[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Ibadat International University, Islamabad\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":426},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,17,0,[8,46,74,99,125,157,183,209,235,256,276,298,318,338,358,377,402],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100053865","ice-packs-versus-cold-baths-combined-with-standard-exercise-therapy-for-plantar-fasciitis-100053865",false,"NCT07694999","Ice Packs Versus Cold Baths Combined With Standard Exercise Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis","Comparative Efficacy of Ice Packs Versus Cold Baths With Standard Exercise Therapy in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 to 65 years.\n* Clinical diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral Plantar Fasciitis.\n* Heel pain localized to the medial calcaneal tubercle.\n* Positive Windlass test.\n* Pain intensity of ≥4 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline.\n* Willing and able to provide written informed consent.\n* Willing to comply with the study protocol and attend all treatment and assessment sessions.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of foot or ankle surgery within the previous 6 months.\n* Corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis within the previous month.\n* Neurological disorders affecting the lower limb.\n* Peripheral vascular disease or other vascular disorders affecting the lower limb.\n* Open wounds, skin infections, or contraindications to cryotherapy.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Participation in another interventional clinical trial during the study period.\n* Inability to follow the study protocol or complete outcome assessments.","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of ice pack therapy and cold bath immersion when combined with standard exercise therapy in adults with plantar fasciitis. Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain that can limit daily activities and reduce quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ice pack therapy or cold bath therapy in addition to the same standardized exercise program. The primary outcome will be pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome will be foot function measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI). The findings of this study may help identify the more effective cryotherapy method for reducing pain and improving function in individuals with plantar fasciitis.",[27],"Plantar Fasciitis",[29,30,31,32],"Ice Pack","Cold Bath","Foot Function Index","Visual Analogue Scale","RECRUITING","2026-07-10",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-07-13","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":37},"2026-02-17",{"date":41,"type":21},"2026-07-07",{"name":43,"class":44},"Ibadat International University, Islamabad","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":52,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":45},"100054132","effects-of-proprioceptive-neuromuscular-facilitation-and-task-oriented-training-on-upper-extremity-function-in-children-with-spastic-diplegic-cerebral-palsy-100054132","NCT07694804","Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Task-Oriented Training on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy","Isolated Versus Combined Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Task-Oriented Training on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy","PNF-TOT-CP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children aged 6 to 12 years.\n* Clinical diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.\n* Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Levels I-III.\n* Ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions.\n* Medically stable and able to participate in physiotherapy sessions.\n* Parent or legal guardian willing to provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Orthopedic surgery involving the upper or lower extremities within the previous 6 months.\n* Botulinum toxin injections administered within the previous 6 months.\n* Severe visual, hearing, or cognitive impairments that would interfere with assessment or treatment.\n* Uncontrolled epilepsy or other unstable neurological or medical conditions.\n* Fixed upper extremity contractures or musculoskeletal deformities preventing participation in the intervention.\n* Participation in another structured upper extremity rehabilitation program during the study period.\n* Failure to obtain informed consent from a parent or legal guardian.","6 Years","12 Years",{"count":57,"type":21},63,[24],"Children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy often experience upper extremity impairments, including reduced coordination, muscle control, and functional hand use, which limit independence in daily activities. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Task-Oriented Training (TOT) are commonly used rehabilitation approaches to improve motor function; however, evidence comparing their individual and combined effects on upper extremity function remains limited.