[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"ankle-injuries\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:ankle-injuries":26},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,11,0,[8,49,75,102,133,155,181,209,233,254,277],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100642817","turkish-version-of-the-ankle-fracture-outcome-of-rehabilitation-measure-a-form-tr-a-multi-centre-validation-study-100642817",false,"NCT07620015","Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Validation Study","Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Prospective Observational Study","A-FORM-TR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Radiographically confirmed unilateral ankle fracture (Weber A, B, or C)\n* Either surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) or conservative (cast, walker boot, or functional brace) treatment completed\n* Currently in the rehabilitation phase, 3 weeks to 12 months post-injury\n* Native Turkish speaker, able to read and self-complete a questionnaire\n* Able and willing to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Bilateral ankle fracture\n* Previous ipsilateral ankle fracture or any prior orthopedic surgery on the same ankle\n* Pathological fracture (tumour, metastasis, or other underlying bone pathology)\n* Concurrent significant ipsilateral lower-limb injury (for example pilon fracture, ipsilateral tibial or fibular shaft fracture, ipsilateral femoral or tibial plateau fracture)\n* Polytrauma (significant head, spine, abdominal, or contralateral lower-limb injury affecting function)\n* Cognitive or psychiatric impairment precluding self-completion of the questionnaire\n* Insufficient Turkish literacy\n* Inability to attend a follow-up visit for the test-retest assessment","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},150,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Ankle fractures are common injuries that can affect a patient's mobility, mood, sleep, and everyday life for months. The Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM) is an English-language patient-reported outcome measure developed in Australia to capture this broader rehabilitation experience. No validated Turkish version of A-FORM currently exists. This prospective multi-centre observational study aims to translate the A-FORM into Turkish (A-FORM-TR), culturally adapt it for use in Turkish-speaking patients, and evaluate its psychometric properties. The investigators will recruit 150 adults with a unilateral ankle fracture, treated either surgically or conservatively, from three orthopedic centres in Turkiye and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Participants complete the A-FORM-TR together with two established comparator questionnaires (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score and the Turkish Olerud-Molander Ankle Score). A subset of approximately 50 participants is re-administered the A-FORM-TR after 7 to 14 days to assess test-retest reliability, with a Global Rating of Change item identifying clinically stable patients. Analyses include classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis, and Rasch measurement analysis.",[25,26],"Ankle Fractures","Ankle Injuries",[28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"patient-reported outcome measure","PROM","cross-cultural adaptation","psychometric validation","ankle fracture","rehabilitation","Rasch analysis","Turkish","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-06-09",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-06-12","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":21},"2026-08",{"date":44,"type":21},"2027-07",{"name":46,"class":47},"Utku Gürhan","OTHER",3,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":55,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":58,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":4},"100561133","outpatient-floor-pedal-bike-utilization-100561133","NCT06586190","Outpatient Floor Pedal Bike Utilization","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients \\>18 years of age\n* Operative fractures of the femur, tibia and select ankle injuries\n* Under the care of an orthopaedic surgeon\n* English or Spanish competent\n* 12 month follow up\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Type IIIB\u002FC fracture\n* Unable to provide consent\u002Fneed for an LAR\n* Major lower extremity peripheral nerve injury (ex. foot drop, sciatic nerve palsy, etc)",{"count":56,"type":21},20,"INTERVENTIONAL",[59],"NA","The goals of this clinical trial are: to test the feasibility of identifying patients and getting patients the floor pedal bikes, to test how well floor pedal bikes help patients with lower body injuries heal, and to test methods of patient self-reported logs for home pedal bike use.