[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":220},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,8,0,[8,47,76,100,123,148,171,198],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100641348","comparative-effectiveness-of-different-neural-mobilization-techniques-in-plantar-fasciitis-100641348",false,"NCT07657533","Comparative Effectiveness of Different Neural Mobilization Techniques in Plantar Fasciitis","Comparative Effectiveness of Different Neural Mobilization Techniques in Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial","RCT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Anyone between the ages of 18 and 50\n* plantar heel pain for six weeks or more was eligible to participate.","ALL","18 Years","50 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","BThis study will be designed to compare between the effect of adding posterior tibial nerve or saphenous nerve mobilization to the traditional physical therapy on pain intensity, foot function, pressure pain threshold, ankle dorsiflexion ROM and central sensitization in patients with PF.",[28],"Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic",[30,31,32,33],"plantar fasciopathy","neural mobilization","conventional therapy","central sensitization","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-14",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-06-18","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":22},"2026-07-01",{"date":42,"type":22},"2026-10-01",{"name":44,"class":45},"Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":53,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":55,"minAge":56,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":63,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":4},"100638054","concurrent-exercise-training-100638054","NCT07630025","Concurrent Exercise Training","The Impact of Morning Versus Evening Concurrent High-Intensity Interval Training and Resistance Training on Glycemic Control in in Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial","T2D","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* men aged 40-60 years with a diagnosis of T2D\n* HbA1c levels between 7.0% and 9.0%\n* treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents for at least 6 months\n* a BMI \\\u003C30 kg\u002Fm²\n* a physically inactive\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* current insulin therapy\n* a cardiovascular event within the previous 6 months\n* cardiovascular, respiratory or musculoskeletal conditions that could limit participation in exercise training\n* body weight instability","MALE","40 Years","60 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the influence of morning versus evening concurrent training consisting of high-intensity interval training and resistance training on glycemic control in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n• Which time is best for concurrent exercise training in diabetic patients, morning or evening? Researchers will compare morning versus evening concurrent training consisting of HIIT and RT on glycemic control in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Perform concurrent training consisting of high-intensity interval training and resistance training for 12 weeks\n* Visit the clinic before and after the 12-week experimental period for checkups and tests",[62],"Typ 2 Diabetes",[64,65,66,67],"Diabetes","High Intensity Interval Trainin","resistance trsaining","glycemic control","2026-06-01",{"date":70,"type":38},"2026-06-05",{"date":72,"type":22},"2026-06",{"date":74,"type":22},"2026-10",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":11,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":83,"minAge":84,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":97,"leadSponsor":99,"locationsCount":4},"100636060","online-delivered-core-stability-exercises-in-postpartum-women-100636060","NCT07560774","Online-Delivered Core Stability Exercises in Postpartum Women","Effects of Online-Delivered Core Stability Exercises on Postural Control and Trunk Endurance in Postpartum Women","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. singleton pregnancy;\n2. medically uncomplicated delivery;\n3. clearance from a healthcare provider to participate in low- to moderate-intensity exercise;\n4. self-reported difficulties with trunk endurance, balance, or early fatigue during daily activities.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. unresolved obstetric complications;\n2. severe pelvic floor dysfunction requiring specialized medical management; (3) neurological or musculoskeletal conditions affecting balance\n\n(4) participation in structured core training more than once per week during the previous three months.","FEMALE","20 Years",{"count":86,"type":22},40,[25],"This study will examine a 12-week online core stability program for postpartum women, where participants will complete supervised sessions three times per week and will be compared with an education-only group. The intervention group will participate in supervised, real-time sessions via a video-conferencing platform, three times per week for 12 weeks. Exercises combine isometric and dynamic core stability tasks, progressing in difficulty over time. Dynamic postural control will be assessed using the lower quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ), while trunk endurance will be measured using the flexor endurance, extensor endurance, and side bridge tests.",[90,91,92],"Postpartum","Trunk Muscle Endurance","Postural Stability","2026-04-28",{"date":95,"type":38},"2026-05-01",{"date":68,"type":22},{"date":98,"type":22},"2027-02-01",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":101,"slug":102,"hasResults":11,"nctId":103,"briefTitle":104,"officialTitle":105,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":106,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":107,"maxAge":108,"enrollmentInfo":109,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":110,"briefSummary":111,"conditions":112,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":115,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":116,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":120,"leadSponsor":122,"locationsCount":4},"100635821","tele-supervised-dual-task-balance-training-in-community-dwelling-older-adults-at-risk-of-falls-100635821","NCT07557667","Tele-Supervised Dual-Task Balance Training in Community-Dwelling Older Adults at Risk of Falls","Efficacy of Tele-Supervised Dual-Task Balance Training on Gait, Balance, and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults at Risk of Falls","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* sixty literate, community-dwelling older individuals (male and female) 65 years of age or older\n* access to the internet at home (for participants in the tele-supervised group)\n* fall risk defined as a Berg Balance Scale score ˂52 (out of a total of 56 points)\n* at least one fall during the preceding year\n* as well as the capacity to walk on one's own without the need for an assistive device.