[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":226},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,8,0,[8,47,78,106,135,160,181,201],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":4},"100641304","rct---suprapatellar-approach-versus-lateral-parapatellar-approach-in-tibial-shaft-fracture-100641304",false,"NCT07657559","RCT - Suprapatellar Approach Versus Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fracture","Comparison of Suprapatellar Approach Versus Extra-articular Lateral Parapatellar Approach in Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial","ELPP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* age 18-60 years\n* tibial shaft fractures\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* pervious knee injury\n* open fracture at least Gustilo grade II\n* ipsilateral femur and ankle fractures","ALL","18 Years","60 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This study aims to compare 2 surgical techniques for tibial shaft nailing (suprapatellar approach vs extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach). following peri-operative and postoperative outcomes",[28,29],"Tibial Shaft Fracture","Intramedullary Nail",[31,32,33,34],"suprapatellar approach","extra-articular lateral parapatellar approach","intramedullary nailing","tibial shaft fracture","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-14",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-18","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":22},"2026-08-01",{"date":43,"type":22},"2028-08-31",{"name":45,"class":46},"Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand","OTHER",{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":57,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":62,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":77},"100592959","phase-2-peripheral-magnetic-stimulation-with-balance-training-to-decrease-fall-risks-in-diabetic-polyneuropathy-100592959","NCT07000214","Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Balance Training to Decrease Fall Risks in Diabetic Polyneuropathy","Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Balance Training to Decrease Fall Risks in Older Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diabetes mellitus type 2 with any symptoms of distal polyneuropathy, including numbness, paresthesia, dysesthesia, or lower leg weakness.\n* Abnormal 10g monofilament test.\n* Abnormal one-leg stance test (OLST) with eyes open.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Chronic foot ulceration.\n* Severe leg or foot pain not controllable with medications or other interventions.\n* Significant foot deformity, including severe pes cavus, severe claw toe, or toe amputation.\n* Body mass index (BMI) over 35 kg\u002Fm².\n* Visual acuity less than 20\u002F100 after correction with glasses or contact lenses.\n* Postural instability or coordination disorders resulting from musculoskeletal, vestibular, or central nervous system conditions.\n* Symptoms such as confusion, drowsiness, dizziness, or a high risk of falls due to any disease or recent medication changes within a two-week period.\n* Presence of cardiac pacemaker, knee prosthesis, or metal implants in the lower legs.\n* Inability to walk or stand for at least 5 minutes.\n* Inability to understand, comprehend, or follow instructions required to conduct the study, or to provide informed consent.","50 Years","75 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},[58],"PHASE2","This study aims to determine whether peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) during balance training in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy reduces fall risk, as measured by balance tests, and lessens disease severity compared to balance training with sham stimulation.\n\nThis proof-of-concept study will utilize the Magnetic and Balance Training Activator (MAGBATA), a platform mounted with a magnetic stimulation coil that delivers electromagnetic pulses directly to the plantar surfaces of the feet while patients stand. A racetrack coil (RT-120), connected to the MagPro X100 magnetic stimulator with MagOption (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark), will be used. Parameters for the repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) protocol will be configured to facilitate sensory input, enhance brain plasticity, and promote axonal regeneration.",[61],"Diabetic Polyneuropathy",[63,64,65,66,67],"diabetic polyneuropathy","peripheral magnetic stimulation","balance training","physical performance","postural control","RECRUITING","2026-03-26",{"date":71,"type":39},"2026-04-01",{"date":73,"type":39},"2025-06-10",{"date":75,"type":22},"2026-07-31",{"name":45,"class":46},1,{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":94,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":99,"startDateStruct":101,"completionDateStruct":103,"leadSponsor":105,"locationsCount":77},"100619396","comparing-outcomes-using-1-versus-2-kirshner-wire-fixation-in-patients-with-severe-hallux-valgus-100619396","NCT07344077","Comparing Outcomes Using 1 Versus 2 Kirshner Wire Fixation in Patients With Severe Hallux Valgus","Comparison of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Minimal Invasive Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy Using 1 Versus 2 Kirshner Wire Fixation in Patients With Severe Hallux Valgus: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* age 18-60 year\n* pain along medial surface of first MTP joint\n* radiographic finding : medial deviation of first Metatarsal bone , and lateral deviation of Big toe\n* complete a follow up period of 1 year , filling questionaires and undergone radiographic examination every visit\n* radiographic finding : Hallux valgus angle \\>20 , Intermetatarsal angle \\> 10 degrees\n* failed conservative treatment for atleast 8 months , with persistent pain along medial eminence and having difficulty walking, bearing