[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Mohamed R El Tahan\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":49},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":44,"leadSponsor":46,"locationsCount":5},"100592077","impact-of-total-coronary-revascularization-via-left-anterior-thoracotomy-tcrat-vs-robotic-assisted-harvesting-of-lima-itcrats-100592077",false,"NCT06988735","Impact of Total Coronary Revascularization Via Left Anterior Thoracotomy (TCRAT) vs. Robotic-Assisted Harvesting of LIMA (ITcrats)","Impact of Total Coronary Revascularization Via Left Anterior Thoracotomy (TCRAT) vs. Robotic-Assisted Harvesting of Left Internal Thoracic Artery on Hospital Stay (ITcrats)","ITcrats","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Scheduled for any type of elective minimally invasive coronary revascularization surgery.\n* Using CPB.\n* General anesthesia is provided in an endotracheally intubated patient\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Planned for coronary revascularization surgery without CPB;\n* Planned for a combined coronary revascularization surgery and a valve or intra-cardiac surgery;\n* LVEF less than 35%;\n* Preoperative cardiogenic shock;\n* Pregnancy;\n* Scheduled for re-do or emergency surgery;\n* Consent for another interventional study during anesthesia;\n* No written informed consent;\n* Preoperative need for mechanical circulatory support;\n* Preoperative need for invasive ventilatory support;","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},182,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The two types of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) might have their potential benefits and disadvantages. The proposed randomized clinical trial here will compare 'RA-TCRAT' with 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedures concerning effects on hospital stays, overall healthcare costs, safety, and feasibility. If the two TCRAT procedures are comparably effective and safe, the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is probably preferred as it seems easier to use. However, if the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is less effective and less safe than the \"robotic TCRAT,' that procedure should be preferred.",[27,28],"Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularization Surgery","Elective Surgery",[30,31,32,33,34,35,36],"minimally invasive coronary revascularization surgery","robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft (RA-CABG)","major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE)","major adverse cerebrovascular events","cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)","hospital stays","costs and charges","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-06-01",{"date":40,"type":41},"2025-06-04","ACTUAL",{"date":43,"type":21},"2025-07",{"date":45,"type":21},"2027-08",{"name":47,"class":48},"Mohamed R El Tahan","OTHER",""]