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of PNF alone, TOT alone, and a combined PNF plus TOT intervention on upper extremity function in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Sixty-three children aged 6 to 12 years with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups. Each group will receive supervised 45-minute treatment sessions, three times per week for six weeks.\n\nUpper extremity function, functional independence, and joint range of motion will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks) using the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MA2), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Functional Skills Scale (PEDI-FSS), and goniometric measurements. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the most effective rehabilitation approach for improving upper extremity function in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.",[61,62],"Cerebral Palsy","Spastic Diplegia",[64,65,66,67,68],"Spastic diplegic cerebral palsy","Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation","Task-oriented training","Motor function","Functional independence",{"date":36,"type":37},{"date":39,"type":37},{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-07-08",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":75,"slug":76,"hasResults":11,"nctId":77,"briefTitle":78,"officialTitle":79,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":81,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":85,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":89,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":92,"startDateStruct":94,"completionDateStruct":96,"leadSponsor":98,"locationsCount":45},"100645283","massage-gun-vs-deep-friction-massage-for-upper-trapezius-trigger-points-100645283","NCT07681661","Massage Gun vs Deep Friction Massage for Upper Trapezius Trigger Points","Effectiveness Of Massage Gun Therapy Versus Deep Friction Massage On Upper Trapezius Trigger Points","Inclusion Criteria: Presence of active trigger points in the upper trapezius (confirmed by palpation, referred pain pattern, and pain reproduction)(travell and simson's method).\n\nModerate to severe pain (VAS\\>4\u002F10). No prior treatment for neck\u002Fshoulder pain in past 4 weeks. Age 24-45 years (young adults according to WHO classification) Both genders Exclusion Criteria:History of cervical spine surgery or severe musculoskeletal pathology.\n\nNeurological deficits. Systemic disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia). Recent trauma or fractures in the neck\u002Fshoulder region. Current pregnancy.\n\n\\-","24 Years","45 Years",{"count":84,"type":21},46,[24],"This study compares the effectiveness of Massage Gun Therapy and Deep Friction Massage in individuals with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. The interventions will be evaluated for their effects on pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, cervical range of motion, and neck disability. The aim is to determine which treatment is more effective in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes.",[88],"Myofacial Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius",[90],"Myofascial Pain Syndromes Trigger Points Neck Pain Massage Musculoskeletal Pain Physical Therapy Modalities Rehabilitation","2026-06-26",{"date":93,"type":37},"2026-07-02",{"date":95,"type":37},"2026-01-01",{"date":97,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":100,"slug":101,"hasResults":11,"nctId":102,"briefTitle":103,"officialTitle":104,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":105,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":106,"enrollmentInfo":107,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":109,"briefSummary":110,"conditions":111,"keywords":113,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":121,"startDateStruct":122,"completionDateStruct":123,"leadSponsor":124,"locationsCount":45},"100645385","sensory-motor-control-and-muscle-energy-technique-for-chronic-mechanical-neck-100645385","NCT07681687","Sensory Motor Control and Muscle Energy Technique for Chronic Mechanical Neck","Effectiveness of Sensory Motor Control and Muscle Energy Techniques on Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain","Inclusion Criteria:Adults aged 18- 35years,Clinical diagnosis of cervical pain due to strain, degenerative changes of the spine, e.g., spondylosis.Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent,Presence of reduced cervical range of motion, especially in the upper cervical spine,Symptom duration in chronic patients is more than 3 months.\n\nExclusion Criteria:History of surgery to the cervical spine in the last 6 months,Neurological deficits or signs of cervical myelopathy,Presence of systemic conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, infections) affecting the spine,Pregnancy or known vestibular disorders,Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up schedule\n\n\\-","35 Years",{"count":108,"type":21},52,[24],"A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Sensory Motor Control training combined with Muscle Energy Technique in reducing pain and improving function, cervical range of motion, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain",[112],"Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain",[114,115,116,117,118,119,120],"Cervical pain","neck pain","neck ache","chronic neck pain","mechanical neck pain","kinesiophobia","quality of