\n\nParticipants will be given a floor pedal bike at first post-operative appointment where weightbearing restrictions are lifted (weight-bearing as tolerated) along with instructions on utilization. Participants will be asked to complete patient reported outcome measure surveys at each follow-up visit.",[62,63,26],"Femur Fracture","Tibia Fracture",[65,66,33],"floor pedal bike","lower extremity","2026-05-21",{"date":69,"type":40},"2026-05-26",{"date":42,"type":21},{"date":72,"type":21},"2028-12",{"name":74,"class":47},"Wake Forest University Health Sciences",{"id":76,"slug":77,"hasResults":11,"nctId":78,"briefTitle":79,"officialTitle":79,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":80,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":81,"enrollmentInfo":82,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":84,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":87,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":92,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":93,"startDateStruct":95,"completionDateStruct":97,"leadSponsor":99,"locationsCount":101},"100546498","does-performing-a-composite-test-3-months-post-operatively-reduce-the-risk-of-failure-to-return-to-sport-after-lateral-ankle-ligamentoplasty-100546498","NCT06395714","Does Performing a Composite Test 3 Months Post-operatively Reduce the Risk of Failure to Return to Sport After Lateral Ankle Ligamentoplasty?","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient with objective chronic ankle instability who has failed medical treatment and undergone lateral ankle ligament repair surgery\n* Patient practicing a sporting activity at least 2 times a week\n* Patient able to read, write and understand French\n* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Minor or over 50 years of age\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Patient under guardianship, deprived of liberty or under court protection\n* Refusal to participate in research\n* Patient unable to understand or give informed consent\n* Patient having undergone associated surgical procedures modifying the postoperative course\n* Patient having undergone revision surgery","50 Years",{"count":83,"type":21},116,[59],"Ankle sprain is one of the most common pathologies in the general population (between 2.1 and 3.2 per 1000 patients per year). Nearly 40% of patients will develop chronic instability in the year following the sprain. We also know that a premature return to sport is a risk factor for developing chronic instability. However, despite the consensus of experts on the subject which have shown the key physiological elements to evaluate before resuming sport, no test or cohort of tests are proposed to allow a safe return to sport by reducing the risks of relapse. Some very recent studies have appeared on non-operated subjects but this remains a subject that is still too little studied, where the lack of consensus and objective criteria increases the risk of instability. Surgical treatment remains an effective option to reduce the risk of recurrence but failure of the latter can occur in approximately 13-37% of patients depending on the population, due to a relapse or a return to sport which does not correspond to expectations. of the patient.\n\nThe objective of the study is therefore to evaluate the predictive nature of a composite test (ANKLE-GO) regarding the return to sport at the same level and the risks of recurrence.",[26],[88,89,90],"ligamentoplasty","ankle-go test","sport return","RECRUITING","2026-03-31",{"date":94,"type":40},"2026-04-06",{"date":96,"type":40},"2024-05-17",{"date":98,"type":21},"2027-12-31",{"name":100,"class":47},"Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac",1,{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":107,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":109,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":111,"briefSummary":112,"conditions":113,"keywords":117,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":131,"locationsCount":4},"100627789","resurfacing-of-foot-and-distal-leg-soft-tissue-defects-using-reversed-pedicled-peroneal-artery-flaps-augmented-by-superficial-sural-artery-100627789","NCT07453199","Resurfacing of Foot and Distal Leg Soft Tissue Defects Using Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flaps Augmented by Superficial Sural Artery","Resurfacing of Foot and Distal Leg Soft Tissue Defects Using Reversed Pedicled Peroneal Artery Flaps Augmented by Superficial Sural Artery: A Prospective Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle, heel, or foot requiring flap coverage.\n* Defect size greater than \\[Specify size, e.g., 5x5 cm\\] or involving exposed bone, tendon, or joint.\n* Palpable pulse in at least one of the major vessels Anterior Tibial Artery (ATA) or Posterior Tibial Artery (PTA)) at the ankle level.\n* Informed consent obtained from the patient or legal guardian\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) or smokers\n* Comminuted fractures of the tibia \\& fibula\n* Patients requiring free flap coverage for massive defects or location beyond the RPAF's reach as the planter aspect of the foot",{"count":110,"type":21},30,[59],"Wounds involving the skin and soft tissue of the lower leg, ankle, heel, and foot can be difficult to treat because there is very little skin and tissue available in that area to cover the wound. When the wound is large or involves exposed bone or tendon, a flap, which is a piece of skin and tissue moved from a nearby area, is needed to close it.