[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"aphasia-broca\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:aphasia-broca":32},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,55],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":37,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":43,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":44,"startDateStruct":47,"completionDateStruct":49,"leadSponsor":51,"locationsCount":54},"100595742","phase-2-comparing-traditional-semantic-feature-analysis-tsfa-and-semantic-feature-analysis--metacognitive-strategy-training-sfamst-100595742",false,"NCT07036406","Comparing Traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (tSFA) and Semantic Feature Analysis + Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST)","Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) Versus SFA Plus Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST) for People With Acquired Aphasia","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Have aphasia due to a single acute event (e.g., left-hemisphere stroke, traumatic brain injury)\n* Be at least six-months post aphasia-onset,\n* Be a proficient English speaker,\n* Have normal or corrected to normal hearing (i.e., hearing aids) and vision (i.e., eyeglasses),\n* Have no history of neurodegenerative disease (e.g., dementia), severe motor speech disorder, significant mental illness, psychiatric disorder, drug\u002Falcohol abuse, or neurological condition that could influence their cognitive, language, and memory systems\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A history of neurodegenerative disease (e.g., dementia), severe motor speech disorder, significant mental illness, psychiatric disorder, drug\u002Falcohol abuse, or neurological condition that could influence their cognitive, language, and memory systems,\n* Children under the age of 18,\n* Adults over the age of 89,\n* Uncorrected hearing and vision.","ALL","18 Years","89 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"PHASE2","The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) treatment to a modified SFA protocol that includes Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST) for adults with acquired aphasia. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* What are the comparative outcomes in picture naming accuracy and strategy use during picture naming following 2 months of traditional SFA versus SFA + MST in adults with acquired aphasia?\n* What are the comparative outcomes in percent of informative content and rate of informative content during spontaneous speech production following 2 months of traditional SFA versus SFA + MST in adults with acquired aphasia?\n\nResearchers will compare outcomes between these two treatments to see if SFA+MST yields larger effects in picture naming and spontaneous speech outcomes than traditional SFA.\n\nParticipants will complete:\n\n* 5-7 pre-treatment assessment sessions where they will be asked to name pictures, tell stories\u002Fdescribe pictures, answer questions, and complete questionnaires,\n* 3 treatment sessions of SFA \\*OR\\* SFA+MST per week for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions,\n* 7 weekly probes (i.e., short, intermittent assessments throughout the treatment phase),\n* 3 post-treatment assessment sessions immediately after treatment ends, where they will complete the same assessment tasks as they did pre-treatment (e.g., naming pictures, telling stories, etc.),\n* 2 retention assessment sessions, one 30 days and the other 60 days following the final treatment session, where they will be asked to name pictures, tell stories\u002Fdescribe pictures, and describe what they learned during the study.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36],"Aphasia","Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction","Aphasia, Acquired","Aphasia, Rehabilitation","Aphasia, Anomic","Aphasia, Broca","Aphasia, Conduction","Aphasia, Expressive","Aphasia Non Fluent","Aphasia, Mixed",[27,38,39,40,41],"Anomia","Stroke","Communication","Language","RECRUITING","2026-06-23",{"date":45,"type":46},"2026-06-25","ACTUAL",{"date":48,"type":46},"2025-07-28",{"date":50,"type":21},"2027-07",{"name":52,"class":53},"Teachers College, Columbia University","OTHER",1,{"id":56,"slug":57,"hasResults":11,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":59,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":60,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":61,"enrollmentInfo":62,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":64,"briefSummary":66,"conditions":67,"keywords":69,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":73,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":74,"startDateStruct":76,"completionDateStruct":78,"leadSponsor":80,"locationsCount":82},"100540936","music-therapy-for-rehabilitation-in-post-stroke-non-fluent-aphasia-the-indian-adaptation-100540936","NCT06323330","Music Therapy for Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Non-fluent Aphasia: the Indian Adaptation","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAll of the following\n\n1. Age ≥18 years of age\n2. Stroke with non-fluent aphasia, within one year of ictus\n3. Imaging evidence suggestive of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of dominant hemisphere\n4. Patient is alert and able to follow simple commands (should not have global aphasia)\n5. Motivated caregiver\n6. Informed and signed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nAny of the following:\n\n1. Patients with a history of a previous stroke other than the index event, which can explain the aphasia.\n2. Any clinical condition (e.g., short life expectancy, coexisting disease) or other characteristics that preclude appropriate follow-up in the study (e.g., distant residence, no family support)\n3. Patients participating in any therapeutic intervention clinical trials evaluating poststroke recovery\n4. Use of psychotropic drugs that interfere with patient evaluation","99 Years",{"count":63,"type":21},60,[65],"NA","The goal of this Interventional Study is to develop and test the Indian Adaptation of Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) for Indian patients in with post-stroke Non-Fluent Aphasia (PSNFA). The main question\\[s\\] it aims to answer are: • To develop the MIT Indian Adaptation tool and check its feasibility • To compare the MIT with standard speech rehabilitation in patient with PSNFA. Participants will undergo Speech Rehabilitation according to the developed module and the standard treatment will be given in the comparator arm. The speech recovery at 12 weeks will be compared in both treatment arms.",[68,32],"Stroke Rehabilitation",[70,71,72],"Post stroke non-fluent aphasia","Melodic Intonation Therapy","Indian Adaptation","2024-11-28",{"date":75,"type":46},"2024-12-03",{"date":77,"type":46},"2024-06-01",{"date":79,"type":21},"2026-11-30",{"name":81,"class":53},"All India Institute of Medical Sciences",3]