life",{"date":93,"type":37},{"date":95,"type":37},{"date":97,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":126,"slug":127,"hasResults":11,"nctId":128,"briefTitle":129,"officialTitle":129,"acronym":130,"eligibilityCriteria":131,"healthyVolunteers":132,"sex":133,"minAge":17,"maxAge":134,"enrollmentInfo":135,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":136,"briefSummary":137,"conditions":138,"keywords":142,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":151,"startDateStruct":152,"completionDateStruct":154,"leadSponsor":156,"locationsCount":45},"100638737","effect-of-upper-limb-plyometric-training-versus-strength-training-for-enhancing-serve-velocity-strength-and-power-in-competitive-tennis-players-100638737","NCT07584941","Effect of Upper-limb Plyometric Training Versus Strength Training for Enhancing Serve Velocity, Strength, and Power in Competitive Tennis Players","ULPT-ST","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18-30 years (male tennis players).\n* Currently training\u002Fcompeting in tennis ≥3 sessions\u002Fweek.\n* Minimum of 4 years of systematic tennis training experience\n* Provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recent musculoskeletal surgery\n* Upper-limb (shoulder\u002Felbow) or lower-limb injury that limits training in past 6 months.\n* Participation in structured strength or agility programs outside routine tennis training\n* Neurological or cardiovascular disorders or other medical condition contraindicating high-intensity exercise",true,"MALE","30 Years",{"count":84,"type":21},[24],"This study aims to compare the effects of upper-limb plyometric training and traditional strength training on serve velocity, muscular strength, and power in competitive tennis players. Serve velocity is a critical performance factor in tennis, and optimizing upper-limb function is essential for enhancing performance.\n\nParticipants will be randomly assigned to either a plyometric training group or a strength training group. Both groups will undergo structured training programs over a defined intervention period. Outcome measures, including serve velocity, upper-limb strength, and power, will be assessed at baseline and after the completion of the intervention.\n\nThe findings of this study will help determine the most effective training approach for improving performance in tennis players and may guide coaches, athletes, and rehabilitation professionals in designing evidence-based training programs.",[139,140,141],"Upper Limb Strength","Upper Limb Power","Upper Limb Serve Velocity",[143,144,145,146,147,148,149],"Plyometric Training","Strength Training","Upper Limb Training","Sports Performance","Tennis Players","Serve Velocity","Power","2026-06-24",{"date":91,"type":37},{"date":153,"type":37},"2026-05-15",{"date":155,"type":21},"2026-07-20",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":158,"slug":159,"hasResults":11,"nctId":160,"briefTitle":161,"officialTitle":161,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":162,"healthyVolunteers":132,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":163,"enrollmentInfo":164,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":166,"briefSummary":167,"conditions":168,"keywords":172,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":177,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":178,"startDateStruct":179,"completionDateStruct":180,"leadSponsor":182,"locationsCount":45},"100639933","effect-of-reactive-balance-training-versus-conventional-balance-training-on-dynamic-stability-and-change-of-direction-performance-in-competitive-tennis-players-100639933","NCT07590674","Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years.\n* Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience.\n* Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recent injury (last 3 months)\n* Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders\n* Previous surgery\n* Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period.\n* Use of ankle\u002Fknee braces or orthotic devices that may influence balance performance.","25 Years",{"count":165,"type":21},64,[24],"This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of reactive balance training versus conventional balance training on dynamic stability and change of direction performance. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Each group will receive its respective intervention over a 6-week period. Outcome measures, including dynamic stability assessed by the Y-Balance Test and change-of-direction performance measured using the 505 Agility Test, will be evaluated at baseline and after the intervention. The study is designed to determine which training approach is more effective in improving balance and functional performance.",[169,170,171],"Dynamic Stability","Athletic Performance","Postural Balance",[173,174,175,169,176],"Reactive Balance Training","Sports Rehabilitation","Change of Direction","Y-Balance