\n\nThis study evaluates a surgical technique called the Reversed Peroneal Artery Flap (RPAF). In this procedure, a flap of skin and tissue from the outer side of the lower leg is lifted and rotated to cover the wound. The blood supply to the flap comes from the peroneal artery, which runs along the fibula bone, and is augmented by the superficial sural artery to improve flap survival. The study will include 30 adult patients who have soft tissue defects of the distal leg, ankle, heel, or foot. All patients will undergo the RPAF procedure at Assiut University Hospitals, Egypt. The main goal is to measure how well the flap survives after surgery. Secondary goals include assessing complications, functional recovery, and the condition of the donor site.",[114,115,116,26],"Soft Tissue Injuries","Leg Injuries","Foot Injuries",[118,119,120,121,122,123],"Reverse Peroneal Artery Flap","Soft Tissue Reconstruction","Distal Leg Defect","Superficial Sural Artery","Pedicled Flap","Reconstructive Surgery","2026-02-27",{"date":126,"type":40},"2026-03-05",{"date":128,"type":21},"2026-04",{"date":130,"type":21},"2027-05",{"name":132,"class":47},"Assiut University",{"id":134,"slug":135,"hasResults":11,"nctId":136,"briefTitle":137,"officialTitle":138,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":139,"healthyVolunteers":140,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":141,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":143,"briefSummary":144,"conditions":145,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":147,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":148,"startDateStruct":150,"completionDateStruct":152,"leadSponsor":153,"locationsCount":101},"100495312","comparing-clinical-outcomes-of-suture-button-versus-fibulink-fixation-for-acute-ankle-syndesmosis-injuries-100495312","NCT05729542","Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries","Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated Surgically With Suture Button Versus Fibulink Fixation for Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Ankle fracture with associated syndesmotic injury requiring surgery\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Ability to understand the content of the patient information\u002Finformed consent form\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Any not medically managed severe systemic disease\n* Patient preference for specific implant\n* Refusal of randomization\n* Pregnant patients\n* Prisoners\n* Participation in any other pharmacologic or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of this study",true,{"count":142,"type":21},140,[59],"This project consists of a randomized controlled study design. Study candidates will include all patients 18 years or older, who were evaluated at UCSD and found to have an acute ankle syndesmosis injury requiring surgery. Patients who consent to study participation will be randomized to receive one of two standard of care procedures - either a suture button or Fibulink implant. Outcome measures, including the Olerud-Molander and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores, pain, range of motion, time to return to work, and radiographic evaluation will be collected for each participant. Given the potential degenerative changes and poor radiographic and clinical outcomes with inadequate repair of the syndesmosis, it is imperative to evaluate existing and emerging methods of fixation for patients with acute ankle fractures with syndesmosis injuries.",[26,146,25],"Syndesmotic Injuries","2026-02-05",{"date":149,"type":40},"2026-02-10",{"date":151,"type":40},"2021-11-18",{"date":98,"type":21},{"name":154,"class":47},"University of California, San Diego",{"id":156,"slug":157,"hasResults":11,"nctId":158,"briefTitle":159,"officialTitle":160,"acronym":161,"eligibilityCriteria":162,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":163,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":165,"conditions":166,"keywords":168,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":172,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":173,"startDateStruct":175,"completionDateStruct":177,"leadSponsor":179,"locationsCount":101},"100597161","assessment-of-the-quality-of-life-of-patients-visiting-the-emergency-department-of-the-saint-brieuc-hospital-following-an-ankle-sprain-100597161","NCT07054892","Assessment of the Quality of Life of Patients Visiting the Emergency Department of the Saint-Brieuc Hospital Following an Ankle Sprain","EntoQuaVie - Assessment of the Quality of Life of Patients Visiting the Emergency Department of the Saint-Brieuc Hospital Following an Ankle Sprain: A Follow-up-based Evaluation Considering the Severity Grade of the Ankle Sprain","EntoQuaVie","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Ankle trauma\n* Initial consultation at the emergency department of Saint-Brieuc\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Surgical treatment following the trauma\n* Fracture resulting from the trauma\n* Ligament or bone injury to either lower limb (knee, hip, ankle) occurring within 6 months prior to the trauma\n* Injury to another joint during the trauma with functional impairment\n* Adult under legal protection (guardianship, trusteeship, or judicial protection) or deprived of liberty\n* Pregnant woman",{"count":164,"type":21},176,"Lateral ankle sprains account for nearly 6,500 emergency department visits per day in France. They are clinically classified into three grades, which can be assessed approximately 3-5 days after an acute sprain. However, this classification remains somewhat approximate, with only mild and severe sprains being reliably identified.