[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Sahmyook University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":208},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,7,0,[8,47,78,108,134,158,181],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100644316","the-effects-of-weight-shift-training-on-the-symmetry-of-upper-extremity-weight-bearing-in-the-prone-position-in-infants-with-congenital-muscular-torticollis-100644316",false,"NCT07663721","The Effects of Weight Shift Training on the Symmetry of Upper Extremity Weight Bearing in the Prone Position in Infants With Congenital Muscular Torticollis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosed with congenital muscular torticollis by a physician\n* Head tilt angle of 15 degrees or greater and limitation of passive cervical rotation range of motion\n* Able to independently maintain the prone position and demonstrate asymmetrical upper extremity weight bearing\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosed with non-muscular torticollis, including postural torticollis or ocular torticollis\n* Presence of congenital cervical spine abnormalities or neurological complications\n* Any medical condition that may interfere with participation in the intervention or outcome assessments","ALL","6 Months","12 Months",{"count":19,"type":20},30,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Congenital muscular torticollis(CMT) is a common musculoskeletal condition in infancy that may result in asymmetrical posture and weight-bearing patterns, limited cervical range of motion, and delayed motor development. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the effects of weight shift training on upper extremity weight-bearing symmetry in infants with CMT.\n\nA total of 30 infants aged 6 to 12 months diagnosed with CMT will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group(n = 15) or a control group(n = 15). The experimental group will receive weight shift training in prone and sitting positions in addition to stretching exercises, while the control group will receive stretching exercises only. Both groups will participate in 30-minute intervention sessions three times per week for eight weeks.\n\nThe primary outcome is upper extremity weight-bearing symmetry, which will be assessed using the Balancia software system. Secondary outcomes include motor development assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale(AIMS), head tilt angle, and passive cervical rotation range of motion. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of weight shift training in improving postural symmetry and motor function in infants with congenital muscular torticollis.",[26],"Congenital Muscular Torticollis",[26,28,29,30,31,32,33],"Weight Shift Training","Upper Extremity Weight Bearing Symmetry","Postural Control","Alberta Infant Motor Scale","Head Tilt","Cervical Range of Motion","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-23",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-06-26","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":20},"2026-06-30",{"date":42,"type":20},"2026-10",{"name":44,"class":45},"Sahmyook University","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":58,"phases":4,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":70,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":71,"startDateStruct":73,"completionDateStruct":75,"leadSponsor":77,"locationsCount":46},"100621209","development-of-multidimensional-screening-tool-for-wmsds-100621209","NCT07367646","Development of Multidimensional Screening Tool for WMSDs","Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Screening Tool for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A COSMIN-Guided Psychometric Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Current regular employees working at the study site.\n* Adults aged 19 years or older who understand the study purpose and procedures and voluntarily agree to participate in writing.\n* Participants capable of reading, understanding, and self-responding to the questionnaire.\n* Individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms according to NIOSH standards: symptoms lasting more than one week OR recurring at least once a month in the past 12 months (symptoms include pain, aching, stiffness, burning sensation, tingling, or numbness).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with cognitive or mental impairments that make it difficult to understand the study or complete the survey.\n* Individuals suspected of having a medical emergency or severe disease requiring immediate medical attention.\n* Individuals deemed unsuitable for participation by the researcher.","19 Years","65 Years",{"count":57,"type":20},250,"OBSERVATIONAL","The purpose of this study is to develop a multidimensional screening tool for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The study involves a cross-sectional survey of approximately 250 workers in the bio-pharmaceutical industry to assess the tool's structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and measurement invariance following COSMIN guidelines.",[61,62,63],"Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders","Musculoskeletal Diseases","Occupational Diseases",[65,66,67,68,69],"WMSDs","Musculoskeletal Pain","Screening Tool","Psychometrics","Occupational Health","2026-04-22",{"date":72,"type":38},"2026-04-24",{"date":74,"type":20},"2026-06-20",{"date":76,"type":20},"2026-12-31",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":79,"slug":80,"hasResults":11,"nctId":81,"briefTitle":82,"officialTitle":83,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":85,"maxAge":86,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":58,"phases":4,"briefSummary":89,"conditions":90,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":101,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":102,"startDateStruct":104,"completionDateStruct":105,"leadSponsor":107,"locationsCount":4},"100614376","survey-based-study-on-recovery-period-differences-in-upper-extremity-injuries-among-indoor-climbers-by-treatment-method-100614376","NCT07278791","Survey-Based Study on Recovery Period Differences in Upper Extremity Injuries Among Indoor Climbers by Treatment Method","A Survey-Based Study on Differences in Recovery Periods of Upper Extremity Injuries Among Indoor Climbers According to Treatment Methods","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18-50 years.\n* Individuals who have participated in indoor climbing within the past 12 months.