Test","2026-06-23",{"date":91,"type":37},{"date":153,"type":37},{"date":181,"type":21},"2026-07",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":184,"slug":185,"hasResults":11,"nctId":186,"briefTitle":187,"officialTitle":188,"acronym":189,"eligibilityCriteria":190,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":191,"enrollmentInfo":192,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":194,"briefSummary":195,"conditions":196,"keywords":198,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":177,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":203,"startDateStruct":204,"completionDateStruct":206,"leadSponsor":208,"locationsCount":45},"100637264","comparative-effects-of-blood-flow-restriction-resistance-training-versus-blood-flow-restriction-cycling-on-pain-quadriceps-strength-and-functional-outcomes-in-athletes-with-patellofemoral-pain-100637264","NCT07585305","Comparative Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training Versus Blood Flow Restriction Cycling on Pain, Quadriceps Strength, and Functional Outcomes in Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain","Comparative Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training Versus Blood Flow Restriction Cycling on Pain, Quadriceps Strength, and Functional Outcomes in Athletes With Patellofemoral Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","BFR-PFP-RCT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male and female athletes aged 18-40 years\n2. Clinically diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome\n3. Anterior or retropatellar knee pain of at least 3 months duration\n4. Pain provoked by at least two functional activities (e.g., squatting, stair climbing, running, prolonged sitting)\n5. Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. History of knee surgery or significant knee trauma in the past 6 months\n2. Presence of ligament, meniscal, or cartilage injuries\n3. Neurological, vascular, or systemic inflammatory conditions\n4. Contraindications to BFR training (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, uncontrolled hypertension)\n5. Pregnancy","40 Years",{"count":193,"type":21},48,[24],"This randomized controlled trial compares blood flow restriction (BFR) resistance training (leg press and seated knee extension at 30% 1RM) versus BFR cycling (stationary cycling at low resistance) in 60 athletes (aged 18-40 years) diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Both interventions are delivered over 8 weeks (3 sessions\u002Fweek) with a pneumatic cuff set at 80% limb occlusion pressure. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (NPRS), quadriceps strength (handheld dynamometer), and functional ability (Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.",[197],"Patello Femoral Pain Syndrome",[199,200,201,170,202],"Patellofemoral pain","Blood flow restriction training","Quadriceps strength","resistance training",{"date":91,"type":37},{"date":205,"type":37},"2026-05-10",{"date":207,"type":21},"2026-07-25",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":210,"slug":211,"hasResults":11,"nctId":212,"briefTitle":213,"officialTitle":213,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":214,"healthyVolunteers":132,"sex":16,"minAge":215,"maxAge":134,"enrollmentInfo":216,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":218,"briefSummary":219,"conditions":220,"keywords":224,"overallStatus":228,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":229,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":230,"startDateStruct":231,"completionDateStruct":232,"leadSponsor":234,"locationsCount":4},"100644543","comparative-effect-of-combined-strength-core-and-balance-training-on-kinesiophobia-ankle-instability-functional-outcomes-and-performance-in-table-tennis-players-with-functional-ankle-instability-100644543","NCT07671170","Comparative Effect of Combined Strength, Core and Balance Training on Kinesiophobia, Ankle Instability, Functional Outcomes, and Performance in Table Tennis Players With Functional Ankle Instability","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male\u002Ffemale table tennis players aged 15-30 years\n2. Experienced at least one ankle sprain with swelling\u002Fpain that interrupted training for \\>1 day within the last 6 months\n3. Reported sensation of instability of the ankle\n4. Scored ≤25 points on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), indicating functional ankle instability\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. History of ankle fracture or surgery\n2. Any fracture of lower limb history\n3. Any neurological or vestibular disorders\n4. Other injuries of lower limb affecting performance","15 Years",{"count":217,"type":21},51,[24],"This randomized controlled trial investigates the comparative effect of combined strength and balance training versus balance and core training on kinesiophobia (fear of movement), ankle instability, functional outcomes, and athletic performance in adolescent table tennis players with functional ankle instability (FAI). Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups over a 6-week intervention (3 sessions\u002Fweek). The Experimental Group will receive combined strength and balance training, while the Control Group will receive balance and core training. