[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"activities-of-daily-living\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:activities-of-daily-living":39},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,79,129,156,182,217,246,274,305],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":43,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":78},"100643981","health-ahead-comparative-effectiveness-study-100643981",false,"NCT07669168","Health Ahead Comparative Effectiveness Study","Health Ahead: Sequential Comparative-Effectiveness Studies Toward Automated, Universally Deployable Preventive Health Screening","HACE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Willing and able to provide written informed consent, or enrollment with consent of a legally authorized representative\n* Willing to participate in longitudinal follow-up.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Age under 18 years.",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},1000000,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","The Health Ahead Comparative Effectiveness Study is a pragmatic, parallel-arm interventional platform that systematically compares successive changes to preventive health screening - each isolated as a single variable against current practice - on the path toward a fully automated screening system deployable in any environment, including the most isolated and resource-limited communities. Each comparison is evaluated with a common set of engagement, behavior-change, experience, cost, and longitudinal outcome measures, allowing results to accumulate on a consistent yardstick across the life of the platform.\n\nThe first comparison evaluates static versus interactive personalized health report delivery. Subsequent pre-planned comparisons, added by protocol amendment, evaluate mobile community versus fixed laboratory screening; and a hybrid medical-droid plus human-delivery model versus human-only screening. All participants are simultaneously enrolled in the 100-Year Human Aging Study and the Human Observatory Study, contributing individual longitudinal and population-level causal inference data through those protocols.",[28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42],"Health Services Accessibility","Rural Health","Medically Underserved Area","Preventive Health Services","Patient Participation","Health Behavior","Aging","Cardiovascular Diseases","Metabolic Syndrome","Cognitive Dysfunction","Frailty","Activities of Daily Living","Health Related Quality of Life","Health Equity","Telemedecine",[44,45,46,47,48,41,29,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65],"Sequential Platform Trial","Interactive Health Report","Health Activation","Mobile Health Screening","Comparative Effectiveness","Medically Underserved","Preventive Medicine","Patient Engagement","Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing","Body Composition","DEXA","Health Ahead Bus","Mobile Clinic","Automated Screening","Medical Droids","Biological Age","Healthspan","Longevity","Life Expectancy","Chronic Disease","Cost-Effectiveness","Health Services Research","RECRUITING","2026-06-20",{"date":69,"type":70},"2026-06-25","ACTUAL",{"date":72,"type":22},"2026-06-09",{"date":74,"type":22},"2099-12-31",{"name":76,"class":77},"William Brandenburg, MD","INDUSTRY",1,{"id":80,"slug":81,"hasResults":11,"nctId":82,"briefTitle":83,"officialTitle":84,"acronym":85,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":88,"phases":4,"briefSummary":89,"conditions":90,"keywords":101,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":72,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":124,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":127,"locationsCount":78},"100641995","human-observatory-study-100641995","NCT07646782","Human Observatory Study","The Human Observatory: A Prospective Individual and Population-Level Study of Aging, Health, and Longevity","HOS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Enrolled in the 100-Year Human Aging Study at any fixed or mobile clinical site; OR completion of online health screener with provision of geographic anchor data and consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age under 18 years (current protocol; pediatric amendment planned).",{"count":21,"type":22},"OBSERVATIONAL","The Human Observatory Study is a prospective observational and ecological surveillance study building a continuously-updating world model for human health, disease, and death at the individual and population level. Individual multi-system clinical data from enrolled participants are linked to a continuously-ingested ecological data infrastructure spanning environmental exposures, social determinants, genealogical and family history records, mortality data, and population health databases at geographic resolutions from home address to global scale and beyond. The resulting model generates individual screening recommendations informed by population-level causal estimates, and population-level causal forecasts anchored by present-timepoint individual clinical biology. Thus creating a feedback architecture designed to improve both simultaneously.",[34,91,92,62,35,93,37,36,38,94,95,96,39,40,97,98,99,41,100],"Mortality","All-cause Mortality","Neoplasms","Musculoskeletal Disease","Neurodegenerative Disease","Dementia","Disability Physical","Environmental Exposure","Occupational Diseases","Social Determinants of Health",[102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,41,115,116,52,53,50,60,117,118,119,120,121],"longevity","biological aging","causal inference","life expectancy","exposome","Environmental Health","Social Determinants","Genealogy","Family History","Human Family Tree","Population Health","Neighborhood Health","Geographic Health Disparities","Mortality Prediction","Biomarker Validation","Functional Decline","Centenarian","Space Medicine","Aerospace Medicine","World