[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":141},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,55,77,110],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":43,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":44,"startDateStruct":47,"completionDateStruct":49,"leadSponsor":51,"locationsCount":54},"100619490","development-and-measurement-of-the-effects-of-a-digital-education-solution-for-patients-undergoing-total-hip-or-knee-arthroplasty-100619490",false,"NCT07345299","Development and Measurement of the Effects of a Digital Education Solution for Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty","CHUVeduc@home","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* male and female patients admitted to the CHUV musculoskeletal department during the study period\n* primary total hip replacement or primary total knee replacement\n* a Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score \\>6\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* a RAPT score \\\u003C6,\n* knee\u002Fhip arthroplasty revision surgery\n* inability to give informed consent or answer questionnaires knowledgeably due to language or cognitive impairment as reported in the medical record","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},160,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital patient education solution, CHUVeduc@home, in improving preoperative preparation for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. In Switzerland, many patients receive joint replacements each year to relieve osteoarthritis-related pain. With shorter hospital stays, adequate preparation before surgery has become increasingly important.\n\nA total of 160 patients will be randomized into two groups:\n\nIntervention group: access to CHUVeduc@home before surgery. Control group: standard preoperative preparation (group information session and consultation).\n\nAll participants will complete questionnaires through the application. No additional visits are required. The intervention lasts approximately 12 weeks.\n\nThe primary goal is to determine whether digital education increases patient knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction, and facilitates recovery and return home after surgery. Participation is voluntary and can be withdrawn at any time.",[26,27],"Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee","Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"knee","hip","replacement","arthroplasty","patient education","digital solution","preoperative care","perioperative care","interdisciplinary intervention","physiotherapy","nursing","health literacy","digital literacy","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-01-09",{"date":45,"type":46},"2026-01-15","ACTUAL",{"date":48,"type":20},"2026-02-15",{"date":50,"type":20},"2027-02-28",{"name":52,"class":53},"Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud","OTHER",1,{"id":56,"slug":57,"hasResults":11,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":60,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":61,"healthyVolunteers":62,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":65,"phases":4,"briefSummary":66,"conditions":67,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":4},"100388216","measurement-of-spinal-kinematics-during-various-movements-100388216","NCT04334889","Measurement of Spinal Kinematics During Various Movements","Differences in Spinal Kinematics During Various Activities Between Asymptomatic Subjects and Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- sufficient French level to understand the instructions for the tests, the information sheet, the consent form.\n\nFor CLBP patients:\n\n\\- diagnosis of non-specific low back pain (pain from lower ribs to gluteal folds) for more than 3 months.\n\nFor asymptomatic participants:\n\n* no history of LBP requiring medical attention during the last two years\n* no other concomitant pain or condition that could compromise the evaluation of lumbar kinematics.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* pregnancy\n* skin allergy to tape\n* body mass index (BMI) above 32\n\nFor patients with CLBP only:\n\n* specific low back pain (such as the presence of infection, rheumatological or neurological diseases, spinal fractures, tumours)\n* any known important spinal deformities\n* previous back surgery that limits spinal mobility\n* high level of pain at the time of experiment that prevents repeated movements (severity and irritability)\n* other concomitant pain or condition that could compromise the evaluation of spinal kinematics.",true,{"count":64,"type":20},40,"OBSERVATIONAL","Participants will perform movements while receiving different visual cues. Spinal kinematics will be measured during these movements and compared between asymptomatic and CLBP participants. Participants will come for a unique session.",[68],"Low Back Pain","2025-09-25",{"date":71,"type":46},"2025-09-30",{"date":73,"type":20},"2025-10",{"date":75,"type":20},"2026-04",{"name":52,"class":53},{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":84,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":86,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":103,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":104,"startDateStruct":106,"completionDateStruct":107,"leadSponsor":109,"locationsCount":4},"100607280","adapted-physical-activity-and-pelvic-floor-function-for-pelvic-girdle-pain-during-pregnancy-100607280","NCT07186504","Adapted Physical Activity and Pelvic Floor Function for Pelvic Girdle Pain During Pregnancy","Impact of Adapted Physical Activity Combined With Pelvic Floor Functionality on Pelvic Girdle Pain During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Exploratory Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant women aged ≥18 years\n* Gestational age ≤27 weeks at enrollment\n* Clinically confirmed pelvic girdle pain, defined as:\n* Pain localized between the posterior iliac crest and the gluteal fold, particularly around the sacroiliac joints and\u002For pubic symphysis, Pain intensity ≥3\u002F10 on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), At least 3 positive clinical tests among: Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation (P4) test, Patrick's FABER, Menell's test, Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR), and palpation of long dorsal sacroiliac ligament or symphysis pubis\n* Ability to understand and provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Isolated low back pain without pelvic involvement\n* Contraindications to exercise during pregnancy (e.g., severe preeclampsia, placenta previa after 26 weeks, risk of preterm labor, ruptured membranes, significant cardiac or pulmonary disease)\n* Neurological, rheumatologic, or orthopedic conditions that may interfere with participation\n* Insufficient French language proficiency to understand questionnaires and instructions\n* Participation in another interventional study that could affect outcomes","FEMALE",{"count":64,"type":20},[23],"Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a common condition during pregnancy, affecting up to two-thirds of women. It can cause significant discomfort, limit daily activities, and reduce quality of life. Current treatment options are limited, and many women continue to experience pain throughout pregnancy and even after childbirth.