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools: TSK-17, CAIT, FAAM, Y-Balance Test, Single-Leg Hop Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test.",[221,222,174,223],"Functional Ankle Instability","Kinesiophobia","Neuromuscular Control",[225,226,221,227,144],"Balance Training","Athletes","Table Tennis","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-22",{"date":91,"type":37},{"date":181,"type":21},{"date":233,"type":21},"2026-10",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":236,"slug":237,"hasResults":11,"nctId":238,"briefTitle":239,"officialTitle":240,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":241,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":242,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":243,"briefSummary":244,"conditions":245,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":248,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":249,"startDateStruct":251,"completionDateStruct":253,"leadSponsor":255,"locationsCount":45},"100641428","comparative-efficacy-of-neuromobilization-tendon-gliding-exercises-and-combined-techniques-in-mild-to-moderate-carpal-tunnel-syndrome-100641428","NCT07653789","Comparative Efficacy of Neuromobilization, Tendon Gliding Exercises, and Combined Techniques in Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome","Comparative Efficacy of Neuromobilization Techniques, Tendon Gliding Exercises, and Combined Techniques in the Management of Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Symptoms of CTS (pain, paresthesia in the area of hand innervated by the median nerve)\n\n  * First and Second Trimester Pregnant women.\n  * Mild to Moderate CTS patients.\n  * Individuals experiencing wrist pain for a duration of at least 6-8 weeks without a history of trauma or specific diagnosis (e.g., fracture, arthritis).\n  * Pain rated between 3 and 5 on (NPRS).\n  * Present neurological disorders (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical radiculopathy).\n  * No prior physical therapy treatment for wrist pain in the last 3-6 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • History of traumatic injury, fracture, or surgery to the wrist or hand.\n\n  * Diagnosis of systemic diseases affecting the wrist (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or diabetes-related neuropathy).\n  * Any skin condition or infection around the wrist that would contraindicate physical therapy.\n  * Third Trimester Pregnant women\n  * Individuals with serious cardiovascular or metabolic disorders.\n  * patients currently undergoing other treatments specifically targeting CTS (e.g., steroid injections)",{"count":108,"type":21},[24],"focuses on the comparative efficacy of Neuromobilization techniques, tendon gliding exercises, and their combined application in the management of mild to moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome through a randomized controlled trial (RCT)",[246,247],"CTS","Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)","2026-06-16",{"date":250,"type":37},"2026-06-17",{"date":252,"type":21},"2026-06-03",{"date":254,"type":21},"2026-09-10",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":257,"slug":258,"hasResults":11,"nctId":259,"briefTitle":260,"officialTitle":260,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":261,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":191,"maxAge":262,"enrollmentInfo":263,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":265,"briefSummary":266,"conditions":267,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":248,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":270,"startDateStruct":271,"completionDateStruct":273,"leadSponsor":275,"locationsCount":45},"100641918","perturbation-based-balance-training-versus-progressive-neuromuscular-training-as-an-adjunct-to-conventional-physiotherapy-for-pain-reduction-and-functional-improvement-in-knee-osteoarthritis-100641918","NCT07653841","Perturbation Based Balance Training Versus Progressive Neuromuscular Training as an Adjunct to Conventional Physiotherapy for Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement in Knee Osteoarthritis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nMale and female, aged between 40-70 years Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis Grades I-III based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification Chronic knee pain for ≥3 months Ability to walk independently\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nGrade IV osteoarthritis Previous knee surgery or joint replacement Rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory joint disease Recent intra-articular injection (\\\u003C6 months) Severe systemic illness, Neurological disorders and Vestibular disorders","70 Years",{"count":264,"type":21},60,[24],"This is an RCT aims to explore Perturbation-Based Balance Training versus Progressive Neuromuscular Training as an Adjunct to Conventional Physiotherapy for Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement in Knee Osteoarthritis.",[268,269],"Knee Arthritis Osteoarthritis","Knee Arthritis, Osteoarthritis",{"date":250,"type":37},{"date":272,"type":21},"2026-05-18",{"date":274,"type":21},"2026-09-20",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":277,"slug":278,"hasResults":11,"nctId":279,"briefTitle":280,"officialTitle":281,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":282,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":283,"maxAge":284,"enrollmentInfo":285,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":287,"briefSummary":288,"conditions":289,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":292,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":293,"startDateStruct":295,"completionDateStruct":296,"leadSponsor":297,"locationsCount":45},"100643522","comparing-the-effectiveness-of-tensioner-vs-slider-neurodynamic-techniques-in-patients-with-sciatica-100643522","NCT07632612","Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica","Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks\n* Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg\n* Positive