[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"International Dental Contiuing Education\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":144},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,46,70,95,121],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100629380","supracrestal-socket-shield-technique-in-anterior-maxilla-a-case-series-100629380",false,"NCT07473921","Supracrestal Socket Shield Technique in Anterior Maxilla. A Case Series","Supracrestal Socket Shield Technique in Anterior Maxilla. A Case Report.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who have a single bounded non-restorable maxillary anterior tooth with opposing natural dentition with no periapical pathosis.\n* Adults above the age of 21.\n* Good oral hygiene.\n* Patient accepts to provide informed consent.\n* Thin intact labial plate of bone (1 mm or less), assessed by CBCT.\n* Intact gingival tissue with at least 2 mm keratinized tissue.\n* Teeth with intact labial root surfaces.\n* Minimum of 3-4 mm of apical bone for primary stability\n\nExclusion Criteria: • Smokers.\n\n* Pregnant and lactating females.\n* Medically compromised patients.\n* Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.\n* Patients with active infection related to the implant site",true,"ALL","21 Years","55 Years",{"count":5,"type":21},"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Post-extraction labio-palatal ridge collapse is a significant challenge in restorative and implant dentistry particularly in anterior maxilla. Following tooth extraction, marked dimensional alveolar ridge changes occur. The buccal plate of bone in the anterior zone is primarily composed of bundle bone, a tooth dependent structure that derives its blood supply from the periodontal ligament (PDL). The PDL loss after tooth extraction results in rapid resorption of the bundle bone, leading to horizontal and vertical ridge reduction (Araújo and Lindhe, 2005, Schropp et al., 2003). Studies have shown that 50% of ridge width reduction occurs within 12 months, with two thirds of this reduction occurring within the first 3 months (Schropp et al., 2003). Moreover, the labial plate thickness in the anterior maxilla is frequently thinner than 1 mm in the majority of cases (Huynh-Ba et al., 2010). The high incidence of mid-facial recession and soft tissue volume loss is attributed to those biological events.\n\nAlthough IIP has become increasingly popular due to its short treatment time, it doesn't prevent physiological remodeling associated with bundle bone resorption (Araújo and Lindhe, 2005). Consequently, soft tissue collapse and midfacial recession remain common complications, especially in thin periodontal phenotypes (Chappuis et al., 2013, Cosyn et al., 2012). In order to overcome the inevitable consequences of tooth extraction, a variety of ridge preservation techniques were proposed in the literature including; flapless implant placement, bone grafting, soft tissue augmentation procedures, immediate provisionalization, a more palatal orientation of the implant in the socket and the socket shield technique.",[27,28],"Immediate Dental Implant Placement","Anterior Maxilla",[30,31,32],"Esthetic zone","immediate implant placement","socket shield","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-29",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-07-01","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-09-01",{"date":41,"type":21},"2027-11-01",{"name":43,"class":44},"International Dental Contiuing Education","NETWORK",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":55,"phases":4,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":69,"locationsCount":4},"100634398","factors-affecting-immediate-anterior-implants-esthetics-100634398","NCT07539168","Factors Affecting Immediate Anterior Implants Esthetics.","Factors Affecting Immediate Anterior Implants Esthetics . Clinical Retrospective Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* flapless immediately placed implants in esthetic zone with 3 years follow up CBCT,\n* presence of immediate postoperative CBCT,\n* initial intact thick gingival biotype with at least 2 mm band of keratinized tissue\n* thin intact labial bone plate (\\\u003C 1mm) extending 7 mm apically assessed by CBCT with good apical bone\n* patients who had provided an informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients with medical conditions that would compromise the surgical procedures, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, taking IV bis-phosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis\n* patients with active infection related at the site of implant and patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.",{"count":54,"type":21},500,"OBSERVATIONAL","This retrospective cohort study evaluates clinical, surgical, and prosthetic factors associated with early and mid-term outcomes of immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. The primary objective is to identify predictors of implant survival and complications (e.g., infection, soft-tissue dehiscence, esthetic failure) within 12 months following placement. Secondary objectives include assessment of peri-implant marginal bone loss, prosthetic complications, and esthetic outcomes (pink esthetic score).",[58,59,60],"Pink Esthetic Score","Implant Survival Rate","Immediate Implant Placement",[62],"Immediate implant, esthetics, anterior maxilla","2026-04-17",{"date":65,"type":37},"2026-04-22",{"date":67,"type":21},"2026-06-01",{"date":39,"type":21},{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":71,"slug":72,"hasResults":11,"nctId":73,"briefTitle":74,"officialTitle":75,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":76,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":77,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":79,"briefSummary":80,"conditions":81,"keywords":83,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":87,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":88,"startDateStruct":90,"completionDateStruct":92,"leadSponsor":94,"locationsCount":4},"100626302","evaluation-of-implant-stability-following-maxillary-sinus-floor-elevation-through-piezoelectric-trans-crestal-approach-versus-crestal-implant-approach-100626302","NCT07433868","Evaluation of Implant Stability Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Through Piezoelectric Trans-crestal Approach Versus Crestal Implant Approach","Evaluation of Implant Stability Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Through Piezoelectric Trans-crestal Approach Versus Crestal Implant Approach: A 1-year Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who have at least one missing posterior maxillary tooth with sound adjacent and opposing dentition.\n* Adults above the age of 21.\n* Bone height from 4mm to 6mm under the maxillary sinus assessed in CBCT.\n* Good oral hygiene.\n* Patient accepts to provide an informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Smokers.\n* Pregnant and lactating females.