[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"acute-respiratory-insufficiency\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:acute-respiratory-insufficiency":25},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,44],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":26,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100627297","ultrasound-scoring-methods-to-monitor-breathing-problems-in-intensive-care-patients-100627297",false,"NCT07446803","Ultrasound Scoring Methods to Monitor Breathing Problems in Intensive Care Patients","Comparison of Lung Ultrasound Protocols for Assessing Pulmonary Function in Intensive Care Patients With Respiratory Failure","UMBPI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged ≥18 years\n* Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Susak\n* Diagnosed with acute respiratory insufficiency\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Technical inability to perform a lung ultrasound due to patient positioning or other technical reasons\n* Morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg\u002Fm²)\n* Serious chest trauma that would compromise assessment\n* Lung pathology that impairs ultrasound visualisation of the desired examination regions","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},20,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this observational study is to compare two lung ultrasound protocols for assessing lung function in patients with acute respiratory insufficiency treated in intensive care units.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n1\\. Is there a statistically significant difference between the established Baciarello (name of author) ultrasound protocol (12-point examination) and a new, abbreviated local ultrasound protocol (6-point examination) for assessing lung function? 2. Do the scoring systems of both protocols correlate with each other and with treatment outcomes in critically ill patients? Researchers will compare the Baciarello protocol (assessing 12 fields-6 per side of the body to a new abbreviated local protocol (assessing 6 fields-3 per side of the body) to see if both protocols provide same diagnostic and prognostic information for evaluating lung pathology and patient outcomes.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nUndergo lung ultrasound assessment using both protocols Have their ultrasound findings scored according to each protocol's point system (0-36 for Baciarello; 0-18 for the new abbreviated protocol) Have their arterial blood gas values recorded (pH, PaCO2, PaO2, oxygen saturation) Be monitored for clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation requirements and hospital mortality",[25],"Acute Respiratory Insufficiency",[27,28,29,30],"Intensive care unit","Acute respiratory failure","Lung ultrasound","Ultrasound protocol","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-27",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-03-03","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2026-03-15",{"date":39,"type":21},"2026-04-15",{"name":41,"class":42},"Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":50,"eligibilityCriteria":51,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":54,"phases":55,"briefSummary":57,"conditions":58,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":59,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":60,"startDateStruct":62,"completionDateStruct":64,"leadSponsor":66,"locationsCount":4},"100567964","respiratory-variability-in-patients-with-acute-hypoxemic-respiratory-failure-and-placed-on-high-flow-oxygen-therapy-100567964","NCT06675045","Respiratory Variability in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Placed on High Flow Oxygen Therapy","Description of Respiratory Variability in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Placed on High Flow Oxygen Therapy - Exploratory Study","HYPOXEVARIA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years\n* Patient admitted to intensive care with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure\n* Patient treated with high-flow oxygen therapy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient admitted to intensive care with invasive ventilation\n* Patient with therapeutic abstention for intubation\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding women",{"count":53,"type":21},60,"INTERVENTIONAL",[56],"NA","Recommendations from the European Respiratory Society are to use high-flow oxygen therapy rather than conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in cases of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.\n\nStudies have shown that high-flow oxygen therapy can reduce the need for intubation and the initiation of NIV without reducing mortality. In addition, by improving oxygenation, high-flow oxygen therapy can create a feeling of security which may delay endotracheal intubation.\n\nTwo studies have suggested that mortality is higher in patients receiving delayed intubation (≥ 48 hours) after failure of high flow oxygen therapy. Another study suggests that delayed endotracheal intubation after high-flow oxygen therapy ≥ 48 hours increases the risk of patient mortality independently of comorbidities and severity of illness on admission. Finally, other results suggest that the increased risk of mortality may be significant after 36 hours of high-flow oxygen therapy. It is therefore difficult to determine the right time for intubation and invasive ventilation.\n\nA diagnostic decision aid could be of great use to the attending physician in optimising the patient's respiratory assistance strategy, whether invasive or non-invasive. Consequently, any clinical marker that can provide early detection of altered respiratory status on high-flow oxygen therapy deserves to be evaluated.\n\nRespiratory variability is synonymous with respiratory 'good health'. A decrease in this same variabilitý is pathological and indicates an increase in the level of loads imposed on the respiratory system. It means that the measurement of respiratory variability indices may be one of these markers\n\nThere are devices for non-invasive, continuous monitoring of respiratory variability, with automated frequency analysis of thoracic movement. In this study, respiratory variability indices will be measured in patients admitted to intensive care under high-flow oxygen therapy using an external sensor called REVAMODE.",[25],"2025-11-18",{"date":61,"type":35},"2025-11-19",{"date":63,"type":21},"2025-12-01",{"date":65,"type":21},"2026-06-30",{"name":67,"class":42},"GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche"]