Slump Test\n* Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°\n* Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* BMI \\\u003C 20 kg\u002Fm² or \\> 30 kg\u002Fm²\n* Previous history of spinal surgery\n* Presence of red flags (significant motor\u002Fsensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel\u002Fbladder dysfunction)\n* Peripheral neuropathy\n* History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal\u002Flimb trauma\n* Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)\n* Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)\n* Pregnancy","20 Years","50 Years",{"count":286,"type":21},80,[24],"objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.",[290,291],"Sciatica","Sciatica Pain","2026-06-02",{"date":294,"type":37},"2026-06-08",{"date":252,"type":21},{"date":254,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":299,"slug":300,"hasResults":11,"nctId":301,"briefTitle":302,"officialTitle":302,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":303,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":304,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":306,"briefSummary":307,"conditions":308,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":311,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":312,"startDateStruct":314,"completionDateStruct":316,"leadSponsor":317,"locationsCount":45},"100639661","comparison-of-sensory-integration-therapy-and-conventional-physical-therapy-on-gross-motor-function-in-children-with-athetoid-cerebral-palsy-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100639661","NCT07611565","Comparison of Sensory Integration Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy on Gross Motor Function in Children With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Diagnosis of athetoid cerebral palsy\n\n  * Aged between 6 and 12 years\n  * GMFCS Level I-III\n  * MMSE score ≥ 24\n  * Able to follow simple instructions\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders\n\n  * Recent orthopedic or neurosurgical interventions\n  * Severe visual or hearing impairment\n  * Uncontrolled epilepsy",{"count":305,"type":21},26,[24],"This is an RCT aiming to explore the comparison of Sensory Integration Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy on Gross Motor Function in Children with Athetoid Cerebral Palsy",[309,310],"Athetoid CP","Cerebral Palsy (CP)","2026-05-21",{"date":313,"type":37},"2026-05-28",{"date":315,"type":37},"2026-03-10",{"date":274,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":319,"slug":320,"hasResults":11,"nctId":321,"briefTitle":322,"officialTitle":323,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":324,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":325,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":327,"briefSummary":328,"conditions":329,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":331,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":332,"startDateStruct":334,"completionDateStruct":336,"leadSponsor":337,"locationsCount":45},"100639459","comparative-effect-of-maitland-mobilization-combined-with-kendall-exercises-for-pain-and-postural-alignment-in-adults-with-upper-cross-syndrome-100639459","NCT07588061","Comparative Effect of Maitland Mobilization Combined With Kendall Exercises for Pain and Postural Alignment in Adults With Upper Cross Syndrome","Comparative Effect of Maitland Mobilization Combined With Kendall Exercises on Pain and Postural Alignment in Adults With Upper Cross Syndrome","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 to 45 years\n* Neck and\u002For upper thoracic pain for a duration of \\> 6 weeks\n* Pain Severity: VAS \\> 5 (Afzal, Noor, Mumtaz, Bashir, \\& Saqulain, 2023)\n* Pain exacerbated by prolonged postures\n* Adults diagnosed with Upper Cross Syndrome\n* Diagnostic criteria: Upper Cross Syndrome will be diagnosed when individuals demonstrate: thoracic kyphosis \\> 40°, craniovertebral angle \\\u003C 50°, and acromion-to-couch distance \\> 2.5 cm based on established normative values.