\n* Individuals who have experienced an upper extremity injury (e.g., finger, wrist, elbow, shoulder; tendonitis, ligament injury, muscle tear) during indoor climbing within the past 12 months.\n* Individuals who received any form of treatment (self-care, physical therapy, injection, surgery, rehabilitation exercise) for the injury.\n* Individuals who can provide informed consent and complete an online questionnaire.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals who underwent major orthopedic surgery or fracture-related surgery unrelated to climbing.\n* Individuals who required hospitalization or long-term inpatient treatment (\\>3 months) due to severe musculoskeletal conditions.\n* Individuals currently receiving ongoing treatment for the same injury.\n* Individuals with neurological, systemic, or medical conditions that significantly affect musculoskeletal recovery.\n* Climbing coaches, professional climbers, or clinicians providing treatment (to avoid expert bias).","18 Years","50 Years",{"count":88,"type":20},300,"This study aims to investigate the differences in recovery periods of upper extremity injuries among indoor climbers according to their treatment methods.\n\nThe research focuses on comparing the recovery duration, specifically the time to return to climbing, between those who received professional physical therapy and those who relied on self-treatment or other conservative management.\n\nAdditionally, this survey-based observational study seeks to explore how individual and training-related factors - such as warm-up duration, climbing frequency, and years of experience - affect the occurrence and recurrence of upper extremity injuries.\n\nParticipants will complete an online questionnaire consisting of demographic data, climbing habits, injury characteristics, treatment methods, and recovery outcomes.\n\nThe data will be collected anonymously and analyzed to determine whether the type of treatment correlates with faster recovery or reduced reinjury risk.\n\nThe findings are expected to provide foundational evidence for developing effective rehabilitation and injury-prevention strategies for indoor climbers, and to guide clinicians and trainers in selecting appropriate treatment approaches for upper extremity injuries.",[91],"Upper Extremity Injury",[93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100],"Indoor Climbing","Bouldering","Physical Therapy","Self-Treatment","Rehabilitation","Injury Recovery","Upper Limb","Sports Injury","2025-12-01",{"date":103,"type":38},"2025-12-12",{"date":101,"type":20},{"date":106,"type":20},"2026-04-30",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":11,"nctId":111,"briefTitle":112,"officialTitle":112,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":113,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":85,"maxAge":114,"enrollmentInfo":115,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":117,"briefSummary":118,"conditions":119,"keywords":121,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":126,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":127,"startDateStruct":129,"completionDateStruct":131,"leadSponsor":133,"locationsCount":46},"100603308","the-effects-of-stroboscopic-visual-conditions-on-gait-and-lower-limb-muscle-activity-in-individuals-with-chronic-ankle-instability-100603308","NCT07134829","The Effects of Stroboscopic Visual Conditions on Gait and Lower Limb Muscle Activity in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with a Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score of less than 24\n* Individuals diagnosed with ankle sprain or instability within the past 6 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals who have undergone lower limb surgery or experienced a fracture due to ankle trauma within the past 6 months\n* Individuals with systemic diseases, such as cardiovascular disorders, that may affect balance\n* Individuals who have difficulty understanding or following instructions during assessment or training","45 Years",{"count":116,"type":20},25,[23],"This interventional study will investigate the effects of stroboscopic visual conditions on gait patterns and lower limb muscle activation in adults with chronic ankle instability (CAI). CAI often results in impaired sensorimotor control, leading to altered gait strategies such as slower walking speed, shorter step length, and increased visual reliance. Stroboscopic glasses intermittently restrict visual input, potentially reducing visual dependence and enhancing proprioceptive feedback.\n\nParticipants will complete walking trials under three randomized visual conditions: high-frequency stroboscopic, low-frequency stroboscopic, and no-glasses control. Gait parameters will be measured using the GAITRite system, and surface electromyography (sEMG) will record activation of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and gastrocnemius muscles. Findings may provide insight into sensorimotor adaptation mechanisms and inform rehabilitation strategies to improve functional stability in individuals with CAI.",[120],"Chronic Ankle Instability",[122,123,124,125],"Stroboscopic Glasses","Stroboscopic Vision","Gait Analysis","Surface Electromyography","2025-08-14",{"date":128,"type":38},"2025-08-21",{"date":130,"type":20},"2025-08-31",{"date":132,"type":20},"2025-10-12",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":135,"slug":136,"hasResults":11,"nctId":137,"briefTitle":138,"officialTitle":139,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":140,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":85,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":141,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":143,"briefSummary":144,"conditions":145,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":151,"startDateStruct":153,"completionDateStruct":155,"leadSponsor":157,"locationsCount":46},"100582285","effects-of-short-foot-exercise-on-knee-pain-muscle-tone-balance-and-quality-of-life-in-flexible-flatfoot-patients-100582285","NCT06861322","Effects of Short Foot Exercise on Knee Pain, Muscle Tone, Balance, and Quality of Life in Flexible Flatfoot Patients","The Effects of Short Foot Exercises on Knee Muscle Tone, Knee Pain and Function, Balance, and Quality of Life in Patients with Flexible Flat Foot with Knee Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* BMI (Body Mass Index): If between 18 and 25 kg\u002Fm²\n* Litigation period: If knee pain lasted for more than 6 weeks\n* Navicular drop test: If