\n\nWhen it comes to immobilization, if weight-bearing is possible, treatment options include an elastic ankle brace for mild sprains, taping, or a semi-rigid orthosis known as a \"stabilizing\" brace. It is worth noting that, according to Rodineau and Besch, the preferred form of immobilization is the semi-rigid orthosis. In cases of severe sprains where weight-bearing is not possible, rigid immobilization may be used.\n\nTo date, few thesis-level studies have focused on trauma care and the outpatient follow-up of ankle sprains. Two studies from the early 2010s assessed general practice management of trauma using questionnaires-one in Seine-Maritime and another in Bouches-du-Rhône. The latter study found that 96.7% of surveyed physicians reported managing all types of sprains. In the Seine-Maritime study, half of the physicians systematically followed up on ankle sprains, while the other half only did so if the patient's condition worsened. It was also found that nearly 47% of physicians referred their patients directly to emergency departments. This pathway was more frequently chosen by urban practitioners or those without specific training in trauma care.\n\nExcept in certain predefined cases depending on the hospital, there is currently no systematic follow-up for ankle sprains in emergency departments. Most patients are redirected toward follow-up in outpatient care.\n\nThe objective of this research project is to assess the recovery of baseline quality of life in participants who consulted the emergency department of Saint-Brieuc for an ankle sprain, three months after the injury. The evaluation will take into account the type of follow-up care (physician, physiotherapist) as well as the severity of the sprain.",[26,167],"Treatment Outcome",[169,170,171],"ankle injuries","emergency department","patient follow-up","2025-07-10",{"date":174,"type":40},"2025-07-11",{"date":176,"type":40},"2025-04-01",{"date":178,"type":21},"2025-10-01",{"name":180,"class":47},"Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc",{"id":182,"slug":183,"hasResults":11,"nctId":184,"briefTitle":185,"officialTitle":186,"acronym":187,"eligibilityCriteria":188,"healthyVolunteers":140,"sex":17,"minAge":189,"maxAge":190,"enrollmentInfo":191,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":193,"conditions":194,"keywords":196,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":200,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":201,"startDateStruct":203,"completionDateStruct":205,"leadSponsor":207,"locationsCount":4},"100587374","the-applicability-of-the-cumberland-ankle-instability-tool-in-basketball-athletes-100587374","NCT06927557","The Applicability of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Basketball Athletes.","The Applicability of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Basketball Athletes: Validity and Reliability Study","The CAIT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 16 and 45\n* History of ankle sprain\n* Participation in basketball training at least once per week\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Participation in basketball training at least once per week","16 Years","45 Years",{"count":192,"type":21},100,"The aim of our study is to evaluate the applicability, validity, and reliability of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in basketball athletes. Given that a significant proportion of injuries in basketball occur in the ankle, our study holds importance for instability assessments conducted in this population. If the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool is found to be applicable in basketball athletes, it may be utilized in future research.",[26,195],"Ankle Sprains",[197,198,199],"ankle instability","validity study","reliability study","2025-04-14",{"date":202,"type":40},"2025-04-15",{"date":204,"type":21},"2025-05-20",{"date":206,"type":21},"2025-07-20",{"name":208,"class":47},"Hacettepe University",{"id":210,"slug":211,"hasResults":11,"nctId":212,"briefTitle":213,"officialTitle":214,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":215,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":216,"enrollmentInfo":217,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":218,"briefSummary":219,"conditions":220,"keywords":221,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":223,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":224,"startDateStruct":226,"completionDateStruct":228,"leadSponsor":230,"locationsCount":232},"100585145","spinal-and-supraspinal-control-in-chronic-ankle-instability-100585145","NCT06898554","Spinal and Supraspinal Control in Chronic Ankle Instability","Cross-Education Effect of Structured Balance Training Program on Spinal and Supraspinal Control in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Volunteering to participate in the study,\n* Being an athlete between the ages of 18-25,\n* Being a player in a field team sport such as basketball, volleyball, and handball,\n* Having a history of at least 2 significant grade II LAS diagnosed by a physician,\n* Related inflammatory symptoms, \"giving away\" sensation, obtaining a score ≤25 from the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT),\n* A score \\\u003C90% for the activities of daily living subscale and \\\u003C80% for the sport subscale from the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure,\n* Recurrent episodes of LAS of the injured ankle which occurred within at least 12 months.