[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Universidad Nacional de la Matanza\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":73},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,46],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100588743","active-learning-and-ebp-competency-in-undergraduate-physiotherapy-100588743",false,"NCT06945367","Active Learning and EBP Competency in Undergraduate Physiotherapy","Impact of Active Learning on Beliefs, Attitudes, Perceived Skills, and Application of Evidence-Based Practice in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Undergraduate students enrolled in the Research Methods course at the Universidad Nacional de La Matanza during the March-July 2024 term.\n* Provided written informed consent.\n* Attended at least 80% of course sessions.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Students who withdrew from the course before completion of the follow-up period.\n* Incomplete or missing baseline or final evaluation data.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},38,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This study aims to evaluate the effect of an active learning-based educational intervention on competencies related to evidence-based practice (EBP) in undergraduate physiotherapy students. The intervention was embedded within a four-month Research Methods course and focused on small group activities involving literature search, critical appraisal, oral presentations, and formative assessment through rubrics.\n\nThe study follows a pre-post quasi-experimental design without a control group. Primary outcomes include students' beliefs, attitudes, perceived skills, and frequency of EBP application, assessed through a custom-developed and validated questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include academic engagement, measured using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale - Student Version (UWES-S), and student satisfaction with the educational approach, measured using the Student Outcomes Survey. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and one week after course completion.",[27],"Health Education",[29,30,31,32],"Evidence-Based Practice","Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice","Physical Therapy Specialty","Education, Professional","RECRUITING","2025-04-18",{"date":36,"type":37},"2025-04-25","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":37},"2025-03-31",{"date":41,"type":21},"2025-07-31",{"name":43,"class":44},"Universidad Nacional de la Matanza","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":51,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":65,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":66,"startDateStruct":68,"completionDateStruct":70,"leadSponsor":72,"locationsCount":45},"100543869","contextual-factors-enriched-standard-care-on-mechanical-neck-pain-100543869","NCT06361472","Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care on Mechanical Neck Pain","A Single-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 4-Week, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study Comparing Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only for Patients with Mechanical Neck Pain (ContextualizAR Trial)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged \\>18.\n* Neck pain for more than 4 weeks without signs or symptoms suggestive of major structural pathology.\n* Read, write, and understand the Spanish language.\n* Signed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Numeric Pain Reporting Scale (NPRS) \\\u003C 3 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).\n* Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) \\\u003C 10 points (to ensure the exclusion of patients with minor disorders).\n* History of cervical spine trauma, fracture, or surgical procedures.\n* Signs and symptoms of cervical myelopathy and\u002For cervical radiculopathy (to rule out cervical radicular pain, the Spurling Test, the Upper Limb Tension Test for the median nerve, and the Traction\u002FDistraction test will be used).\n* Red flags or serious pathologies, such as malignancy, inflammatory or rheumatic diseases, infections, and vascular conditions like cervical artery insufficiency.",{"count":54,"type":21},94,[24],"The primary purpose of this study will be to determine if a CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach is an effective treatment for mechanical neck pain in terms of reducing pain and improving function. We hypothesize that a 4-week CFs-Enriched Standard Care approach will be superior to Standard Care alone in terms of patient-reported disability and pain, with measurements conducted using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, respectively.\n\nThis will be an assessor-blinded, 2-group (1:1) randomized clinical trial aiming to enroll 94 participants with neck pain persisting for more than 4 weeks. Both groups will undergo 4 weeks of standard care twice weekly, following established clinical practice guidelines. In the intervention group, CFs will be enhanced, encompassing the physical, psychological, and social elements inherent in the clinical encounter, based on existing evidence.\n\nThe primary outcomes will encompass changes in Pain and Disability after 4 weeks of treatment, with a follow-up reassessment at week 12 post-treatment. Secondary outcomes will include changes in Active Range of Motion, Global Rating of Change, and Satisfaction with treatment. The change between groups after treatment and at the 12-week follow-up will be reported for all outcomes, considering the difference from scores recorded at baseline.",[58],"Neck Pain",[60,61,62,63,64],"neck pain","functional status","contextual factors","placebo","randomized controlled trial","2025-03-24",{"date":67,"type":37},"2025-03-28",{"date":69,"type":37},"2024-05-02",{"date":71,"type":21},"2026-05-30",{"name":43,"class":44},""]