[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Hawler Medical University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":155},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,49,77,98,123],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100483026","two-different-regimens-of-bemiparin-as-a-thromboprophylaxis-in-morbidly-obese-surgical-patients-100483026",false,"NCT05569681","Two Different Regimens of Bemiparin as a Thromboprophylaxis in Morbidly Obese Surgical Patients","Comparison of Two Different Regimens of Bemiparin as a Thromboprophylaxis After Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized, Outcome-assessor Blinded Trial.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Participants required surgical intervention in: general surgery, gynecology, bariatric surgery\n2. Moderate, high, and very high risk for venous thromboembolism according to Caprin RAM\n3. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.\n4. BMI ≥40kg\u002Fm2\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Having any contraindication to LMWH, such as active bleeding, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia , baseline platelet count \\\u003C75 × 108\u002Fμl, severe renal disease (glomerular filtration rate \\\u003C30 ml\u002Fminute), severe liver disease, or uncontrolled hypertension (\\>200\u002F120 mmHg)\n2. Known hypersensitivity to unfractionated or LMWHs\n3. On oral or parenteral anticoagulants within 5 days before surgery\n4. Severe arterial hypertension\n5. Unable to comply with the study treatment and\u002For follow-up\n6. Receiving prohibited medications\n7. Pregnancy or lactation mother",true,"ALL","18 Years","90 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},2400,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Morbid obesity, is known to be associated with a high risk of VTE and, unfortunately, fixed doses of anticoagulant regimens may not provide optimal VTE prophylaxis in these patients especially after surgery.",[28],"Morbid Obesity",[30,31,32,33,34,35],"LMWH","Thromboprophylaxis","Non-orthopedic surgeries","Gynecological surgeries","General surgeries","Bariatric surgeries","RECRUITING","2026-01-12",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-01-13","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2023-01-07",{"date":44,"type":22},"2026-10-02",{"name":46,"class":47},"Hawler Medical University","OTHER",1,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":48},"100598087","optimizing-alveolar-ridge-expansion-100598087","NCT07066930","Optimizing Alveolar Ridge Expansion","Optimizing Alveolar Ridge Expansion: A Clinical Comparison of Magneto-Dynamic Ridge Splitting and Versah Osseodensification Techniques","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 to 70 years.\n* Partially edentulous patients requiring ridge expansion prior to dental implant placement.\n* Alveolar ridge width between 4 mm and 6 mm as measured on CBCT.\n* Sufficient vertical bone height for implant placement without the need for vertical augmentation.\n* Adequate oral hygiene and commitment to postoperative care and follow-up visits.\n* Signed informed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of systemic conditions contraindicating oral surgery (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immune-compromised status).\n* History of bisphosphonate therapy or radiation therapy to the head and neck region.\n* Active periodontal disease or untreated oral infections.\n* Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day).\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.\n* History of substance abuse or psychiatric disorders that could impair compliance with study protocol.","70 Years",{"count":58,"type":22},40,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical techniques-Magneto-Dynamic Ridge Splitting and Versah Osseodensification-for expanding narrow alveolar ridges in adults requiring dental implant placement. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhich technique better preserves alveolar bone width after surgery?\n\nWhich method results in higher primary implant stability?\n\nResearchers will compare ridge splitting using the Magnetic Mallet to ridge expansion using Versah drills to see if one technique leads to better clinical outcomes, such as improved bone preservation, greater implant stability, and favorable soft tissue response.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUndergo ridge expansion surgery using either the Magnetic Mallet or Versah drills, followed by immediate dental implant placement.\n\nReceive CBCT scans before and 4 months after surgery to measure bone changes.\n\nUndergo implant stability testing using the ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) method.\n\nHave intraoral scans to evaluate changes in soft tissue volume and thickness.",[62],"Dental Implant",[64,65,66,67],"Ridge expansion","Osseodensification","Magnetic mallet","Dental implants","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-07-04",{"date":71,"type":40},"2025-07-15",{"date":73,"type":22},"2025-08-01",{"date":75,"type":22},"2026-06-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":84,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":92,"startDateStruct":94,"completionDateStruct":95,"leadSponsor":97,"locationsCount":48},"100596613","efficacy-of-dietary-interventions-and-educational-programs-as-adjunctive-therapies-for-the-management-of-urolithiasis-efficacy-of-fresh-lemon-juice-and-roselle-as-educational-program-on-urolithiasis-parameters-100596613","NCT07047742","Efficacy of Dietary Interventions and Educational Programs as Adjunctive Therapies for the Management of Urolithiasis: Efficacy of Fresh Lemon Juice and Roselle as Educational Program on Urolithiasis Parameters","Assess the Efficacy of Dietary Interventions and Educational Programs as Adjunctive Therapies for the Management of Urolithiasis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* The following aspects is considered for the inclusion of participants in the study:\n\n  * Adults aged 18-75 years diagnosed with urolithiasis.