Model",{"date":123,"type":70},"2026-06-15",{"date":125,"type":70},"2026-04-25",{"date":74,"type":22},{"name":128,"class":77},"Longevity Metrics, Inc.",{"id":130,"slug":131,"hasResults":11,"nctId":132,"briefTitle":133,"officialTitle":134,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":135,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":136,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":88,"phases":4,"briefSummary":137,"conditions":138,"keywords":144,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":72,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":150,"startDateStruct":152,"completionDateStruct":154,"leadSponsor":155,"locationsCount":78},"100636291","100-year-human-aging-study-100636291","NCT07563777","100-Year Human Aging Study","100-Year Human Aging Study: Prospective Longitudinal Validation of Multi-System Health Measurements Against Mortality and Aging Outcomes","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Willing and able to provide written informed consent, or enrollment with consent of a legally authorized representative\n* Willing to participate in longitudinal follow-up\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age under 18 years",{"count":21,"type":22},"The 100-Year Human Aging Study is a prospective, pragmatic, observational trial enrolling participants across fixed and mobile clinical sites to undergo comprehensive multi-system health screening and longitudinal follow-up until death. Participants are followed to determine whether measurements taken at enrollment and repeated across the lifespan - individually and in combination - predict all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, incident serious disease, and functional disability. The study is designed to generate the surrogate endpoint validation data that longevity medicine currently lacks.",[34,139,140,91,36,35,37,141,93,38,39,142,97,143,96],"Aging Well","All-Cause Mortality","Musculoskeletal Diseases","Health-Related Quality of Life","Neuro-Degenerative Disease",[61,52,53,50,145,115,117,60,62,146,147,148,116,149,112,118],"Surrogate Endpoint Validation","Biological Aging","Preventive Screening","Longitudinal Cohort","Human Performance",{"date":151,"type":70},"2026-06-11",{"date":153,"type":70},"2025-02-09",{"date":74,"type":22},{"name":128,"class":77},{"id":157,"slug":158,"hasResults":11,"nctId":159,"briefTitle":160,"officialTitle":160,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":161,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":162,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":163,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":165,"briefSummary":166,"conditions":167,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":171,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":172,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":173,"startDateStruct":175,"completionDateStruct":177,"leadSponsor":179,"locationsCount":78},"100638334","quantitative-monitoring-of-disability-care-quality-for-long-term-care-facilities-2-100638334","NCT07579832","Quantitative Monitoring of Disability Care Quality for Long-Term Care Facilities 2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Older adults with disabilities:\n\n  * Aged ≥ 65 years.\n  * Classified as CMS level 2-6 under Taiwan Long-Term Care Need Assessment.\n  * Currently receiving at least one Long-Term Care 2.0 service (e.g., home care, home-based rehabilitation, or respite care).\n  * Have normal cognitive function, or a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23 when cognitive screening is performed.\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n* Family caregivers:\n\n  * Have normal cognitive function, or a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23 when cognitive screening is performed.\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n* Multidisciplinary rehabilitation professionals:\n\n  * Employed or contracted by a home-based long-term care institution with at least three professional disciplines (e.g., physical therapists, occupational therapists, nurses, social workers).\n  * Own and are able to use a smartphone.\n  * Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Older adults with disabilities:\n\n  * Severe acute medical conditions or unstable physiological status.\n  * Severe cognitive impairment without a caregiver capable of assisting with questionnaires.\n  * Not currently receiving any long-term care services.\n* Family caregivers:\n\n  * Severe acute medical conditions or unstable physiological status.\n  * Severe cognitive impairment without ability to complete questionnaires.\n  * Not currently involved in long-term care services.\n* Multidisciplinary rehabilitation professionals:\n\n  * Providing services exclusively in non-home-based settings (e.g., institutional or hospital-only care).","65 Years",{"count":164,"type":22},1080,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether a smart wearable wristband-based care system can improve the quality of care and physical activity levels among older adults with disabilities receiving home-based care. The study population includes older adults with disabilities, their family caregivers, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation service providers.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. Whether the use of a smart wearable wristband can improve functional performance, as measured by Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) assessments?\n2. Whether the intervention can increase physical activity levels and improve overall care quality, while reducing caregiver burden and enhancing satisfaction?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n1. Wear a smart wearable wristband continuously for 8 weeks to record physical activity data, including step count, activity level, heart rate, and fatigue index.