\n\nThis study will evaluate whether a structured program of adapted physical activity, with additional individualized pelvic floor rehabilitation when needed, can reduce pelvic girdle pain and improve function during pregnancy. The intervention consists of weekly 60-minute sessions of adapted physical activity, led by a pelvic health physiotherapist, from inclusion until 36-38 weeks of gestation. The exercises focus on lumbopelvic stability, mobility, strengthening, and safe aerobic activity. If a participant presents with pelvic floor dysfunction, individualized rehabilitation may be added in parallel.\n\nParticipants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (adapted physical activity ± pelvic floor rehabilitation) or a control group. The control group will receive standard pregnancy follow-up care plus a validated flyer with international recommendations on physical activity during pregnancy but without supervised sessions.\n\nThe primary outcomes are pain intensity and functional impact of PGP, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ). Secondary outcomes include self-reported physical activity, pelvic symptoms, pelvic floor function, adherence to the intervention, and acceptability of the program.\n\nA total of 40 pregnant women will be enrolled at Hospital La Tour in Geneva, Switzerland. Assessments will take place at three time points: inclusion (≤27 weeks of gestation), late pregnancy (36-38 weeks), and 3 months after delivery.\n\nThe study is expected to provide new evidence on the benefits of integrating pelvic floor functionality into physical activity programs for pregnant women with PGP. If effective, this approach could inform clinical practice and improve care for women during pregnancy",[89,90,91],"Pelvic Girdle Pain","Pregnancy","Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions",[93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102],"Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain","Prenatal pelvic pain","Pelvic floor function","Pelvic floor rehabilitation","Adapted physical activity","Prenatal exercise","Physiotherapy in pregnancy","Prenatal musculoskeletal pain","Maternal health","Randomized controlled trial","2025-09-15",{"date":105,"type":46},"2025-09-22",{"date":71,"type":20},{"date":108,"type":20},"2027-10-31",{"name":52,"class":53},{"id":111,"slug":112,"hasResults":11,"nctId":113,"briefTitle":114,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":115,"eligibilityCriteria":116,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":117,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":65,"phases":4,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":128,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":133,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":134,"startDateStruct":136,"completionDateStruct":138,"leadSponsor":140,"locationsCount":4},"100599041","structural-validity-and-inter-rater-reliabitiliy-of-the-ataxia-trunk-lower-and-upper-extremity-scale-atlas-100599041","NCT07079332","Structural Validity and Inter-rater Reliabitiliy of the Ataxia Trunk, Lower And Upper Extremity Scale (ATLAS)","ATLASReVa","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be adults\n* Be able to provide written informed consent\n* Be able to understand and follow simple physical instructions\n* Have a diagnosis of genetic or hereditary ataxia, or a cerebellar or pontine stroke (either hemorrhagic or ischemic), confirmed by a neurologist\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Muscle group strength \\\u003C 3 on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale\n* Spasticity \\> 2 in any muscle on the Modified Ashworth Scale\n* Pain \\> 5 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in any part of the body",{"count":118,"type":20},64,"Ataxia is a neurological disorder affecting coordination, caused by damage to the cerebellum, brainstem, or related pathways. It can be hereditary (e.g., Friedreich's ataxia) or acquired (e.g., multiple sclerosis, stroke). Though rare, ataxia significantly impacts quality of life and independence. Treatments are limited and mainly focus on multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Accurate assessment is essential, yet current tools like Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) have limitations. This study aims to validate a new scale, named the Ataxia Trunk, Lower And upper extremity Scale (ATLAS), through Rasch analysis, to develop a shorter, reliable version. It will assess internal consistency, construct validity, and inter-rater reliability.\n\nFor the valitdity part, statistics will be used (1) to see if the different items of the scale are indeed different and complementary to each other, and (2) to compare the results of this scale with other scales already known and valid (SARA, Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Functional Impairment Measurement(FIM)). Secondly, the investigators would like to know whether ATLAS is reliable. In this particular case, the reliability being assessed is inter-rater reliability, i.e. whether all raters give the same score on the items performed by the patient. To carry out such a study, 64 people will be needed to achieve these goals. Each person will complete the 20 items of the ATLAS scale, those of a trunk motor capacity assessment (TIS), and will evaluate his or her functional independence (FIM).",[121,122,123,124,125,126,127],"Ataxia, Cerebellar","Ataxia, Gait","Ataxia, Motor","Ataxia","Ataxia, Spinocerebellar","Ataxias, Hereditary","Ataxia - Other",[124,129,130,131,132],"Scale","Validity Study","reliability study","new scale","2025-08-07",{"date":135,"type":46},"2025-08-13",{"date":137,"type":20},"2025-09-01",{"date":139,"type":20},"2028-12-31",{"name":52,"class":53},""]