[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Yosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":40},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":5},"100598830","a-comparative-study-between-the-usage-of-flexible-and-navigable-suction-ureteral-access-sheath-versus-traditional-access-sheath-in-retrograde-intrarenal-surgeries-100598830",false,"NCT07076589","A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgeries","A Comparative Study Between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) Versus Traditional Access Sheath in RIRS : Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥14 years old in patients not known to have stone forming medical conditions.\n* Renal stones diameter of ≤2 cm confirmed by CT with all types of configurations (branching \\& non-branching).\n* Non - recurrent cases with no history of previous open renal surgeries or PCNL with normal renal anatomy.\n* Patients with non - infected urine analysis.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with abnormal urinary tract anatomy (such as horseshoe kidney or ileal conduit).\n* Patients with medical conditions promoting stone formation (hyperparathyroidism - gout).\n* Patients with history of stones on the same side with previous open surgical intervention or PCNL .\n* Patients with e-GFR \\\u003C 60 ml \u002F min.\n* Patients with uncontrolled urinary tract infection.\n* Patients with health or other factors that are absolute contraindications to RIRS.\n* Patients who are unable to understand or complete trial documentation.","ALL","14 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},80,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","A comparative study between the Usage of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Traditional Access sheath in RIRS : Randomized controlled trial .",[26,27],"Stones, Kidney","Ureter Stones","RECRUITING","2026-03-08",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-03-10","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2025-06-01",{"date":36,"type":20},"2026-03-03",{"name":38,"class":39},"Yosseif elhousseiny ammar ahmed","OTHER",""]