[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"University of Faisalabad\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":452},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,18,0,[8,49,80,113,141,166,183,200,225,250,273,295,313,330,359,384,403,427],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100641879","comparing-two-soft-tissues-technique-on-piriformis-syndrome-patients-100641879",false,"NCT07661485","Comparing Two Soft Tissues Technique on Piriformis Syndrome Patients","Effect of Myofascial Release as Compared to Post Isometric Relaxation in Improving Pain and Lower Extremity Function in Piriformis Syndrome","MPR-PIR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Positive Lasegue sign\n* Positive FAIR test\n* Grade 1-3 tenderness on palpation of piriformis between sacrum and greater trochanter of femur\n* 4 or more pain intensity on the VAS scale\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Lower extremity injuries including ligament, tendon injuries, muscle strains as well as nerve injuries\n\n  * Systemic diseases including tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease as well as chronic inflammatory conditions\n  * Congenital deformities including hip dysplasia, limb length discrepancy, scoliosis and congenital pelvic asymmetry\n  * Cognitive issues including dementia, severe depression and severe psychotic disorders\n  * Lumbar Radiculopathy\n  * SIJ Dysfunction\n  * Lower Extremity Fractures\n  * Pregnancy\n  * Malignancy","ALL","20 Years","50 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},26,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Piriformis Syndrome is a neuromuscular condition with symptoms of pain, numbness and tingling tracing the route of the sciatic nerve, due to the nerve impingement by the piriformis muscle. Two common manual therapy techniques used to treat musculoskeletal conditions are myofascial release and post-isometric relaxation. The intent of the research is to evaluate the effects of myofascial release (MFR) as compared to post-isometric relaxation (PIR) in improving pain and lower extremity function in piriformis syndrome (LEFS). The study population involved 32 individuals aged between 20 to 50 years who will be randomly assigned to two groups; a group that received MFR and a group that received PIR. Both groups received the baseline treatment for four weeks. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be employed to gauge the amount of pain, while the LEFS was used to measure functional mobility",[28,29,30],"Piriformis Syndrome","Musculoskeletal Abnormalities","Sciatica",[32,33,34,35,36],"myofasical release","Post isometric relaxation","physiotherapy","Radiculopathy","Piriformis syndrome","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-25",{"date":40,"type":41},"2026-06-30","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":22},{"date":44,"type":22},"2026-09-30",{"name":46,"class":47},"University of Faisalabad","OTHER",1,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":55,"eligibilityCriteria":56,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":57,"maxAge":58,"enrollmentInfo":59,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":61,"briefSummary":62,"conditions":63,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":72,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":73,"startDateStruct":75,"completionDateStruct":77,"leadSponsor":79,"locationsCount":48},"100643075","effects-of-wearable-vibratory-devices-on-arm-function-in-subacute-stroke-patients-100643075","NCT07641790","Effects of Wearable Vibratory Devices on Arm Function in Subacute Stroke Patients","Effects of Wearable Vibratory Devices for Upper Limb Function Among Subacute Hemiplegic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial","WEVIB-HEMI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unilateral hemiplegia secondary to stroke\n* Age between 30 and 60 years\n* Subacute stage (3 to 6 months post-stroke)\n* Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score between 20 and 50\n* Able to follow simple verbal commands\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous peripheral nerve injury or surgery affecting the upper limb\n* Fixed contractures or bony fractures in the affected limb\n* Complete sensory loss of the upper limb\n* Co-existing neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson's, MS, Dementia)\n* Unstable cardiovascular conditions","30 Years","60 Years",{"count":60,"type":22},30,[25],"Hemiplegia, or paralysis of one side of the body, often results from stroke and severely limits arm function. Standard physiotherapy helps, but recovery is often slow. This study tests if adding a wearable vibratory device to standard therapy improves arm movement better than standard therapy alone. Thirty patients with subacute stroke (3-6 months) will be split into two groups. One group will receive usual physiotherapy, while the other will receive usual physiotherapy plus the vibratory device for 8 weeks. Doctors will measure changes in spasticity (muscle stiffness), motor function, and daily independence before and after treatment.",[64,65],"Hemiplegia","Stroke",[67,68,69,70],"Vibration","Upper Extremity","Physical Therapy","Subacute Stroke","RECRUITING","2026-06-06",{"date":74,"type":41},"2026-06-11",{"date":76,"type":41},"2026-02-01",{"date":78,"type":22},"2026-07-15",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":81,"slug":82,"hasResults":11,"nctId":83,"briefTitle":84,"officialTitle":85,"acronym":86,"eligibilityCriteria":87,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":88,"maxAge":89,"enrollmentInfo":90,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":92,"briefSummary":93,"conditions":94,"keywords":98,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":105,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":106,"startDateStruct":108,"completionDateStruct":110,"leadSponsor":112,"locationsCount":48},"100643444","comparing-two-shoulder-treatments-for-athletes-100643444","NCT07637916","Comparing Two Shoulder Treatments for Athletes","Comparative Effects of Kaltenborn Joint Mobilization (Posterior Glide) Versus Pragmatic Posterior Capsular Stretch on Pain, Limited ROM and Functional Disability in Athletes With Posterior Capsule Tightness","PCT-KM-PPS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Male and female athletes\n* Positive GIRD test\n* Age 22-40 years\n* Overhead throwing athletes (Cricketers)\n* Able to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Fracture\n* Recent shoulder injury (last 6 months)\n* History of shoulder surgery\n* Osteoarthritis\n* Peripheral nerve injuries","22 Years","40 Years",{"count":91,"type":22},34,[25],"Many athletes who play overhead sports like cricket develop tightness in the back of the shoulder. This causes pain and makes it hard to lift the arm. This study will compare two common physical therapy treatments: Kaltenborn joint mobilization (a specific manual therapy glide) versus a Pragmatic Posterior Capsular Stretch (a specific stretching technique). We want to see which one works better for pain, range of motion, and daily function. 