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of neck or shoulder surgery or trauma\n* Inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis or gout\n* Pregnancy\n* Neurological conditions affecting upper limb function, and\n* Cardiovascular Problems\n* Congenital issues i.e.; torticollis, and scoliosis\n* Disc prolapse and other spine issues\n* Currently taking any medication or taking physical therapy",{"count":326,"type":21},58,[24],"This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of Maitland mobilization combined with Kendall exercises versus Kendall exercises alone on pain and postural alignment in adults with Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS). Upper Cross Syndrome is characterized by muscle imbalance leading to forward head posture, rounded shoulders, and increased thoracic kyphosis. The study will evaluate pain intensity, craniovertebral angle, thoracic kyphosis, and rounded shoulder posture",[330],"Upper Cross Syndrome","2026-05-17",{"date":333,"type":37},"2026-05-20",{"date":335,"type":37},"2026-04-06",{"date":294,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":339,"slug":340,"hasResults":11,"nctId":341,"briefTitle":342,"officialTitle":343,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":344,"healthyVolunteers":132,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":163,"enrollmentInfo":345,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":346,"briefSummary":343,"conditions":347,"keywords":349,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":153,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":353,"startDateStruct":354,"completionDateStruct":356,"leadSponsor":357,"locationsCount":45},"100639990","comparison-of-combined-sprint-plyometric-training-versus-traditional-strength-training-on-speed-agility-power-and-movement-quality-in-intermediate-rugby-players-100639990","NCT07591675","Comparison of Combined Sprint-Plyometric Training Versus Traditional Strength Training on Speed, Agility, Power, and Movement Quality in Intermediate Rugby Players","Comparison of Combined Sprint-Plyometric Training Versus Traditional Strength Training on Speed, Agility, Power, and Movement Quality in Intermediate Rugby Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male and female athletes aged 18-25 years\n2. A minimum of 2 years of structured rugby training experience\n3. Actively training at least 3 hours per week\n4. Medically cleared to engage in high-intensity physical activity\n5. Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. History of moderate or severe musculoskeletal injuries or surgery within the past 6-12 months\n2. Not medically approved to engage in high-intensity physical activities\n3. Cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary disease or risk factors that contraindicate high-intensity training\n4. Participation in any additional structured strength or plyometric program outside the study protocol during the intervention period",{"count":165,"type":21},[24],[170,348],"Neuromuscular Training",[350,351,352,149],"Sprint training","Plyometric training","Agility",{"date":272,"type":37},{"date":355,"type":21},"2026-04",{"date":181,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":359,"slug":360,"hasResults":11,"nctId":361,"briefTitle":362,"officialTitle":363,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":364,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":106,"maxAge":262,"enrollmentInfo":365,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":366,"briefSummary":367,"conditions":368,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":370,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":371,"startDateStruct":373,"completionDateStruct":375,"leadSponsor":376,"locationsCount":45},"100640462","effect-of-adding-latissimus-dorsi-myofascial-release-to-scapular-proprioceptive-neuromuscular-facilitation-on-pain-disability-and-range-of-motion-in-adhesive-capsulitis-100640462","NCT07588087","Effect of Adding Latissimus Dorsi Myofascial Release to Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Pain, Disability, and Range of Motion in Adhesive Capsulitis","Effect of Adding Latissimus Dorsi Myofascial Release to Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Pain, Disability, and Range of Motion in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Age between 35 and 70 years.\n* Both male and female participants.\n* Stiffening (Stage II) phase of frozen shoulder.\n* Pain intensity ≥ 4\u002F10 on NPRS during shoulder movement.\n* Unilateral shoulder involvement.\n* Presence of capsular pattern:ER \\> ABD \\> IR limitation\n* Apley's Scratch Test\n* Limited both ROMs\n* Symptom duration between 3 and 9 months.(Di Mascio et al., 2024)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Secondary adhesive capsulitis due to trauma or surgery\n* History of shoulder fracture or dislocation.\n* Bilateral frozen shoulder.\n* Active systemic inflammatory or neurological disease\n* Recent intra-articular corticosteroid injection (within last 3 months)\n* Current anticoagulation therapy or bleeding disorders.\n* Pregnant females.",{"count":326,"type":21},[24],"This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) alone versus PNF combined with latissimus dorsi myofascial release on pain, range of motion, and functional disability in patients with stage II adhesive capsulitis; a condition characterized by capsular stiffness, pain, and restricted shoulder mobility, with outcomes assessed using NPRS, goniometry, and SPADI over a 6-week intervention period.",[369],"Adhesive Capsulitis","2026-05-08",{"date":372,"type":37},"2026-05-14",{"date":374,"type":37},"2026-04-05",{"date":294,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":378,"slug":379,"hasResults":11,"nctId":380,"briefTitle":381,"officialTitle":382,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":383,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":283,"maxAge":284,"enrollmentInfo":384,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":386,"briefSummary":387,"conditions":388,"keywords":390,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":374,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":395,"startDateStruct":397,"completionDateStruct":399,"leadSponsor":401,"locationsCount":45},"100633223","comparative-effects-of-shockwave-therapy-and-eccentric-exercises-in-patients-with-lateral-epicondylitis-100633223","NCT07523893","Comparative