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, orthopedic conditions)\n* or severe sensory impairments that could interfere with participation or balance were excluded.","65 Years","80 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},[25],"Dual-task training combines movement with cognitive tasks to improve gait, balance, and thinking.\n\nThis study will compare tele-supervised versus onsite dual-task balance training in older adults at risk of falls.\n\nSixty participants aged 65+ will be randomly assigned to either remote or face-to-face training for 8 weeks.\n\nBoth groups will follow the same program, delivered via video calls or direct supervision.\n\nOutcomes measures will include gait speed, balance, and cognition using the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B).",[113,114],"Telerehabilitation","Gait Balance","2026-04-25",{"date":117,"type":38},"2026-04-29",{"date":119,"type":22},"2026-09-10",{"date":121,"type":22},"2027-02-10",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":124,"slug":125,"hasResults":11,"nctId":126,"briefTitle":127,"officialTitle":128,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":129,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":56,"maxAge":130,"enrollmentInfo":131,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":133,"briefSummary":134,"conditions":135,"keywords":137,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":140,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":141,"startDateStruct":143,"completionDateStruct":145,"leadSponsor":147,"locationsCount":46},"100617792","neural-mobilization-and-capsular-stretching-in-adhesive-capsulitis-100617792","NCT07323225","Neural Mobilization and Capsular Stretching in Adhesive Capsulitis","Effectiveness of Combined Neural Mobilization Techniques and Capsular Stretching Exercises in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients from both gender (male \\&female) will be included if they would have second or third stage AC with their age between forty and seventy years\n* experiencing pain, capsular adhesions, and a reduction of greater than fifty percentage in passive ROM of the GH joint (external rotation, abduction, and internal rotation compared to the sound side\n* lasting for a minimum of three months. Patients with positive upper limb tension test-1 will be also included in this study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* they would have stroke,Parkinson's diseases that interfere with shoulder muscles activity\n* diabetes\n* traumatic shoulder conditions\n* glenohumeral osteoarthritis confirmed by x-ray\n* previous surgery, and manipulation of the affected GH joint under general anesthesia\n* Patients with passive elbow extension ROM","70 Years",{"count":132,"type":22},50,[25],"Restriction of glenohumeral (GH) mobility in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) was known owing to capsular adhesion. There is a little evidence about the involvement of neural restriction in limiting range of motion (ROM) of the GH joint in patients with AC. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the combined effect of median nerve mobilization and capsular stretching on improving shoulder external rotation, abduction and internal rotation ROM among patients with AC. Methods Thirty patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups : Group (A) will receive median nerve mobilization and capsular stretching while Group (B) will receive only capsular stretching (anterior, posterior and anteroinferior capsular stretching). Both groups will receive passive and self-assisted exercises. All patients in both groups will be evaluated pre and post treatment for GH external rotation, abduction and internal rotation ROM.",[136],"Adhesive Capsulitis",[138,31,139],"Adhesive capsulitis","capsular stretch","2025-12-28",{"date":142,"type":38},"2026-01-07",{"date":144,"type":22},"2026-01-01",{"date":146,"type":22},"2026-04-10",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":149,"slug":150,"hasResults":11,"nctId":151,"briefTitle":152,"officialTitle":153,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":154,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":155,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":156,"briefSummary":157,"conditions":158,"keywords":160,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":140,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":164,"startDateStruct":166,"completionDateStruct":168,"leadSponsor":170,"locationsCount":46},"100618252","femoral-nerve-mobilization-for-patients-with-knee-osteoarthritis-100618252","NCT07329205","Femoral Nerve Mobilization for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis","Effects of Femoral Nerve Mobilization on Pain Intensity, Function, Quality of Life and Central Sensitization in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients aged 50 years or older, diagnosed with KO according to theAmerican College of Rheumatology's criteria with knee pain, and grade I or II on the Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic scale\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* individuals suffering from chronic conditions considered to be perpetuating factors (e.g., fibromyalgia)\n* those with conditions causing lower extremity pain\n* individuals who had taken analgesics within 24 h before evaluations\n* those who had undergone corticosteroid or local anesthetic infiltration in the year prior to the study or during the follow-up period\n* those using substances that could interfere with treatment\n* those with a previous diagnosis of neuropathy (lumbosacral plexus) or myopathy\n* those with contraindications to mobilization or exercise, and those with cognitive deficits (dementia, Alzheimer's).",{"count":132,"type":22},[25],"Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is considered as a cause of disability among the elderly, causing pain, reduced quality of life, and decreased functionality. There is a limited knowledge about using femoral nerve mobilization in treating patients with arthritic changes.