28 athletes will be treated for 4 weeks, and we will measure their progress using a goniometer and the SPADI questionnaire.",[95,96,97],"Posterior Capsule Tightness","Joint Diseases","Joint Range of Motion",[95,99,100,101,102,103,104],"GIRD","Kaltenborn Mobilization","Pragmatic Stretch","Glenohumeral Joint","Athletes","Atheletic over head shoulder restrictions","2026-06-04",{"date":107,"type":41},"2026-06-10",{"date":109,"type":22},"2026-06-15",{"date":111,"type":22},"2026-09-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":114,"slug":115,"hasResults":11,"nctId":116,"briefTitle":117,"officialTitle":118,"acronym":119,"eligibilityCriteria":120,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":58,"enrollmentInfo":121,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":123,"briefSummary":124,"conditions":125,"keywords":127,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":133,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":134,"startDateStruct":136,"completionDateStruct":138,"leadSponsor":140,"locationsCount":48},"100638666","rhythmic-initiation-vs-isometric-training-for-arm-recovery-after-stroke-100638666","NCT07598435","Rhythmic Initiation vs Isometric Training for Arm Recovery After Stroke","Comparative Effects of Rhythmic Initiation and Isometric Resistance Training on Upper Limb Motor Function, Strength, and Coordination in Subacute Stroke Patients","RIITSTROKE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Clinically diagnosed subacute stroke (1 to 6 months post-onset)\n* Unilateral upper limb involvement\n* Age 40 to 60 years\n* Both genders\n* Medically stable and able to participate in physical therapy\n* Able to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score \\>3)\n* Recurrent or bilateral stroke\n* Shoulder subluxation\n* Shoulder or upper limb pain limiting active movement\n* Cognitive or perceptual deficits impairing ability to follow instructions\n* Other neurological disorder affecting upper limb (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)\n* Orthopedic condition affecting upper limb function",{"count":122,"type":22},40,[25],"Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide. Many stroke survivors experience persistent weakness, loss of motor control, and poor coordination in their upper limb, which limits their ability to perform daily activities and return to independent living. This study compares two physical therapy approaches for patients in the subacute stage of stroke recovery (1 to 6 months after stroke). The first approach is Rhythmic Initiation, a technique from Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) that uses smooth, guided movement patterns progressing from passive to active movement. The second approach is Isometric Resistance Training, which involves holding static muscle contractions against resistance without moving the joint. The study will enroll 40 patients aged 40 to 60 years with unilateral upper limb weakness from a first-time stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Rhythmic Initiation or Isometric Resistance Training for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The researchers will measure changes in motor function, muscle strength, coordination, and spasticity before and after the 4-week intervention. The results will help physiotherapists understand which approach is more effective for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients.",[65,126],"Upper Extremity Paresis",[128,129,130,131,132],"Stroke Rehabilitation","PNF","Isometric Exercise","Upper Limb","Motor Function","2026-06-01",{"date":135,"type":41},"2026-06-03",{"date":137,"type":41},"2026-01-19",{"date":139,"type":22},"2026-06-24",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":142,"slug":143,"hasResults":11,"nctId":144,"briefTitle":145,"officialTitle":146,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":147,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":148,"maxAge":149,"enrollmentInfo":150,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":152,"briefSummary":153,"conditions":154,"keywords":156,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":133,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":160,"startDateStruct":161,"completionDateStruct":163,"leadSponsor":165,"locationsCount":48},"100640117","comparative-effects-of-blackburn-and-egoscue-exercises-to-improve-cva-in-individuals-with-forward-head-posture-100640117","NCT07622979","Comparative Effects of Blackburn and Egoscue Exercises to Improve CVA in Individuals With Forward Head Posture","Comparative Effects of Blackburn and Egoscue Exercises to Improve Craniovertebral Angle in Individuals With Forward Head Posture","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age range: 25 to 45 years (Mahmoud et al., 2019).\n* Individuals demonstrating a Craniovertebral Angle between 30 and 45 degrees.\n* Individuals reporting pain levels classified as moderate to severe on the NPRS.\n* Individuals demonstrating moderate to severe disability as measured by the Neck Disability Index.\n* Both male and female participants will be considered eligible.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals currently receiving any physical therapy intervention targeting the neck or shoulder regions.\n* Individuals utilizing cervical or lumbar orthotic devices.\n* Individuals taking prescribed pain medications.\n* Individuals with a formally diagnosed psychological condition.\n* Any recent bone fracture.\n* Any recently sustained trauma or injury.\n* Formally diagnosed neurological signs or symptoms.\n* Burns or open wounds.\n* Formally diagnosed vestibular pathology.","25 Years","45 Years",{"count":151,"type":22},28,[25],"The trial aims to evaluate and compare the therapeutic outcomes of Blackburn and Egoscue exercise interventions in managing forward head posture. The study will be conducted as a Randomized Clinical Trial enrolling subjects diagnosed with forward head posture. Participants of both sexes will be eligible provided they present with a Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) ranging between 30 and 45 degrees, a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score indicating moderate to severe impairment, and pain levels rated as moderate to severe on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Individuals currently wearing orthotic devices or having a history of recent trauma or fractures will be ineligible for participation. Written as well as verbal informed consent shall be obtained from each participant prior to enrollment. A total of 28 subjects will be distributed across 2 groups, each comprising 14 individuals, with allocation performed through randomization. Group A will undertake Blackburn exercise protocols while Group B will follow Egoscue method exercises. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), isometric exercises, and thermotherapy via hot pack will serve as baseline interventions for both cohorts alongside cervical isometrics. The complete intervention protocol will span 24 sessions administered across 3 sessions weekly on alternate days. The principal outcomes assessed will include pain severity, craniovertebral alignment, and functional disability. Assessment instruments will comprise the Craniovertebral Angle measurement, Neck Disability Index, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Baseline measurements will be recorded at the start, pain will be documented before and after every treatment session, whereas forward head posture assessment and neck disability evaluations will be conducted both at baseline and upon completion of the 8-week protocol. Statistical processing of data will utilize SPSS version 23.",[155],"Forward Head Posture",[155,157,158,159],"Blackburn Exercise","Egoscue Exercise","Craniovertebral Angle",{"date":135,"type":41},{"date":162,"type":22},"2026-05-20",{"date":164,"type":22},"2026-09-20",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":167,"slug":168,"hasResults":11,"nctId":169,"briefTitle":170,"officialTitle":170,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":171,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":58,"enrollmentInfo":172,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":173,"briefSummary":174,"conditions":175,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":176,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":177,"startDateStruct":179,"completionDateStruct":180,"leadSponsor":182,"locationsCount":48},"100637314","effect-of-pelvic-stability-training-on-lower-limb-motor-function-in-subacute-stroke-100637314","NCT07609407","Effect of Pelvic Stability Training on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute Stroke","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: 40-60 years\n\n  * Gender: both Male and Female.\n  * 1st episodes of stroke either haemorrhagic and Ischemic\n  * Standing Ability with or without assistance aid\u002Fmobility Beyond burnstorm stage 3,argue that Burnstrom stage beyond 3 will be recruited.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Neurological and musculoskeletal dysfunction Any past history of Fracture of the lower limb\u002F pelvis • Any Implant Cardiac pathology",{"count":91,"type":22},[25],"A stroke occurs when blood stops flowing through a blood vessel to the brain, typically from a burst blood vessel or a blood clot. Hemiparesis is associated with impairment of motor function in the lower limb(s) and with instability of the pelvis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of pelvic stability training on the lower limb motor function after subacute stroke. A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 34 participants (17 in each group). This study will utilize the Non-Probability sampling technique called Consecutive sampling technique. All participants are included\u002Fexcluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed informed consent (both written and verbal). Participants will be block randomized in to two group, one will get pelvic stability training and lower limb passive stretching and lower limb NMES (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) and other group will get only lower limb passive stretching and lower limb NMES. Both interventions will be administer over a Eight- week period, thrice a week (alternative days). The results of the study will be pelvic tilt, fugal-meyer assessment lower extremities and cadence of gait. Data will be gathered at baseline and following the 8 week session. Data will be analysed by SPSS 23 program.",[65],"2026-05-19",{"date":178,"type":41},"2026-05-27",{"date":176,"type":22},{"date":181,"type":22},"2026-07-18",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":184,"slug":185,"hasResults":11,"nctId":186,"briefTitle":187,"officialTitle":187,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":188,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":189,"enrollmentInfo":190,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":191,"briefSummary":192,"conditions":193,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":194,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":195,"startDateStruct":197,"completionDateStruct":198,"leadSponsor":199,"locationsCount":48},"100640233","comparative-effects-of-telerehabilitation-and-clinic-based-constraint-induced-movement-therapy-on-upper-limb-function-in-sub-acute-stroke-patients-100640233","NCT07604181","Comparative Effects of Telerehabilitation and Clinic Based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Limb Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Diagnosed cases of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. 2. Age between 40-70 years. 3. Both male and female. 4. Presented with stroke for once in a life and in a period of 6 months post stroke.\n\n5\\. Patient should not have any history of rehabilitation in his\u002Fher 6 months post stroke period. 6. Medically stable condition. 7. Ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions. 8. Minimum active wrist and finger extension required to participate in CIMT.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Severe cognitive impairment. 2. Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score \\>3). 3. Other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders affecting upper limb function.\n\n  4\\. Severe aphasia limiting effective communication. 5. Any other musculoskeletal deficits interfering with task performance. 6. Uncontrolled systemic medical conditions. 7. No attendant's support the session. 8. Depression that restrains participant to cooperate during the session.","70 Years",{"count":151,"type":22},[25],"Stroke constitutes a principal cause of chronic neurological disability globally, frequently precipitating profound upper limb motor impairment that compromises functional autonomy and overall quality of life. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) represents a rigorously validated neurorehabilitation paradigm grounded in the doctrine of experience-dependent neuroplasticity, promoting cortical reorganization through enforced utilization of the paretic limb while restraining the unaffected extremity. By counteracting learned non-use and emphasizing high- intensity, task-specific training, CIMT substantially augments motor recovery and functional performance. The primary objective of the present study is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of CIMT delivery-clinic-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation-in individuals with stroke. A total of 28 participants will be recruited through a non-probability consecutive sampling technique in accordance with explicitly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and will subsequently be randomized into two equal groups (n = 14 per group) using the chit-and-draw method to ensure unbiased allocation. Group A will receive CIMT within a clinical setting under direct supervision, whereas Group B will undergo an equivalent intervention via a structured online telerehabilitation platform under complete supervision. The intervention will be administered to both groups for duration of eight weeks. Outcome measures will include the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to comprehensively evaluate upper limb motor function and spasticity. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and at the completion of the eight-week intervention period.\n\nStatistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.",[65],"2026-05-16",{"date":196,"type":41},"2026-05-22",{"date":194,"type":22},{"date":78,"type":22},{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":201,"slug":202,"hasResults":11,"nctId":203,"briefTitle":204,"officialTitle":204,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":205,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":206,"maxAge":207,"enrollmentInfo":208,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":209,"briefSummary":210,"conditions":211,"keywords":214,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":220,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":221,"startDateStruct":222,"completionDateStruct":223,"leadSponsor":224,"locationsCount":48},"100638108","comparative-effects-of-mulligan-mobilization-with-and-without-myofascial-release-technique-in-management-of-post-traumatic-elbow-stiffness-100638108","NCT07598526","Comparative Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With and Without Myofascial Release Technique in Management of Post Traumatic Elbow Stiffness","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participants aged between 17 and 44 years will be included in the study (Sun et al., 2025).\n* Both male and female patients experiencing mild to moderate elbow pain (3\u002F10 to 5\u002F10 on NPRS) along with restricted range of motion will be eligible (Zulfqar et al., 2021).\n* Subjects having elbow movement limitation of more than 30° in extension, flexion less than 120°, and 50° restriction in both pronation and supination will be included (Masci et al., 2020).\n* Participants will be recruited 3 to 6 weeks after POP removal, and radiographic confirmation of bone\u002Fskeletal healing will be ensured before inclusion (Morrey et al., 2017).\n* Patients with both intra-articular and extra-articular fractures will be considered eligible.\n* Individuals with DASH scores ranging from 45 to 50 points will be included.\n* Only patients willing to participate in the study will be enrolled.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of previous surgical excision will be excluded from the study (Zheng et al., 2018).\n* Participants presenting with pathological fractures will not be included (Zulfqar et al., 2021).\n* Patients in the acute stage of fracture will be excluded from participation (Zulfqar et al., 2021).\n* Individuals with metabolic or malignant conditions causing elbow stiffness, such as gout or osteosarcoma, will not be eligible (Fusaro et al., 2014).\n* Patients with elbow fractures associated with a history of metal implants will be excluded (Zheng et al., 2018).\n* Individuals who have already received physiotherapy treatment or medication for the condition will not be included.\n* Patients diagnosed with psychological illnesses that may interfere with following instructions will be excluded.\n* Participants with brain trauma or referred neurological symptoms, including numbness, dizziness, or hyperesthesia, will not be considered (Fusaro et al., 2014).\n* Patients with structural or postural abnormalities involving the shoulder or wrist will be excluded.\n* Individuals with open skin wounds or burn injuries around the affected area will not be included.\n* Patients with a pre-operative history of arthritis will also be excluded from the study.","17 Years","44 Years",{"count":60,"type":22},[25],"The Randomize Clinical Trial will involve 30 participants with post traumatic elbow stiffness recruited from Madinah Teaching Hospital and Chiniot General hospital Faisalabad. Consecutive sampling technique will be used. Study will include individuals with \\>30° extension loss and \\\u003C120° flexion, 50° in both directions for pronation-supination, who are 3-6 weeks post-POP removal from radiograph confirmation of skeletal\u002Fbone healing will be insured, who have elbow pain from 3 to 5\u002F10 on NPRS and have fully healed fractures. Both intra-articular and extra-articular injuries will be accepted. DASH Score with 45 to 50 points. Study will exclude pathological or acute fractures, burns, brain trauma, neurological or psychological disorders, history of pre-operative osteoarthritis. Consent will be taken written and verbal from participants before including into study. Patients will be allocated with online randomization generator method into 2 groups. Group A will receive Mulligan Mobilization with Myofascial release technique, while Group B will receive Mulligan Mobilization alone. Hot pack for 20 minutes before treatment and static stretching after treatment will apply in both groups. Each stretch is performed 10 repetition with hold duration of 30 sec and rest period 15 sec between each stretch. Total 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions) on alternative days will be given. Outcome of study will be elbow pain, elbow range of motion (flexion and extension) and functional disability will be measure by using Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Universal Goniometer and Dash Questionnaire Score respectively. Data will be investigated by using SPSS version 2023.",[212,213],"Elbow Stiffness","Elbow Pain",[215,216,217,218,219],"Post op elbow stiffness","Mulligan Mobilization","Myofascial Release Technique","Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand","Elbow pain","2026-05-13",{"date":162,"type":41},{"date":162,"type":22},{"date":164,"type":22},{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":226,"slug":227,"hasResults":11,"nctId":228,"briefTitle":229,"officialTitle":230,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":231,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":58,"enrollmentInfo":232,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":234,"briefSummary":235,"conditions":236,"keywords":238,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":220,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":244,"startDateStruct":245,"completionDateStruct":247,"leadSponsor":249,"locationsCount":48},"100639987","pregabalin-phonophoresis-and-met-for-knee-osteoarthritis-100639987","NCT07598474","Pregabalin Phonophoresis and MET for Knee Osteoarthritis","Evaluating the Combined Efficacy of Pregabalin-Encapsulated Hydrogel Phonophoresis Along With Gastrocnemius Muscle Energy Technique on Neuropathic Pain and Mobility in Grade III Knee Osteoarthritis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Diagnosed Grade III knee osteoarthritis confirmed by Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale (radiograph within past 12 months or newly obtained).