[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"acromioclavicular-joint-dislocation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:acromioclavicular-joint-dislocation":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,58,82,109,131],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":46,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":47,"startDateStruct":50,"completionDateStruct":52,"leadSponsor":54,"locationsCount":57},"100643384","contralateral-resistance-training-during-immobilization-in-patients-with-acromioclavicular-joint-injury-100643384",false,"NCT07628361","Contralateral Resistance Training During Immobilization in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Injury","Effects of Contralateral Eccentric and Concentric Resistance Training During Immobilization on Neuromuscular Function, Functional Recovery, and Quality of Life in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial","CROSS-ACD","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Men and women aged 18 to 36 years.\n* Diagnosis of acute acromioclavicular joint injury confirmed by an orthopedic surgeon.\n* Physician-prescribed upper-limb immobilization using a sling for approximately 2 to 4 weeks, with or without surgical repair.\n* Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent.\n* Medical clearance to participate in the rehabilitation and resistance training program.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Previous surgery or severe musculoskeletal injury affecting either upper limb within the previous 12 months.\n* Neurological disorders affecting motor function or neuromuscular performance.\n* Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation according to established safety guidelines.\n* Current participation in another clinical trial or structured upper-limb rehabilitation program.\n* Cognitive impairment or inability to comply with study procedures.\n* Pregnancy.\n* Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, may compromise participant safety or study participation.","ALL","18 Years","36 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},16,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of contralateral eccentric and concentric resistance training performed during the immobilization period following acromioclavicular joint injury. Immobilization is commonly prescribed after injury but may lead to reductions in muscle mass, neuromuscular function, force production, and upper-limb functionality.\n\nContralateral resistance training, also known as cross-education training, involves exercising the non-injured limb to induce beneficial adaptations in the immobilized limb through neural mechanisms. While both eccentric and concentric exercise may produce contralateral effects, their relative effectiveness in a clinical population remains unclear.\n\nParticipants with acute acromioclavicular joint injury requiring sling immobilization will be randomly assigned to either a contralateral eccentric training group or a contralateral concentric training group. During immobilization, participants will perform supervised resistance training with the non-injured upper limb. Following immobilization, all participants will receive the same standardized rehabilitation program.\n\nNeuromuscular function, muscle morphology, force production, upper-limb function, and quality of life will be assessed before immobilization, after immobilization, and following rehabilitation. The findings may contribute to the development of more effective rehabilitation strategies for patients recovering from upper-limb injuries requiring temporary immobilization.",[28,29],"Acromioclavicular Joint Injury","Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation",[31,32,33,34,35,36,37,28,38,39,40,41,42,43,44],"Cross-Education","Contralateral Training","Eccentric Exercise","Concentric Exercise","Resistance Training","Immobilization","Shoulder Rehabilitation","Neuromuscular Function","Muscle Strength","Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation","Electromyography","Upper Limb Function","Physical Therapy","Rehabilitation","RECRUITING","2026-06-04",{"date":48,"type":49},"2026-06-08","ACTUAL",{"date":51,"type":49},"2026-01-01",{"date":53,"type":22},"2027-07-01",{"name":55,"class":56},"Universidad Nacional Andres Bello","OTHER",1,{"id":59,"slug":60,"hasResults":11,"nctId":61,"briefTitle":62,"officialTitle":63,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":64,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":65,"enrollmentInfo":66,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":68,"briefSummary":69,"conditions":70,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":72,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":73,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":74,"startDateStruct":76,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":4},"100594792","acute-acj-dislocation-type-iiivi-cc-ligaments-reconstruction-with-ac-ligament-reconstruction-vs-cc-ligaments-reconstruction-with-ac-temporary-k-wire-fixation-100594792","NCT07024056","Acute ACJ Dislocation Type (III&VI): CC Ligaments Reconstruction With AC Ligament Reconstruction vs. CC Ligaments Reconstruction With AC Temporary k Wire Fixation","Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Rockwood Type (III&VI): Coracoclavicular Ligaments Reconstruction Associated With Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Versus Coracoclavicular Ligaments Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Temporary k Wire Fixation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age at least 18 years old.\n* Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type VI.\n* Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type III patients with pre-injury high level of activity (work or athletic activity).\n* Patient is fit for surgery.\n* Patient is willing to participate.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Chronic AC dislocation.\n* AC dislocation Rockwood type (I, II, IV and VI).\n* Previous surgery to the same shoulder, degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint, shoulder infections, and concomitant neurologic diseases.\n* Associated neurological disorders in the affected limb.","60 Years",{"count":67,"type":22},20,[25],"The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographical outcome of patients treated by coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction versus coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation in management of Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type (III\\&VI).