[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":85},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,60],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":33,"overallStatus":48,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":49,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":50,"startDateStruct":53,"completionDateStruct":55,"leadSponsor":57,"locationsCount":5},"100630933","aurora-ai-based-narrative-intervention-to-support-emotional-well-being-in-clinical-and-non-clinical-populations-100630933",false,"NCT07494110","Aurora: AI-Based Narrative Intervention to Support Emotional Well-Being in Clinical and Non-Clinical Populations","Aurora: Evaluation of an AI-Based Narrative Intervention for Emotional Well-Being, Identity Processes, and Recovery-Oriented Outcomes in Clinical and Non-Clinical Populations","Aurora","Inclusion Criteria\n\nArm 1: Healthy Adults (Single-Session Intervention)\n\nAge 18 years or older at screening.\n\nSufficient ability to read and understand Spanish to follow study instructions and complete questionnaires.\n\nAbility to engage in a brief guided interaction and complete self-report measures.\n\nAble and willing to provide written informed consent.\n\n\\---\n\nArm 2: Adults with DSM-5 Diagnosed Mental Disorder in Residential Care (4-hour Intervention)\n\nAge 18 years or older at screening.\n\nCurrently residing in a participating long-term mental health residential care facility and expected to remain there for the duration of the intervention and post-assessment period.\n\nDocumented diagnosis of a mental disorder according to DSM-5 criteria, confirmed by the treating clinician.\n\nMinimal clinical stability at baseline, defined as all of the following:\n\nClinically stable in the judgment of the treating clinician.\n\nNo requirement for acute psychiatric hospitalization or crisis intervention in the previous 4 weeks.\n\nClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score between 3 and 5 inclusive during the 4 weeks prior to enrollment, indicating relative clinical stability.\n\nSufficient ability to understand spoken and written Spanish to participate in study procedures.\n\nAbility to engage in guided interaction and provide feedback.\n\nAble and willing to provide informed consent; when applicable, provision of legal guardian consent plus participant assent.\n\nWillingness to participate in all study procedures.\n\n\\---\n\nArm 3: Healthy Older Adults (≥65 Years; 4-hour Intervention)\n\nAge 65 years or older at screening.\n\nNo self-reported diagnosis of a serious mental disorder (for example, psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder).\n\nSufficient ability to read and understand Spanish to participate in study procedures.\n\nAdequate cognitive and communication abilities to engage in guided interaction and complete questionnaires.\n\nAble and willing to provide written informed consent.\n\n\\---\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\nArm 1: Healthy Adults\n\nCurrent acute medical or psychiatric condition that would compromise safe participation or data validity.\n\nModerate or high acute suicide or self-harm risk at screening.\n\nSignificant cognitive, communication, or comprehension impairment that would interfere with participation.\n\nExplicit refusal to participate.\n\n\\---\n\nArm 2: Adults with DSM-5 Diagnosed Mental Disorder in Residential Care\n\nCurrent acute psychiatric decompensation requiring crisis-level care.\n\nModerate or high acute suicide or self-harm risk at screening or baseline.\n\nHigh risk of clinically significant emotional harm from autobiographical life review, defined as treating clinician judgment that narrative or reminiscence work is contraindicated due to one or more of the following:\n\nSevere clinical destabilization within the past 3 months.\n\nTrauma-related re-experiencing symptoms.\n\nMarked dissociative symptoms.\n\nInability to provide informed consent, with no legal representative available when required, or lack of participant assent when applicable.\n\nSignificant cognitive, communication, or comprehension impairment without available supports.\n\nExplicit refusal to participate.\n\nImminent discharge or transfer that would prevent completion of the intervention or post-assessment.\n\n\\---\n\nArm 3: Healthy Older Adults\n\nSelf-reported diagnosis of a serious mental disorder (for example, psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder).\n\nModerate or high acute suicide or self-harm risk at screening.\n\nCurrent acute medical or psychiatric condition that would compromise safe participation.\n\nSignificant cognitive, communication, or comprehension impairment that would interfere with participation.\n\nExplicit refusal to participate.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},55,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Aurora is an interdisciplinary project evaluating a chatbot-mediated supportive care intervention designed to promote emotional expression, autobiographical meaning-making, identity processes, and emotional well-being through guided narrative reconstruction. The Aurora system provides a structured, person-centered storytelling process supported by generative AI and human facilitation. Under the supervision of a trained facilitator (licensed mental health professional), participants engage in guided reminiscence and storytelling sessions to co-create a personalized \"life book.\" The chatbot is not a diagnostic or treatment tool; rather, it is intended to support emotional expression, narrative reconstruction, and recovery-oriented processes. The study includes three non-randomized arms implemented sequentially: (1) a single-session arm of healthy adults focused on acceptability, usability, and emotional safety; (2) a four-hour intervention arm of adults with DSM-5 diagnosed mental disorders in residential care; and (3) a four-hour intervention arm of healthy older adults aged 65 years and older. Quantitative outcomes assess affect, mental well-being, and recovery-related constructs. Additional measures include usability, satisfaction, and qualitative feedback. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is conducted in Arms 2 and 3.",[28,29,30,31,32],"Institutionalization","Elderly","Mental Health","Wellbeing","Aging",[34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47],"artificial intelligence","digital mental health","human-computer interaction","recovery","identity","autobiographical narrative","life story","reminiscence","wellbeing","storytelling","residential care","older adults","chatbot intervention","mental health","RECRUITING","2026-03-19",{"date":51,"type":52},"2026-03-27","ACTUAL",{"date":54,"type":52},"2026-02-12",{"date":56,"type":22},"2026-04-01",{"name":58,"class":59},"Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona","OTHER",{"id":61,"slug":62,"hasResults":11,"nctId":63,"briefTitle":64,"officialTitle":65,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":66,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":67,"minAge":19,"maxAge":68,"enrollmentInfo":69,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":71,"briefSummary":72,"conditions":73,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":48,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":76,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":77,"startDateStruct":79,"completionDateStruct":81,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":84},"100625068","cognitive-behavioral-and-digital-therapy-for-suicide-risk-in-eating-disorders-100625068","NCT07417826","Cognitive-Behavioral and Digital Therapy for Suicide Risk in Eating Disorders","Efficacy of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Digital Therapy (DT) in the Prevention of Suicide Risk in Patients With Eating Disorders (ED): a Randomized Clinical Trial.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Gender: Female.\n* Age between 18 and 65 years old.\n* Clinically stable and able to provide written informed consent.\n* Subjects included in the \"Suicide Risk Code\" (Codi Risc Suïcidi - CRS) program due to recent suicidal ideation or suicide attempts.\n* Patients with a diagnosis of an Eating Disorder (ED).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of intellectual disability or cognitive impairment that prevents understanding the therapy or the study requirements.\n* Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder or any Psychotic Disorder.\n* Current active substance abuse or dependence.\n* Any medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes participation unsafe or unfeasible.","FEMALE","65 Years",{"count":70,"type":22},150,[25],"The purpose of this study is to determine if adding a digital intervention to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is more effective in preventing suicide risk and reducing eating disorder symptoms. Participants will be women between 18 and 65 years old who have recently experienced suicidal ideation or attempts. One group will receive standard group therapy, while the other will receive group therapy plus a mobile application and digital monitoring devices. The goal is to see if digital tools can improve clinical outcomes and safety for patients.",[74,75],"Eating Disorders","Suicide Risk","2026-02-13",{"date":78,"type":52},"2026-02-18",{"date":80,"type":52},"2025-10-22",{"date":82,"type":22},"2028-10",{"name":58,"class":59},1,""]