[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"University General Hospital of Patras\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":84},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,53],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":36,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":41,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":42,"startDateStruct":45,"completionDateStruct":47,"leadSponsor":49,"locationsCount":52},"100607313","driving-pressure-during-surgeries-with-high-risk-for-postoperative-pulmonary-complications-100607313",false,"NCT07186933","Driving Pressure During Surgeries With High Risk for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* \\>17 years old\n* Surgery with general anesthesia \\& invasive mechanical ventilation\n* Preoperative ARISCAT score estimation \\>25\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\\u003C18 years old\n* Preoperative ARISCAT score estimation \\\u003C26\n* Women during pregnancy or just given birth\n* Other type of anesthesia (Not general)\n* Contraindication of administration of neuromuscular blockade agents.\n* Contraindication of cease of spontaneous ventilation.\n* Mechanical ventilation without endotracheal intubation.\n* Severe heart failure \u002F Severe cardiac arrhythmia.\n* Severe emphysematous lung disease.\n* Patient denial of participation in the trial.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},200,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of perioperative mechanical ventilation (MV), specifically Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) and MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP), in relation to the appearance of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients who are operated and have higher risk of PPCs.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Is MV with lower ΔP better than conventional PMV in preventing PPCs in patients with higher risk for PPCs?\n* Does MV with lower ΔP decrease hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need and mortality?\n* Does MV with lower ΔP suit better than PMV to lung characteristics and needs intraoperatively?\n\nResearchers will compare MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP) to Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) to see if any of this is more protective than the other concerning PPCs.\n\nAll participants will receive perioperative MV.\n\nHalf of them will receive conventional Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV). This will include well known generally protective settings for mechanical ventilation of patients, concerning volumes, pressures, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers.\n\nThe rest of participants will be ventilated with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP). This will be similar to PMV in the chosen volumes, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. However, the pressure inside lung at the end of expiration, eg Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), will be not be preset for every patient. Initially, the investigators will perform a maneuver that will quantify each individual's lung characteristics and mechanics. According to this, the investigators will find the exact PEEP that seems to suit each patients lungs most, and use this perioperatively, trying to provide lungs the best conditions every time.\n\nAfter the completion of the operation, all the patients will be screened for PPCs, via arterial blood testing and chest X ray, and the results will be statistically analyzed trying to find if any of the forementioned strategies of mechanical ventilation surpasses the other concerning PPCs appearance. PPCs include atelectasis, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, pleural effusion, pneumonia, aspiration and pneumothorax.\n\nFurthermore hospital stay, ICU need and mortality will be noted. Finally, measurements of perioperative lung pressures, volumes and derived variables will be noted and compared statistically as well.",[26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Postoperative Pulmonary Atelectasis","Postoperative Pulmonary Complications","Postoperative Respiratory Failure","Postoperative Bronchospasm","Postoperative Pleural Effusion","Postoperative Pneumothorax","Postoperative Pneumonia","Postoperative Aspiration Pneumonitis","Mechanical Power","Driving Pressure",[35,34,37,38,27,28,39],"Atelectasis","Pulmonary Complications","Elastic Power","RECRUITING","2026-02-08",{"date":43,"type":44},"2026-02-11","ACTUAL",{"date":46,"type":44},"2025-11-03",{"date":48,"type":20},"2027-11-30",{"name":50,"class":51},"University General Hospital of Patras","OTHER",1,{"id":54,"slug":55,"hasResults":11,"nctId":56,"briefTitle":57,"officialTitle":58,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":59,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":60,"enrollmentInfo":61,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":63,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":75,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":77,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":78,"startDateStruct":80,"completionDateStruct":81,"leadSponsor":83,"locationsCount":52},"100606900","anesthesia-techniques-neuroprotection-and-surgical-field-in-fess-under-controlled-hypotension-100606900","NCT07181564","Anesthesia Techniques, Neuroprotection and Surgical Field in FESS Under Controlled Hypotension","FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC NASAL AND SINUS SURGERY AND ANESTHESIA: Study of Hemodynamic Parameters During General Anesthesia Compared to the Surgical Field, as Well as Assessment of Cerebral Ischemia Intraoperatively by Measurement of S100B Protein and Specific Neuronal Enolase (NSE).","Inclusion Criteria :\n\nAdult patients (≥18 years old). Scheduled for F.E.S.S (Functional endoscopic sinus surgery ) under general anesthesia.\n\nAble to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nEmergency surgery. ASA physical status IV-V. Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction. Known allergy or contraindication to study drugs. Pregnant or lactating women. unable to provide informed consent\n\nPatients unwilling or unable to provide consent.","90 Years",{"count":62,"type":20},150,[23],"This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigates the effect of four different anesthetic maintenance techniques on surgical field conditions, hemodynamic stability, and neuroprotection during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) performed under controlled hypotension. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either total intravenous anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil, propofol-remifentanil with adjunct ketamine and magnesium, sevoflurane-remifentanil, or sevoflurane-remifentanil with adjunct ketamine and magnesium. Primary outcomes include serum biomarkers of neuronal injury (S100B and neuron-specific enolase, NSE) measured perioperatively, as well as surgical field visibility and intraoperative bleeding scores. Secondary outcomes include recovery profile and postoperative pain.",[66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74],"Magnesium Sulfate","Remifentanil","S 100beta","S100 Beta Protein, Human","Neuron-Specific Enolase","Brain Ischemia","Sevoflurane Anaesthesia","Propofol\u002FRemifentanil","Ketamine",[76],"\"Anesthesia\", \"Controlled Hypotension\", \"FESS\", \"S100B\", \"Neuron-Specific Enolase\"","2025-09-11",{"date":79,"type":44},"2025-09-18",{"date":77,"type":44},{"date":82,"type":20},"2026-03-20",{"name":50,"class":51},""]