[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Montclair State University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":147},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,41,61,90,123],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100619447","blood-flow-restriction-resistance-exercise-and-cardiac-cycle-dynamics-100619447",false,"NCT07344740","Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise and Cardiac Cycle Dynamics","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Generally healthy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Uncontrolled hypertension\n* Peripheral vascular disease\n* Lymphedema\n* Sickle cell anemia\n* Heart failure\n* Stroke history\n* Heart attack history\n* Rheumatoid arthritis\n* Chronic kidney disease\n* Diabetes\n* Severe neuropathy\n* Any condition that may make blood flow restriction resistance exercise riskier like history of blood clots\n* Use of coagulant therapy\n* Susceptible to blood clots\n* Obesity",true,"ALL","18 Years","50 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Blood flow restriction resistance exercise uses partial vascular occlusion of a limb during low weight resistance exercises to stimulate muscle strengthening and growth. This is commonly used during rehabilitation from an injury. Because blood flow in and out of the limbs is decreased, this may have consequences for blood flow through the heart. The purpose of this study will be to test cardiac dynamics during blood flow restriction resistance exercise to determine if cardiac blood flow is impacted. It is hypothesized that both non-BFR exercise and BFR exercise will increase heart rate shortening various cardiac cycle parameters, but BFR exercise will increase the isovolumetric contraction time vs non-BFR exercise due to an increase in total peripheral resistance. It is also hypothesized that BFR exercise will lower early ventricular filling parameters due to lower venous return.",[27],"Cardiac","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-11",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-02-13","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":21},"2026-02-01",{"date":36,"type":21},"2028-01-01",{"name":38,"class":39},"Montclair State University","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":45,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":46,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":47,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":49,"briefSummary":50,"conditions":51,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":53,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":54,"startDateStruct":56,"completionDateStruct":58,"leadSponsor":60,"locationsCount":4},"100616685","effects-of-a-peer-mentoring-program-on-undergraduate-students-outcomes-and-perspectives-related-to-a-career-in-communication-sciences-and-disorders-100616685","NCT07308821","Effects of a Peer-mentoring Program on Undergraduate Students' Outcomes and Perspectives Related to a Career in Communication Sciences and Disorders","Inclusion Criteria: enrolled in CSND 100 -\n\nExclusion Criteria: not enrolled in CSND 100\n\n\\-",{"count":48,"type":21},65,[24],"The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of implementing a semester-long mentoring program in Communication Sciences \\& Disorders on its participants and how the experience differs from the students who did not participate.",[52],"Mentoring","2025-12-22",{"date":55,"type":32},"2025-12-30",{"date":57,"type":21},"2025-12-15",{"date":59,"type":21},"2026-06",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":62,"slug":63,"hasResults":11,"nctId":64,"briefTitle":65,"officialTitle":66,"acronym":67,"eligibilityCriteria":68,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":69,"maxAge":70,"enrollmentInfo":71,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":73,"briefSummary":74,"conditions":75,"keywords":77,"overallStatus":82,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":83,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":84,"startDateStruct":86,"completionDateStruct":87,"leadSponsor":89,"locationsCount":40},"100596151","biofeedback-online-for-sibilant-treatment-100596151","NCT07041723","BiOfeedback, Online for Sibilant Treatment","Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: BiOfeedback, Online for Sibilant Treatment","BOOST","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 8;0 and 17;11 years at the time of enrollment\n* English as the dominant language (must have begun learning English by age 3, per parent report)\n* Passes pure-tone hearing screening at 30 dB hearing level\n* Passes brief examination of oral structure and function\n* Less than 30% accuracy, based on consensus across 2 trained listeners, on a probe list eliciting fricative \u002Fs, z\u002F in various phonetic contexts at the word level\n* No more than 3 sounds other than \u002Fs\u002F in error on