\n2. Neuropathic pain component confirmed by DN-4 questionnaire (score ≥4).\n3. Age between 40 and 70 years inclusive.\n4. Both male and female participants.\n5. Unilateral or bilateral knee involvement (if bilateral, the more symptomatic knee selected for assessment and treatment).\n6. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.\n7. Available to attend 4 sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks (total 16 sessions).\n8. Able to understand and follow verbal instructions (for MET).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Diabetic neuropathy (diagnosed or DN-4 score attributable to diabetes rather than knee OA).\n2. Active skin lesions, wounds, infections, or dermatitis on the knee or calf.\n3. Metal implants (including knee replacement), pacemaker, or other electronic implant (contraindications for ultrasound).\n4. Received intra-articular knee injection (corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid) within the last 3 months.\n5. Grade I, II, or IV knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence).\n6. Aseptic arthritis of knee (rheumatoid, psoriatic, gouty).\n7. Any lower extremity deformity (genu varum \\>15°, genu valgum \\>15°, fixed flexion deformity \\>15°).\n8. Previous knee replacement surgery (partial or total).\n9. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to pregabalin, gabapentin, or any gel components.\n10. Pregnant or lactating women (ultrasound safety in pregnancy not established for non-obstetric use).\n11. Concurrent participation in another interventional study.\n12. Diagnosis of fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, or other centralized pain disorder that might confound neuropathic pain assessment.\n13. Active malignancy or history of knee malignancy.\n14. Deep vein thrombosis or thrombophlebitis in lower limb.",{"count":233,"type":22},35,[25],"Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition causing pain, stiffness, and difficulty walking. Many patients with advanced (Grade III) knee OA also experience neuropathic pain - burning, tingling, or electric shock sensations - which is harder to treat with standard physiotherapy. Oral pregabalin works for neuropathic pain but causes side effects like dizziness and drowsiness. This study tests whether delivering pregabalin through the skin using ultrasound (phonophoresis), combined with calf muscle stretching (Muscle Energy Technique), can reduce nerve pain and improve walking better than ultrasound alone.",[237],"Knee Osteoarthritis",[239,240,241,242,243],"Neuropathic Pain","Phonophoresis","Pregabalin","Muscle Energy Technique","Gastrocnemius",{"date":162,"type":41},{"date":246,"type":41},"2026-01-01",{"date":248,"type":22},"2026-07-19",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":251,"slug":252,"hasResults":11,"nctId":253,"briefTitle":254,"officialTitle":254,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":255,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":256,"enrollmentInfo":257,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":259,"briefSummary":260,"conditions":261,"keywords":264,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":220,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":269,"startDateStruct":270,"completionDateStruct":271,"leadSponsor":272,"locationsCount":48},"100637553","comparative-effects-of-perturbation-based-balance-training-on-firm-surface-and-rolling-board-for-diabetic-neuropathy-patients-100637553","NCT07598513","Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Firm Surface and Rolling Board for Diabetic Neuropathy Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) (Bolen et al., 2016).\n* Participants with a diabetes duration of more than 10 years (Grewal et al., 2015).\n* Participants exhibiting signs and symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (such as numbness, tingling, burning, shooting or electric shock-like pain, and glove-and-stocking distribution), confirmed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument with scores of 6-8 (patient version) and 2.5-4 (physical assessment) (Haque et al., 2022).\n* Participants aged between 40 and 75 years (Rasool et al., 2024).\n* Both male and female participants will be eligible for inclusion (Haleem et al., 2024).\n* Participants currently using insulin-sensitizing medications (e.g., metformin, Diamicron, insulin).\n* Participants who are able to stand and walk independently (Allin et al., 2020).\n* Participants with a Berg Balance Scale score ranging from 25 to 40 (Phyu et al., 2022).\n* Participants willing to provide informed consent (Lepesis et al., 2023).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) will be excluded (Daud et al., 2021).\n* Those with cognitive deficits (such as dementia or Alzheimer's disease) that may interfere with comprehension or compliance with study procedures will not be included (Hatton et al., 2019).\n* Individuals presenting with foot drop or other neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, myelopathy, or cerebellar ataxia) that could affect the study findings will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).\n* Patients who have recently undergone surgery, sustained trauma to the feet or lower limbs, or have any foot amputation will not be eligible (Collings et al., 2023).\n* Individuals diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or orthostatic hypotension will be excluded (Khurshid et al., 2025).\n* Patients with active diabetic foot ulcers or notable musculoskeletal deformities (such as scoliosis or degenerative joint disease) will be excluded (Lepesis et al., 2023).\n* Individuals with neuropathy unrelated to diabetes, including cases associated with alcohol use or Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, will not be included.