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Acute injury of lower extremity musculoskeletal structures in the last three months,\n* Orthopedic surgery in any of the lower extremities,\n* Bilateral ankle instability,\n* Vestibular or balance disorder","25 Years",{"count":110,"type":21},[59],"Ankle sprains are common sports injuries that often lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). Patients with CAI experience deficits in neuromuscular control (NMC), including proprioception and strength. It is believed that damage to the ankle's ligament mechanoreceptors and the peroneal nerve after the initial ankle sprain can cause alterations in NMC, resulting in postural control and dynamic joint stability dysfunction. Inflammation related to recurrent ankle sprains may also contribute to neuromuscular impairments. Evidence suggests that bilateral postural control deficits occur after an ankle sprain, suggesting alterations in the central nervous system (CNS). Rehabilitation for CAI has been shown to lead to bilateral improvements in NMC, potentially due to neural alterations at both the spinal and supraspinal levels. Cross-education, which refers to the muscular crossed effect of unilateral training, has also been proposed as a mechanism for improving contralateral strength in neurologically healthy individuals. While the exact mechanisms underlying cross-education are not yet fully understood, evidence suggests that it involves neural adaptations at both spinal and supraspinal levels. This study aims to investigate the cross-education effect of a 6-week, unilateral balance training on corticomotor excitability, motor neuron pool excitability, and static and dynamic balance in athletes with chronic ankle instability.",[26,195],[222],"ankle, joint instability, cross-education, rehabilitation","2025-03-21",{"date":225,"type":40},"2025-03-27",{"date":227,"type":40},"2024-11-15",{"date":229,"type":21},"2025-07-31",{"name":231,"class":47},"Ayca Yagcioglu",2,{"id":234,"slug":235,"hasResults":11,"nctId":236,"briefTitle":237,"officialTitle":238,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":239,"healthyVolunteers":140,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":216,"enrollmentInfo":240,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":242,"briefSummary":243,"conditions":244,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":246,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":247,"startDateStruct":249,"completionDateStruct":251,"leadSponsor":252,"locationsCount":101},"100580039","kinesio-taping-effects-on-balance-and-ankle-proprioception-100580039","NCT06832111","Kinesio Taping Effects on Balance and Ankle Proprioception","The Effect of Different Kinesio Tape Applications on Balance and Ankle Joint Position Sensation: A Randomised Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: Participants must be between 18-25 years old.\n* General Health: Participants must be generally healthy individuals, with no previously diagnosed chronic health conditions, musculoskeletal disorders, or history of injuries.\n* Ankle Health: No ankle injuries or surgical interventions in the past six months.\n* Informed Consent: Participants must voluntarily agree to participate and sign the informed consent form.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of Injuries: Any lower extremity injury (ankle or knee) within the past year.\n* Neurological Disorders: Any neurological condition that may affect balance or proprioception.\n* Other Health Conditions: Presence of chronic diseases such as rheumatic diseases, diabetes, or musculoskeletal disorders that could impact the study outcomes.",{"count":241,"type":21},120,[59],"Ankle injuries are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries, affecting both athletes and the general population. Various methods are used to prevent such injuries, but the effectiveness of different kinesio taping applications on joint position sense and balance remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects of different kinesio taping techniques on proprioception and postural stability in healthy young adults. By identifying changes in balance and proprioception before injuries occur, the findings may provide clinical insights into the potential role of kinesio taping in rehabilitation and injury prevention.",[26,245],"Balanced","2025-02-11",{"date":248,"type":40},"2025-02-18",{"date":250,"type":40},"2025-01-01",{"date":176,"type":21},{"name":253,"class":47},"University of