\n  * Patients are willing to participate and provide informed consent.\n  * Patients do not currently use lemon juice, Roselle, or other herbal treatments for urolithiasis.\n  * No history of severe gastrointestinal disorders or metabolic conditions interfering with dietary interventions.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Based on predefined criteria, patients are excluded if they have:\n\n  * Allergies to citrus fruits or hibiscus.\n  * Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or higher.\n  * Pregnancy or lactation.\n  * Gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., GERD, ulcers, chronic gastritis for lemon juice group).\n  * Metabolic disorders (e.g., hyperparathyroidism, gout, hyperoxaluria).\n  * Recent urolithiasis surgery (within the last 3-6 months).\n  * Severe systemic diseases (e.g., cancer, advanced cardiovascular diseases).\n  * Hypertension requires diuretics (due to potential interaction (synergic effect) between dietary interactions and prescribed medications for hypertension which may lead to hypotension).\n  * Malabsorption disorders (e.g., Crohn's disease, celiac disease).\n  * Non-compliance with study protocols. The exclusion criteria ensure homogeneity in the study sample and improve the reliability of intervention assessment.","75 Years",{"count":86,"type":22},200,[25],"The Efficacy of Dietary and Health Educational Program, as Adjunctive Therapies for the Management of Urolithiasis Introduction Background Urolithiasis, commonly known as kidney stone disease, is a prevalent global health concern affecting millions of individuals annually. The incidence and recurrence of urolithiasis have been increasing due to dietary habits, metabolic disorders, and genetic predispositions (Qian et al., 2022). Kidney stones are crystalline mineral deposits that form within the urinary tract and are classified based on their chemical composition, including calcium oxalate, uric acid, struvite, and cystine stones (Wang et al., 2021).The condition is associated with debilitating symptoms such as renal colic, hematuria, and urinary tract obstruction, leading to significant morbidity and healthcare costs (Urolithiasis EAU Guidelines on, 2023).Conventional management strategies for urolithiasis include pharmacological treatments, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy, and surgical interventions (Fedorowicz et al., 2024). Despite these treatments, high recurrence rates highlight the necessity of preventive strategies through dietary and lifestyle modifications.\n\nComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has gained increasing attention in urolithiasis prevention and management, particularly the use of herbal remedies and nutritional interventions. Citrus fruits, particularly lemon juice, have been proposed as effective dietary interventions due to their high citrate content, which inhibits stone formation (Ruggenenti et al., 2022). Additionally, Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle) has been traditionally used for its diuretic and nephroprotective properties, suggesting potential benefits in preventing urolithiasis (Prasongwatana et al., 2018). However, while these natural interventions have shown promise, there is a lack of strong clinical evidence supporting their efficacy in reducing kidney stone formation and recurrence. Additionally, patient education is crucial in modifying lifestyle behaviors and improving adherence to preventive measures (Gamal et al., 2023). Thus, a comprehensive approach integrating dietary interventions with structured education could be more effective in managing urolithiasis.\n\nAim of study This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of dietary interventions (fresh lemon juice and Hibiscus sabdariffa) combined with an educational program in managing urolithiasis.\n\nObjectives of study\n\nThis dissertation has several objectives which are listed below:\n\n1. Evaluate the effectiveness of fresh lemon juice, in conjunction with an educational program, on the urinary stones parameters (like stone size, symptoms, infection rate, …), as well as tracking its potential complications.\n2. Evaluate the effectiveness of Hibiscus sabdariffa (Roselle) in conjunction with an educational program, on the urinary stones parameters (like stone size, symptoms, infection rate, …), as well as tracking its potential complications.\n3. To determine the effectiveness of educational program on the urinary stones parameters (like stone size, symptoms, infection rate, …)\n4. To compare the outcomes among four study groups: (i) lemon juice + education, (ii) roselle tea + education, (iii) education-only, and (iv) control (no intervention).\n5. Assess demographic data and clinical status, stone characteristics, lifestyle and dietary habits of participants.