[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Prof. Dr. Julia Glombiewski\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":45},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":5},"100576349","network-based-vs-standardized-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-in-chronic-primary-pain-100576349",false,"NCT06784141","Network-Based vs. Standardized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Chronic Primary Pain","Network-Based vs. Standardized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Chronic Primary Pain: A Single-Case Experimental Design With Randomized Baselines","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* main diagnosis of chronic pain (i.e. pain persists for at least 6 months and is the most prominent\u002Fmost burdensome symptom)\n* subjective impairment\u002Fdisability (yes-no)\n* access to a smartphone compatible with the app mPath\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* acute hazard due to suicidality, substance abuse, and\u002For psychosis\n* only migraine\u002Fheadache or migraine\u002Fheadache are the focus of pain\n* analphabetism\n* insufficient German knowledge\n* current psychotherapy\n* current participation in another intervention study\n* physical inability to take part in therapy and study sessions","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},75,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic primary pain (CPP), but overall effect sizes are small to moderate. Process orientation, personalization, and data-driven clinical decision-making may be able to address the heterogeneity among people with CPP and are thus promising ways to increase the effectiveness of CBT for CPP. In a previous study, the feasibility of personalized CBT for CPP using network analysis was investigated. Based on this work, the present study aims to compare this personalized CBT with a standardized CBT as treatment-as-usual condition.\n\nIn a balanced repeated measures design, a personalized CBT intervention is compared with a standardized CBT intervention. Participants are patients with CPP in German outpatient clinics. Primary and secondary outcome measures (disability, treatment expectations, pain intensity, working alliance, and side effects) will be collected after each study period. In addition, a SCED with randomized baselines will be embedded in the study, in which changes in processes relevant to chronic pain will be evaluated.",[26],"Chronic Primary Pain",[28,29,30,31,32],"Chronic Pain","Single Case Experimental Design","Ecological Momentary Assessment","Network Analysis","Cognitive Behavior Therapy","RECRUITING","2025-04-30",{"date":36,"type":37},"2025-05-01","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":20},"2025-04",{"date":41,"type":20},"2027-04",{"name":43,"class":44},"Prof. Dr. Julia Glombiewski","OTHER",""]