the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3)\n* Diagnosis of ADHD, learning disability, dyslexia, or neurodiversity is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1\n* History of CAS is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1\n* Braces and removable retainers are admissible\n* Access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Scaled score of 7 or higher on the Recalling Sentences and Formulated Sentences subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5)\n* History of permanent hearing loss (temporary hearing loss due to otitis media, including recurrent OM\u002Ftubes, is admissible)\n* History of developmental disorder (e.g., Down syndrome, cerebral palsy)\n* History of major brain injury, surgery, or stroke in the past year (mild concussion is admissible)\n* Active diagnosis of epilepsy or other neurological disorder (permissible if well-controlled for at least 6 months)\n* Current diagnosis of voice or fluency disorder\n* Current presence of orthodontia that crosses the palate (braces and removable retainers are admissible)\n* Lack of access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions","8 Years","17 Years",{"count":72,"type":21},6,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of sibilant biofeedback treatment delivered via telepractice in six children ages 8:0-17;11 who present with distortions of \u002Fs\u002F. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Primary hypothesis: Biofeedback treatment for sibilants delivered via telepractice will produce positive gains compared to a no-treatment baseline phase.\n* Secondary hypothesis: Participants will experience positive changes in social-emotional well-being after receiving biofeedback treatment for sibilants as reported by the participants and their guardians.\n\nFollowing the initial evaluation, participants will be randomly assigned to transition from baseline to treatment at one of seven possible points, ranging from 4-10 baseline sessions in which \u002Fs\u002F production will be probed but not treated. All participants will then receive 20, 1-hour biofeedback treatment sessions over 10 weeks with a certified Speech-Language Pathologist via teletherapy, followed by three maintenance sessions.",[76],"Speech Sound Disorder",[78,79,80,81],"speech intervention","biofeedback","articulation disorder","lisp","RECRUITING","2025-07-30",{"date":85,"type":32},"2025-08-03",{"date":83,"type":32},{"date":88,"type":21},"2027-07",{"name":38,"class":39},{"id":91,"slug":92,"hasResults":11,"nctId":93,"briefTitle":94,"officialTitle":95,"acronym":96,"eligibilityCriteria":97,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":69,"maxAge":98,"enrollmentInfo":99,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":101,"briefSummary":102,"conditions":103,"keywords":106,"overallStatus":82,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":114,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":115,"startDateStruct":117,"completionDateStruct":119,"leadSponsor":121,"locationsCount":122},"100585603","brain-activity-changes-after-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-for-anxiety-in-autistic-youth-from-high-need-communities-100585603","NCT06904508","Brain Activity Changes After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Autistic Youth From High-Need Communities","Electrophysiological Correlates of Anxiety-related Improvements Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Autistic Youth in High-Need Communities","IAA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Between the ages of 8 and 14\n* Have significant deficits in reciprocal social behavior as defined by a score of 11 or above on the parent-report SCQ questionnaire\n* Are verbally fluent in English, enabling them to participate in the appropriate modules (3 or 4) of the researcher-administered ADOS-2\n* Have an estimated verbal IQ of 70 or above as determined by the researcher-administered KBIT-2\n* Have clinically significant anxiety symptoms as defined by significant elevations on either the parent-report SCARED questionnaire or the parent-report PRAS-ASD questionnaire\n* Have a legal guardian who can provide consent for their child's participation as well as their own participation in the intervention alongside their child. If the legal guardian is unable to participate in the intervention themselves but would like for their child to receive the intervention with another caregiver who lives with the child, the legal guardian will still be the one to sign the consent form, but will provide permission for another caregiver (logged on the consent form) to participate in the intervention alongside the child\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Fail to meet any of the above inclusion criteria\n* If it is determined by the research team via parent report or direct observation that the child has a severe medical or psychiatric impairment (e.g., psychosis, severe aggressive behavior, or other severe clinical symptoms) that require more intensive treatment such as day treatment or hospitalization","14 Years",{"count":100,"type":21},60,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate neural constructs related to anxiety symptoms in response to Facing Your Fears (FYF) treatment in autistic participants with co-occurring anxiety.