\n6. Assess knowledge and attitude of participants regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).",[90],"Urolithiasis, Lemon Juice","2025-07-01",{"date":93,"type":40},"2025-07-02",{"date":91,"type":22},{"date":96,"type":22},"2025-09-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":99,"slug":100,"hasResults":11,"nctId":101,"briefTitle":102,"officialTitle":103,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":104,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":105,"maxAge":106,"enrollmentInfo":107,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":108,"briefSummary":109,"conditions":110,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":115,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":116,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":120,"leadSponsor":122,"locationsCount":48},"100582406","effect-of-chest-physiotherapy-on-clinical-outcome-of-infants-with-bronchiolitis-100582406","NCT06862895","Effect of Chest Physiotherapy on Clinical Outcome of Infants With Bronchiolitis","Effect of Chest Physiotherapy Educational Program on Mother's Knowledge, Practice and Clinical Outcomes of Infants With Bronchiolitis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Mothers of infants diagnosed with bronchiolitis. 2. Presence of crackle on auscultation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Children with contraindication of chest physiotherapy (ex. Fracture, recent surgery)\n2. Children who intubated and admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU).","1 Month","1 Year",{"count":58,"type":22},[25],"The goal of clinical trial study is to evaluate effect of chest physiotherapy educational on mother's knowledge, practice and clinical outcomes of infants aged less than 12 months diagnosed with bronchiolitis by physician\n\nThe main questions aims to answer:\n\n* Does chest physiotherapy improve clinical outcomes of infants with bronchiolitis?\n* Does educational program improve mothers knowledge and practice regarding chest physiotherapy?\n\nResearcher compare two groups one receive routine hospital care (control group) other receive chest physiotherapy applied by mothers in addition to routine hospital care and will be followed up for 3 days",[111,112,113,114],"Bronchiolitis","Infant, Newborn, Diseases","Chest Physiotherapy","Educational Program","2025-03-03",{"date":117,"type":40},"2025-03-06",{"date":119,"type":40},"2025-01-01",{"date":121,"type":22},"2025-09-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":124,"slug":125,"hasResults":11,"nctId":126,"briefTitle":127,"officialTitle":128,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":129,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":130,"minAge":18,"maxAge":131,"enrollmentInfo":132,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":134,"briefSummary":135,"conditions":136,"keywords":139,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":147,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":148,"startDateStruct":150,"completionDateStruct":152,"leadSponsor":154,"locationsCount":48},"100567595","effectiveness-of-upright-vs-lithotomy-birthing-position-on-maternal-and-newborn-outcomes-100567595","NCT06670235","Effectiveness of Upright vs. Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes","Effectiveness of Using Upright Versus Lithotomy Birthing Position on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes: A Quasi Experimental Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies;\n* Gestational age ranges from (≥37 to 41+6 weeks);\n* Spontaneous labor with no contraindications to upright positions;\n* Active phase of first stage labor;\n* Age 18-35 years old;\n* Normal size fetus with occipito-anterior position;\n* Communicate normally and participate voluntary.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Abnormal fetal position (malpresentation) (e,g., persistent occipital-transverse and occipital-posterior position, etc.);\n* Risky pregnancy or childbirth complications, such as (preeclampsia, eclampsia, heart disease, cephalic presentation dystocia, antepartum hemorrhage, fetal distress, intra-uterine growth restriction, intra-amniotic infection); and free from any chronic diseases (heart disease, epilepsy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and renal disease)\n* Multiple gestation;\n* Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD);\n* Precipitate labor;\n* Antenatally diagnosed fetal anomalies;\n* Current history of a leg injury, fracture, and deep vein thrombosis.","FEMALE","35 Years",{"count":133,"type":22},124,[25],"This study investigates the effectiveness of upright versus lithotomy birthing positions on maternal and newborn outcomes. Conducted at the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, it employs a quasi-experimental design with 62 women in each group (Intervention and control), comparing outcomes for those encouraged to use upright positions with those in standard lithotomy. Maternal and newborn outcomes will be assessed to provide evidence on how birthing positions impact labor progression, comfort, and delivery results. The findings aim to inform clinical practice and policy, enhancing midwifery care and supporting patient-centered approaches to childbirth. Does the upright birthing position effect on maternal and newborn outcomes? Does the lithotomy birthing position effect on maternal and newborn outcomes? The expected outcomes will decrease the rate of perineal tear , episiotomy , post partum hemorrhage and decreasing the rate of admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in newborn.",[137,138],"Maternal Outcomes","Newborn Complication",[140,141,142,143,144,145,146],"Upright birthing position","Lithotomy position","Maternal outcomes in childbirth","Newborn outcomes in labor","Birth position comparison","Labor positions and delivery","Effectiveness of birth positions","2024-10-30",{"date":149,"type":40},"2024-11-01",{"date":151,"type":22},"2024-11-10",{"date":153,"type":22},"2026-09-01",{"name":46,"class":47},""]