weight\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* previous injury\u002Ffracture at big toe\n* deviation\u002F subluxation of 1st MTP joint from traumatic event\n* arthritic change of metatarsal bone, phalangeal bone of big toe\n* previous\u002Factive infection , open wound along first metatarsal and big toe\n* patient denied enrolling in study",{"count":86,"type":22},50,[25],"Comparing the radiographic and functional outcomes by using a Minimal invasive procedure to treat Hallux Valgus ; Distal linear Metatarsal Osteotomy -\n\n1 Kirshner wire fixation versus two Kirshner wire fixation",[90,91,92,93],"Hallux Valgus Correction","Hallux Valgus","Hallux Valgus Deformity","Minimal Invasive Surgery",[95,96,97],"DLMO","kirshner wire fixation","minimal invasive surgery","2026-01-07",{"date":100,"type":39},"2026-01-15",{"date":102,"type":39},"2024-06-01",{"date":104,"type":22},"2026-05-01",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":107,"slug":108,"hasResults":11,"nctId":109,"briefTitle":110,"officialTitle":110,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":111,"healthyVolunteers":112,"sex":113,"minAge":18,"maxAge":114,"enrollmentInfo":115,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":117,"briefSummary":118,"conditions":119,"keywords":123,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":98,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":129,"startDateStruct":130,"completionDateStruct":132,"leadSponsor":134,"locationsCount":4},"100619395","the-effects-of-adjunctive-therapy-with-vaginal-tablets-lactobacillus-acidophilus-and-a-low-dose-estriol-gynoflor-to-prolong-pregnancy-time-in-preterm-labor-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100619395","NCT07344064","The Effects of Adjunctive Therapy With Vaginal Tablets Lactobacillus Acidophilus and a Low Dose Estriol (Gynoflor®) to Prolong Pregnancy Time in Preterm Labor, A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria\n\n\\- Pregnant women diagnosed with preterm labor or threatened preterm labor, with a gestational age between 24 and 33 weeks, who are receiving tocolytic therapy.\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n* Age under 18 years or 35 years and older\n* Incomplete course of Gynoflor® (less than 6 days of use)\n* Presence of contraindications to tocolysis\n* Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)\n* Unable to be contacted for follow-up\n* History of allergy to probiotics or Gynoflor®\n* Multiple gestation\n* History of short cervix diagnosed between 16-24 weeks of gestation\n* History of previous preterm labor (PTL)\n* Pregnancy achieved via assisted reproductive technology (ART)\n* Presence of fetal anomaly\n* History of antepartum hemorrhage\n* Substance abuse, including cigarette smoking, alcohol, cocaine, or heroin use\n* Other causes of preterm labor such as uterine overdistension (e.g., polyhydramnios, multifetal gestation), uterine abnormalities (e.g., myoma uteri), or systemic infections, except vaginitis",true,"FEMALE","35 Years",{"count":116,"type":22},80,[25],"The study aim to study The Adjunctive therapy with vaginal tablets containing Lactobacillus acidophilus KS400 and low-dose Estriol (Gynoflor®) in addition to standard tocolytic treatment administered once daily for 6 days starting the same day as tocolytic therapy, in pregnant women diagnosed with preterm labor at gestational age 24-33 weeks .Primary Outcome is the rate of pregnancy prolongation beyond 7 days after initiation of tocolytic therapy.",[120,121,122],"Threaten Preterm","Prethrem Labour","Bacterial Vaginitis",[124,125,126,127,128],"Lactobacillus","Gynoflor","Threaten preterm","Bacterial vaginitis","Probiotic",{"date":100,"type":39},{"date":131,"type":22},"2026-02",{"date":133,"type":22},"2026-10",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":136,"slug":137,"hasResults":11,"nctId":138,"briefTitle":139,"officialTitle":140,"acronym":141,"eligibilityCriteria":142,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":143,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":144,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":146,"briefSummary":147,"conditions":148,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":152,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":153,"startDateStruct":155,"completionDateStruct":157,"leadSponsor":159,"locationsCount":77},"100573671","comparison-of-endoscopic-lumbar-decompression-and-minimally-invasive-transforaminal-lumbar-interbody-fusionmis-tlif-for-degenerative-lumbar-spondylolisthesis-100573671","NCT06749314","Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis","Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimal Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Controlled Study","MIS-TLIF","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Single level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding Grading Grade I or II).\n* Failed conservative treatment for at least 3 months.\n* No instability evidence of levels of lesion (Consideration from translation more than 5 mm or angulation change more than 10 degree in flexion and extension L-S plain films ).\n* Able to follow up for at least 12 months.\n* Patient who vorantarily agree to participate in research.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with severe foraminal stenosis diagnosed by MRI.\n* Patients who have previously undergone lumbar spine surgery (revision surgery).\n* Patients with other abnormalities in the lumbar spine, such as infection, tumors, or fractures.