[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":253},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,42,76,96,118,151,175,206,227],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":30,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":31,"startDateStruct":34,"completionDateStruct":36,"leadSponsor":38,"locationsCount":41},"100643287","thrombectomy-in-pulmonary-embolism-100643287",false,"NCT07650435","Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism","Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Use of Computer-Aided Vacuum Thrombectomy Within the Context of Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism","TiPE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute pulmonary embolism with duration of 14 days or less\n* Patients who present with computed tomography confirmed pulmonary embolism\n* Defined as intermediate or high-risk pulmonary embolism (according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines)\n* Date of computed tomography imaging from within a two-year period\n* Patient is greater than or equal to 18 years of age\n* Informed consent obtained\n* Evidence of cardiac dysfunction (either biochemical or imaging features of right heart strain)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known serious, uncontrolled sensitivity to radiographic agents\n* Computed tomography not available to evaluate pulmonary embolism\n* Low-risk pulmonary embolism as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines\n* Current participation in another investigational drug or device study that may confound the results of this study. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational\n* Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the study\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE with duration of 14 days or less\n2. Patients who present with CT confirmed PE\n3. Defined as intermediate or high-risk PE (according to ESC guidelines1)\n4. Date of CT imaging from within a two-year period\n5. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age\n6. Informed consent obtained\n7. Evidence of cardiac dysfunction (Either biochemical or imaging features of RHS)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\. Known serious, uncontrolled sensitivity to radiographic agents 2. CT not available to evaluate PE 3. Low Risk PE as defined by ESC guidelines1 4. Current participation in another investigational drug or device study that may confound the results of this study. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational studies 5. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, precludes the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the study","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},2000,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Pulmonary embolism is a blood clot on the lung, which can cause death or significant reduced quality of life. Sucking the clot out with a special tube (catheter) is a relatively new procedure that can be performed but doesn't have the data required to properly support its use in some patients. We know this procedure works in patients who have no other options and would almost certainly die without intervention. We currently don't know how well this procedure is tolerated, how well it works and what its complications are in patients who are moderately to severely unwell. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), an advisory body, suggests more data is required to support its use in patients who are sick or very sick. This registry aims to support this growing evidence base to workout if the treatment is effective and the associated risks that come with using it. We are collecting data about this procedure and other treatments patients get offered to better inform clinicians and researchers.",[25],"Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis",[27,28],"PE","Thrombectomy","RECRUITING","2026-06-22",{"date":32,"type":33},"2026-06-25","ACTUAL",{"date":35,"type":33},"2026-05-11",{"date":37,"type":21},"2029-12-11",{"name":39,"class":40},"University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust","OTHER",1,{"id":43,"slug":44,"hasResults":11,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":48,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":52,"phases":53,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":61,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":41},"100617116","5-minute-hot-trauma-ct-rates-of-detection-study-100617116","NCT07314437","5 Minute 'HOT' Trauma CT Rates Of Detection Study","Randomised Trial (With Integrated Pilot) Evaluating Whether a Standardised Approach, Educational Package (Including Checklist) Improve Recognition of Major Life-threatening Injuries in the Hot Reporting of Trauma Scans","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Medical professionals involved in trauma image review.\n* This includes clinicians who are emergency department doctors, radiologists and other specialties.\n* Non-radiologist clinicians will be participating completing the hot reports, radiologists will be evaluating their submissions and assessing their accuracy.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to review CT imaging due to lack of previous experience or disability that prevents them from doing so.