\n\nResearchers will compare participants receiving immediate FYF intervention to those in the waitlist control group (receiving treatment as usual) to see if there are differences in neural constructs and anxiety symptom changes over the study period.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Complete the Facing Your Fears (FYF) intervention if assigned to the immediate treatment group\n* Continue their usual treatment during a waitlist period if assigned to the control group, followed by the opportunity to participate in FYF intervention after the waiting period ends\n* Complete assessments of neural constructs, anxiety symptoms, and other measures",[104,105],"Autism Spectrum Disorder","Anxiety",[107,108,109,110,111,112,113],"autism","autism spectrum disorder","anxiety","youth","randomized controlled trial","cognitive behavioral therapy","electroencephalogram","2025-06-19",{"date":116,"type":32},"2025-06-25",{"date":118,"type":32},"2025-04-30",{"date":120,"type":21},"2027-09",{"name":38,"class":39},2,{"id":124,"slug":125,"hasResults":11,"nctId":126,"briefTitle":127,"officialTitle":128,"acronym":129,"eligibilityCriteria":130,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":69,"maxAge":70,"enrollmentInfo":131,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":132,"briefSummary":133,"conditions":134,"keywords":135,"overallStatus":82,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":139,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":140,"startDateStruct":142,"completionDateStruct":144,"leadSponsor":146,"locationsCount":40},"100590600","online-rotating-delivery-of-perceptionproduction-enhanced-treatment-for-rhotics-100590600","NCT06969521","Online Rotating Delivery of Perception\u002FProduction Enhanced Treatment for Rhotics","Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Online Rotating Delivery of Perception\u002FProduction Enhanced Treatment for Rhotics","ORDER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nMust be between 8;0 and 17;11 years of age at the time of enrollment. Must speak English as the dominant language (i.e., must have begun learning English by age 2, per parent report).\n\nMust speak a rhotic dialect of English. Must pass a pure-tone hearing screening at 20dB hearing level. Must pass a brief examination of oral structure and function. Must exhibit less than 30% accuracy, based on consensus across 2 trained listeners, on a probe list eliciting rhotics in various phonetic contexts at the word level.\n\nMust exhibit no more than 3 sounds other than \u002Fr\u002F in error on the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nMust not receive a T score more than 1.3 SD below the mean on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-2 (WASI-2) Matrix Reasoning Must not receive a scaled score of 7 or higher on the Recalling Sentences and Formulated Sentences subtests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5).\n\nMust not have an existing diagnosis of developmental disability or major neurobehavioral syndrome such as cerebral palsy, Down Syndrome, or Autism Spectrum Disorder",{"count":100,"type":21},[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether perceptual training enhances speech perception and production outcomes in children with Residual Speech Sound Disorders (RSSD). The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes pre-treatment speech production accuracy predict treatment response?\n\nDoes perceptual acuity influence the effectiveness of perception-first versus production-first interventions?\n\nResearchers will compare TAU+Perception-first and TAU-first treatment conditions to see if the order of intervention affects speech improvement outcomes, particularly based on participants' initial perception and production accuracy.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nComplete pre-treatment evaluations to assess \u002Fr\u002F production and speech perception.\n\nBe grouped into high or low production and perception accuracy categories based on established thresholds.\n\nBe randomly assigned (using a blocked randomization procedure) to one of two treatment arms via telepractice.\n\nParticipate in the assigned treatment condition designed to target speech sound accuracy.\n\nRandomization is stratified to ensure treatment groups are balanced based on pre-treatment severity in both the perception and production domains.",[76],[136,137,138],"speech sound disorder","auditory perception","articulation","2025-05-22",{"date":141,"type":32},"2025-05-29",{"date":143,"type":32},"2025-05-10",{"date":145,"type":21},"2027-07-01",{"name":38,"class":39},""]