\n2. Undergo assessments at baseline and after the 8-week intervention, including Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), and the Chinese Version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-C).\n3. Provide data on caregiver stress, satisfaction, and service utilization for the analysis of care quality.",[168,39,169,170],"Disabled Persons","Aged","Motor Activity","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-05-06",{"date":174,"type":70},"2026-05-12",{"date":176,"type":22},"2026-05-15",{"date":178,"type":22},"2027-12-31",{"name":180,"class":181},"National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan","OTHER",{"id":183,"slug":184,"hasResults":11,"nctId":185,"briefTitle":186,"officialTitle":187,"acronym":188,"eligibilityCriteria":189,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":190,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":192,"briefSummary":193,"conditions":194,"keywords":199,"overallStatus":171,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":209,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":210,"startDateStruct":212,"completionDateStruct":213,"leadSponsor":215,"locationsCount":78},"100627588","virtual-activities-of-living-for-occupational-rehabilitation-100627588","NCT07450586","Virtual Activities of Living for Occupational Rehabilitation","Virtual Activities of Living for Occupational Rehabilitation (VALOR)","VALOR","Criteria for inclusion:\n\n1. Participant has had a right or left hemispheric stroke affecting normal hand function.\n2. At least 3 months have passed since the last stroke.\n3. Participant has sufficient active finger flexion at the MCP joint in at least one finger to be detected by visual observation by a study therapist.\n4. Participant has visual acuity with corrective lenses of 20\u002F50 or better.\n5. Participant must have active movement against gravity of at least 30 degrees shoulder flexion, 45 degrees elbow flexion, elbow extension to within 30 degrees of full extension, and 15 degrees shoulder internal and external rotation.\n6. In the opinion of a study therapist, participant can independently and safely use the system at home or has an at-home caregiver who is willing and able to assist.\n7. In the opinion of a study therapist, participant has a suitable and safe space in their home for using the VALOR system.\n8. Participant is willing and able to provide informed consent.\n\nCriteria for exclusion:\n\n1. Withholding or withdrawal of consent by the participant.\n2. Inability to understand and follow verbal directions.\n3. Determination by the Principal Investigator that participation would result in overexertion or significant discomfort or pain.\n4. A psychological diagnosis that in the determination of the Principal Investigator could significantly impact subject's participation or that could be aggravated by study participation (Principal Investigator will consult with candidate's personal physician as appropriate).\n5. Determination by the Principal Investigator that participation would result in significant agitation or elevated stress.\n6. Visual field deficit in either eye that impairs the ability to view the VR display.\n7. Significant contractures of the muscles, joints, tendons, ligaments, or skin that restrict normal upper extremity movement.\n8. More than mild tone\u002Fspasticity (measured on modified Ashworth, 5-point scale);\n9. Severe pre-stroke co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular, neurological, orthopedic, or rheumatoid impairments before stroke that may interfere with task performance.\n10. Severe sensory deficits from the involved UE; or\n11. Hemispatial neglect that impairs the ability to process and perceive visual stimuli provided through the VR display.\n\nAs the system will be adaptable to a wide range of hand dexterity, no restriction will be made for fine control of digits. Patients will not be excluded due to inability to use the VR headset. If at any time the study therapist, in consultation with the Duke PI, determines the patient is not tolerating VR headset use, the patient will be given the option to use a non-immersive version of the VALOR system which employs a TV monitor and depth sensor in lieu of the headset. Please see Potential Risks section for additional details on controls and mitigations for potential cyber sickness.",{"count":191,"type":22},48,[25],"Duke University will serve as the clinical research site for the Phase II RCT of the VALOR system, which enables telehealth delivery of evidence-based upper extremity (UE) stroke therapy in a patient's home using immersive VR headset technology for guided practice of activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). The study compares VALOR Home Exercise Program (HEP) to Usual Care Treatment (UCT) in adults with stroke-related UE impairment.",[195,196,39,197,198],"Stroke","Occupational Therapy","Rehabilitation","Virtual Reality",[200,198,201,202,203,39,204,205,206,207,208,196],"Stroke Rehabilitation","Upper Extremity","Telehealth","Home Exercise Program","Fugl-Meyer Assessment","Wolf Motor Function Test","Motor Activity Log","Hand Function","Hemiplegia","2026-04-22",{"date":211,"type":70},"2026-04-27",{"date":123,"type":22},{"date":214,"type":22},"2027-07-29",{"name":216,"class":77},"Barron Associates, Inc.",{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":11,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":222,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":223,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":224,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":227,"briefSummary":228,"conditions":229,"keywords":231,"overallStatus":171,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":237,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":238,"startDateStruct":240,"completionDateStruct":242,"leadSponsor":244,"locationsCount":4},"100630004","the-impact-of-training-on-self-efficacy-symptom-level-and-activities-of-daily-living-100630004","NCT07482033","The Impact