\n* Under 18 years old.\n* Not a medical professional or clinician.",true,{"count":51,"type":21},300,"INTERVENTIONAL",[54],"NA","Many injured patients receive urgent CT imaging to identify major injury. CT imaging of trauma patients is often time critical and the accurate detection of life-threatening findings on this CT is essential. Often following a scan a radiologist is not immediately available to review the imaging, however other members of the trauma team have access to the imaging and may be in a position to provide a \"hot\" report. In this study we aim to demonstrate if an educational intervention with a checklist improves accuracy of the hot report.",[57,58,59,60],"Trauma (Including Fractures)","Trauma Abdomen","Trauma Blunt","Trauma Centers",[62,63,64,65,66],"Trauma","CT","Hot Report","Radiology","HOT-RODs","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-01-08",{"date":70,"type":33},"2026-01-12",{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-01-30",{"date":74,"type":21},"2027-02-28",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":11,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":82,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":88,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":89,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":4},"100614589","opinions-perceptions--thoughts-of-british-resident-doctors-on-orthopaedics-100614589","NCT07281560","Opinions, Perceptions, & Thoughts of British Resident Doctors on Orthopaedics","ORTHO BRO: Opinions, Perceptions, & Thoughts of British Resident Doctors on Orthopaedics","ORTHO BRO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Are currently employed within the UK National Health Service (NHS) as a Foundation Year 1 (F1), Foundation Year 2 (F2), Core Training Year 1 (CT1), Core Training Year 2 (CT2) or trust-grade\u002Fnon-training senior house officer (SHO).\n* Are aged 18 years or older.\n* Are able to read and understand English sufficiently to comprehend the participant information and complete the online questionnaire.\n* Are willing and able to provide electronic informed consent before taking part.\n* Agree to participate voluntarily and understand that participation is anonymous and non-compulsory.",{"count":51,"type":21},"Orthopaedic surgery is one of the largest surgical specialties in the UK, delivering high-volume, high-impact care across trauma and elective pathways. Despite this, the specialty continues to face challenges in recruitment, diversity, inclusivity and perceptions of workload and culture. International literature suggests that impressions formed during undergraduate and early postgraduate training strongly influence specialty choice; however, contemporary UK-specific data on how resident doctors view orthopaedics remain limited. The ORTHO BRO Study is a cross-sectional, anonymous online survey designed to capture UK trainees' perceptions of orthopaedics, compare views between those with and without prior orthopaedic rotations, and explore spontaneous associations. Findings will inform training improvement, inclusivity initiatives, and recruitment strategies.\n\nThe study targets UK foundation doctors (F1\u002FF2), core trainees (CT1\u002FCT2), and trust-grade\u002Fnon-training senior house officers (SHOs) across multiple trusts\u002Ffoundation schools.",[87],"Perceptions of Orthopaedic Surgery Among UK Resident Doctors","2025-12-12",{"date":90,"type":33},"2025-12-15",{"date":92,"type":21},"2026-01-15",{"date":94,"type":21},"2026-07-14",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":97,"slug":98,"hasResults":11,"nctId":99,"briefTitle":100,"officialTitle":101,"acronym":102,"eligibilityCriteria":103,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":104,"targetDuration":106,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":107,"conditions":108,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":110,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":111,"startDateStruct":113,"completionDateStruct":115,"leadSponsor":117,"locationsCount":41},"100541776","splenic-embolisation-decisions-100541776","NCT06334263","Splenic Embolisation Decisions","Decision to Treat Acute Traumatic Splenic Artery Injury in the Context of Trauma","SPEED","INCLUSION Criteria:\n\nAll patients who had traumatic splenic injury between 01\u002F01\u002F2016 and 31\u002F12\u002F2020 with data available from TARN CT available for review.