[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Region Zealand\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":92},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,44,59],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100520504","activity-levels-amongst-patients-with-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-100520504",false,"NCT06057428","Activity Levels Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","Activity Levels Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery","B-ATLAS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 65 years\n* Referred to decompressive spinal surgery due to symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis at ≥ 1 level\n* Central canal LSS grade B or C (Schizas classification) at ≥ 1 level by Magnetic Resonance Imaging\n* Minimum of 3 months of unsuccessful non-operative treatment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Signs of malignancy or infection in the spinal column\n* Severe comorbidities incl. neurodegenerative conditions which may contribute to balance problems\n* Revision surgery (previous decompression surgery at the same vertebral level)\n* Spinal surgery up to 1 year prior to the date of inclusion\n* Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of ≤ 27 points\n* Degenerative spondylolisthesis more than 3mm on pre-operative imaging diagnostics","ALL","65 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},80,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the spinal column, with symptoms including low back pain which worsens with ambulation, poor balance, decreased activity due to pain, and a marked decrease in quality of life (QoL). Prevalence rises with age, and current treatment options range from varied conservative management strategies, to surgical intervention with decompression of neural structures.\n\nWhile the effects of surgical decompression on back pain and QoL has been widely researched, the effects of surgery on activity levels is less well understood. Though patients generally have subjective improvements in this parameter after surgery, objective measurements in this patient group have been lacking.\n\nThis study aims to investigate the effects of decompressive surgery on activity levels in elderly patients with LSS. Measurements of activity will be taken before and after decompressive surgery, as well as with regular intervals during a two-year follow-up period.\n\nA better understanding of the effect that LSS has on activity may lead to more patients being able to receive surgical treatment, which is hypothesized to lead to an increase in QoL and less perceived disability amongst this patient group.",[25],"Lumbar Spinal Stenosis",[27,28,29,30],"Spinal stenosis","Elderly","Activity","Surgery","RECRUITING","2026-06-01",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-06-03","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":35},"2023-09-21",{"date":39,"type":21},"2028-12",{"name":41,"class":42},"Region Zealand","OTHER",2,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":51,"conditions":52,"keywords":53,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":55,"startDateStruct":56,"completionDateStruct":57,"leadSponsor":58,"locationsCount":43},"100521920","balance-amongst-patients-with-lumbar-spinal-stenosis-100521920","NCT06075862","Balance Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","Postural Imbalance Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery",{"count":20,"type":21},"Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the spinal column, with symptoms including low back pain which worsens with ambulation, poor balance, decreased activity due to pain, and a marked decrease in quality of life (QoL). Prevalence rises with age, and current treatment options range from varied conservative management strategies, to surgical intervention with decompression of neural structures.\n\nWhile the effects of surgical decompression on back pain and QoL has been widely researched, the effects of surgery on patient balance is less well understood. Though patients generally have subjective improvements in this parameter after surgery, objective measurements in this patient group have been lacking.\n\nThis study aims to investigate the effects of decompressive surgery on postural balance in elderly patients with LSS. Measurements of postural balance will be taken before and after decompressive surgery, as well as with regular intervals during a two-year follow-up period.\n\nA better understanding of the effect that LSS has on balance may lead to more patients being able to receive surgical treatment, which is hypothesized to lead to an increase in QoL and less perceived disability amongst this patient group.",[25],[27,28,54,30],"Balance",{"date":34,"type":35},{"date":37,"type":35},{"date":39,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":60,"slug":61,"hasResults":11,"nctId":62,"briefTitle":63,"officialTitle":63,"acronym":64,"eligibilityCriteria":65,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":66,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":67,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":69,"conditions":70,"keywords":81,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":84,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":85,"startDateStruct":87,"completionDateStruct":89,"leadSponsor":91,"locationsCount":5},"100617117","procedural-sedation-and-analgesia-for-treatment-of-adults-with-fractures-and-dislocations-in-the-emergency-department-100617117","NCT07314450","Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Treatment of Adults With Fractures and Dislocations in the Emergency Department","PAINEX","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥18.\n2. Patients with the following injuries are eligible:\n\n   1. Reduction treatment of shoulder dislocation\n   2. Reduction treatment of elbow dislocation\n   3. Reduction treatment of distal radius fractures, application of cast\n   4. Reduction treatment of finger fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   5. Casting treatment of upper extremity fractures\n\n      * Proximal humerus fracture, application of fixed sling\n      * Humeral shaft fracture, application of Sarmiento brace\n      * Supracondylar fracture, application of angled cast\n   6. Reduction treatment of hip dislocation\n   7. Reduction treatment of patella dislocation\n   8. Reduction of tibial shaft fracture, application of cast\n   9. Reduction treatment of ankle fractures including distal tibia fracture\n   10. Reduction treatment for toe fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   11. Casting treatment of lower extremity fractures\n\n       * Distal femur fracture, application of cast\u002Ftraction\n       * Proximal tibia fracture, application of cast or hinged brace\n       * Ankle fracture, application of walker\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Unable to give informed consent (e.g. unconscious, psychotic or dementia)\n2. Unwilling to participate in the study\n3. Prior inclusion in the study\n4. Already included in another clinical study at the same day\u002Fhospital visit\n5. Pregnant or breastfeeding","18 Years",{"count":68,"type":21},200,"The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different procedural sedation and analgesia methods used for adults with painful fractures requiring reduction treatment in the emergency department.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Which sedation and analgesia methods provide the best patient satisfaction and pain relief?\n* How do different treatment methods affect clinician satisfaction and the occurrence of adverse events?\n\nThe investigators will compare different types of procedural sedative and analgesic treatments (such as systemic sedation\u002Fanalgesia and regional techniques like nerve or hematoma blocks) to see which approach offers the best patient satisfaction and most effective pain control.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe adult patients with upper or lower extremity fractures or joint dislocations requiring painful reduction procedures.\n\nReceive one of the routinely used sedation or analgesia treatments (or no analgesia) during their emergency department care.\n\nReport their pain levels and satisfaction before, during, and after treatment. Be monitored for any side effects, complications, or use of antidotes. Data will be collected over a six-month period at Odense University Hospital, Holbæk Hospital, and Zealand University Hospital, Køge, following the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.",[71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80],"Pain, Procedural","Analgesia","Extremity Injury","Patient Satisfaction","Satisfaction, Personal","Satisfaction","Upper Extremity Injury","Lower Extremity Fracture","Upper Extremity Fracture","Extremity Injuries Lower",[82,83],"Emergency Department","Procedural sedation and analgesia","2025-12-17",{"date":86,"type":35},"2026-01-02",{"date":88,"type":35},"2025-07-29",{"date":90,"type":21},"2026-07-01",{"name":41,"class":42},""]