[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"atherosclerotic-renal-artery-stenosis\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:atherosclerotic-renal-artery-stenosis":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,48],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":31,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100636467","covered-vs-bare-metal-stents-for-atherosclerotic-renal-artery-stenosis-100636467",false,"NCT07566065","Covered vs Bare Metal Stents for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis","Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Covered Stents and Bare Metal Stents","COMBAT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\) Renal artery diameter stenosis ≥60%; 2) Office systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and\u002For office diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg on at least two separate days without antihypertensive medication, or office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and\u002For office diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg while on three antihypertensive drugs at conventional doses; 3) Serum creatinine \\\u003C 264 μmol\u002FL (3.0 mg\u002FdL); 4) Affected kidney length ≥ 7.0 cm, with residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 10 mL\u002Fmin;\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* 1\\) Unstable clinical condition rendering the patient intolerant to revascularisation therapy; 2) Urinary protein ≥2+; 3) Contrast medium allergy; 4) Renal artery anatomy unsuitable for revascularisation therapy; 5) Reference vessel diameter \\\u003C3.5mm or \\>8mm. 6)Patients with non-atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (such as fibromuscular dysplasia or Takayasu arteritis); 7)Reference vessel diameter \\\u003C 3.5 mm or \\> 8 mm","ALL","40 Years","80 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},150,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is the most common cause of secondary hypertension , increasing the risk of cardiovascular and kidney-related complications. Some small-scale studies have suggested that covered stents are effective and safe, but high-quality evidence from large-scale studies in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis remains limited.\n\nThis study aims to evaluate whether covered stents are more effective than bare metal stents in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a covered stent or a bare metal stent. Patients will be followed for 12 months to assess Changes in eGFR, 24-hour systolic blood pressure, and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months were compared among the groups.\n\nThe results of this study may help improve treatment strategies and guide the selection of stent type for patients with this condition.",[28,29,30],"Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis","Hypertension","Renal Artery Stenosis",[32,33,34],"covered stents","bare metal stents","atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-04-27",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-05-04","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":22},"2026-04-30",{"date":43,"type":22},"2028-04-30",{"name":45,"class":46},"Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital","OTHER",15,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":54,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":64,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":71},"100632255","ffr-guided-revascularization-in-atherosclerotic-renal-artery-stenosis-100632255","NCT07511309","FFR-Guided Revascularization in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis","Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial","FARS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Renal artery diameter stenosis ≥60%;\n2. Office systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and\u002For office diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg on at least two separate days without antihypertensive medication, or office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and\u002For office diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg while on three antihypertensive drugs at conventional doses;\n3. Serum creatinine \\\u003C 264 μmol\u002FL (3.0 mg\u002FdL);\n4. Affected kidney length ≥ 7.0 cm, with residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 10 mL\u002Fmin;\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Unstable clinical condition rendering the patient intolerant to revascularisation therapy;\n2. Urinary protein ≥2+;\n3. Contrast medium allergy;\n4. Renal artery anatomy unsuitable for revascularisation therapy;\n5. Reference vessel diameter \\\u003C3.5mm or \\>8mm.\n6. Patients with non-atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (such as fibromuscular dysplasia or Takayasu arteritis);\n7. Reference vessel diameter \\\u003C 3.5 mm or \\> 8 mm.",{"count":57,"type":22},300,[25],"For patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, the results of randomized controlled trials published in recent years have failed to demonstrate that renal artery stenting is superior to optimal medical therapy. However, these studies still have limitations.\n\nFractional flow reserve (FFR) has been extensively studied in coronary artery disease, and it has been established that FFR-guided revascularization is superior to both angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and medical therapy alone. Whether FFR can guide interventional treatment in patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension is currently a hot topic in the field of renal artery stenosis research.\n\nEligible patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Pharmacologically induced FFR values were measured as the baseline. Patients with FFR ≥ 0.8 were randomly assigned to either the medical therapy group or the stenting group, while patients with FFR \\\u003C 0.8 underwent stent implantation. Changes in eGFR, 24-hour systolic blood pressure, and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months were compared among the groups.",[28,61,62,63],"Fractional Flow Reserve","Optimal Medical Therapy","Stent Implantation",[28,61,62],{"date":41,"type":39},{"date":67,"type":22},"2026-03-31",{"date":69,"type":22},"2028-03-31",{"name":45,"class":46},20]