\n\nEXCLUSION CRITERIA:\n\nCT not available to radiologically grade the Splenic injury",{"count":105,"type":21},8000,"3 Years","The spleen is often injured when the body sustains trauma. This leads to bleeding. The bleeding can be stopped by a big operation cutting open the belly or a small hole in your groin where a blood vessel can be accessed and through which the bleeding can be stopped. We do not know what types of injuries it is best to use this procedure. We do not know why we do not use the smaller technique in some instances. We also do not know exactly which of a number of ways to stop the bleeding could be better. We have a big data set in the trauma and audit research network (TARN) which we would like to use to help answer these questions and design further studies to better answer the questions. Adding a few other pieces of data, we are able to answer key questions into how the spleen will best be treated in trauma.",[62,109],"Spleen Injury","2025-11-26",{"date":112,"type":33},"2025-12-04",{"date":114,"type":33},"2024-07-22",{"date":116,"type":21},"2026-09-30",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":119,"slug":120,"hasResults":11,"nctId":121,"briefTitle":122,"officialTitle":123,"acronym":124,"eligibilityCriteria":125,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":126,"targetDuration":128,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":129,"conditions":130,"keywords":135,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":143,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":144,"startDateStruct":146,"completionDateStruct":148,"leadSponsor":150,"locationsCount":41},"100607780","quality-of-life-improvement-after-tavi-qualitavi-uk-trial-100607780","NCT07193004","Quality of Life Improvement After TAVI (QualiTAVI-UK Trial)","Quality of Life Improvement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in the UK: A Prospective 1-Year Study (QualiTAVI-UK Trial)","QualiTAVI-UK","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who were eligible and accepted for TAVI procedure regardless of the patient's age and informed consent provided by the patient for the TAVI procedure.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who declined enrollment in this research.",{"count":127,"type":21},100,"3 Months","Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an important therapeutic intervention for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high surgical risk. While the clinical outcomes of TAVI are well established, there is limited data on the long-term quality of life (QoL) following the procedure. This prospective study will assess QoL in patients undergoing TAVI at Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth, UK. Investigators will employ the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) and Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MoCA) to evaluate both physical and mental health outcomes, supplemented by an analysis of life expectancy estimated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Data will be collected at referral, pre-procedural, 30 days, and 3 months post-TAVI. This will be the first prospective trial focused on QoL improvement after TAVI, as all previous studies have been retrospective in nature. The study aims to provide comprehensive insights into the QoL improvements after TAVI, which will guide future clinical decision-making in this population.",[131,132,133,134],"TAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation)","TAVI","Quality of Life","Mental Health",[136,137,138,139,140,141,142],"Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)","quality of life","Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire","Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MoCA)","life expectancy","Mental health","Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)","2025-09-24",{"date":145,"type":33},"2025-09-30",{"date":147,"type":21},"2025-11-01",{"date":149,"type":21},"2027-02-01",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":152,"slug":153,"hasResults":11,"nctId":154,"briefTitle":155,"officialTitle":156,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":157,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":158,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":160,"conditions":161,"keywords":163,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":167,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":168,"startDateStruct":170,"completionDateStruct":172,"leadSponsor":174,"locationsCount":41},"100528075","tolerance-in-beekeepers-100528075","NCT06156046","Tolerance in Beekeepers","Elucidation of the Mechanism of Immune Tolerance in Beekeepers","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Group 1 inclusion criteria.\n\n* Individuals naive to beekeeping (\\\u003C2 previous bee stings, none in the last 24 months)\n* no history of anaphylaxis to stings. Group 2 inclusion criteria.\n* Beekeepers with \\> approximately 10 stings\u002Fyear who have been beekeeping for \\>3 years.\n* No history of anaphylaxis to bee venom. Group 3 inclusion criteria\n* Beekeepers with diagnosis of anaphylaxis to bee venom in the last 12 months who are sensitised to bee venom (as evidenced by positive specific IgE and positive skin test to bee venom)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to understand protocol\u002Fconsent.\n* Unable to commit to follow up visits.\n* Participants with a known history of mastocytosis or under investigation for suspected mastocytosis.\n* Participants undergoing desensitisation treatment to bee venom before the first visit.\n* Participants being treatment with immunosuppressive medications. being treatment with immunosuppressive medications.",{"count":159,"type":21},120,"Beekeepers experience multiple bee stings each year. Many of these beekeepers (25-60%) become sensitized to bee venom through the production of specific antibodies that target the bee venom. Although these antibodies are important in the triggering of an allergic reaction only a small number of sensitised beekeepers go on to have an allergic reaction with symptoms away from the site of the sting. These reactions can be severe and are known as anaphylactic reactions.