of Training on Self-Efficacy, Symptom Level, and Activities of Daily Living","The Effect of Pecha Kucha Training on Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation Support for Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Self-Efficacy, Symptom Level, and Daily Living Activities","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at least one year prior\n* Currently receiving treatment with noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) support\n* Ability to communicate verbally and in writing in a clear and sustainable manner\n* No severe visual or hearing impairment that would prevent understanding of educational materials\n* Basic ability to use a smartphone\n* Active use of the WhatsApp application on a personal smartphone\n* Technical capability to view educational materials sent via phone (e.g., internet access, video playback)\n* No prior education on NIMV delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation technique\n* Adequate cognitive function to allow independent participation (e.g., no history of dementia or confusion)\n* Availability to attend educational and assessment sessions as scheduled\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n* Failure to attend planned educational sessions or inability to complete the study protocol\n* Voluntary withdrawal from the study, declared verbally or in writing\n* Death during the study period\n* Development of a serious health condition preventing continuation in the education program (e.g., hospitalization, acute exacerbation, deterioration in mental status)\n* Loss of phone or internet access preventing receipt of educational materials\n* Significant communication problems that substantially interfere with participation in the educational process","18 Days",{"count":226,"type":22},60,[25],"This study is a randomized, controlled experimental trial with a pretest-posttest design, conducted to evaluate the effects of Pecha Kucha-based education on self-efficacy, symptom level, and activities of daily living in individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving noninvasive mechanical ventilation support.\n\nThe study will include two groups, and intergroup differences will be evaluated:\n\n1. Control group\n2. Intervention group\n\nStudy Hypotheses H1: Pecha Kucha-based education on noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) support provided to individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases patients' self-efficacy levels.\n\nH2: Pecha Kucha-based education on noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) support provided to individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces patients' symptom levels.\n\nH3: Pecha Kucha-based education on noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) support provided to individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves patients' activities of daily living.",[39,230],"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)",[232,233,234,235,236],"self-efficacy","symptom severity","activities of daily living","Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","Pecha Kucha","2026-04-21",{"date":239,"type":70},"2026-04-24",{"date":241,"type":22},"2026-05-01",{"date":243,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":245,"class":181},"Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University",{"id":247,"slug":248,"hasResults":11,"nctId":249,"briefTitle":250,"officialTitle":251,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":252,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":253,"maxAge":254,"enrollmentInfo":255,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":257,"briefSummary":258,"conditions":259,"keywords":262,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":266,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":267,"startDateStruct":269,"completionDateStruct":271,"leadSponsor":272,"locationsCount":78},"100535149","effectiveness-of-online-program-and-task-related-training-for-parkinsons-disease-100535149","NCT06248073","Effectiveness of Online Program and Task-related Training for Parkinson's Disease","Comparing the Effectiveness of Online Self-management Program and On-site Task-related Training for People With Early Stage Parkinson's Disease on Activity Participation and Quality of Life","Inclusion criteria:\n\n1. Willingness to sign the informed consent form.\n2. Age between 45 and 70 years, with mild idiopathic Parkinson's disease and Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.\n3. No cognitive impairment.\n4. No severe depression that could affect the motivation to participate in the study.\n5. No history of shoulder dislocation or fracture that could affect body proprioception.\n6. No diseases that could affect the ability to reach for objects, such as stroke.\n7. No diseases that could affect peripheral sensation, such as diabetes.\n8. No severe tremors; patients whose hands, when relaxed and placed on the apparatus, still exhibit significant tremor interfering with the experiment will not be included.\n9. Able to follow instructions and complete the assessment process.\n10. Have not received physical or occupational therapy in the past year.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n1. Other central nervous system diseases, such as stroke.\n2. Have major surgery on the head or upper limbs.\n3. Inability to perform the reaching task while sitting.","45 Years","70 Years",{"count":256,"type":22},100,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of online self-management program and on-site task-related training for people with early stage Parkinson's disease.\n\npeople with early stage of Parkinson's disease (age range: 45-70 years) will be randomly assigned into the following three groups: control group, online self-management program group and on-site task-related training group.The control group will receive no treatment during the experimental period. For the other two groups, participants will receive the intervention twice a week, one hour per session and 12 sessions in total.