[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Meltem Gunes Akinci\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":64},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,44],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":34,"startDateStruct":37,"completionDateStruct":39,"leadSponsor":41,"locationsCount":4},"100621035","pelvic-restricted-vs-pelvic-free-robot-assisted-gait-training-in-stroke-patients-100621035",false,"NCT07365384","Pelvic-Restricted vs. Pelvic-Free Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Stroke Patients","Comparison of Pelvic-Free and Pelvic-Restricted Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Pattern, Balance, and Fear of Falling After Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* History of stroke more than 6 months prior\n* Presence of hemiplegia-related gait disorder\n* Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score ≥ 2\n* Ability to walk independently prior to stroke\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe cognitive or communication impairment\n* Movement limitations due to joint contracture or deformity\n* Presence of open wounds or pressure ulcers\n* Uncontrolled hypertension or orthostatic hypotension\n* Severe cardiovascular disease, heart failure, cancer, or serious pulmonary disease\n* High risk of fracture due to severe osteoporosis\n* Gait impairment caused by lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders\n* Severe psychosis\u002Fneurosis\n* Modified Ashworth Scale \\> 3 in the lower extremities (severe spasticity)","ALL","18 Years","75 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},36,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of pelvic-free versus pelvic-restricted robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on gait pattern, balance, and fear of falling in stroke patients. Stroke survivors often experience gait impairments, reduced balance, and fear of falling, which limit independence and quality of life. Conventional physiotherapy requires high intensity and repetition but is restricted by therapist capacity. Robotic gait systems provide intensive, repetitive, and safe training; however, most limit pelvic motion, potentially disrupting natural gait patterns and balance strategies.\n\nA total of 36 participants with chronic stroke (≥6 months post-stroke, age ≥18 years, hemiplegic gait disorder, Functional Ambulation Category ≥2) will be randomized into two groups: (1) pelvic-free RAGT plus conventional rehabilitation, or (2) pelvic-restricted RAGT plus conventional rehabilitation. Interventions will consist of 8 RAGT sessions (twice weekly) and 20 conventional rehabilitation sessions (five times weekly) over 4 weeks.\n\nPrimary outcomes include gait analysis parameters (gait speed, step length, cadence, temporal symmetry index) and clinical measures such as the Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulation Category, Motricity Index (lower limb), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International. Assessments will be performed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.\n\nThe study hypothesizes that pelvic-free RAGT will improve gait symmetry, balance, and reduce fear of falling more effectively than pelvic-restricted training. Results are expected to provide evidence supporting the integration of pelvic-free robotic gait systems into post-stroke rehabilitation to enhance functional recovery and patient confidence",[27,28,29,30,31],"Stroke","Hemiplegia","Gait Disorder, Sensorimotor","Balance Impairment","Fear of Falling","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-01-23",{"date":35,"type":36},"2026-01-26","ACTUAL",{"date":38,"type":21},"2026-01-15",{"date":40,"type":21},"2026-04",{"name":42,"class":43},"Meltem Gunes Akinci","OTHER",{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":52,"briefSummary":53,"conditions":54,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":32,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":33,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":59,"startDateStruct":60,"completionDateStruct":61,"leadSponsor":63,"locationsCount":4},"100608621","effects-of-robotic-rehabilitation-on-quality-of-life-mood-and-fatigue-after-stroke-100608621","NCT07203937","Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation on Quality of Life, Mood, and Fatigue After Stroke","Effects of Combined Robotic and Conventional Lower Limb Rehabilitation on Quality of Life, Depression, Anxiety, and Fatigue After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 75 years\n* History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least 3 months prior to enrollment\n* Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 24 or higher\n* Modified Ashworth Scale score \\\u003C 2 in the lower extremities\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe cognitive or communication impairment\n* Mobility limitations due to joint contracture or deformity\n* Presence of open wounds or pressure ulcers\n* Uncontrolled hypertension or orthostatic hypotension\n* Severe cardiovascular disease, heart failure, cancer, or significant pulmonary disease\n* High fracture risk due to severe osteoporosis\n* Ambulation difficulty caused by lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders\n* Severe psychosis or neurosis\n* Modified Ashworth Scale score \\> 3 in the lower extremities",{"count":20,"type":21},[24],"Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability and is often associated with reduced quality of life, depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Rehabilitation plays a key role in recovery, and robotic-assisted gait training provides intensive, repetitive, and individualized therapy. However, its effects on psychological outcomes and quality of life are not fully established.\n\nThis randomized controlled trial will compare conventional rehabilitation combined with robotic-assisted gait training to conventional rehabilitation combined with treadmill training in stroke survivors. Both groups will receive treatment 5 days per week for 6 weeks.\n\nAssessments will be conducted at baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, and at 3 months after treatment. The primary outcome is quality of life. Secondary outcomes include depression, anxiety, and fatigue. The results of this study will provide new evidence on the benefits of robotic rehabilitation for improving both physical and psychological well-being after stroke.",[27,55,56,57,58],"Post-stroke Depression","Post-stroke Anxiety","Post-stroke Fatigue","Quality of Life",{"date":35,"type":36},{"date":38,"type":21},{"date":62,"type":21},"2026-07",{"name":42,"class":43},""]