\n\nThe study investigates why some beekeepers develop severe allergic symptoms after bee stings while others do not.\n\nThis study will explore factors in the blood that protect sensitised individuals from having anaphylactic reactions - meaning that despite being sensitised they are tolerant and do not react to subsequent stings.",[162],"Bee Sting",[164,165,166],"Immune tolerance","Anaphylaxis","Beekeepers","2025-04-29",{"date":169,"type":33},"2025-04-30",{"date":171,"type":33},"2024-01-22",{"date":173,"type":21},"2027-10-01",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":176,"slug":177,"hasResults":11,"nctId":178,"briefTitle":179,"officialTitle":180,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":181,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":182,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":184,"conditions":185,"keywords":189,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":198,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":199,"startDateStruct":201,"completionDateStruct":203,"leadSponsor":205,"locationsCount":41},"100588250","ergonomic-challenges-for-surgeons-the-problem-and-solutions-100588250","NCT06938958","Ergonomic Challenges for Surgeons; The Problem and Solutions","Characterisation of the Postures Encountered During Surgery and Development of Strategies to Reduce the Risk of Developing Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Surgeons","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Surgeons performing gastro-intestinal (GI) surgery\n* Surgeons assisting GI surgery\n* Open, laparoscopic and robotic GI operation\n* Informed consent from surgeon\n* Informed consent from patient\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pre-existing severe practice-limiting musculoskeletal disorder\n* Surgeon not consenting to participation\n* Patient not consenting to participation",{"count":183,"type":21},30,"Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are highly prevalent among surgeons. Despite growing awareness, there remains a lack of detailed data on the specific postures that contribute to ergonomic risk, particularly within General Surgery. This study aims to characterise postures encountered during open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrointestinal procedures using wearable sensor technology and video analysis, to inform future ergonomic interventions and training.\n\nA single-centre, prospective observational study of 30 surgical cases will be conducted at University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust. Participating surgeons will wear inertial measurement units (IMUs) to record real-time body segment position data whilst performing live surgery. A biomechanical model will then be used to calculate joint angles and whole body posture. Video recordings will be synchronised with IMU data to map posture to surgical tasks. Static and dynamic postures will be analysed using standard ergonomic assessment tools. Alternative tools tailored to surgery will be assessed and proposed. Surgeons will complete questionnaires pre- and post-operatively to report musculoskeletal symptoms. Outcomes will compare ergonomic risk across surgical techniques, identify high-risk procedural steps, and assess the acceptability of wearable technologies in the operating theatre. The data generated will also be used to evaluate, train or refine artificially intelligent camera-based pose estimation models for the operating theatre environment in order to make future ergonomics research and assessment more accessible.",[186,187,188],"Musculoskeletal Strain","Ergonomics","Posture",[190,187,191,192,193,194,195,188,196,197],"Surgeons","OR","Operating Room","Operating Theatre","Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders","Strain","IMU","Computer vision","2025-04-14",{"date":200,"type":33},"2025-04-22",{"date":202,"type":21},"2025-06-01",{"date":204,"type":21},"2026-08",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":207,"slug":208,"hasResults":11,"nctId":209,"briefTitle":210,"officialTitle":211,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":212,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":213,"enrollmentInfo":214,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":216,"conditions":217,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":219,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":220,"startDateStruct":222,"completionDateStruct":224,"leadSponsor":226,"locationsCount":4},"100567243","evaluation-of-the-eyhance-and-zoe-lenses-100567243","NCT06665659","Evaluation of the Eyhance and Zoe Lenses","Retrospective Evaluation of the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe Intraocular Lenses","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult (over 18) patients with cataract requiring cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.