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1. the potential impact of motor and non-motor symptoms on activity participation and quality of life for people with early stage of Parkinson's disease (PD).\n2. compare and examine the the effectiveness of online self-management program and on-site task-related training for people with early stage Parkinson's disease on activity participation and quality of life.",[260,196,261,39],"Parkinson Disease","Telerehabilitation",[261,263,264,265],"early intervention","patient-reported outcome assessment","self-perception","2026-03-18",{"date":268,"type":70},"2026-03-20",{"date":270,"type":70},"2024-03-01",{"date":178,"type":22},{"name":273,"class":181},"Chang Gung University",{"id":275,"slug":276,"hasResults":11,"nctId":277,"briefTitle":278,"officialTitle":279,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":280,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":281,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":282,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":88,"phases":4,"briefSummary":284,"conditions":285,"keywords":290,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":296,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":297,"startDateStruct":299,"completionDateStruct":301,"leadSponsor":303,"locationsCount":78},"100602251","the-effects-of-a-dynamic-arm-support-in-daily-life-100602251","NCT07121075","The Effects of a Dynamic Arm Support in Daily Life","The Effects of a Dynamic Arm Support in Daily Life. A Mixed Methods Study Including the Different Components of the ICF","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: 16 and oler\n* Being able to understand and comprehend test instructions\n* Using a DAS from Focal Meditech (Balancer, Flowing, Dowing, Gowing 2 or Top Help)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\u002F","16 Years",{"count":283,"type":22},50,"The goal of this mixed method study is to learn about how a dynamic arm support device (DAS) helps people with everyday activities. The study focuses on people with neuro(-muscular) conditions, age 16 and older. The research questions that are formulated, are:\n\n* How does a person experience their daily activities, with and without a DAS?\n* What are the contextual (external and personal) factors that influence the use of a DAS?\n\nParticipants will take part in three testing sessions. In each session, they must complete a few questionnaires and participate in an interview. The first time, without DAS. In the second and third session, they will be using their DAS (resp. 3 to 4 weeks and 3 months). The data collection will be executed by phone, digital questionnaires and\u002For paper.",[286,287,288,39,196,289],"Neuromuscular Disease","Neuromuscular Disability","Assistive Technology","Upper Limb",[291,292,293,294,295],"dynamic arm support","dynamic arm support device","ICF","daily life","outcome measures","2025-08-12",{"date":298,"type":70},"2025-08-13",{"date":300,"type":70},"2024-12-02",{"date":302,"type":22},"2026-08",{"name":304,"class":181},"Hasselt University",{"id":306,"slug":307,"hasResults":11,"nctId":308,"briefTitle":309,"officialTitle":309,"acronym":310,"eligibilityCriteria":311,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":312,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":88,"phases":4,"briefSummary":313,"conditions":314,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":321,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":322,"startDateStruct":324,"completionDateStruct":326,"leadSponsor":328,"locationsCount":78},"100547595","assessment-of-overall-functioning-in-patients-with-complex-health-issues-100547595","NCT06410014","Assessment of Overall Functioning in Patients With Complex Health Issues","CPH-Func","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* All patients referred by a municipality to the Department of Social Medicine at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital for a clinical assessment (Klinisk Funktion) who provide written consent to participate.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Insufficient ability to communicate either in written or oral Danish",{"count":256,"type":22},"The overall aim of the study is to assess whether each outcome measures the same aspect of overall functioning or contributes with different aspects. More specifically, the aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between each single instrument.\n\nDuring study period all patients presenting at our clinic will be offered to participate in the study. Patients will be included in the study when referred to the department of Social Medicine and providing written informed consent to participate in the study. Inclusion will continue until 100 patients have completed an AMPS test. All participants will, apart from standard procedure, be asked to complete:\n\n* An AMPS-test\n* ADL-Q (Questionnaire concerning Activities of Daily Living)\n* ADL-I (Interview based questionnaire concerning Activites of Daily Living)\n\nAs standard procedure all participants will also perform\u002Fcomplete:\n\n* 30 seconds chair stand test (30sCST)\n* Hand grip strength (HGS)\n* Evaluation of ambulation (Cumulated Ambulation Score \u002FCAS)\n* WORQ (Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire)\n\nTo obtain the aim of the study correlation-analysis will be performed to investigate the relationship between each included instruments.",[39,315,316,317,318,319,320],"Surveys and Questionnaires","ADL Motor Skills","Disability Evaluation","Health Status","Muscle Strength","Physical Examination","2024-12-06",{"date":323,"type":70},"2024-12-09",{"date":325,"type":70},"2023-10-10",{"date":327,"type":22},"2025-02-01",{"name":329,"class":181},"University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg"]