\n* Medically compromised patients.\n* Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.\n* Patients with active infection related to the implant site.\n* Patients with parafunctional habits.\n* Patients with Acute or chronic sinusitis.\n* Presence of sinus septa\n* History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the past 2 years",{"count":78,"type":21},26,[24],"Rehabilitation of the maxillary posterior region is a challenge in every-day clinical practice. Following extraction of maxillary molars, alveolar ridge atrophy along with maxillary sinus pneumatization decrease the bone volume and increase implant placement complexity (Lyu et al., 2023). Several surgical procedures have been proposed to overcome these complications, including; short implants (Bechara et al., 2017), tilted implants (Meng and Zhang, 2022) as well as different sinus floor elevation techniques (Irinakis, 2011, Bishbish et al., 2023, Dragonas et al., 2023). Crestal maxillary sinus floor elevation has been considered a predictable and less invasive approach, providing sufficient vertical ridge height with high rates of implant survival (Guruprasad et al., 2024). However, there's limited body of evidence comparing the efficacy of different trans-crestal approaches as PISE and crestal implant approach with no bone graft. Thus, further clinical trials are recommended to determine whether the adjunctive use of piezoelectric instrumentation in internal sinus elevation offers significant clinical advantages over the crestal implant approach.",[82],"Internal Sinus Lifting",[84,85,86],"crestal implant approach","PISE","implant stability","2026-02-26",{"date":89,"type":37},"2026-03-02",{"date":91,"type":21},"2026-03-01",{"date":93,"type":21},"2027-05-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":96,"slug":97,"hasResults":11,"nctId":98,"briefTitle":99,"officialTitle":100,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":101,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":102,"enrollmentInfo":103,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":105,"briefSummary":106,"conditions":107,"keywords":110,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":113,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":114,"startDateStruct":116,"completionDateStruct":118,"leadSponsor":120,"locationsCount":45},"100616266","flapless-immediate-implant-placement-with-socket-shield-technique-versus-connective-tissue-graft-in-anterior-maxilla-100616266","NCT07303374","Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla","Supra-Implant Complex Stability Following Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Initial intact thick gingival biotype\n* 2 mm band of keratinized tissue,\n* Thin intact labial bone plate (\\\u003C 1mm)\n* Good apical bone for primary stability\n* Patients who had provided an informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Immediate implants with bone grafts or guided bone regeneration procedures\n* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus\n* Patients taking IV bisphosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis\n* Patients with active infection related at the site of implant\n* Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.","50 Years",{"count":104,"type":21},28,[24],"The present study aims to compare the dimensional stability of the supra-implant complex following flapless immediate implant placement using two socket management approaches: the connective tissue graft and the socket shield technique. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be employed to assess and quantify changes in soft and hard tissue thickness and height surrounding the implant site.",[27,108,109],"Connective Tissue Graft","Socket Shield Technique",[111,112],"Socket Shield","Connective tissue graft","2025-12-18",{"date":115,"type":37},"2025-12-24",{"date":117,"type":21},"2026-02",{"date":119,"type":21},"2027-05",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":122,"slug":123,"hasResults":11,"nctId":124,"briefTitle":125,"officialTitle":126,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":127,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":128,"maxAge":129,"enrollmentInfo":130,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":132,"briefSummary":133,"conditions":134,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":136,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":137,"startDateStruct":139,"completionDateStruct":141,"leadSponsor":143,"locationsCount":4},"100604829","esthetic-outcome-of-3d-printed-hybrid-ceramics-as-final-restorations-for-single-screw-retained-implant-100604829","NCT07154602","Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.","Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant. A Clinical Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: between 18 and 70 years old at the time of screening.\n* Patients with implants placed and in need for crown restoration\n* Medically free with no systemic diseases.\n* Good oral hygiene with no active periodontal disease.\n* Patient's having adequate interocclusal and mesiodistal restorative space for the fabrication of a single implant-supported crown.\n* Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study, understanding its risks, benefits, and alternative treatments.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, severe cardiovascular disease, active autoimmune disorders, uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction).\n* Patients with composite restoration on the labial\u002Fbuccal surface implant's neighbouring.\n* Immunocompromised patients or those undergoing immunosuppressive therapy.\n* Patients undergoing radiation therapy to the head and neck region, or chemotherapy.\n* Patients currently on or with a history of medications known to significantly affect bone metabolism (e.g., long-term bisphosphonates, corticosteroids).\n* Pregnancy or lactation.\n* Known allergies to titanium, resin components, or any other materials used in the study (e.g., composite, zirconia).","18 Years","70 Years",{"count":131,"type":21},32,[24],"clinical trial\n\nThe goal of this clinical trial is to record the esthetic outcome of the 3d printed hybrid resin crowns. It will also test which method of fabrication is advantageous than the other one. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes any of the fabrication methods differ in its esthetic outcome?\n\nResearcher will compare 3d printing fabrication to conventional fabrication method which is the milling technique to see if 3d printing of hybrid resin serves patients a better crown's esthetic outcome.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nReceive a crown after implants are osseointegrated Visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups and tests Keep records of level of patient's satisfaction.",[135],"3D Printing","2025-08-26",{"date":138,"type":37},"2025-09-04",{"date":140,"type":21},"2025-11-01",{"date":142,"type":21},"2026-11-01",{"name":43,"class":44},""]