it was 10 mm or more\n* Numerical assessment scale: If knee pain was 4 or more\n* Health status: If you are a person without health problems and are trying to participate in the experiment\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of knee surgery: If you have had knee surgery\n* Treatment history: If you have received physical therapy for knee pain in the 4 weeks before the start of the study\n* Mental status: If you have a psychological disorder that may interfere with your participation in the study\n* Injury status: If you have a current serious injury affecting the lower extremity joints and foot\n* Lower extremity alignment abnormalities and specific conditions: If you have structural flat foot, scoliosis\n* Diseases and other conditions: If you have diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or menopause\n* Neurological disorders: If you have experienced a neurological disorder within the past 6 months",{"count":142,"type":20},44,[23],"This study was a clinical trial to investigate the effects of Short Foot Exercise (SFE) and standard physical therapy on knee muscle tone, knee pain and function, balance ability, and quality of life in adults with flexible flat feet and knee pain.",[146,147,148,149],"Flexible Flatfoot","Knee Pain","Balance Impairment","Quality of Life (QOL)","2025-02-28",{"date":152,"type":38},"2025-03-06",{"date":154,"type":20},"2025-03-02",{"date":156,"type":20},"2025-06-30",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":159,"slug":160,"hasResults":11,"nctId":161,"briefTitle":162,"officialTitle":163,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":164,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":85,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":165,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":58,"phases":4,"briefSummary":167,"conditions":168,"keywords":170,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":174,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":175,"startDateStruct":177,"completionDateStruct":178,"leadSponsor":180,"locationsCount":46},"100553386","investigating-the-association-between-central-sensitization-and-breathing-pattern-disorders-100553386","NCT06485414","Investigating the Association Between Central Sensitization and Breathing Pattern Disorders","Investigating the Association Between Central Sensitization and Breathing Pattern Disorders : A STROBE-compliant Cross-sectional Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 and above.\n* Individuals scoring 40 or above on the Central Sensitization Inventory for Koreans (CSI-K).\n* Individuals who consent to the use and publication of their personal information and wish to participate in assessment measurements.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with pulmonary, cardiac, or respiratory diseases.\n* Individuals with severe hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg.\n* Individuals with cognitive impairments.\n* Individuals who express a desire to withdraw from the study during its duration.",{"count":166,"type":20},40,"Breathing pattern disorders can cause mechanical, physiological, and psychological issues in the body, contributing to the initiation and chronicity of pain. Therefore, considering breathing patterns is significant in managing chronic pain, yet direct research on central sensitization and breathing pattern disorders remains scant. This study aims to analyze the correlation between central sensitization and breathing pattern disorders in adults by assessing both respiration and pain.",[169],"Central Sensitisation",[171,172,173],"central sensitization","breathing pattern disorders","chronic pain","2024-06-29",{"date":176,"type":38},"2024-07-03",{"date":176,"type":20},{"date":179,"type":20},"2024-08-31",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":182,"slug":183,"hasResults":11,"nctId":184,"briefTitle":185,"officialTitle":186,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":187,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":15,"minAge":188,"maxAge":189,"enrollmentInfo":190,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":192,"briefSummary":193,"conditions":194,"keywords":196,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":200,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":201,"startDateStruct":203,"completionDateStruct":205,"leadSponsor":207,"locationsCount":46},"100552687","robot-assisted-gait-training-with-self-observation-in-stroke-rehabilitation-100552687","NCT06476327","Robot-Assisted Gait Training With Self-Observation in Stroke Rehabilitation","The Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training Concurrent With Self-Observation Training on Balance, Gait, Cognitive Function in Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants who have had a stroke for more than 6 months but less than 1 year\n* Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) ≥ 2\n* Able to walk 10 meters independently with or without an assistive device\n* Participants eligible for application of the robot (ANGEL LEGS M20, Anger Robotics)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Inability to wear the robot due to open wounds or skin conditions\n* Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE-K \\\u003C 10) or significant difficulty in communication due to language disorders\n* Spasticity of the paralyzed limb with a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≥ 2\n* High risk of fractures, such as osteoporosis\n* Severe cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases\n* Neurological disorders affecting gait function, such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis","30 Years","80 Years",{"count":191,"type":20},20,[23],"The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of robot-assisted gait training Concurrent with self-observation training on balance, gait, and cognitive function in stroke participants. The main question it aims to answer is:\n\nDoes robot-assisted gait training combined with self-observation improve balance abilities in stroke participants?\n\nParticipants will be\n\nGroup 1 Perform robot-assisted gait training combined with self-observation five times a week for four weeks.\n\nGroup 2 Perform robot-assisted gait training five times a week for four weeks.\n\nAll groups perform for 30 minutes per session.",[195],"Stroke",[197,198,199],"stroke","gait","cognitive function","2024-06-27",{"date":202,"type":38},"2024-07-01",{"date":204,"type":20},"2024-07",{"date":206,"type":20},"2024-10",{"name":44,"class":45},""]