* Medically compromised patients that are burdened with systemic conditions that contradicts implant placement and interfere with wound healing.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\-","30 Years",{"count":75,"type":21},22,[24],"Background: The use of hydrodynamic piezoelectric techniques for trans crestal \u002F internal sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement has gained popularity as a safe and minimally invasive technique for managing the posterior edentulous maxilla, particularly in cases with sinus pneumatization. This method offers a controlled elevation of the Schneiderian membrane while reducing the risk of perforation compared to conventional techniques. Additionally, it minimizes postoperative discomfort and oedema, leading to better acceptance and satisfaction by the patients. In contrast to traditional osteotome tapping procedures, the hydrodynamic piezoelectric technique enhances surgical outcomes while preserving vital anatomical structures, making it a superior alternative in implant dentistry. This study aims to evaluate the use of the hydrodynamic piezoelectric technique in internal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement in comparison to the conventional osteotome technique.",[79,80],"Maxillary Sinus Lift","Osteotome","2025-06-22",{"date":83,"type":32},"2025-07-01",{"date":85,"type":21},"2025-10-01",{"date":87,"type":21},"2026-04-30",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":90,"slug":91,"hasResults":11,"nctId":92,"briefTitle":93,"officialTitle":94,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":95,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":48,"maxAge":49,"enrollmentInfo":96,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":97,"briefSummary":98,"conditions":99,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":57,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":81,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":103,"startDateStruct":104,"completionDateStruct":106,"leadSponsor":108,"locationsCount":40},"100596395","diode-laser-photocoagulation-with-immediate-implant-placement-100596395","NCT07044895","Diode Laser Photocoagulation With Immediate Implant Placement","Evaluation of Diode Laser Photocoagulation With Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic zone are indicated for extraction and subsequent immediate implant placement, including those with:\n* A severely carious tooth that cannot be restored.\n* Pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis that is not amenable to endodontics.\n* Periodontally involved teeth with grade 2 mobility or above.\n* Teeth with root caries that can't be restored.\n* Patients with an extraction socket Type I.\n* A good standard of oral hygiene.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with extraction socket Type II or III, with buccal plate defects.\n* Absence of at least 2 mm of bone apical to the extraction socket\n* tooth ankylosis.\n* Patients with deciduous teeth.\n* Heavy smokers.\n* Systemic conditions\n* History of oral or intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or any treatments with other medications that may interfere with bone metabolism within the past 12 months",{"count":51,"type":21},[24],"Placement of an immediate implant is becoming popular because of its potential in minimizing the treatment time and enhancing the patient comfort and esthetic outcomes. It is crucial to maintain adequate thickness of labial bone with the establishment of a stable and healthy gingival seal around the implant abutment to prevent the invasion of bacteria and peri-implant inflammation. Diode lasers have been developed as a promising tool in dentistry, providing a precise manipulation and photocoagulation effect that may have a positive influence on both bone remodeling and soft tissue healing. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the utilization of diode laser photocoagulation with immediate implant placement and customized healing abutment in the maxillary esthetic zone.",[100,101,102,56],"Tooth Extraction","Immediate Dental Implant","Photocoagulation",{"date":83,"type":32},{"date":105,"type":21},"2025-06-30",{"date":107,"type":21},"2026-02-25",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":115,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":116,"maxAge":117,"enrollmentInfo":118,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":120,"briefSummary":121,"conditions":122,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":130,"locationsCount":40},"100568189","clinical-performance-and-acceptance-of-bioflx-crowns-100568189","NCT06677983","Clinical Performance and Acceptance of Bioflx Crowns","Clinical Performance and Acceptance of Bioflx Crowns: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* A child with primary molars is indicated for full coverage.