Effects of Shockwave Therapy and Eccentric Exercises in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis","Comparative Effects of Shockwave Therapy and Eccentric Exercises on Pain, Functional Ability, Quality of Life, Grip Strength and Range of Motion in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients diagnosed with Lateral epicondylitis\n* Patients with 20-50 years\n* Both males and females\n* Willing to participate and provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with recent trauma (fractures, injury etc.)\n* Patients with blood clotting disorder (including thrombosis), oral anti-coagulants, and pacemaker, tumors at site of treatment, infected area or skin rupture or abrasion at the site of treatment, pregnancy.\n* Cervical Radiculopathy or any diseases that mimic or refer pain to elbow.\n* Patients who received steroid injection within 6 weeks.",{"count":385,"type":21},50,[24],"The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of shockwave therapy and eccentric exercises on pain, functional ability, quality of life, grip strength and range of motion in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Participants will be randomly assigned to either Group A (Shockwave therapy) or Group B (Eccentric Exercises) using a computer-generated random number tables method.\n\nThe intervention will be provided over five weeks, with three sessions per week (total of 15 sessions):\n\nGroup A (Shockwave therapy): Participants will receive shockwave therapy, for 5 min with energy level 7.0 m J and frequency 6 Hz.\n\nGroup B (Eccentric Exercises): Participants will receive eccentric exercises, repeating each 10 repetitions 3 sets per session with a 1 min rest between each of them.\n\nOutcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 0 and week 5 to evaluate which exercise program is more effective in reducing symptoms and improving functional outcomes.",[389],"Tennis Elbow",[391,392,393,394],"Lateral epicondylitis","Shockwave Therapy","Eccentric Exercises","Grip Strength",{"date":396,"type":37},"2026-04-13",{"date":398,"type":37},"2026-02-02",{"date":400,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":403,"slug":404,"hasResults":11,"nctId":405,"briefTitle":406,"officialTitle":407,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":408,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":134,"enrollmentInfo":409,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":411,"briefSummary":412,"conditions":413,"keywords":415,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":374,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":420,"startDateStruct":421,"completionDateStruct":423,"leadSponsor":425,"locationsCount":45},"100633224","effects-of-lumbar-stabilization-exercises-versus-muscular-chain-therapy-in-patients-with-mechanical-chronic-low-back-pain-100633224","NCT07523906","Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Versus Muscular Chain Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain","Effects of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises Versus Muscular Chain Therapy on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 18-30 years will be included in the study.\n* Participants must have a history of mechanical CLBP.\n* The pain must be localized to the lumbar region.\n* Participants must be able to perform physical activities and participate in exercise-based interventions.\n* Participants who have pain range \\> 4 will be included in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with structural lesions, such as spondylolisthesis, stenosis, vertebral bone fracture, scoliosis and kyphosis on x-ray, will be excluded.\n* Pregnant females would be excluded.\n* Females with a history of neurological, infections, and systemic disease, including cerebrovascular disease, spondylitis, cancer, spinal cord disease, cauda equine, rheumatologic disorders.\n* Females who have undergone spinal surgery or any surgical intervention related to the lower back or pelvis will be excluded.\n* Lumbar radiculopathy will be excluded in the study.",{"count":410,"type":21},42,[24],"The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercises and muscular chain therapy on reducing pain intensity and functional disability in patients with mechanical CLBP.\n\n* Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups:\n* Group A: Lumbar stabilization exercises\n* Group B: Muscular chain therapy (posterior sagittal muscle chain)\n\nOutcomes will be assessed at baseline and on week 6 to evaluate which exercise program is more effective in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes.",[414],"Low Back Pain, Mechanical",[416,417,418,419],"Low Back Pain","Lumbar Stabilization Exercises","Muscular Chain Therapy","Functional Disability",{"date":396,"type":37},{"date":422,"type":37},"2026-02-04",{"date":424,"type":21},"2026-06-15",{"name":43,"class":44},""]