[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"amputees--rehabilitation\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:amputees--rehabilitation":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,42],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":5},"100548688","dynamic-balance-in-unilateral-transtibial-amputees-following-virtual-reality-versus-conventional-rehabilitation-100548688",false,"NCT06424249","Dynamic Balance in Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Following Virtual Reality Versus Conventional Rehabilitation","EQUIL-ARC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unilateral transtibial amputees in hospitalized in the rehabilitation of the musculoskeletal system service\n* All etiologies: vascular, traumatic and septic.\n* Adapted vascular equipment validated by physician.\n* Able to walk for 5 minutes on a treadmill without technical assistance.\n* The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form\n* The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* The subject is participating in an interventional study or one involving a drug or medical device, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study\n* Patient already included in the present study.\n* The subject refuses to or is unable to sign the consent\n* It is impossible to give the subject informed information\n* The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship\n* Patients with uncorrected or untreated visual disorders.\n* Patients with major cognitive disorders (MOCA\\>23).\n* Patients with vestibular disorders.\n* Patient with uncontrolled epilepsy.\n* Patient with an unhealed amputation stump.\n* Patients weighing \\> 135kg or \\\u003C 20kg.\n* Patients with a functional ambulation category of 1 (i.e. patients requiring the firm, continuous assistance of another person to carry their weight and maintain their balance) or less.\n* Patients with medication affecting exercise tolerance,\n* Patients with sensory impairments\n* Patients with significantly reduced bone density\n* Patients for whom it is impossible to correctly adjust the harness to the corresponding body part due to:\n\n  * Body shape\n  * Colostomy bags\n  * Skin lesions that cannot be adequately protected.\n  * Any other reason that prevents proper, pain-free adjustment of the sling.\n* Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patients.\n* Appearance of a stump wound during the study requiring discharge.\n* Patient with more than 50% absenteeism from rehabilitation sessions.\n* Patient requiring a new prosthesis insert.\n* Patient with a serious adverse event affecting dynamic balance rehabilitation.","ALL","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},20,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Amputation causes somatic and psychological damage. Prognostic factors for postoperative gait recovery include the need for proprioceptive re-education for dynamic balance. Improved gait patterns and use of the prosthesis contribute to an overall improvement in the amputee's autonomy. Virtual reality coupled with movement analysis allows personalization of treatment with objective assessment of progress.\n\nThe study authors hypothesize that a virtual reality protocol for the dynamic balance of a unilateral transtibial amputee in initial rehabilitation will improve the dynamic balance assessment criteria compared with a conventional rehabilitation protocol.",[27,28,29],"Amputees \u002F Rehabilitation","Virtual Reality","Postural Balance","RECRUITING","2026-06-23",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-06-25","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2024-10-14",{"date":38,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":40,"class":41},"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes","OTHER",{"id":43,"slug":44,"hasResults":11,"nctId":45,"briefTitle":46,"officialTitle":47,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":48,"healthyVolunteers":49,"sex":16,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":50,"targetDuration":52,"studyType":53,"phases":4,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":74,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":75,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":76,"startDateStruct":78,"completionDateStruct":80,"leadSponsor":82,"locationsCount":4},"100571890","the-nrc-dataset-developing-a-minimum-dataset-for-multidisciplinary-rehabilitation-a-modified-e-delphi-study-100571890","NCT06726135","The NRC Dataset. Developing a Minimum Dataset for Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation: a Modified E-Delphi Study","The National Rehabilitation Centre Dataset. Development of a Minimum Dataset for Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation: a Modified E-Delphi Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nThe panel will aim to include clinicians with a minimum of 5 years' experience from a variety of professional backgrounds within the following specialist areas:\n\n* Neuro Rehab\n* Trauma Rehab\n* Community Rehab\n* Outpatient Rehabilitation services\n* Defence medical services\n* Psychology services\n* Amputee Rehab\n* Speech and Language therapy\n* Emergency department\n* Critical Care\n* Trauma and Orthopaedics\n* Rehabilitation Medicine\n\nIt is expected that the expert panel will include:\n\n* Medical Doctors\n* Dietitians\n* Physiotherapists\n* Psychologists\n* Prosthetists\n* Occupational therapists\n* Speech and Language therapists\n* Data-base managers\n* Researchers\u002FAcademics\n* Commissioners\n* Local service managers\n* A department of work and pensions representative\n* An epidemiologist\u002Fdata-scientist with healthcare financial modelling experience\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nIndividuals will be excluded from the expert panel for any of the following reasons:\n\n1. They do not have 5 years' experience in their specialist field\n2. They do not have an understanding of various health indicators and the appropriate outcome measure instruments required to evaluate these health indicators.\n3. They have no understanding of how demographic and socio-economic variables impact health outcomes\n4. They have no understanding of how to evaluate clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation services.\n5. Their professional background is not represented in the above noted specialist areas",true,{"count":51,"type":21},50,"6 Months","OBSERVATIONAL","Several rehabilitation datasets are presently in use for specific patient groups in England. The 'National Clinical Audit of Specialist Rehabilitation for patients with complex needs following major injury' (NCASRI) evaluated outcomes within a cohort of Major Trauma patients between 2015 and 2018 using data from two of these datasets. The NCASRI project outlined some of the shortcomings of the pre-existing datasets and highlighted the need for a single National Rehabilitation Dataset to provide long term evaluation of a variety of patient presentations.\n\nThe proposed study will seek to develop such a dataset by means of an E-delphi study. This study will seek consensus from a panel of experts on the data items required to measure the effectiveness and socio-economic impact of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. Providing commissioners, researchers and clinicians with the data required to improve patient care, conduct research and develop rehabilitation services.\n\nThere are three potential phases to this study:\n\n* Phase one involves the establishment of a core domain set, outlining what information (data) should be included in the NRC core dataset.\n* Phase one will consist of at least 2 rounds of voting, with successive rounds of voting undertaken until an a-priori consensus of 70% is reached for all core data items marked as mandatory\u002Fcritical data in fitting OMERACT guidelines.\n* After 2 rounds, any data item that have reached consensus will be included in the final dataset. These core domain (data items) will then be excluded from subsequent rounds of voting.\n* A maximum of 4 rounds will be allowed in Phase 1. At which point the highest-ranking data items remaining with a consensus above 60% from each of the pre-identified categories will be included in the final dataset.\n* Phase two will explore what tools should be used to collect the core domains (outcome measure instruments) for each category outlined in phase 1.\n* Phase 2 will follow the same protocol for including outcome measure instruments into the core outcome set as were required to include core data items from phase 1.\n* If a consensus of equal or greater than 60% cannot be reached using an E-Delphi method in either phase 1 or phase 2 then a virtual meeting will be held amongst all expert panel members to reach consensus using a nominal group technique (phase 3).",[56,57,58,59,27,60,61,62,63],"Pain","Traumatic Brain Injury","Major Trauma","Multiple Sclerosis","Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)","Functional Neurological Disorder","Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Acquired Weakness (ICU - AW)","Trauma Related Injuries",[65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73],"E-delphi","Delphi","Multidisciplinary","Rehabilitation","Core outcome set","Dataset","national rehabilitation centre","outcome measure instruments","inpatient","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2024-12-15",{"date":77,"type":34},"2024-12-19",{"date":79,"type":21},"2025-01",{"date":81,"type":21},"2025-06",{"name":83,"class":41},"ThomasCorbett"]