\n* Patients who cannot undergo surgery due to underlying conditions or who cannot maintain the prone position for extended periods.","40 Years",{"count":145,"type":22},66,[25],"Comparing the functional and radiographic outcomes in surgical treatment in failed conservative treatment, single-level low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between Minimal Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, which is conventional treatment recently, and Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression, which is minimal invasive in symptomatic treatment.",[149,150,151],"Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis","Lumbar Degenerative Disease","Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","2025-04-21",{"date":154,"type":39},"2025-04-22",{"date":156,"type":22},"2025-05-01",{"date":158,"type":22},"2026-05-31",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":161,"slug":162,"hasResults":11,"nctId":163,"briefTitle":164,"officialTitle":165,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":166,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":113,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":167,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":169,"briefSummary":170,"conditions":171,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":173,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":174,"startDateStruct":176,"completionDateStruct":178,"leadSponsor":180,"locationsCount":77},"100511499","comparison-of-rate-of-complete-abortion-between-letrozole-plus-misoprostol-vs-misoprostol-alone-100511499","NCT05940233","Comparison of Rate of Complete Abortion Between Letrozole Plus Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone","Comparison of Rate of Complete Abortion Between Letrozole Plus Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone in First Trimester Pregnancy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diafnoed Early pregnancy loss by TVS according to ACOG Practice bulletin 2018\n* GA \\\u003C= 14 weeks\n* Os open \\\u003C= 1 cm and no conceptus per os\n* Hematicrit \\>= 30\n* Systolic blood pressure \\>= 95 mmHg\n* Informed consent done and can follow up and comunicate in Thai language\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Allerguc to Letrozole or Misoprostol\n* Intrauterine contraceptive device use\n* Breast feeding\n* Diagnoed with ectopic pregnancy or undiagnoed adnexal mass\n* Severe or recurrent liver disease or AST or ALT more than or equal to 3 times of upper normal limit\n* Multiple pregnancy\n* Myoma uteri that involves the endometrium ex. Submucous myoma uteri\n* Thromboembolism or has a history of thromboembolism\n* Serum creatinine \\>= 2",{"count":168,"type":22},70,[25],"Comparison of rate of complete abortion between Letrozole plus Misoprostol versus Misoprostol alone in first trimester pregnancy",[172],"Medical; Abortion, Fetus","2024-11-04",{"date":175,"type":39},"2024-11-06",{"date":177,"type":39},"2023-06-30",{"date":179,"type":22},"2025-05-30",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":182,"slug":183,"hasResults":11,"nctId":184,"briefTitle":185,"officialTitle":186,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":187,"healthyVolunteers":112,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":188,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":190,"briefSummary":191,"conditions":192,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":194,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":195,"startDateStruct":197,"completionDateStruct":198,"leadSponsor":200,"locationsCount":77},"100566960","topical-oral-anesthesia-adjuncts-in-conventional-intubation-on-first-pass-success-rate-100566960","NCT06661967","Topical Oral Anesthesia Adjuncts in Conventional Intubation on First-Pass Success Rate","Topical Oral Anesthesia Adjuncts in Conventional Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Topical Oral Anesthesia on First-pass Success Rate","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients in emergency department that have indication for conventional intubation\n* Age \\> 18 yr\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient who undergo RSI\n* Patient who falls in cardiac arrest airway algorithm\n* Patient who is currently pregnancy\n* Known allergy to lidocaine",{"count":189,"type":22},110,[25],"This study aims to determine the first-pass success rate in video laryngoscopy and other parameters that topical anesthesia can affect during intubation.",[193],"Unrecognized Condition","2024-10-25",{"date":196,"type":39},"2024-10-28",{"date":194,"type":39},{"date":199,"type":22},"2026-04-30",{"name":45,"class":46},{"id":202,"slug":203,"hasResults":11,"nctId":204,"briefTitle":205,"officialTitle":206,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":207,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":208,"enrollmentInfo":209,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":211,"briefSummary":212,"conditions":213,"keywords":215,"overallStatus":68,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":218,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":219,"startDateStruct":221,"completionDateStruct":223,"leadSponsor":225,"locationsCount":77},"100504116","arthroscopic-assisted-cc-stabilization-alone-vs-additional-k-wire-fixation-for-acute-acromioclavicular-joint-injury-100504116","NCT05844098","Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury","Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18-45 years old\n* Acute AC joint injury rockwood classification III, IV and V\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of underwent previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery\n* Specific active associated ipsilateral injury (Rib fractures, clavicel fractures, scapula fractures and base of coracoid fractures)\n* Onset of injury more than 3 weeks\n* Cannot underwent arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization surgery","45 Years",{"count":210,"type":22},20,[25],"This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.\n\nThe main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?",[214],"Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation",[216,217],"Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization","AC joint injury","2024-10-23",{"date":220,"type":39},"2024-10-26",{"date":222,"type":39},"2024-04-01",{"date":224,"type":22},"2024-12-30",{"name":45,"class":46},""]