Beykent",{"id":255,"slug":256,"hasResults":11,"nctId":257,"briefTitle":258,"officialTitle":259,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":260,"healthyVolunteers":140,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":261,"enrollmentInfo":262,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":264,"briefSummary":265,"conditions":266,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":91,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":268,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":269,"startDateStruct":271,"completionDateStruct":273,"leadSponsor":275,"locationsCount":101},"100554503","the-effect-of-taping-on-plantar-pressure-distribution-in-players-with-chronic-ankle-instability-100554503","NCT06499935","The Effect of Taping on Plantar Pressure Distribution in Players With Chronic Ankle Instability","The Immediate Effects of Rigid Taping Versus Kinesio-Taping on Plantar Pressure Distribution in Basketball Players With Chronic Ankle Instability","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* A history of at least 1 significant ankle sprain\n* The initial sprain must have occurred at least 12 months before study enrollment\n* A history of the previously injured ankle joint \"giving way\" and\u002For recurrent sprain and\u002For \"feelings of instability.\"\n* Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool: score of 24 or less\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures (i.e., bones, joint structures, nerves) in either lower extremity\n* A history of a fracture in either lower extremity requiring realignment\n* Acute injury to musculoskeletal structures of other joints of the lower extremity in the previous 3 months that impacted joint integrity and function (i.e., sprains, fracture) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity.","28 Years",{"count":263,"type":21},88,[59],"The goal of this study is to investigate whether there exists a difference in baropdometric readings of plantar pressure between individuals with chronic ankle instability and normal health individuals, in addition another goal of this study is to investigate the effect of rigid taping vs. kinesio taping on plantar pressure distribution as well as stability markers in individuals with chronic ankle instability.\n\nThe main questions aimed to answer are:\n\n1. Is there a difference in plantar pressure distribution between individuals with chronic ankle instability and individuals without chronic ankle instability?\n2. What effect do rigid and kinesio taping have on plantar pressure distribution and ankle stability markers?\n3. Which tape affects plantar pressure distribution and ankle stability better?\n\nParticipants will:\n\nFirstly be divided into two macro groups, one with chronic ankle instability and one without, with an observational part of the study to be carried out to investigate the differences in plantar pressure between both groups.\n\nSecondly, the group with chronic ankle instability will be divided into two micro groups one receiving rigid taping and the other receiving kinesio taping, and the immediate effects of these tapes in terms of plantar pressure and ankle stability will be recorded and compared before and after within groups, and after between both groups.",[26,267,195],"Ankle Injuries and Disorders","2024-07-07",{"date":270,"type":40},"2024-07-15",{"date":272,"type":40},"2024-05-24",{"date":274,"type":21},"2024-10-25",{"name":276,"class":47},"Cairo University",{"id":278,"slug":279,"hasResults":11,"nctId":280,"briefTitle":281,"officialTitle":282,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":283,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":189,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":284,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":57,"phases":285,"briefSummary":286,"conditions":287,"keywords":289,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":294,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":295,"startDateStruct":297,"completionDateStruct":299,"leadSponsor":301,"locationsCount":4},"100522715","functional-outcomes-following-ankle-fracture-fixation-with-or-without-ankle-arthroscopy-100522715","NCT06086223","Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy","Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy: Randomized Control Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients ≥16 years of age who will be managed operatively for:\n\n  * rotational ankle fracture Danis-Weber classification B or C fibula fracture\n  * fracture dislocation ankle\n  * Fractures extending into the tibial plafond,\n  * Talus fractures (body or neck) in our institution\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPediatric fractures, Polytrauma patients, Fractures managed with closed-contact casting and, patients with lost follow up during this study",{"count":164,"type":21},[59],"The aim of our study is to identify if there is statistically significant difference in patient reported functional outcomes in cases of unstable ankle fracture managed by ORIF with and without ankle arthroscopy.",[25,26,288],"Arthroscopic Surgery",[290,291,292,293],"functional outcomes of ankle fracture management","ankle scope","syndesmosis reduction","ankle ligaments evaluation","2023-10-13",{"date":296,"type":40},"2023-10-17",{"date":298,"type":21},"2023-11-01",{"date":300,"type":21},"2026-07-30",{"name":132,"class":47}]