\n* Patients who have had either an OphthalmoPro Zoe or a Tecnis Eyhance monofocal lens implanted during routine cataract surgery within the past year\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous penetrating keratoplasty or anterior lamellar keratoplasty\n* Patients who are not willing to cooperate for the follow up period\n* Patients where it is not possible to take informed consent","90 Years",{"count":215,"type":21},50,"The goal of this observational study is to assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs). The main outcomes are:\n\nTo assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs) To assess depth of focus of the IOLs To assess tilt and decentration of the IOLs\n\nThe potential participants will be chosen from the list of patients in the Southend NHS database who have had routine cataract surgery using the Zoe or Eyhance lenses in the past 12 months and contacted by phone and letter. The member of the ophthalmological team carrying out the screening will use the research inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 50 potential participants. Once identified, the potential participants will be asked if they would be willing to discuss inclusion into the study with a member of the clinical care team (Prof Myerscough or Dr Law). If they agree, they will be asked to attend one further clinical visit.\n\nThey will be given a patient information sheet and consent form at this visit. All potential participants will be informed that participation in this research study will be entirely voluntary.\n\nAt the clinical visit participants will have their vision assessed, have dilating drops instilled, and undergo two non-invasive scans of their eyes.",[218],"Cataract","2024-10-28",{"date":221,"type":33},"2024-10-30",{"date":223,"type":21},"2024-11-30",{"date":225,"type":21},"2025-12-31",{"name":39,"class":40},{"id":228,"slug":229,"hasResults":11,"nctId":230,"briefTitle":231,"officialTitle":232,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":233,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":234,"enrollmentInfo":235,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":236,"conditions":237,"keywords":241,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":245,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":246,"startDateStruct":248,"completionDateStruct":250,"leadSponsor":252,"locationsCount":4},"100550378","generational-diversity-in-the-medical-profession-100550378","NCT06446297","Generational Diversity in the Medical Profession","Investigating the Experiences of Generational Diversity Within the Medical Profession of the National Health Service: An Exploratory Study Amongst Post-Graduate Doctors in Training","The following criteria must all be met to permit inclusion in the research study:\n\n* Any medically qualified healthcare professional with a General Medical Council (GMC) registration number, AND\n* Currently working in a recognised training programme in the Southwest (i.e. foundation year training, integrated medical training, core surgical training, acute care common stem training, higher specialty training), AND\n* Currently based at University Hospitals Plymouth (UHP), AND\n* Consents to being interviewed and recorded for the purposes of the study.\n\nAn individual will be excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are met:\n\n* Any medically qualified professional with a GMC registration number that is not currently enrolled within a recognised training programme at UHP, OR\n* any medical professional working outside of UHP, OR\n* employed as an Allied Health Professional, Advanced Clinical Practitioner, Advanced Critical Care Practitioner or Physician Associate will not be eligible for inclusion in the study, OR\n* any individual eligible for inclusion into the study that does NOT consent to being interviewed OR recorded.","100 Years",{"count":183,"type":21},"The purpose of this work is to investigate how post-graduate doctors in training (PGDiTs) experience generational diversity with their colleagues in the workplace. The investigators want to explore and understand how PGDiTs perceive and experience generational diversity in the workplace and look into where these differences between generations could come from.\n\nThe research team wants to do this by running focus groups. These focus groups would be made up of PGDiTs that are working within one hospital. The doctors will be split into the different generations (i.e. generation X, Y and Z). A set list of questions will be used to prompt and guide the focus group conversations. Each focus group will be audio-recorded using an electronic device and then analysed with the aid of computer software. The investigators will then generate themes from the data and use this to create an overall story of the data.\n\nIt is hoped that this research can help inform supervisors and employers of the impact of generational diversity on on PGDiTs. This may be used to help develop ways of improving working relationships for PGDiTs with their supervisors and employers.",[238,239,240],"Generation Gap","Generations","Intergenerational Relations",[242,238,243,244],"Generation","Generational Diversity","Intergenerational workforce","2024-06-19",{"date":247,"type":33},"2024-06-21",{"date":249,"type":21},"2024-08-01",{"date":251,"type":21},"2025-02-01",{"name":39,"class":40},""]