[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Noor Sattar Raheem\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":48},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":5},"100614504","effectiveness-of-gold-fixed-retainers-compared-to-conventional-stainless-steel-retainers-100614504",false,"NCT07280455","Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers","The Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: 15-30 years.\n* Patients who have completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment ,with well-aligned mandibular anterior teeth (Little's Irregularity Index ≤ 0.5 mm) at debond; both extraction and non-extraction cases are eligible.\n* Patients with good oral hygiene and healthy periodontium at baseline; no previous bonded retainer.\n* All mandibular anterior teeth present (canine-canine), with sound lingual enamel suitable for bonding.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) or surgically assisted RME (SARME).\n* Patients with a cleft lip \u002F and or palate (craniofacial anomalies).\n* Patients with marked deep overbite and\u002For parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching).\n* Patients with conditions precluding reliable bonding in the mandibular anterior segment (active caries, extensive restorations, enamel fractures) or missing teeth from canine to canine.\n* Patients with medical\u002Fperiodontal conditions likely to affect gingival health (e.g., active periodontitis, uncontrolled systemic disease).","ALL","15 Years","30 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of a gold-plated multistranded mandibular fixed retainer versus a conventional multistranded stainless-steel fixed retainer in maintaining lower anterior tooth alignment after completion of orthodontic treatment. Eligible participants (post-orthodontic patients requiring mandibular fixed retention) will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a gold-plated 0.0195-inch multistranded retainer or an identical-gauge 0.0195-inch stainless-steel multistranded retainer. Participants will be followed for 6 months.\n\nThe primary outcome is post-treatment stability of mandibular anterior alignment, assessed by changes in Little's Irregularity Index over time, along with retainer failure outcomes (e.g., time to first failure and tooth-level failure events). Secondary outcomes include periodontal health indices and related clinical measures collected at baseline and follow-up visits.\n\nFor the microbiological assessment, plaque\u002Fbiofilm will be collected from the retainer using sterile swabs at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months to evaluate bacterial levels associated with each retainer material.",[27,28],"Orthodontic Retention Appliance","Orthodontic Relapse",[30,31,32,33,34,35],"fixed retainer","gold-coated retainer wire","stainless steel retainer wire","Little's Irregularity Index","retainer failure","periodontal indices","RECRUITING","2025-12-11",{"date":39,"type":40},"2025-12-12","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2025-11-01",{"date":44,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":46,"class":47},"Noor Sattar Raheem","OTHER",""]