[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"University of Kyrenia\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":81},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,52],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":41,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":42,"startDateStruct":45,"completionDateStruct":47,"leadSponsor":49,"locationsCount":5},"100635047","phase-4-prp-vs-prpbetamethasone-vs-betamethasone-injection-for-upper-trapezius-myofascial-pain-100635047",false,"NCT07547605","PRP vs PRP+Betamethasone vs Betamethasone Injection for Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain","Comparison of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Combined Platelet-Rich Plasma Plus Betamethasone, and Betamethasone Monotherapy Trigger Point Injections in Patients With Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Assessor-Blind, Controlled Trial","UMAY-RCT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 65 years\n* Presentation to the Orthopedics and Traumatology outpatient clinic with neck and\u002For shoulder pain\n* Diagnosis of upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome based on Simons and Travell criteria, including:\n* Presence of a taut band\n* Local tenderness\n* Referred pain pattern\n* Local twitch response\n* Presence of a single active trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle\n* Symptom duration ≥ 4 weeks\n* Pain intensity ≥ 4 on the visual analog scale (VAS)\n* Inadequate response to at least 4 weeks of conservative treatment (physical therapy and\u002For oral analgesics)\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of multiple active trigger points\n* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to ACR 2010 criteria\n* Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy\n* Trigger point injection in the same region within the past 3 months\n* Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy\n* Known allergy or contraindication to corticosteroids, local anesthetics, or PRP components\n* Active infection (systemic or local)\n* Pregnancy or lactation\n* Thrombocytopenia (platelet count \\\u003C 100,000\u002FµL)\n* Malignancy\n* Inability to cooperate or provide informed consent","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},150,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"PHASE4","Brief Summary\n\nMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by active trigger points (TrPs), which are hypersensitive, painful nodules within taut bands of skeletal muscle. The upper trapezius muscle is one of the most frequently affected sites. Trigger point injection (TPI) is a widely used minimally invasive treatment for patients who are refractory to conservative management.\n\nCorticosteroids provide rapid anti-inflammatory effects, whereas platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has regenerative properties through growth factors that may support tissue healing. Despite their widespread use, the optimal injectate for TPI remains unclear. Additionally, the potential benefit of combining PRP with corticosteroids has not been adequately studied in upper trapezius MPS.\n\nThis study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded controlled trial designed to compare the clinical effectiveness of three injection protocols: (1) PRP plus bupivacaine, (2) PRP plus betamethasone plus bupivacaine, and (3) betamethasone plus bupivacaine with saline (volume-matched control). A total of 150 patients with a single active trigger point in the upper trapezius will be included.\n\nThe primary outcome is pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include pressure pain threshold (PPT), cervical range of motion (ROM), rescue analgesic use, recurrence rate, and adverse events at 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.\n\nAll injections are performed by the same investigator using a palpation-guided technique, and outcome assessments are conducted by a blinded evaluator.",[28,29,30],"Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome","Trigger Points, Myofascial","Trigger Point in Trapezius Muscle",[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"platelet-rich plasma","PRP","betamethasone","trigger point injection","myofascial pain syndrome","trapezius","randomized controlled trial","pressure pain threshold","RECRUITING","2026-06-14",{"date":43,"type":44},"2026-06-16","ACTUAL",{"date":46,"type":44},"2026-05-15",{"date":48,"type":22},"2027-01",{"name":50,"class":51},"University of Kyrenia","OTHER",{"id":53,"slug":54,"hasResults":11,"nctId":55,"briefTitle":56,"officialTitle":57,"acronym":58,"eligibilityCriteria":59,"healthyVolunteers":60,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":61,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":63,"briefSummary":65,"conditions":66,"keywords":69,"overallStatus":40,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":77,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":5},"100635889","vr-vs-classical-anatomy-teaching-100635889","NCT07558551","VR vs Classical Anatomy Teaching","Comparison of PlayStation VR2-Based Virtual Reality vs. Classical Method in Teaching Wrist Anatomy: A Randomized Controlled Study","VrISt","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* First-year medical student at Kyrenia University\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Voluntary participation\n* Signed written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* First-year medical student at Kyrenia University\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Voluntary participation\n* Signed written informed consent",true,{"count":62,"type":22},80,[64],"NA","This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled educational trial comparing the effectiveness of PlayStation VR2-based immersive virtual reality (VR) anatomy teaching versus classical (lecture\u002Fatlas\u002F3D-model) teaching for wrist anatomy among first-year medical students at Kyrenia University Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital. Eighty healthy adult students will be randomized 1:1 into a VR Group (30-35-minute PSVR2 wrist anatomy module delivered on PlayStation 5) or a Classical Group (30-35-minute faculty-led standard anatomy education using lecture, atlas, and 3D anatomical models). The primary outcome is immediate post-test knowledge score (multiple-choice questions plus visual labeling; 0-30 scale). Secondary outcomes include a 2-4-week retention test, Likert-type learning satisfaction (15-75), cognitive load (0-10), and incidence and severity of VR-related side effects (dizziness, nausea, eye strain; 0-3 ordinal). Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. The study aims to evaluate whether immersive VR is non-inferior or superior to classical teaching for initial acquisition and short-term retention of wrist anatomy knowledge, while characterizing tolerability of consumer-grade VR in an educational setting.",[67,68],"Medical Education","Anatomy Education",[70,71,72,73],"virtual reality","anatomy education","medical students","wrist anatomy","2026-05-20",{"date":76,"type":44},"2026-05-26",{"date":46,"type":44},{"date":79,"type":22},"2026-08",{"name":50,"class":51},""]