\n* Participants taking medications that may provoke vertigo or disturb balance (for example, aspirin) will be excluded.","75 Years",{"count":258,"type":22},42,[25],"The present study is designed to compare the effectiveness of perturbation-based balance training performed on two different surfaces, stable (firm surface) and unstable (rolling board), for enhancing static, dynamic, and reactive balance in individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy. This randomized clinical trial will recruit a total of 42 participants, with the sample size calculated using Epi Tool software. A consecutive sampling technique will be implemented. Eligible participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two equal groups (n = 21 each) through an online randomization method. Participants in Group A will undergo perturbation-based balance exercises on a stable surface, whereas participants in Group B will receive similar training on a rolling board to introduce surface instability. In addition to the primary intervention, both groups will receive contrast bath therapy as a standard baseline treatment. Written as well as verbal informed consent will be obtained prior to participation. The intervention protocol will span four weeks, consisting of three sessions per week on alternate days, resulting in a total of twelve treatment sessions. The primary outcomes will focus on balance performance and fall risk. These outcomes will be measured using the Berg Balance Scale, the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Screening for diabetic neuropathy will be carried out using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 23.",[262,263],"Balance Impairment","Diabetic Neuropathy",[263,265,266,267,268],"Balance","Perturbation-Based Balance Training","Mini-BESTest","Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument",{"date":162,"type":41},{"date":162,"type":22},{"date":164,"type":22},{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":274,"slug":275,"hasResults":11,"nctId":276,"briefTitle":277,"officialTitle":278,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":279,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":57,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":280,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":282,"briefSummary":283,"conditions":284,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":287,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":288,"startDateStruct":290,"completionDateStruct":292,"leadSponsor":294,"locationsCount":48},"100638219","wrist-heavy-slow-resistance-and-shoulder-stabilization-exercises-on-pain-grip-strength-and-functional-ability-in-lateral-epicondylitis-100638219","NCT07576829","Wrist Heavy Slow Resistance and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Grip Strength and Functional Ability in Lateral Epicondylitis","Comparative Impact of Wrist Heavy Slow Resistance and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Grip Strength and Functional Ability in Lateral Epicondylitis","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Both genders will be involved with ages 30-50. Patients who have had pain for the last 2 weeks with tenderness. Subjects who will have a positive cozen test. Also include those who have a radiological graph with normal bone and joint alignment of the upper limb.\n\nInclude those who will be clinically diagnosed with LE from the orthopedic OPD. A pain score of more than or equal to 4 in NPRS diagnosed as tennis elbow.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Those who will have pain on the lateral aspect of the elbow for 6 months or more than 6 months.\n\nSubjects who will be diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy. Those who will have the injury and disease around the shoulder, elbow and wrist.\n\nThose with a history of elbow surgery, open wound and infectious limb. Those with a history of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Those who have any fracture of the treatment side upper limb. systemic illness like bleeding disorders, anticoagulants, diabetes, and hypertension.",{"count":281,"type":22},32,[25],"The study will compare the shoulder and wrist treatment approaches to determine their effect on elbow. Thirty-two medically stable participants with active shoulder and wrist movements will be enrolled into two groups. Both groups will receive structured training for six weeks. Outcomes will be measured using standardized assessment tools. The aim is to identify the more effective strategy for improving upper limb kinetic chain which is affected by lateral epicondylitis",[285,286],"Lateral Epicondylitis","Tennis Elbow","2026-05-04",{"date":289,"type":41},"2026-05-08",{"date":291,"type":41},"2026-02-02",{"date":293,"type":22},"2026-06-02",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":296,"slug":297,"hasResults":11,"nctId":298,"briefTitle":299,"officialTitle":299,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":300,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":148,"maxAge":89,"enrollmentInfo":301,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":303,"briefSummary":304,"conditions":305,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":287,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":308,"startDateStruct":309,"completionDateStruct":311,"leadSponsor":312,"locationsCount":48},"100637693","effects-of-hip-based-versus-knee-based-exercises-on-medial-longitudinal-arch-dynamic-balance-and-muscle-strength-in-flexible-flatfoot-100637693","NCT07576816","Effects of Hip-Based Versus Knee-Based Exercises on Medial Longitudinal Arch, Dynamic Balance, and Muscle Strength in Flexible Flatfoot","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Give verbal or written consent to enter the study.\n* People without any pain and in the age group of about 25-40 years.\n* People in the category of normal to obese BMI.\n* People whose value of navicular drop above 10mm.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* People having any surgical procedure on the lower limb.\n* People using any kind of orthosis.\n* If the difference between the length of both legs is more than 1.1cm.\n* People having any disease like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, plantar fasciitis or sciatica.\n* People having any injury within 6 months.",{"count":302,"type":22},46,[25],"This study aims to compare the effects of hip-based and knee-based exercise interventions on medial longitudinal arch height, dynamic balance, and lower limb muscle strength in individuals with flexible flat feet. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving hip-focused strengthening and stretching exercises, and the other receiving knee-focused exercises, while both groups will perform a common set of foot intrinsic exercises. The intervention will be conducted over 6 weeks. Outcomes will be measured pre- and post- intervention and in the middle of intervention to determine which approach is more effective in improving foot stability and functional performance.",[306,307],"Flexible Flatfoot","Flexible Flatfoot or Pes Planus",{"date":289,"type":41},{"date":310,"type":41},"2026-03-30",{"date":40,"type":22},{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":314,"slug":315,"hasResults":11,"nctId":316,"briefTitle":317,"officialTitle":317,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":318,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":89,"maxAge":256,"enrollmentInfo":319,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":320,"briefSummary":321,"conditions":322,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":323,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":324,"startDateStruct":326,"completionDateStruct":327,"leadSponsor":329,"locationsCount":48},"100633193","unilateral-versus-bilateral-task-specific-training-on-motor-impairment-upper-extremity-function-and-hand-dexterity-in-post-stroke-rehabilitation-100633193","NCT07523503","Unilateral Versus Bilateral Task-specific Training on Motor Impairment, Upper Extremity Function, and Hand Dexterity in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Age between 40 and 75 years\n\n  * Clinically diagnosed stroke (no more than three lifetime episodes)\n  * Stroke duration between 6 to 24 months\n  * Ability to perform antigravity shoulder movement with the paretic limb\n  * Abbreviated Mental Test score ≥ 7\n  * Medically stable and capable of giving consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Uncontrolled systemic conditions (e.g. Unstable cardiac conditions)\n\n  * Major orthopedic issues affecting the involved upper limb\n  * Hearing deficits\n  * Allergy to electrodes\n  * Receptive aphasia or severe language impairment\n  * Severe joint contracture limiting required upper limb movements",{"count":281,"type":22},[25],"This randomized clinical trial will examine upper limb rehabilitation in individuals recovering from stroke. The study will compare unilateral and bilateral task-oriented training approaches to determine their relative effectiveness. Thirty-two medically stable participants with active shoulder movement and adequate cognition will be enrolled into two groups. Both groups will receive structured training for four weeks. Outcomes related to motor function and dexterity will be measured using standardized assessment tools. The aim is to identify the more effective strategy for improving upper extremity function after stroke.",[65],"2026-04-05",{"date":325,"type":41},"2026-04-13",{"date":323,"type":22},{"date":328,"type":22},"2026-05-15",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":331,"slug":332,"hasResults":11,"nctId":333,"briefTitle":334,"officialTitle":334,"acronym":335,"eligibilityCriteria":336,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":337,"maxAge":338,"enrollmentInfo":339,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":341,"briefSummary":344,"conditions":345,"keywords":347,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":351,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":352,"startDateStruct":354,"completionDateStruct":356,"leadSponsor":358,"locationsCount":4},"100629491","phase-1-lesion-sterilization-and-tissue-repair-antibiotic-paste-versus-zinc-oxide-and-eugenol-pulpectomy-for-treatment-of-primary-molars-with-pulp-necrosis-100629491","NCT07475364","Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Antibiotic Paste Versus Zinc Oxide and Eugenol Pulpectomy for Treatment of Primary Molars With Pulp Necrosis","LSTR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Children of both genders\n\n  * 4 years and 10 years\n  * Pulp necrosis in mandibular primary molars with minimum of 2\u002F3 of the roots\n  * Consent from Parents\u002FGuardian of children.\n  * Sufficient crown structure for restoration\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Children who have a physical or mental change.\n\n  * Involving systemic illnesses.\n  * History of allergy to drugs being utilized\n  * Antibiotics use within three months\n  * Teeth with aberrant root resorption or pulp canal obliteration on periapical radiography","4 Years","10 Years",{"count":340,"type":22},180,[342,343],"PHASE1","PHASE2","The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) antibiotic paste versus zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy for the treatment of primary molars with pulp necrosis in pediatric patients.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Is LSTR antibiotic paste (CTZ paste) effective in treating primary molars with pulp necrosis?\n* Is ZOE pulpectomy effective in treating primary molars with pulp necrosis, and how does its efficacy compare with LSTR therapy?\n\nResearchers will compare LSTR therapy (Group A) with ZOE pulpectomy (Group B) to determine which treatment provides better clinical and radiographic outcomes after six months.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups after diagnosis of pulp necrosis in primary molars.\n* Receive treatment under standard behavior management techniques with local anesthesia following topical application of 2% lignocaine gel and rubber dam isolation.\n* Undergo either Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR) therapy with CTZ paste or zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy according to group allocation.\n* Return for a clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluation after six months to assess treatment outcomes.\n* Allow researchers to record their clinical findings and radiographic results to evaluate the efficacy of both treatment methods.",[346],"Pulp Necrosis",[348,349,350],"LSTR therapy","primary molars","pulp therapy","2026-03-16",{"date":353,"type":41},"2026-03-19",{"date":355,"type":22},"2026-05-01",{"date":357,"type":22},"2027-05-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":360,"slug":361,"hasResults":11,"nctId":362,"briefTitle":363,"officialTitle":364,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":365,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":366,"minAge":367,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":368,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":370,"briefSummary":371,"conditions":372,"keywords":374,"overallStatus":71,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":376,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":377,"startDateStruct":379,"completionDateStruct":381,"leadSponsor":383,"locationsCount":48},"100603614","effect-of-met-vs-neck-calliet-exercises-on-neck-pain-and-disability-in-nurses-100603614","NCT07138807","Effect of MET vs Neck Calliet Exercises on Neck Pain and Disability in Nurses","Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique and Neck Calliet Exercises on Mechanical Neck Pain and Disability Due to Trapezius Trigger Point Among Nurses","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Female nurses\n* Between 18 and 30 years of age\n* Having mechanical neck discomfort that is confined to the cervical or bilateral scapular regions (pain level must be 3-5 VAS)\n* There must be at least one trigger point in trapezius muscle\n* The participant must be ready to participate No clinical therapy for neck pain must have been performed in the preceding month\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A