\n\nObjectives: This study will be designed to determine the efficacy of adding of femoral nerve mobilization on pain intensity, function, quality of life and central sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis Methods: Thirty patients (aged ≥50 years with KO Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-II) will be included in this study: Patients will randomly be assigned into two groups: group A will receive traditional physical therapy while group B will receive femoral nerve mobilization in addition to traditional physical therapy. Three sessions will be performed for four weeks by 3 session \u002Fweek. Patients will be evaluated for pain intensity using the numerical rating scale (NRS), knee function by WOMAC scale, quality of life by 12-item Short Form Survey questionnaire (SF-12) and central sensitization by the Arabic version of central sensitization inventory (CSI).",[159],"Knee Osteoarthristis",[161,162,163],"NEURAL MOBILIZATION","Knee osteoarthritis","conventional physical therapy",{"date":165,"type":38},"2026-01-09",{"date":167,"type":22},"2025-12-20",{"date":169,"type":22},"2026-02-25",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":172,"slug":173,"hasResults":11,"nctId":174,"briefTitle":175,"officialTitle":176,"acronym":177,"eligibilityCriteria":178,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":55,"minAge":56,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":179,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":180,"briefSummary":181,"conditions":182,"keywords":183,"overallStatus":189,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":190,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":191,"startDateStruct":193,"completionDateStruct":195,"leadSponsor":197,"locationsCount":46},"100581063","effects-of-combined-high-intensity-interval-training-and-resistance-training-100581063","NCT06845436","Effects of Combined High Intensity Interval Training and Resistance Training","Effects of Combined High Intensity Interval Training and Resistance Training on Body Composition, Blood Pressure, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Obese Hypertensive Men","Hypertension","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* men aged between 40 and 60 years old,\n* have been diagnosed with clinical stage 1 or 2 hypertension,\n* being obese with body mass index more than 30 kg\u002Fm2\n* physically inactive\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* musculoskeletal problems that may limit their ability to participate in resistance or HIIT programs\n* diabetes mellitus\n* a history of respiratory or chronic heart disease",{"count":21,"type":22},[25],"Background: Hypertension has long been considered as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease representing a high public health concern.\n\nObjectives: the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of combined HIIT and resistance training on body composition, blood pressure, and cardiorespiratory fitness in obese hypertensive men.\n\nMethods: This study will make use of sixty obese hypertensive men aged 40 to 60 years. All participants meeting the eligibility criteria will be assigned to one of three groups; combined HIIT and resistance group, HIIT only group or control group. Combined exercise group subjects will undergo weekly three sessions of both HIIT and resistance training for sixteen weeks. The HIIT session will involve four four-minute high-intensity intervals with an intensity of at 80-95% of the HRmax interspersed with two-minute active recovery intervals with intensity of 40% to 60% of the HRmax. The resistance training session will be composed of eight exercises perform 3 sets of 8-12 repetitions with an intensity of 80% of the subject's estimated 1-RM. The HIIT only group perform 12 weeks of HIIT only. The control group subjects will be instructed not to change their usual daily physical activities routine and instructed to abstain from practicing any exercise regimens during the 12-week study period. Body composition measures, blood pressure and VO2peak will be assessed at baseline and at the end of the study period.\n\nResults: All the outcome variables will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks following the treatment period.",[177],[184,185,186,187,188],"hypertension.","obesity","High Intensity Interval Training","resistance training","blood pressure","RECRUITING","2025-06-01",{"date":192,"type":38},"2025-06-04",{"date":194,"type":38},"2025-04-01",{"date":196,"type":22},"2025-07-01",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":199,"slug":200,"hasResults":11,"nctId":201,"briefTitle":202,"officialTitle":203,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":204,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":107,"enrollmentInfo":205,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":207,"briefSummary":208,"conditions":209,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":212,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":213,"startDateStruct":215,"completionDateStruct":217,"leadSponsor":219,"locationsCount":4},"100578518","effects-of-different-positions-on-mechanical-traction-outcome-100578518","NCT06812338","Effects of Different Positions on Mechanical Traction Outcome","Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult 18-65 years of age\n* Non specific LBP persisted for more than 12 weeks\n* At least 4\u002F10 on NPRS\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Vertebral fractures\n* Axial spondylarthritis\n* Aauda equina syndrome\n* Radicular pain\n* Radiculopathy\n* Spinal stenosis\n* Spinal surgeries\n* Malignancy\n* Pregnancy\n* Inflammatory or infectious cases of LBP",{"count":206,"type":22},30,[25],"Our primary purpose for this study is to investigate the effect of different positions during traction on pain, function, and range of motion in adults with non-specific low back pain.",[210,211],"Non-specific Low Back Pain","Lumbar Traction","2025-02-02",{"date":214,"type":38},"2025-02-06",{"date":216,"type":22},"2025-02-15",{"date":218,"type":22},"2025-06",{"name":44,"class":45},""]