[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Junbo Liang\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":84},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,45,65],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":44},"100643506","robot-assisted-minimally-invasive-treatment-versus-conventional-surgery-for-ffp3-4-fragility-fractures-of-the-pelvis-in-elderly-patients-100643506",false,"NCT07639619","Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis in Elderly Patients","Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Elderly Patients With FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 60 years\n* Low energy trauma\n* Diagnosis of osteoporosis\n* Diagnosis of FFP3 or FFP4 fragility fractures of the pelvis\n* Injury duration less than 3 weeks\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe open injury or skin infection at the surgical site\n* Hemodynamic instability preventing anesthesia or surgery\n* Severe psychiatric disorders or dementia\n* Severe obesity affecting imaging quality\n* Severe systemic diseases preventing surgery\n* Pathological fracture\n* Current chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic corticosteroid therapy, or growth factor therapy","ALL","60 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},88,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conventional surgery in elderly patients with FFP3-4 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, imaging outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies in elderly patients with unstable pelvic fragility fractures.",[26,27],"Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP)","Osteoporosis",[29,30,31],"Fragility Fracture","Robot Assisted Surgery","pelvis","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-09",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-06-10","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":20},"2026-06-01",{"date":40,"type":20},"2028-12-30",{"name":42,"class":43},"Junbo Liang","OTHER",1,{"id":46,"slug":47,"hasResults":11,"nctId":48,"briefTitle":49,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":58,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":60,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":61,"startDateStruct":62,"completionDateStruct":63,"leadSponsor":64,"locationsCount":4},"100643300","robot-assisted-minimally-invasive-treatment-versus-conservative-treatment-for-fragility-fractures-of-the-pelvis-type-1-2-in-elderly-patients-100643300","NCT07636616","Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Type 1-2 in Elderly Patients","Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients With FFP1-2 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis","FFP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAge ≥ 60 years Low energy trauma Diagnosis of osteoporosis Diagnosis of FFP1 or FFP2 fragility fractures of the pelvis Injury duration less than 3 weeks Ability to walk independently or with assistance before injury Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nSevere open injury or skin infection at the surgical site Long term bedridden status or severe disability Severe psychiatric disorders or dementia Severe obesity affecting imaging quality Severe systemic diseases preventing surgery Pathological fracture Current chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic corticosteroid therapy, or growth factor therapy",{"count":54,"type":20},152,[23],"This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted minimally invasive treatment versus conservative treatment in elderly patients with FFP1-2 fragility fractures of the pelvis. Eligible patients will be stratified according to FFP classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or standardized conservative treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, functional recovery, fracture progression, venous thromboembolism events, complications, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing treatment strategies in elderly patients with pelvic fragility fractures.",[26],[29,31,30,59],"Conservative Treatment","2026-06-03",{"date":33,"type":36},{"date":38,"type":20},{"date":40,"type":20},{"name":42,"class":43},{"id":66,"slug":67,"hasResults":11,"nctId":68,"briefTitle":69,"officialTitle":70,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":71,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":72,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":73,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":74,"briefSummary":75,"conditions":76,"keywords":78,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":79,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":80,"startDateStruct":81,"completionDateStruct":82,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":4},"100638781","robot-assisted-treatment-versus-conventional-surgery-for-tile-b-and-c-pelvic-fractures-100638781","NCT07624942","Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures","Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Diagnosis of Tile B or Tile C pelvic fracture\n* Injury duration less than 3 weeks\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe open injury or skin infection at the surgical site\n* Hemodynamic instability preventing anesthesia or surgery\n* Severe psychiatric disorders or dementia\n* Severe obesity affecting imaging quality\n* Severe systemic diseases preventing surgery\n* Pathological fracture\n* Current chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic corticosteroid therapy, or growth factor therapy","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},[23],"This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted treatment versus conventional surgery in patients with Tile B and C pelvic fractures. Eligible patients will be stratified according to Tile fracture classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment. Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, imaging outcomes, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, opioid consumption, and healthcare resource utilization. The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies for unstable pelvic fractures.",[77],"Pelvic Fracture",[77,30],"2026-05-30",{"date":60,"type":36},{"date":38,"type":20},{"date":40,"type":20},{"name":42,"class":43},""]