recent medical history including surgery on the shoulder or neck\n* Signs of myelopathy in the clinic or radiculopathy\n* Diagnosed Fibromyalgia syndrome, psychiatric problems\n* Pregnancy\n* Cervical stenosis, malignancy (cervical, breast cancer)\n* Thoracic outlet syndrome\n* Vestibulobasilar artery syndrome\n* Whiplash injury\n* Diagnosis of migraine\n* Diabetes type I, systematic illness of cardio-respiratory system\n* Congenital deformities affecting the spine, shoulders, and limbs\n* Osteoporosis of cervical spine or cervical myeloma","FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":369,"type":22},38,[25],"This study compares the effectiveness of Muscle Energy Techniques (MET) and Neck Calliet Exercises in managing mechanical neck pain and associated disability due to trapezius trigger points among nurses. A total of 38 female nurses were randomly assigned to two intervention groups, each receiving therapy for four weeks. Pain, cervical range of motion, and disability outcomes were assessed.",[373],"Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial",[375],"MET, Neck Calliet Exercise, Cervical ROM, VAS, NDI","2025-09-11",{"date":378,"type":41},"2025-09-12",{"date":380,"type":41},"2025-08-15",{"date":382,"type":22},"2025-09-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":385,"slug":386,"hasResults":11,"nctId":387,"briefTitle":388,"officialTitle":388,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":389,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":390,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":391,"briefSummary":392,"conditions":393,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":395,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":396,"startDateStruct":398,"completionDateStruct":400,"leadSponsor":402,"locationsCount":4},"100575931","comparative-effects-of-motor-control-and-isolated-strengthening-lumbar-exercises-on-functional-outcomes-in-patients-with-chronic-low-back-pain-100575931","NCT06778694","Comparative Effects of Motor Control and Isolated Strengthening Lumbar Exercises on Functional Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* LBP for more than 3 months\n\nBoth male and females.\n\nAge between 20-50 years old.\n\nModerate to severe pain (VAS; 3-7)\n\nCurrently seeking care for LBP.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Spinal surgery\n\nPregnancy\n\nProstatectomy\n\nEngaged in any sports activities\n\nAny evidence of nerve root compression",{"count":233,"type":22},[25],"Comparative effects of motor control and isolated strengthening lumbar exercises on functional outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain",[394],"Chronic Low-back Pain","2025-02-14",{"date":397,"type":41},"2025-02-19",{"date":399,"type":22},"2025-02",{"date":401,"type":22},"2025-08",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":404,"slug":405,"hasResults":11,"nctId":406,"briefTitle":407,"officialTitle":407,"acronym":408,"eligibilityCriteria":409,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":58,"enrollmentInfo":410,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":412,"briefSummary":413,"conditions":414,"keywords":416,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":420,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":421,"startDateStruct":423,"completionDateStruct":424,"leadSponsor":426,"locationsCount":4},"100578474","comparative-effects-of-strain-counterstrain-and-muscle-energy-techniques-on-neck-pain-and-functional-disability-in-patients-with-cervicogenic-headache-100578474","NCT06811766","Comparative Effects of Strain-counterstrain and Muscle Energy Techniques on Neck Pain and Functional Disability in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache","SCS METs","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* participants who fulfill the criteria of international headache society.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* participants who have cervicogenic headache after cervical injury or head surgery.",{"count":411,"type":22},54,[25],"The primary objective of this study is to compare effects of SCS and METs on reduction of neck pain intensity and improvement in functional disability in individuals with CGH. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of both techniques on ROM in cervical spine",[415],"Cervicogenic Headache",[417,418,419],"CGH","SCS","METs","2025-01-31",{"date":422,"type":41},"2025-02-06",{"date":399,"type":22},{"date":425,"type":22},"2025-09",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":428,"slug":429,"hasResults":11,"nctId":430,"briefTitle":431,"officialTitle":431,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":432,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":433,"maxAge":434,"enrollmentInfo":435,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":436,"briefSummary":437,"conditions":438,"keywords":440,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":444,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":445,"startDateStruct":447,"completionDateStruct":449,"leadSponsor":451,"locationsCount":4},"100574468","comparative-effects-of-group-based-exercises-with-and-without-cognitive-functional-therapy-on-clinical-outcomes-in-patients-with-chronic-low-back-pain-100574468","NCT06759675","Comparative Effects of Group Based Exercises with and Without Cognitive Functional Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pain level equal or more than 3 on NPRS A score of fourteen percent 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Low back pain for at least 6months duration\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Red flags (neoplastic diseases or cancer in the spine, inflammatory diseases, infections, and fractures) Neurological symptoms and psychiatric, rheumatologic, and cardiac diseases Radiculopathy with symptoms Lumbar stenosis Spondylolisthesis History of spinal surgeries Pregnancy","35 Years","65 Years",{"count":122,"type":22},[25],"1.1Research objective The objective of the study is to find the comparative effects of group based exercises with and without cognitive functional therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic low back? 1.2 Hypothesis Null Hypothesis H0= There is no significant difference of clinical outcomes between the cognitive functional therapy with group exercises and group based exercises only in patients with chronic low back pain.\n\nAlternative Hypothesis H1= There is a significant difference of clinical outcomes between the cognitive functional therapy with group exercises and group based exercises only in patients with chronic low back pain.",[439],"Low Back Pain, Chronic",[441,442,443],"Cognitive Functional therapy","group based exercise","chronic low back","2024-12-28",{"date":446,"type":41},"2025-01-06",{"date":448,"type":22},"2025-01",{"date":450,"type":22},"2025-05",{"name":46,"class":47},""]