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with any systemic disease\n* Clinical or radiographic signs\u002Fsymptoms of irreversible pulpitis as abscess, fistula, spontaneous pain, mobility, furcation involvement, internal or external root resorption\n* Children cooperation (1,2) according to Frankl scale\n* Parents are unwilling to enroll their children in study","4 Years","8 Years",{"count":119,"type":21},62,[24],"Treating pediatric patients with early childhood caries can be challenging. For clinicians, managing a young child while ensuring high-quality treatment is difficult. It is essential to have the best equipment and materials available. Today, aesthetics are crucial in managing decayed teeth, with zirconia crowns often preferred for their visual appeal, although they require substantial preparation. The newly developed Bioflx crown, combining stainless steel and zirconia properties, offers an alternative solution.",[123],"Caries","2024-11-05",{"date":126,"type":32},"2024-11-07",{"date":128,"type":32},"2024-02-01",{"date":83,"type":21},{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":132,"slug":133,"hasResults":11,"nctId":134,"briefTitle":135,"officialTitle":136,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":73,"maxAge":138,"enrollmentInfo":139,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":141,"briefSummary":142,"conditions":143,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":145,"startDateStruct":147,"completionDateStruct":149,"leadSponsor":151,"locationsCount":40},"100568123","magnetic-mallet-and-densah-bur-for-crestal-sinus-left-100568123","NCT06677125","Magnetic Mallet and Densah Bur for Crestal Sinus Left","Magnetic Mallet Versus Densah Bur for Crestal Sinus Left With Implant Placement in Maxilla (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient seeking replacement of missing maxillary posterior teeth by dental implant procedure.\n* Residual bone height is (5-7) mm measured from crestal bone to sinus floor.\n* Both genders.\n* Good general health;\n* Good oral hygiene.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Uncontrolled Diabetes.\n* Coagulation disorders.\n* Immunological disorders.\n* Previous radiation of the head and neck region.\n* Presence of chronic systemic diseases;\n* Presence of acute or chronic sinus problems;\n* Alcohol or drug abuse;\n* Heavy smokers.","60 Years",{"count":140,"type":21},18,[24],"Background: Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic procedure, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height, which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. When the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcrestal sinus lifting is recommended. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate Densah bur versus Magnetic mallet in transcrestal sinus lifting procedure in edentulous molar and premolar maxillary region.",[144],"Maxillary Sinus Left",{"date":146,"type":32},"2024-11-06",{"date":148,"type":32},"2024-01-01",{"date":150,"type":21},"2025-01-30",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":153,"slug":154,"hasResults":11,"nctId":155,"briefTitle":156,"officialTitle":157,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":158,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":116,"maxAge":159,"enrollmentInfo":160,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":162,"briefSummary":163,"conditions":164,"keywords":166,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":169,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":170,"startDateStruct":172,"completionDateStruct":174,"leadSponsor":175,"locationsCount":40},"100564029","digital-versus-conventional-impression-on-discomfort-and-dental-anxiety-among-preschoolers-100564029","NCT06623851","Digital Versus Conventional Impression on Discomfort and Dental Anxiety Among Preschoolers","Effectiveness of Digital Versus Conventional Impression on Discomfort and Dental Anxiety in Preschool Children (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children with scores of 3 or 4 during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale.\n* No previous dental experience.\n* Patient's parents signed an informed consent before participating in the trial.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any physical or mental disability, or psychological problems.\n* Children with temporomandibular joint or periodontal discomfort","6 Years",{"count":161,"type":21},66,[24],"Background: Taking alginate impressions for preschoolers is challenging and might be disturbing for them. Therefore, intraoral scanners are suggested as a better alternative to the conventional alginate impression.\n\nObjectives: The present study aims to evaluate and compare the level of patients' discomfort, dental anxiety, gag reflex, behavior and time required for taking alginate impressions with that of intraoral scanning.\n\nMaterials and methods: The study will be a randomized, controlled clinical trial, parallel design. A total of 666 pediatric dental patients aged from 4-6 years will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. Participants will be allocated into 2 groups. Children in the first group will receive digital impressions by an intraoral scanner, while those of the second group will receive conventional alginate impressions. Patients' discomfort will be evaluated by a modified VAS index supported with emojis. Dental anxiety will be evaluated using Facial Image Scale (FIS). Gag reflex will be assessed by Gag Severity Index (GSI). Child's behavior towards the impression technique in the 2 groups will be evaluated using Venham's Behavior rating scale. Time taken to complete the procedures will be recorded using a digital stopwatch.",[165],"Dental Anxiety",[167,168],"Dental impression","Digital impression","2024-10-01",{"date":171,"type":32},"2024-10-02",{"date":173,"type":32},"2024-06-23",{"date":169,"type":21},{"name":38,"class":39},""]