\n\n* Number of patients (20)\n* Type of disease (AC dislocation Rockwood type (III\\&VI)\n* follow up period (6 months)\n* type of study: this is a clinical research study",[71,29],"Acromioclavicular Joint","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-06-17",{"date":75,"type":49},"2025-06-22",{"date":77,"type":22},"2025-07-01",{"date":79,"type":22},"2026-08",{"name":81,"class":56},"Benha University",{"id":83,"slug":84,"hasResults":11,"nctId":85,"briefTitle":86,"officialTitle":86,"acronym":87,"eligibilityCriteria":88,"healthyVolunteers":89,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":90,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":92,"briefSummary":93,"conditions":94,"keywords":98,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":100,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":101,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":105,"leadSponsor":107,"locationsCount":57},"100514266","kinesiotaping-in-trauma-100514266","NCT05976256","Kinesiotaping in Trauma","KIT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ≥18 years\n* Acute injury (occurred \\\u003C24 hours ago)\n* Single shoulder or chest wall injury, which includes one of the following injuries:\n\n  * rib fracture\n  * disruption of the AC-joint Tossy type 1 and 2\n  * not or hardly dislocated fracture of the clavicle\n  * Not or hardly dislocated fracture of the r proximal humeral fracture\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Patients younger than 18 years\n\n  * Incapacitated persons\n  * Refusal of participation\n  * Intubation indication\n  * Decrease of Consciousness\n  * Hemodynamic instability\n  * 3 or more rib fractures\n  * Rib fracture rib 1-3\n  * Indication for surgery\n  * Hospitalization required\n  * Presence of a haemo- or pneumothorax with chest drain indication\n  * Already known with allergy for adhesive tape\n  * Patients with very thin or loose skin on the applicable body part\n  * Skin infection\u002Firritation or open wound on the applicable body part\n  * Patients who do not speak Dutch or English",true,{"count":91,"type":22},387,[25],"Rationale: Patients with acute traumatic injury to the shoulder or chest wall in de Emergency Department (ED) usually have intense pain. The patient normally is treated with oral analgesics as standard care and in shoulder injury with a sling. Pain of the shoulder or chest wall increases with movement of the affected arm and chest. Kinesiotaping is offered regularly as an additional pain treatment, but there is no hard evidence about its effectiveness. A randomized pilot study in OLVG (Bakker 2022) showed the pain decreasing more when using kinesiotaping comparing to no tape. However, a placebo-effect could not be ruled out and the pilot data need confirmation in a large cohort of patients to study the effectiveness of additional treatment with kinesiotaping in terms of pain, comfort and patient satisfaction.",[95,29,96,97],"Fracture Rib","Fracture Clavicle","Fracture, Proximal Humeral",[99],"kinesiotaping","2025-05-27",{"date":102,"type":49},"2025-05-31",{"date":104,"type":49},"2023-12-11",{"date":106,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":108,"class":56},"Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis",{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":114,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":115,"maxAge":65,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":118,"studyType":119,"phases":4,"briefSummary":120,"conditions":121,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":72,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":122,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":123,"startDateStruct":125,"completionDateStruct":127,"leadSponsor":129,"locationsCount":4},"100517570","open-versus-arthroscopic-assisted-treatment-of-acute-acromioclavicular-joint-disruption-using-suture-button-device-100517570","NCT06019260","Open Versus Arthroscopic Assisted Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption Using Suture Button Device","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age of 16 to 60 years\n* Definite radiographic diagnosis of isolated Rockwood type IIIb(unstable), IV and type v acromioclavicular joint dislocation\n* Time from injury to operation \\\u003C 3 weeks\n* Patient with complete at least 12-month follow-up assessments\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* . Age outside the range\n\n  * Open injury, old injury (≥ 3 weeks since injury)\n  * Injury caused by other diseases (tendinitis, metabolic, et al.), concurrent shoulder osteoarthritis, arthropathy or any fracture\n  * Any previous operation of the injured limb\n  * Incomplete data or follow-up \\\u003C 12 months","16 Years",{"count":117,"type":22},54,"1 Year","OBSERVATIONAL","Compare the clinical and radiological outcome between the arthroscopic and open surgical repair using suture button device method in cases with acute AC joint disruption",[29],"2024-12-20",{"date":124,"type":49},"2024-12-27",{"date":126,"type":22},"2025-01-01",{"date":128,"type":22},"2025-10-01",{"name":130,"class":56},"Assiut University",{"id":132,"slug":133,"hasResults":11,"nctId":134,"briefTitle":135,"officialTitle":136,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":138,"enrollmentInfo":139,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":140,"briefSummary":141,"conditions":142,"keywords":143,"overallStatus":45,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":146,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":147,"startDateStruct":149,"completionDateStruct":151,"leadSponsor":153,"locationsCount":57},"100504116","arthroscopic-assisted-cc-stabilization-alone-vs-additional-k-wire-fixation-for-acute-acromioclavicular-joint-injury-100504116","NCT05844098","Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury","Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18-45 years old\n* Acute AC joint injury rockwood classification III, IV and V\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of underwent previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery\n* Specific active associated ipsilateral injury (Rib fractures, clavicel fractures, scapula fractures and base of coracoid fractures)\n* Onset of injury more than 3 weeks\n* Cannot underwent arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization surgery","45 Years",{"count":67,"type":22},[25],"This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.\n\nThe main question it aims to answer is:\n\n\\- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?",[29],[144,145],"Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization","AC joint injury","2024-10-23",{"date":148,"type":49},"2024-10-26",{"date":150,"type":49},"2024-04-01",{"date":152,"type":22},"2024-12-30",{"name":154,"class":56},"Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand"]